AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

The following table or figure may be downloaded to PowerPoint for personal use in teaching and presentations. This feature is available to all subscribers to the journal.

You MUST read and follow the guidelines at Request to Reproduce AJR Content if you are distributing or using AJR content beyond academic use (limited distribution, non-revenue producing, or educational purposes).

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1


Fig. 1A Malignancy detected by human second reviewer in 52-year-old woman with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who presented with group of three or four punctate calcifications on screening mammograms. At time of screening, these calcifications had arguably been stable for 3 years. Therefore, human second reviewer's motivation to recommend additional views is unknown. At diagnostic visit, radiologist thought that calcifications were stable, but short-interval follow-up was recommended. At that follow-up visit, radiologist thought that calcifications had increased in number since mammograms obtained 3.5 years earlier, although differences in technique were considered, and recommended biopsy. Pathology results were DCIS and calcifications were associated with carcinoma. Mediolateral oblique view. Photographic enlargement shows punctate calcifications (arrows) seen on mammograms obtained 3 years before study mammogram.





Right arrow Return to article
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS