AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bredella, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Plotkin, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bredella, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Plotkin, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2060
AJR 2007; 189:928-935
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Value of PET in the Assessment of Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Miriam A. Bredella1, Martin Torriani1, Francis Hornicek2, Hugue A. Ouellette1, William E. Plamer1, Ziv Williams3, Allan J. Fischman1 and Scott R. Plotkin4

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Yawkey 6E, Boston, MA 02114.
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
3 Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
4 Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Received February 16, 2007; accepted after revision June 7, 2007.

 
Address correspondence to M. A. Bredella (mbredella{at}partners.org).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to investigate the use of PET in the detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-five patients with NF1 who underwent whole-body PET for suspected MPNST based on clinical symptoms or radiologic examinations were retrospectively evaluated. Ten patients underwent additional carbon-11 (11C) methionine PET because of equivocal 18F-FDG PET findings or because of a discrepancy between the FDG PET and clinical findings. PET images were evaluated for the distribution and uptake pattern, and the standardized uptake values (SUVs) were obtained. Twenty-seven patients underwent biopsy or surgery of the detected lesions and 18 patients were followed up clinically and with repeat imaging studies.

RESULTS. Fifty lesions were identified on FDG PET. There were eight false-positive results and one false-negative on FDG PET. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FDG PET in detecting MPNSTs in patients with NF1 were 95%, 72%, 71%, 95%, and 82%, respectively. Using 11C methionine PET in combination with FDG PET reduced the number of false-positive results from eight to two, which increased the specificity from 72% to 91%. In five patients, 11C methionine FDG PET contributed additional information about nontarget lesions that influenced treatment planning.

CONCLUSION. FDG PET is a sensitive technique in the detection of MPNSTs in patients with NF1. The addition of 11C methionine PET increases specificity in equivocal cases. PET may improve preoperative tumor staging by detecting metastases or second primary tumors, which often are present in patients with NF1.

Keywords: 11C methionine PET • FDG PET • neurofibromatosis type 1 • peripheral nerve sheath tumors • PET • radiotracers • soft-tissue tumors


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common autosomal-dominant disease with a birth incidence of one in 3,500 [1, 2]. Patients with NF1 are at increased risk for developing both benign and malignant tumors, including plexiform neurofibromas, which have an increased risk of malignant degeneration. Transformation of plexiform neurofibromas into malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) is the main cause of mortality in patients with NF1. The lifetime prevalence of MPNST in patients with NF1 is approximately 10% [3, 4]. The prognosis of NF1 patients with MPNST is poor, with an overall 5-year survival of approximately 30% [5]. Therefore, differentiating benign from malignant tumors has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. MRI and CT can be used to determine the site and extent of a lesion and its relationship to surrounding structures but often do not allow precise discrimination between plexiform neurofibromas and those that have degenerated into MPNSTs [68].

In contrast to MRI or CT, 18F-FDG PET can yield metabolic information that is based on increased glucose metabolism of malignant lesions [911]. However, FDG uptake is known to be nonspecific and high FDG accumulation has been observed not only in viable cancer cells but also in benign neoplasms, inflammatory cells, and granulation tissue. Because many tumors also overexpress amino acid transporters, alternative functional biomarkers using radio-labeled L-amino acids, such as carbon-11 (11C) methionine, have been proposed as indicators of tumor activity. Accumulation of 11C methionine is largely due to carrier-mediated transport by an L-amino acid transporter, which is highly expressed in malignant tumors. 11C methionine undergoes complex metabolism and is incorporated into proteins; therefore, increased 11C methionine uptake may reflect the metabolic needs of tumors [12, 13]. The purpose of our retrospective study was to investigate the use of FDG and 11C methionine PET in detecting MPNSTs in patients with NF1.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This study was approved by the institutional review board of our institution, which waived the need for informed consent. The study was compliant with HIPAA. A retrospective search was performed using Boolean operators (Folio, Open Market, Inc.) to identify all patients with NF1 who had undergone whole-body PET at our institution from 2000 to 2006. Imaging studies and reports, medical records, and operative notes of the selected cases were reviewed.

Patients
We identified 45 patients with NF1 who had undergone whole-body PET for suspected MPNST based on clinical or radiographic findings. The symptoms included growing lesions or pain, and the imaging characteristics of suspected malignant degeneration included interval growth of a lesion or a change in imaging characteristics, such as the presence of necrosis or hemorrhage, or infiltration into surrounding structures. There were 23 women and 22 men, aged 17–73 years with a mean age of 37 years. Forty-five whole-body FDG PET, nine whole-body 11C methionine PET, 10 FDG PET/CT, and one 11C methionine PET/CT were performed.

Twenty-seven patients underwent biopsy or surgical tumor resection, and the pathologic results were used as the standard of reference. The remaining 18 patients who did not undergo biopsy or surgical resection were followed up clinically and with repeat imaging for a period of 1–5 years, and the findings at clinical follow-up and on imaging studies were used for lesion verification. All patients underwent MRI or CT before PET.

Image Acquisition
Whole-body PET was performed on an ECAT HR+ scanner (CTI Molecular Imaging). All patients fasted for at least 6 hours before image acquisition, and blood glucose levels were measured before the injection of FDG. For FDG PET, a dose of 15–20 mCi (555–740 MBq) of FDG was administered IV 45 minutes–1 hour before scanning. For 11C methionine PET, a dose of 20 mCi (740 MBq) of 11C methionine was administered IV 20 minutes before scanning. Patients were positioned supine on the scanner, and emission images were acquired in six or seven bed positions from mandible to mid thigh or to the level of the ankles in patients with lower extremity lesions. Transmission images obtained with a rotating germanium-68 rod sources were used for attenuation correction. Images were reconstructed using the ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm.

Combined PET/CT studies were performed with a 16-section hybrid PET/CT gantry (Biograph Sensation 16, Siemens Medical Solutions) that comprises a high-performance 16-MDCT scanner with a lutetium oxyorthosilicate–based PET scanner. The PET image spatial resolution was 5.0-mm full width at half maximum, and the section thickness was 3.5 mm. Patients fasted for at least 6 hours before image acquisition, and blood glucose levels were measured before the injection of FDG. One hour before scanning, patients drank two 10-oz (294 mL) cups of water, which served as negative contrast material. For FDG PET/CT, a dose of 15–20 mCi (555–740 MBq) of FDG was administered IV 45 minutes–1 hour before scanning. For 11C methionine PET/CT, a dose of 20 mCi (740 MBq) of 11C methionine was administered IV 20 minutes before scanning. Patients were positioned supine on the scanner, and emission images were acquired in six or seven bed positions from the mandible to mid thigh or to the level of the ankles in patients with lower extremity lesions. Images were reconstructed with Fourier rebinning and attenuation-weighted OSEM. A low-dose CT scan was obtained before PET primarily for attenuation correction while patients held their breath in mid expiration and included an area from the mandible to mid thigh or to the level of the ankles in those with of lower extremity lesions. Diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT was performed using 2.5-mm sections subsequent to PET/CT after the administration of 100 mL of IV contrast material (iopamidol [Isovue 300, Bracco Diagnostics]) at an injection rate of 2 mL/s.

Image Analysis
Semiquantitative and qualitative evaluations of PET images were performed on a high-resolution workstation (Reveal-MVS, Mirada Solutions) by two independent investigators who were blinded to the clinical and pathologic results. The images were displayed in rotating maximum intensity projections and in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. Semiquantitative analysis of FDG uptake of softtissue lesions was performed in 41 lesions in 36 patients by creating a region of interest over the area of maximal radiotracer activity.

Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) were automatically generated according to the following equation:

Formula
where SUVmax (bw) is the maximum SUV normalized for body weight; Ctis, tissue concentration expressed as megabecquerels per milliliter; Dinj, injected dose expressed as megabecquerels; and bw, body weight expressed as kilograms. The PET and PET/CT scanners were calibrated so that SUVs from both scanners were comparable. Qualitative assessment was performed with the specific aim of establishing whether the mass was benign or malignant. Radiotracer uptake by the tumor was compared with that by the liver: Tumors with uptake greater than the liver were classified as malignant, and those with uptake equal to or less than the liver were classified as benign.

Statistical Analysis
The recorded data were analyzed using statistical database software (JMP, SAS Institute). The findings on the PET images and SUVs of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors and MPNSTs were correlated with the final diagnosis of the lesion as malignant or benign. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated. The Student's t test was used to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between the SUVs for benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors and MPNSTs. A difference with a p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Interobserver agreement was measured using kappa statistics.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Twenty-seven patients underwent biopsy or surgical resection of soft-tissue lesions, and 18 patients were followed up clinically and with repeat imaging. Of the 27 patients who underwent biopsy or surgical resection, there were 16 MPNSTs, two gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), three neurofibromas with atypia, five neurofibromas, and one poorly differentiated carcinoma of clear cell type. In one patient with an MPNST, an additional colonic adenocarcinoma was detected. Of the 18 patients who were followed up clinically and with repeat imaging, none showed findings indicative of MPNST.

Qualitative PET Analysis
Fifty lesions were identified in 45 patients. Based on visual inspection of the suspected lesions, 26 tumors were characterized as benign and 24 tumors as malignant. The malignant lesions showed intense radiotracer uptake (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C), whereas the benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors showed only mildly increased or no increased uptake on FDG PET. One patient with a known large plexiform neurofibroma of the lower extremity showed low-level uptake of the plexiform neurofibroma with two small foci of increased FDG uptake within the lesion, which resulted in complete resection of the neurofibroma, and foci of malignant degeneration were found at surgery (Fig. 2A, 2B).


Figure 1
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 48-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 1 who presented with pain in right buttock area. Coronal fat-saturated T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (TR/TE, 4,000/98) shows multiple hyperintense soft-tissue masses (arrows) that are consistent with multiple nerve sheath tumors.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 48-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 1 who presented with pain in right buttock area. Coronal whole-body FDG PET image shows mild FDG uptake in multiple nerve sheath tumors (black arrows); dominant mass (white arrow) along right sciatic nerve shows intense FDG uptake that is suspicious for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 48-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 1 who presented with pain in right buttock area. Axial FDG PET image corresponding to B shows markedly increased FDG uptake along right sciatic nerve (standardized uptake value = 5.1) (arrows). MPNST was confirmed at surgery and patient underwent right hemipelvectomy.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 20-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 1 who presented with enlarging calf mass. Sagittal fat-saturated T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (TR/TE, 4,000/98) shows large plexiform neurofibroma along tibial nerve (arrows).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 20-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 1 who presented with enlarging calf mass. Coronal FDG PET image shows increased FDG uptake in large plexiform neurofibroma with two foci of increased uptake (standardized uptake value = 4.1) (arrows) that are suspicious for malignant transformation. Mass was resected and foci of malignant transformation were found.

 
The histologic data and the clinical and imaging follow-up data were analyzed. On the basis of FDG PET findings, 20 lesions were correctly classified as malignant (true-positive) and 21 lesions were correctly classified as benign (true-negative). One malignant tumor was incorrectly classified as benign (false-negative) (Fig. 3), and eight benign tumors were incorrectly classified as malignant (false-positive).


Figure 6
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 False-negative FDG PET study in 38-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 1 who presented with enlarging abdominal mass. Axial FDG PET image shows large area of photopenia with surrounding mildly increased FDG uptake (standardized uptake value = 1.8) (arrows). At surgery, poorly differentiated carcinoma was found.

 

Ten patients underwent 11C methionine PET after FDG PET because of equivocal FDG PET findings—that is, uptake equal to or slightly greater than liver uptake—or because of a discrepancy between the FDG PET and clinical findings, such as abnormal FDG uptake without a change in clinical symptoms. Nine of these 10 patients showed increased uptake on the initial FDG PET scan that was suspicious for malignancy. In six of these nine patients, there was no abnormal uptake on subsequently performed 11C methionine PET, and the surgery or biopsy result (n = 4) or the clinical and imaging follow-up (n = 2) was negative in all six patients (Figs. 4A, 4B and 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D). One patient showed increased uptake on FDG PET and on 11C methionine PET that was suspicious for malignancy; however, surgery showed a benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Two patients with increased FDG and 11C methionine uptake were found to have MPNSTs at surgery. One patient had no evidence of abnormal radiotracer uptake on FDG and 11C methionine PET, and clinical and imaging follow-up was negative for malignancy.


Figure 7
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A 53-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 1. Coronal fused FDG PET/CT image depicts mass (arrow) in left iliopsoas muscle that shows increased FDG uptake (standardized uptake value = 4.2).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B 53-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 1. Coronal carbon-11 (11C) methionine PET image, obtained after A, shows no abnormal activity in left iliopsoas muscle. Biopsy and long-term follow-up showed no evidence of malignancy. Note lack of radiotracer uptake in heart on 11C methionine PET. Physiologic uptake within several bowel loops (arrows) is noted.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A 35-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type 1. Sagittal fat-saturated T2-weighted fast spinecho MR image (TR/TE, 4,000/98) shows multiple nerve sheath tumors (arrows).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B 35-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type 1. Axial fat-saturated T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (4,000/98) shows dominant left apical mass (arrows).

 

Figure 11
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5C 35-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type 1. Coronal FDG PET image shows increased FDG uptake (standardized uptake value = 4.1) (arrow) that is suspicious for malignant transformation.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5D 35-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type 1. Coronal fused carbon-11 methionine PET/CT image shows no abnormal radiotracer uptake in left lung apex, and biopsy and follow-up were negative for malignancy.

 
In five patients, FDG PET contributed additional information about nontarget lesions that influenced the treatment plan. One patient who had previously undergone resection of an MP-NST was found to have a new unsuspected MPNST at routine follow-up, and one patient with a known MPNST was found to have multiple metastatic lesions from the MPNST on FDG PET. In one patient with increased FDG uptake within a retroperitoneal nerve sheath tumor, a second area of increased FDG uptake was seen in the colon and was found to be an adenocarcinoma at surgery. Two patients showed increased FDG uptake in the abdomen and were found to have a GIST (Fig. 6A, 6B).


Figure 13
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in 36-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 1. Contrast-enhanced axial CT image shows mass in small bowel (arrows) that was not appreciated on this CT scan prior to PET imaging.

 

Figure 14
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in 36-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 1. Axial fused FDG PET/CT image shows increased FDG uptake within mass (arrow), and surgical resection showed GIST.

 

Quantitative PET Analysis
SUVs were measured in 41 lesions in 36 patients. SUVs could not be measured in nine lesions in the nine remaining patients because the images could be reviewed only on a workstation that did not have SUV measurement capability. Interobserver agreement ({kappa} = 0.95) was classified as very good. The SUVs for MP-NST ranged from 3.8 to 13.0 with a mean of 8.5 ± 0.63 SEM (standard error of the mean) on FDG PET. Benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors showed SUVs ranging from 0 to 5.3 with a mean of 1.5 ± 0.37 SEM on FDG PET. The difference between the SUV values of benign and malignant lesions was statistically significant (p < 0.001, Student's t test) (Fig. 7).


Figure 15
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7 Mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of benign and malignant lesions in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Box plot of maximum SUV (SUVmax) for benign and malignant lesions shows there is a statistically significant difference between absolute SUV values of benign and those of malignant lesions (p < 0.001, Student's t test). Middle horizontal lines in boxes correspond to mean SUV, and upper and lower horizontal lines correspond to mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean).

 
Statistical Analysis
The sensitivity, specificity, PPVs, NPVs, and accuracy of FDG PET in detecting MP-NSTs in patients with NF1 were 95%, 72%, 71%, 95%, and 82%, respectively. For the 10 11C methionine PET studies alone, the sensitivity, specificity, PPVs, NPVs, and accuracy were 100%, 87%, 67% 100%, and 90% respectively. The use of both FDG PET and 11C methionine PET reduced the number of false-positive results from eight to two, which increased the specificity from 72% to 91% without a change in the false-negative results.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The transformation of plexiform neurofibromas into MPNSTs is the major cause of mortality in patients with NF1 [14]. MPNSTs are aggressive tumors with a high rate of local recurrence and a propensity to metastasize. Therefore, optimal management and final prognosis depend on early and accurate detection of malignant transformation. Clinical indicators of malignant degeneration include persistent or increasing pain, increasing tumor size, and neurologic deficits. These findings may be seen in both benign and malignant lesions, so surgical biopsy is often necessary to exclude malignancy.

Although MRI and CT have been shown to be excellent tools for the noninvasive evaluation of tumor extent, they are commonly not reliable in accurately characterizing a lesion as benign or malignant [15]. Surgical resection of the entire nerve sheath tumor is often not feasible because of the associated morbidity, and biopsies may yield false-negative results due to sampling error. In this context, metabolic imaging techniques such as FDG PET have received closer scrutiny because they can provide information about tumor metabolism. FDG PET has been found to be helpful in detecting tumor recurrence in patients with sarcomas and in differentiating benign from malignant neoplasms [1618].

Preliminary studies and case reports have shown that FDG PET is a useful imaging technique in detecting malignant change in peripheral nerve sheath tumors in patients with NF1 [3, 1921]. In our study, FDG PET was very sensitive in detecting MPNSTs in patients with NF1 (sensitivity = 95%). The only false-negative case was a poorly differentiated carcinoma with large areas of necrosis that showed no abnormal FDG uptake. However, the specificity of PET was only 72% and several benign neurofibromas were classified as malignant on the basis of a visual analysis and SUV measurements because of an overlap between benign and malignant lesions.

The overlap of SUVs for benign and malignant lesions in patients with NF1 is known and is the factor that led us to use 11C methionine PET. In equivocal cases, the addition of 11C methionine PET was helpful, improving specificity from 72% to 91%. The mechanism of 11C methionine uptake in tumors is influenced by amino acid transport, which correlates with cell proliferation. Increased uptake of 11C methionine has been suggested to reflect increased transport; transmethylation rate; and, to some extent, protein synthesis of malignant tissue [12, 13]. Radiolabeled methionine, by providing relevant information about amino acid transport, has been found useful for the early assessment of treatment response in patients with intracranial neoplasms [22, 23]. To our knowledge, no study has been performed using 11C methionine for the detection of malignant degeneration in soft-tissue tumors.

The advantages of 11C methionine over FDG include low uptake in nonviable cells and macrophages and better correlation with tumor proliferative activity. A short-coming is the short half-life of 20 minutes, which requires an on-site cyclotron. In our study, 11C methionine provided additional information about tumor metabolism and increased specificity for MPNST detection in equivocal cases.

Overall, the mean SUVs were significantly higher for malignant lesions (8.5 ± 0.63 SEM) than for benign lesions (1.5 ± 0.37 SEM) on FDG PET. Also, interobserver agreement was high, making PET a reliable technique for evaluating malignant transformation of plexiform neurofibromas in patients with NF1. In a study of NF1-related MPNSTs, Brenner et al. [3] found that tumor SUV on FDG PET was an important predictor for survival: Patients with tumors showing an SUV of > 3 had a shorter survival than those with tumors showing an SUV of < 3.

PET and PET/CT were equally sensitive in the detection of MPNSTs. However, PET/CT proved to be useful in biopsy planning. MP-NSTs often contain heterogeneous areas of tumor, so biopsy of a small part of the lesion does not always reflect the overall character of the lesion and high-grade areas may be missed. We therefore used the fused PET/CT images for percutaneous CT-guided biopsy planning, which allowed us to target the most metabolically active area of the tumor. Coregistration of PET and CT images also allowed accurate interpretation of the anatomic location of abnormal radiotracer uptake, especially in complex anatomic regions, such as the head and neck area and the abdomen.

In five patients, FDG PET contributed additional information about nontarget lesions that influenced treatment planning. In one of these patients, unsuspected metastatic disease from MPNST was found within the soft tissues and lung, and in another patient, a colonic adenocarcinoma was detected. In a third patient, an unsuspected MPNST was found at routine follow-up. The remaining two patients were found to have a GIST, which has an increased incidence in patients with NF1 [2428]. We therefore recommend that PET of the whole body be performed in patients with NF1.

Our study had several limitations. The first is the retrospective nature of the study. Second, surgical and histopathologic confirmation was not available in all patients. Indeed, in 18 of the 45 patients, clinical follow-up and repeat imaging studies were used as the alternate standard of reference. However, patients were followed up over a period of 1–5 years and none of the patients developed MPNSTs.

In conclusion, the detection of MPNSTs in patients with NF1 using clinical characteristics and MRI or CT alone is extremely difficult. The results of our study indicate that FDG PET is a highly sensitive and noninvasive method for detecting malignant change in peripheral nerve sheath tumors in patients with NF1. The addition of 11C methionine PET increases specificity in equivocal cases. PET provides metabolic information about the whole body and may improve preoperative tumor staging by detecting metastases or second primary tumors, which are often present in patients with NF1. PET is also able to guide biopsy and direct appropriate therapy in positive cases obviating repetitive surgery and biopsy in negative cases.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Huson SM, Compston DA, Harper PS. A genetic study of von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis in south east Wales. II. Guidelines for genetic counselling. J Med Genet 1989;26 : 712–721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Lammert M, Friedman JM, Kluwe L, Mautner VF. Prevalence of neurofibromatosis 1 in German children at elementary school enrollment. Arch Dermatol 2005;141 : 71–74[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Brenner W, Friedrich RE, Gawad KA, et al. Prognostic relevance of FDG PET in patients with neurofibromatosis type-1 and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging2006; 33:428 –432[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Ferner RE. Neurofibromatosis 1. Eur J Hum Genet 2007; 15:131 –138[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Carli M, Ferrari A, Mattke A, et al. Pediatric malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: the Italian and German soft tissue sarcoma cooperative group. J Clin Oncol 2005;23 : 8422–8430 [Erratum in J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:724][Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Kluwe L, Fünsterer C, Mautner VF. Extensively high load of internal tumors determined by whole body MRI scanning in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 and a non-LCR-mediated 2-Mb deletion in 17q11.2. Hum Genet 2005;116 : 466–475[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Kosucu P, Ahmetolu A, Cobanolu U, Dinc H, Ozdemir O, Gümele HR. Mesenteric involvement in neurofibromatosis type 1: CT and MRI findings in two cases. Abdom Imaging 2003;28 : 822–826[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Mautner VF, Hartmann M, Kluwe L, Friedrich RE, Fünsterer C. MRI growth patterns of plexiform neurofibromas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 Neuroradiology2006; 48:160 –165[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Aoki J, Endo K, Watanbe H, et al. FDG-PET for evaluating musculoskeletal tumors: a review. J Orthop Sci2003; 8:435 –441[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Gaa J, Rummeny EJ, Seemann MD. Whole-body imaging with PET/MRI. Eur J Med Res 2004;9 : 309–312[Medline]
  11. Glaspy JA, Hawkins R, Hoh CK, Phelps ME. Use of positron emission tomography in oncology. Oncology (Williston Park)1993; 7:41 –46, 49–50; discussion 50–52, 55
  12. Ishiwata K, Kubota K, Murakami M. Re-evaluation of amino acid PET studies: can the protein synthesis rates in brain and tumor tissues be measured in vivo? J Nucl Med 1993;34 :1936 –1943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Jager PL, Vaalburg W, Pruim J, de Vries EG, Langen KJ, Piers DA. Radiolabeled amino acids: basic aspects and clinical applications in oncology. J Nucl Med 2001;42 : 432–445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ducatman BS, Scheithauer BW, Piepgras DG, Reiman HM, Ilstrup DM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 120 cases. Cancer 1986;57 :2006 –2021[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Hermann G, Abdelwahab IF, Miller TT, Klein MJ, Lewis MM. Tumour and tumour-like conditions of the soft tissue: magnetic resonance imaging features differentiating benign from malignant masses. Br J Radiol 1992; 65:14 –20[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Aoki J, Watanabe H, Shinozaki T, et al. FDG PET of primary benign and malignant bone tumors: standardized uptake value in 52 lesions. Radiology 2001;219 : 774–777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Aoki J, Watanabe H, Shinozaki T, et al. FDG-PET for preoperative differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue masses. Skeletal Radiol 2003;32 : 133–138[Medline]
  18. Bredella MA, Caputo GR, Steinbach LS. Value of FDG positron emission tomography in conjunction with MR imaging for evaluating therapy response in patients with musculoskeletal sarcomas. AJR 2002; 179:1145 –1150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Basu S, Nair N. Potential clinical role of FDG-PET in detecting sarcomatous transformation in von Recklinghausen's disease: a case study and review of the literature. J Neurooncol2006; 80:91 –95[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Cardona S, Schwarzbach M, Hinz U, et al. Evaluation of F18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to assess the nature of neurogenic tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol2003; 29:536 –541[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Ferner RE, Lucas JD, O'Doherty MJ, et al. Evaluation of (18)fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG PET) in the detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours arising from within plexiform neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68:353 –357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Galldiks N, Kracht LW, Burghaus L, et al. Use of 11C-methionine PET to monitor the effects of temozolomide chemotherapy in malignant gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33 : 516–524[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Grosu AL, Weber WA, Astner ST, et al. (11)C-methionine PET improves the target volume delineation of meningiomas treated with stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 66:339 –344[Medline]
  24. Miettinen M, Fetsch JF, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis 1: a clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 45 cases. Am J Surg Pathol2006; 30:90 –96[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Takazawa Y, Sakhurai S, Samuka Y, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of neurofibromatosis type I (von Recklinghausen's disease). Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29 : 755–763[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Maertens O, Prenen H, Debiec-Rychter M, et al. Molecular pathogenesis of multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors in NF1 patients. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15 :1015 –1023[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Andersson J, Sihto H, Meis-Kindblom JM, Joensuu H, Nupponen N, Kindblom LG. NF1-associated gastrointestinal stromal tumors have unique clinical, phenotypic, and genotypic characteristics. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29:1170 –1176[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Bümming P, Nilsson B, Sörensen J, Nilsson O, Ahlman H. Use of 2-tracer PET to diagnose gastrointestinal stromal tumour and pheochromocytoma in patients with Carney triad and neurofibromatosis type 1 Scand J Gastroenterol 2006;41 : 626–630[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
V.-F. Mautner, F. A. Asuagbor, E. Dombi, C. Funsterer, L. Kluwe, R. Wenzel, B. C. Widemann, and J. M. Friedman
Assessment of benign tumor burden by whole-body MRI in patients with neurofibromatosis 1
Neuro-oncol, August 1, 2008; 10(4): 593 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bredella, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Plotkin, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bredella, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Plotkin, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS