| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Original Research |
1 All authors: Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy St., Providence, RI 02903.
Received March 4, 2007;
accepted after revision May 19, 2007.
Address correspondence to J. H. Song
(jsong2{at}lifespan.org).
Abstract
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
MATERIALS AND METHODS. A computer search of CT reports from January 2000 to December 2003 identified patients with incidentally detected, indeterminate, but benign-appearing adrenal lesions who had no known malignancy and no clinical suspicion of hyperfunctioning adrenal mass. Patients with adrenal masses diagnostic on the initial CT or heterogeneous masses were excluded. Two hundred ninety patients with 321 lesions met the study criteria. Each lesion was determined to be benign or malignant based on histopathology, characterization with diagnostic imaging studies, or a minimum of 1 year of stability on imaging follow-up or 2 years of stability on clinical follow-up.
RESULTS. Of the 321 lesions, 318 masses (99.1%) were confirmed to be benign and clinically insignificant. These included three (0.9%) histologically confirmed adenomas, 198 (61.7%) adenomas by imaging characterization, five (1.6%) other benign lesions, 71 (22.1%) masses stable on imaging follow-up, and 41 (12.8%) masses with clinical stability. There were three (0.9%) clinically unsuspected functioning masses: one cortisol-producing adenoma and two pheochromocytomas. There were no metastatic adrenal lesions, even among the 13 patients who subsequently developed malignancy elsewhere.
CONCLUSION. All of the incidentally detected adrenal masses with a CT attenuation of > 10 H were benign in patients with no known malignancy. Follow-up imaging to characterize an incidental adrenal mass appears to have a limited role in this patient cohort.
Keywords: adenoma • adrenal glands • adrenal mass • benign adenoma • CT • incidental adrenal mass • incidentalomas • neoplasms
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Tremendous progress has been made in the radiologic evaluation of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT [4–6], chemical shift MRI [7–9], and CT contrast washout analysis [10–13]. More recently, promising results of CT histogram analysis have been reported, adding to the armamentarium of adrenal imaging [14]. Because the adrenal gland is also a common site for metastasis in certain malignancies, differentiating benign from malignant lesions in these onc ologic patients is crucial. The results reported recently in the literature focus on noninvasive imaging evaluation of an adrenal lesion to differentiate a benign adenoma from a malignancy and from a metastasis in particular. These advances in adrenal imaging have made an important impact in management of these patients. However, it is unclear from the recent literature whether imaging workup is necessary in low-risk patients who do not have underlying malignancy. In many of these studies, patients with known malignancy are grouped with low-risk patients, with the implication that imaging workup is necessary in both groups to confirm the benign diagnosis. This uncertainty is reflected in clinical practice: Some radiologists routinely recommend dedicated adrenal CT or MRI, whereas others may make the presumptive diagnosis of an adenoma for an incidentally discovered adrenal lesion.
The purposes of our study were to determine the prevalence of malignancy in incidentally discovered indeterminate adrenal lesions on CT in patients with no known cancer and, further, whether imaging evaluation is necessary to establish benignity in these patients. Our hypothesis was that most of these incidentally found adrenal masses are benign and would not require a confirmatory imaging study.
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The CT reports of 128,401 consecutive chest, abdominal, or chest and abdominal CT examinations from our academic institution performed from January 2000 to December 2003 were queried for the word "adrenal" in the impression section. The search identified 3,307 patients with adrenal masses. Two authors retrospectively reviewed these CT reports and further identified patients with incidentally detected indeterminate adrenal lesions in a population at low risk for adrenal metastases as described in the next sections of text.
Exclusion criteria—We considered patients with any available clinical history or current imaging evidence of malignancy to be at high risk for adrenal metastasis and therefore excluded 2,227 patients with known malignancy. Patients diagnosed with malignancy after the initial CT examination, however, were included in the study cohort. We excluded six patients with an adrenal mass who had clinical suspicion of a functioning adrenal lesion, because these lesions are clinically significant and would warrant further management. Sixty-four patients who had known adrenal masses from previous imaging studies were excluded. In 502 (49.7%) of the remaining 1,010 patients, adenoma was diagnosed on the initial CT on the basis of the currently accepted CT threshold of 10 H, and these patients were excluded. One hundred thirteen patients were excluded because another specific imaging diagnosis, such as hematoma and myelolipoma, could be made on the initial CT. In seven patients, the adrenal lesions had atypical features for an adenoma, such as heterogeneity (n = 6) or calcification (n = 1), and were excluded because these lesions warrant further imaging or histologic evaluations. Ninety-eight patients had inadequate follow-up (n = 66) or were lost to follow-up (n = 32), including six patients who died within 1 year of the initial CT examination with the cause of death not related to cancer.
Inclusion criteria—The remaining low-risk patients with incidental, benign-appearing but indeterminate adrenal masses who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria constituted the study group, all of whom had appropriate follow-up (Fig. 1). The results of histopathology, specific imaging diagnosis, or at least 1 year of stability on imaging or 2 years of stability on clinical follow-up was the criterion for diagnosis.
|
We recorded the number, size, and side of the lesions and the clinical indication for the chest or abdominal CT examination. Each lesion was determined to be benign or malignant on the basis of the histopathology results, findings on imaging studies, or clinical follow-up. When available, the histologic diagnosis was considered to be the reference standard. The benign diagnosis by imaging included adenoma diagnostic on unenhanced CT, adrenal CT with contrast washout, and chemical shift MRI. For the lesions without confirmatory adrenal imaging, at least 1 year of stability on follow-up examination was used as imaging proof for benignity. For the remaining lesions, clinical stability of at least 2 years was considered to be benign, as described in the next section.
Imaging Method and Analysis
The initial CT examinations were performed at two hospitals and at
outpatient offices and included both chest and abdominal CT images. All
studies were performed on a helical CT unit (HiSpeed CT/i [GE Healthcare];
4-MDCT: LightSpeed [GE Healthcare] and Asteion [Toshiba Medical Systems];
16-MDCT: Sensation, Siemens Medical Solutions). Incidental adrenal lesions
were identified on unenhanced abdominal CT and on contrast-enhanced abdominal
CT, typically performed during the portal venous phase (60–70 seconds)
after IV administration of 100 mL of low-osmolar contrast material at a
collimation ranging from 3 to 7 mm, depending on the body part being imaged,
scanner, and the year of the examination. Most of the chest CT examinations
were performed as unenhanced studies. Contrast-enhanced chest CT was performed
with IV administration of 100 mL of low-osmolar contrast material using
routine protocol or as chest CT angiography (pulmonary embolism and aortic
dissection protocol) with 120 mL of low-osmolar contrast material. For
confirmatory imaging diagnosis, unenhanced CT, dedicated adrenal CT with
contrast washout, or adrenal MRI with chemical shift imaging was
performed.
Adrenal CT—For the 57 patients who underwent follow-up dedicated adrenal CT to characterize the incidentally discovered adrenal mass, the following protocol was used: Initially unenhanced sections were obtained at 2.5 mm (multidetector) or 3 mm (single-detector) through the adrenal glands using an average field of view of 25–28 mm. An elliptic region of interest through the adrenal mass was obtained, and if it measured greater than 10 H, then 100 mL of nonionic contrast material was IV injected at 3 mL/s. Sections of the same thickness were then acquired through the adrenal glands at 60 seconds after contrast injection and then after a 10- or 15-minute delay using the same parameters [10].
Adrenal MRI—MRI was performed on a variety of MR equipment including 1.5-T systems (Vision or Symphony, Siemens Medical Solutions) and 1-T systems (Harmony, Siemens Medical Solutions). A phased-array torso coil was used whenever possible. Axial T1-weighted in-phase and opposed-phase breath-hold images were obtained with a 2D gradient-refocused echo sequence using the following parameters: TR range, 150–193 milliseconds; in-phase TE range, 4.4–7.5 milliseconds; and opposed-phase TE range, 2.2–3.7 milliseconds. Additional parameters were a flip angle of 70–90°, a field of view of 350–360 mm, matrix of 127–192 x 256, slice thickness of 5–6 mm, intersection gap of 0–1 mm, and 1 signal acquisition. All studies included some type of T2-weighted sequence of variable technique.
Using the current imaging criteria, an adenoma was diagnosed when a lesion
had an attenuation coefficient of 
10 H on unenhanced CT, and absolute
contrast washout of 
52% at 10 minutes or 60% at 15 minutes on adrenal CT
[13,
15]. For the chemical shift MR
criteria, we used signal cancellation based on subjective analysis of signal
dropout on opposed-phased imaging.
Clinical Follow-Up
Electronic medical charts were searched and reviewed for all subjects
included in the study group. For the lesions without a specific histologic or
imaging diagnosis, less than 1 year of imaging follow-up, or no imaging
follow-up, clinical stability was evaluated
[16,
17]. Clinical information was
gathered from review of electronic medical records (n = 75) and
telephone calls (n = 20) to the referring clinician of the patient
specifically to determine whether malignancy was diagnosed after CT or whether
there were any clinical findings suspicious for biochemically active adrenal
lesions.
Statistical Analysis
We calculated the 95% CI for the detection of malignancy using a Web
program for calculating exact binomial and Poisson CIs from
www.statpages.org
[18].
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
Of the six lesions with histologic diagnosis, three lesions were biopsied using CT guidance and three lesions were surgically removed. There were four adenomas (1.2%), two diagnosed from biopsy specimens and two surgically resected. One of the surgically resected adenomas was a 3-cm mass that did not meet the criteria of an adenoma on adrenal CT. The second lesion was an incidentally detected 1.4-cm adenoma subsequently found to be a functioning lesion with excess cortisol production, causing subclinical Cushing's syndrome, on endocrine evaluation.
There were two (0.6%) clinically unsuspected pheochromocytomas, a 2.8-cm
mass and a 3-cm mass, that did not fulfill the imaging criteria of adenoma on
adrenal CT and chemical shift MRI, respectively. On further clinical
investigation, both patients had elevated serum catecholamine levels. The
first of these pheochromocytomas was surgically resected. The second was
biopsied under CT guidance after 
-blockade with phenoxybenzamine and
was subsequently treated with radiofrequency ablation because the patient was
a poor surgical candidate. Therefore, there were three (0.9%) clinically
unsuspected, benign but clinically significant functioning masses discovered
incidentally.
Two hundred seventy-four lesions had imaging follow-up. There were 203 lesions for which a specific benign diagnosis could be made and 71 lesions with at least 1 year of stability on imaging studies. Of the 203 diagnostic lesions, 198 (61.7%) were adenomas, three (0.9%) were hematomas occurring in the setting of trauma, and two (0.6%) were cysts. Most of the adenomas were diagnosed on unenhanced CT, with the remaining lesions by adrenal CT, chemical shift MRI, or a combination of these studies (Table 2). Seventy-one lesions had radiologic proof of stability of at least 1 year: 68 were followed with CT, two with MRI, and one with PET. The mean length of imaging follow-up on these lesions was 2.7 years (1–2 years, 24 lesions; > 2–3 years, 22 lesions; and > 3 years, 25 lesions). Five lesions that did not meet the criteria of adenoma on dedicated adrenal imaging were stable for at least 1 year and, therefore, were presumed to be benign on the basis of imaging stability. None of the lesions had increased in size on follow-up study.
|
Forty-one lesions without histologic diagnosis or adequate imaging follow-up had available clinical information of at least 2 years from the time of the initial study. The mean length of clinical follow-up was 3.3 years (2–3 years, 21 lesions; and > 3 years, 20 lesions). Two lesions that were not diagnostic of adenoma on dedicated adrenal imaging and six lesions with less than 1 year of imaging follow-up had clinical stability for more than 2 years and were presumed to be benign.
When 209 adrenal masses with histologic diagnosis or imaging characterization only were considered for the final diagnoses, there were 202 (96.7%) adenomas, three (1.4%) hematomas, two (1.0%) cysts, and two (1.0%) pheochromocytomas.
There was no malignant adrenal lesion in our study (95% CI: 0.0000–0.0093). Of the study population, 13 patients with a total of 14 adrenal masses subsequently developed malignancy elsewhere (five lung; three prostate; and one each breast, skin [melanoma], kidney, rectum, and head and neck). None of the adrenal lesions was a metastasis. Of these benign adrenal lesions, one was a histologically proven adenoma, seven were adenomas by imaging, and six lesions were presumed to be benign by imaging stability.
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
10 H on
unenhanced CT or CT contrast washout of 50%), even though the author
acknowledged that there are no data from large, long-term studies to support
that recommendation. In a separate review, Copeland
[20] advised that masses of
more indeterminate nature that are not immediately resected should be followed
at 3, 6, and 18 months. These adrenal lesions add to the growing list of
serendipitous findings on imaging studies. The American College of Radiology
states that extensive and costly workup is usually not justified for
small—that is, < 3 cm—adrenal masses
[21]. The recommendation for additional imaging to evaluate an adrenal mass is in part due to the recent success of imaging for diagnosing adenoma with high accuracy. Now, most benign adrenal lesions can be distinguished from metastasis based on noninvasive imaging using CT and MRI [13, 15, 22]. As a result, the number of adrenal masses requiring histologic diagnosis has declined recently [23]. In our study, only six (1.8%) lesions required histologic evaluation. There is little debate that imaging evaluation is crucial in oncologic patients presenting with an adrenal mass; however, there is little discussion in the recent literature about whether an adrenal incidentaloma in a patient at low risk for adrenal metastasis should require imaging confirmation of benignity.
In our study, none of the incidentally detected adrenal masses in patients
without cancer were malignant. Thirteen patients with a total of 14 adrenal
masses subsequently developed malignancy elsewhere, and none of these lesions
was a metastasis. Similar findings were reported separately by Lee et al.
[24] and Herrera et al.
[16], where only 0.2% and 0.3%
of incidental adrenal masses were the initial presentation of metastatic
cancer. In those studies, the morphology of the masses was not analyzed, but
these uncommon metastatic masses were reported to be large ( 6 cm and 5.5
cm, respectively). In addition, some of the patients were reported to be
symptomatic and have bilateral masses
[24]. The reason for a
somewhat higher incidence of metastasis of 4.1% reported by Gajraj and Young
[25] is unclear, but it
perhaps is related to different imaging practice and technique.
None of the incidental masses in our study was a primary adrenal cortical carcinoma, which is a rare malignancy. In a series of 210 patients with adrenal masses, Terzolo et al. [26] reported the prevalence of adrenal cortical carcinoma to be 13%. However, the average size of the adrenal mass in their study was 9.4 cm and the masses were inhomogeneous with irregular margins. As stated in their work, these findings are imaging features that are suspicious for malignancy and require histologic evaluation. In a multicenter series of 381 patients, Bülow et al. [27] reported a 4% incidence of malignancy including 10 patients with adrenal cortical carcinomas. However, their criteria for incidentaloma were broader than ours: 10% of their subjects had symptoms or signs of malignant disease, including three of the patients with cortical carcinoma. In addition, the mean size of the carcinoma was 10 cm and four of these 10 patients had elevated biochemical activity. Adrenal cortical carcinomas detected on CT are described to be large (4–17 cm) in studies with reported prevalence of 1.2–4.7% in incidentally detected adrenal masses [16, 25, 27]. The average adrenal mass size in our study was 2.1 cm, which is smaller than the studies described, and because none of the masses in our study were malignant, we could not assess for the size threshold for the risk of malignancy. The 6-cm mass, the largest in our study, typically would have been resected; however, instead it was followed up using CT with confirmed stability at 5 years. No lesion in our series had increased in size on follow-up imaging, although previous studies have observed mass enlargement of more than 1 cm over 1 year in approximately 5% of benign adenomas [28, 29].
There were three (0.9%) unsuspected functioning adrenal masses in our study: one cortisol-producing benign adenoma (0.3%) and two pheochromocytomas (0.6%). Subclinical hormone secretion by adrenal mass is well recognized, reported as high as 12% of cortisol-producing adenoma [20] and 9% of pheochromocytoma [26] among incidentalomas. Although most of the patients with incidentally found pheochromocytoma have a history of hypertension, pheochromocytomas can be clinically silent but are potentially lethal. In one autopsy series, 46% of patients with pheochromocytoma did not have a recorded history of hypertension [30]. The 0.9% incidence of unsuspected functioning adrenal mass in our study may be an underrepresentation because biochemical screening was not routinely performed in all patients.
This study has several limitations. Thirty-two patients were lost to follow-up and 66 patients had less than 12 months of imaging follow-up or less than 24 months of clinical follow-up and thus the outcomes of these patients are unknown. The second limitation is the lack of histology results as the gold standard for most of the cases. However, this reflects the shift in management of incidental adrenal masses and the acceptance of imaging diagnosis to be highly accurate. A third limitation is that, although imaging stability is well accepted and clinical stability has been used as evidence of a benign process, it is theoretically possible that a very early presentation of a small adrenal cortical carcinoma can be inaccurately diagnosed as a benign lesion using those two methods. However, that would be a rare exception for adrenal cortical carcinoma, which is a rare malignancy that can also be hormonally active. To minimize such outcome, we used conservative periods of 1 year for imaging follow-up and 2 years for clinical follow-up. A fourth limitation is that we could not address the relevance of the size to the risk of malignancy because there was no malignant mass in our study. Last, the functional status of adrenal masses was not routinely evaluated and may account for the less than 1% prevalence of incidental hyperfunctioning masses. However, the primary goal of our study was to determine the necessity of imaging evaluation, not of biochemical screening which is generally recommended.
In conclusion, the results of our study show that none of the incidentally detected adrenal masses was malignant in patients with no known cancer. If an incidental adrenal mass appears benign on imaging and the patient has no known malignancy, follow-up imaging appears to have a limited role. Further research with prospective studies and cost–benefit analyses would be useful to guide management of the incidentally discovered adrenal mass.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dennis Welch for his assistance with gathering data.
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T J Cawood, P J Hunt, D O'Shea, D Cole, and S Soule Recommended evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas is costly, has high false-positive rates and confers a risk of fatal cancer that is similar to the risk of the adrenal lesion becoming malignant; time for a rethink? Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2009; 161(4): 513 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. T. Johnson, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman Adrenal Imaging with Multidetector CT: Evidence-based Protocol Optimization and Interpretative Practice RadioGraphics, September 1, 2009; 29(5): 1319 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Mazzaglia and J. M. Monchik Limited Value of Adrenal Biopsy in the Evaluation of Adrenal Neoplasm: A Decade of Experience Arch Surg, May 1, 2009; 144(5): 465 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. D. Craig, J. C. Fanburg-Smith, L. R. Henry, R. Guerrero, and J. H Barton Fat-containing Lesions of the Retroperitoneum: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation1 RadioGraphics, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 261 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Is Follow-Up Imaging Necessary for Benign-Appearing Adrenal Incidentalomas? Journal Watch (General), December 11, 2007; 2007(1211): 2 - 2. [Full Text]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
