AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shah, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shah, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F., IV
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1213
AJR 2007; 189:W212-W214
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

Oncocytoma of the Parotid Gland: A Potential False-Positive Finding on 18F-FDG PET

Vinil N. Shah1 and Barton F. Branstetter, IV1,2

1 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop St., PUH Room D-132, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
2 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

Received July 13, 2005; accepted after revision September 21, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to B. F. Branstetter IV (bfb1{at}pitt.edu).

WEB

This is a Web exclusive article.

Keywords: head and neck imaging • parotid gland • PET • salivary neoplasms


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
PET with 18F-FDG has been successfully used for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of many malignant tumors. PET is particularly useful for staging of head and neck tumors and for detecting recurrence [1]. Its utility in other settings, however, such as detection of non–squamous cell cancer of the head and neck and differentiating benign salivary gland tumors from malignant ones, is limited [2, 3]. This lack of usefulness may partly be explained by the poor anatomic localization of PET combined with variable physiologic uptake of FDG in the head and neck. These factors decrease the specificity of PET for head and neck cancer and thus increase the rate of false-positive findings.

Combined PET/CT scanners, which fuse the functional data of PET with the anatomic data of CT, have shown promise in the evaluation of cancer of the head and neck [4]. Non–squamous cell cancer of the head and neck, particularly salivary gland tumors, however, have not been studied extensively with either PET or combined PET/CT. In cases that have been studied, the variable uptake from salivary gland tumors often causes false-negative results [46]. In addition, some benign tumors of the salivary glands, particularly Warthin's tumor, show focal FDG uptake leading to false-positive results [2]. These false-positive findings reduce the utility of PET in differentiating benign salivary gland tumors from malignant tumors. We report a case of a benign parotid oncocytoma that had marked FDG avidity on PET/CT.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
A 76-year-old man presented with a 2-cm mass in the left side of the neck. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma, but no primary tumor was evident on CT or physical examination. Because PET/CT has been shown to be useful in identifying unknown primary squamous cell carcinomas, the patient was referred for PET/CT to find the primary tumor. Imaging was performed on a scanner (Reveal, CTI Medical Systems) that combines dualchannel CT with PET (LSO Allegra, CTI Medical Systems). PET and contrast-enhanced CT images were obtained from the skull base through the abdomen 1 hour after IV injection of 10 mCi of FDG. CT was used for attenuation correction and image fusion.

On PET/CT, no primary tumor was identified in the left side of the head and neck, and there were no abnormalities outside the head and neck. A 1-cm mass, however, was seen in the posterior aspect of the superficial lobe of the right parotid gland (Fig. 1A, 1B). The PET portion of the scan showed intense focal FDG uptake in the parotid lesion. The standardized uptake value (SUV) for the lesion was 3.8, which was considered worrisome for malignancy. However, because SUVs are not well established for characterization of salivary gland tumors, the patient chose watchful waiting. PET 1 month after the first scan showed no change in the size of the mass but revealed increased activity within it, with an SUV of 6.2.


Figure 1
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 76-year-old man with parotid oncocytoma. Contrast-enhanced CT scan through parotid glands shows 1-cm briskly enhancing mass (arrow) in superficial lobe of right parotid gland.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 76-year-old man with parotid oncocytoma. PET image shows marked 18F-FDG uptake (arrow) in mass (standard uptake value, 3.8).

 
Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the right parotid mass showed no malignant cells; however, the aspirate was less than optimal owing to scant cellularity. The patient agreed to excisional biopsy, and partial right parotidectomy was performed. The pathologic specimen contained a well-circumscribed mahogany brown lesion measuring 2.5 x 1.8 x 1.6 cm. The lesion was homogeneous without areas of necrosis or hemorrhage. Histopathologic examination revealed benign oncocytoma. Two months after the benign oncocytoma was detected, a nodule palpated in the left parotid gland prompted parotidectomy. An 8-mm primary adenocarcinoma was identified at pathologic examination. The patient underwent definitive therapy for cancer. PET/CT and clinical examination 4 months after treatment revealed no evidence of residual disease.


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
FDG PET has been shown in certain clinical settings to be useful in the diagnostic evaluation and clinical management of masses of the head and neck [7]. PET has been especially useful in the staging and posttherapy monitoring of head and neck cancer. Because most extracranial malignant tumors of the head and neck are squamous cell cancer, these malignant tumors have been extensively studied regarding the clinical applicability of PET and PET/CT [4]. Non–squamous cell tumors, including most salivary gland tumors, have not been studied as extensively, and the role of PET in the diagnosis and management of such tumors remains largely unclear.

Most salivary gland tumors arise within the parotid gland, and most of these tumors are benign. Because therapy for these tumors is almost always surgical, it is important for surgical planning to accurately determine whether the tumor is benign or malignant. Physical examination, MRI, sonography, and CT findings currently are not specific to the histopathologic features of these tumors [5, 8, 9]. Cross-sectional imaging techniques are generally poor for differentiating benign from malignant parotid tumors. Characteristics such as irregular margins, infiltration into the parenchyma, and degree of intensity on T1- and T2-weighted MR images can be useful but are not reliable [9]. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy frequently does not provide enough information for diagnosis [10]. PET also has limited utility for differentiating benign from malignant salivary gland tumors, primarily because of high FDG uptake by some benign salivary gland tumors, especially Warthin's tumors [4].

Some practitioners have used nuclear medicine techniques to evaluate parotid gland tumors. Studies [5, 11] have shown that of all benign and malignant parotid gland tumors, Warthin's tumor and oncocytoma almost exclusively accumulate 99mTc–sodium pertechnetate after oral acid stimulation. Results in a series of 72 parotid gland tumors [5] suggested that a combination of salivary gland scintigraphy and PET is useful for differentiating malignant and benign parotid tumors. In that series, false-negative results were found in one salivary duct carcinoma (SUV, 2.01), one mucoepidermoid carcinoma (SUV, 2.07), and one metastatic tumor of renal cell carcinoma (SUV, 2.24). False-positive results were found in many of the Warthin's tumors (mean SUV, 7.06), five pleomorphic adenomas, two cases of inflammation, one basal cell adenoma, and one monomorphic adenoma. Interestingly, the sole oncocytoma had low FDG uptake. To our knowledge, no reports have described benign parotid oncocytoma with high FDG uptake.

Oncocytes are large, polygonal cells with granular and intensely eosinophilic cytoplasm, a round nucleus, and a low nuclear-tocytoplasm ratio [12]. These cells are present in many types of human tissue, including salivary glands, thyroid, pituitary gland, liver, kidneys, and gonads. Oncocytoma of the salivary glands is an unusual benign tumor that appears most frequently in the parotid glands. The clinical features resemble those of other benign and low-grade salivary gland tumors. Surgical excision usually affords cure, but recurrences due to a multifocal configuration or incomplete excision have been reported [13].

Oncocytomas other than those of the salivary glands have been studied with PET. For example, PET has been shown useful in the evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with Hürthle cell carcinoma of the thyroid gland [12]. PET studies of patients with Hürthle cell carcinoma have shown intense focal FDG uptake similar to that seen in other highly metabolically active malignant tumors.

Although this case report focuses on a false-positive finding, the primary tumor in this case, parotid adenocarcinoma, was not detected on FDG PET. This situation is consistent with results of previous studies [46] showing variable uptake of salivary gland tumors that led to false-negative results. This case report is the first description, to our knowledge, of a parotid oncocytoma exhibiting intense FDG uptake on PET. This unusual case emphasizes that PET and PET/CT by themselves may not be reliable for classifying salivary masses as benign or malignant; both false-positive and false-negative results may be seen.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Keyes JW Jr, Watson NE Jr, Williams DW 3rd, et al. FDG PET in head and neck cancer. AJR 1997;169 :1663 –1669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Branstetter BF 4th, Blodgett TM, Zimmer LA, et al. Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? Radiology 2005;235 : 580–586[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kitagawa Y, Nishizawa S, Sano K, et al. Whole body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with head and neck cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol2002; 93:202 –207
  4. Freling NJ, Molenaar WM, Vermey A, et al. Malignant parotid tumors: clinical use of MR imaging and histologic correlation. Radiology 1992;185 : 691–696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Uchida Y, Minoshima S, Kawata T, et al. Diagnostic value of FDG PET and salivary gland scintigraphy for parotid tumors. Clin Nucl Med 2005; 30:170 –176[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Yousem DM, Kraut MA, Chalian AA. Major salivary gland imaging. Radiology 2000;216 : 19–29[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Wong DS, Li GK. The role of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the management of parotid tumors: a critical clinical appraisal. Head Neck 2000; 22:469 –473[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Keyes JW Jr, Harkness BA, Greven KM, et al. Salivary gland tumors: pretherapy evaluation with PET. Radiology1994; 192:99 –102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. San Pedro EC, Lorberboym M, Machac J, et al. Imaging of multiple bilateral parotid gland oncocytomas. Clin Nucl Med1995; 20:515 –518[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Capone RB, Ha PK, Westra WH, et al. Oncocytic neoplasms of the parotid gland: a 16 year institutional review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 126:657 –662[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Brandwein MS, Huvos AG. Oncocytic tumors of major salivary glands. Am J Surg Pathol 1991;15 : 514–528[Medline]
  12. Lowe VJ, Mullan BP, Hay ID, et al. 18F-FDG PET of patients with Hürthle cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med2003; 44:1402 –1406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Bui CD, Ching AS, Carlos RC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography imaging in nonsquamous tumors of the head and neck. J Invest Radiol 2003; 38:593 –601

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shah, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shah, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F., IV
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS