AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wible, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wible, J. H., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2464
AJR 2007; 189:1539-1544
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Measurement of Serum Calcium Concentration After Administration of Four Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents to Human Volunteers

Jeffery J. Brown1, Michael R. Hynes2 and James H. Wible, Jr.2

1 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
2 Covidien/Mallinckrodt Imaging, PO Box 5840, 675 McDonnell Blvd., Saint Louis, MO 63134.

Received April 24, 2007; accepted after revision June 24, 2007.

 
This study was designed and funded by Covidien/Mallinckrodt. J. J. Brown is an investigator at the clinical site and a paid consultant of Covidien/Mallinckrodt. J. H. Wible and M. R. Hynes are employees of Covidien/Mallinckrodt.

Address correspondence to J. H. Wible, Jr. (james.wible{at}covidien.com).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to use three analytic methods to measure serum calcium concentration to assess the magnitude and time course of the effects of four gadolinium-based contrast agents.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. After providing informed consent, 12 healthy adult volunteers (mean age, 38.6 ± 13.6 [SD] years) received IV injections of gadoversetamide, gadodiamide, gadopentetate dimeglumine, and gadoteridol at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. Blood samples were obtained before contrast administration and 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after contrast injection. Serum calcium levels were measured with an orthocresolphthalein complexone method, an arsenazo III method, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Analyses of variance coupled with a Dunnett test were used to compare baseline serum calcium measurements with values at the different time points after injection.

RESULTS. Administration of gadoversetamide or gadodiamide caused no significant change in serum calcium concentration measured with the arsenazo III and ICP-MS analytic methods. However, the orthocresolphthalein assay showed a transient decrease in serum calcium concentration after injection of gadoversetamide or gadodiamide. Injection of gadopentetate or gadoteridol produced no significant change in serum calcium values measured with the orthocresolphthalein, arsenazo III, and ICP-MS methods.

CONCLUSION. Administration of gadoversetamide or gadodiamide caused no significant effect on serum calcium concentration. Neither gadoversetamide nor gadodiamide interfered with measurement of serum calcium with the arsenazo III or ICP-MS method. However, the orthocresolphthalein method of measuring serum calcium produced a transient hypocalcemia artifact in the presence of gadoversetamide or gadodiamide.

Keywords: calcium assay • contrast agents • gadolinium • gadoversetamide • MRI


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The efficacy of extracellular gadolinium chelates in MRI has been well established [1]. These agents facilitate the diagnosis of disease by increasing lesion visibility, characterizing lesion perfusion, and highlighting vascular structures. In almost all patient populations, the approved dosages of gadolinium contrast agents have a favorable safety profile [2, 3]. In a small percentage of patients with renal insufficiency, however, administration of gadolinium contrast agents has been associated with the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis [4, 5].

Results of previous studies [6, 7] indicated that some gadolinium chelates can interfere with colorimetric assays of serum calcium. Severe hypocalcemia can be life-threatening if not promptly and properly managed, making early detection critical [8]. However, managing an erroneously low calcium level with IV or oral calcium comes with the risk of hypercalcemia, which can result in muscle weakness, coma, hypertension, and cardiac arrhythmia [9]. The literature provides reports on in vitro [6, 1014] and retrospective in vivo [14, 15] studies and case reports [1618], but there is a dearth of information on prospective in vivo studies of different methods and the time course of the gadolinium interference.

A study with dogs [19] showed that gadoversetamide and gadodiamide produced a transient decrease in serum calcium concentration measured with an orthocresolphthalein assay system. However, when the arsenazo III and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) methods of measuring serum calcium were used, these gadolinium chelates were not found to interfere. In this study, we explored the effects on human volunteers and defined the duration and magnitude of the analytic artifact in subjects with normal renal function.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This trial was a single-center open-label cross-over comparative study. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board at the site and was compliant with the HIPAA of 1996. Informed consent was obtained from each subject before enrollment. The study began in September 2003 and ended in August 2004.

Subjects
Adult healthy volunteers (n = 28) were enrolled for MRI of the abdomen to evaluate the time course of contrast enhancement with four extracellular gadolinium contrast agents. Physical examination and a history interview were performed to determine the health status of each subject. The first 12 subjects (five men, seven women; age, 32–64 years) who completed all four dosing cycles also participated in the pharmacokinetic portion of the study. Subjects were excluded from the study if they withdrew informed consent or met any of the following conditions: had received any investigational drug within 30 days of participation; were pregnant or lactating; had a condition that was a contraindication to MRI (e.g., presence of cardiac pacemaker, epicardial pacing leads, cochlear implant, or ferromagnetic aneurysm clip) or other condition that precluded safe proximity to a strong external magnetic field; had undergone any contrast-enhanced imaging examination within 7 days before participation; had a history of hemolytic anemia, sickle cell anemia, or other hemoglobinopathy; had a history of hypersensitivity or adverse reaction to any radiologic contrast agent; or had a history of marked claustrophobia.

Contrast Agents
All of the gadolinium chelates were supplied as commercial materials at a concentration of 0.5 mmol/mL. Gadoversetamide (Optimark, Mallinckrodt Imaging) is a nonionic gadolinium chelate of diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid bismethoxyethylamide. Gadodiamide (Omniscan, GE Healthcare) is a nonionic formulation of a gadolinium complex of diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid bismethylamide. Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Bayer Schering Pharma AG) is an ionic N-methylglucamine salt of the gadolinium complex of diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid gadopentetate. Gadoteridol (Pro-Hance, Bracco) is a nonionic formulation of the gadolinium complex 10-(2-hydroxypropyl)-1,4,7,10 tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triacetic acid. All gadolinium-based contrast agents approved for human use in the United States at the time of the study were included in this investigation. A fifth agent, gadobenate dimeglumine, was approved after initiation of the study.

Procedures
Each subject received 0.1-mmol/kg (0.2 mL/kg) IV injections of gadoversetamide, gadodiamide, gadopentetate dimeglumine, and gadoteridol at separate imaging sessions. Contrast agents were administered IV in an appropriate arm vein by power injection at a rate of 2 mL/s. The order of administration of the contrast agents was assigned with a Latin square design. A period of at least 6 days and a maximum of 5 weeks elapsed between administrations of the contrast agents.

Blood specimens (2 mL) were collected from each subject before (within 2 hours) and after injection of each gadolinium chelate. The collection times were 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after injection. Blood samples were collected from the arm opposite the site of contrast injection. The catheter system used to obtain the blood samples was flushed with normal saline solution before collection and after each sampling to ensure a fresh specimen. Each specimen was centrifuged for 20 minutes to separate the serum, which was transferred to a storage tube and frozen at approximately –20°C until analyzed.

Analytic Measurements
Analysis of serum calcium and serum gadolinium concentrations was performed at MedTox Laboratories. The serum calcium level of each sample was measured with the orthocresolphthalein, arsenazo III, and ICP-MS methods. The gadolinium concentration of each sample was measured with ICP-MS.

A chemistry analyzer (Aeroset, Abbott Laboratories) was used for assessment of serum calcium concentrations with the orthocresolphthalein and arsenazo III methods. The orthocresolphthalein method was performed with reagents manufactured by Roche Diagnostics. With this analytic kit, a reaction takes place between orthocresolphthalein dye and calcium in the presence of 8-hydroxyquinoline under acidic conditions to produce a purple solution measured at a wavelength of 604 nm. The orthocresolphthalein method produced a maximum intraassay coefficient of variation of 1.8% with a maximum interassay coefficient of variation of 1.8%. The lower limit of detection was 1.3 mg/dL (0.3 mmol/L) with a linear range up to 19.4 mg/dL (4.9 mmol/L). The arsenazo III method was performed with kit reagents from Abbott Laboratories. A reaction takes place between the arsenazo III dye and calcium under acidic conditions to produce a blue–purple complex. The colored solution was measured spectro-photometrically and had a wavelength of 660 nm. Under these conditions, the assay system had intraassay and interassay coefficients of variation of 1.9%. The lower limit of detection was 2.0 mg/dL (0.5 mmol/L) with a linear range up to 13.0 mg/dL (3.2 mmol/L).

Both serum calcium and serum gadolinium concentrations were measured with a validated ICP-MS system (Elan 6000 ICP-MS, Perkins-Elmer). For serum calcium measurements, this method had an intraassay coefficient of variation of 4.7% and an interassay coefficient of variation of 6.0%. The lower limit of detection was 0.5 mg/dL with a linear range of 60.0 mg/dL. For serum gadolinium concentration, the ICP-MS technique had an intraassay coefficient of variation of 5.2% and an interassay coefficient of variation of 8.9%. The lower limit of detection was 0.2 µg/mL with a linear range up to 40.0 µg/mL.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis
The pharmacokinetic characteristics of the gadolinium chelates were based on serum gadolinium measurements. The pharmacokinetic parameters of elimination half-life (t1/2), area under the plasma concentration curve to time of the last collected blood sample (AUC0–t), steady-state volume of distribution (VDSS), and total clearance (CLT) were calculated with standard pharmacokinetic noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin, v1.1, Pharsight) based on the following equations: t1/2 = ln(2)/kel where kel is the slope from the regressed log-transformed concentration with respect to time;

Formula
where Ct is the concentration of gadolinium at time t;

Formula
where AUMC{infty} = {Sigma}Ci/kel2 and AUC{infty} = {Sigma}Ci/kel (AUMC = area under the first moment curve);

Formula

Statistical Analysis
Serum calcium and serum gadolinium concentrations were summarized with the mean ± SD for each gadolinium chelate and time point. Analyses of variance coupled with the Dunnett test were used to compare serum calcium concentrations at the different collection time points after contrast injection with the baseline values. Pharmacokinetic parameters of the gadolinium chelates were compared by use of a two-way mixed model analysis of variance and analysis of covariance. Pharmacokinetic and statistical analyses were conducted with SAS for Windows version 9 (SAS Institute). The criterion for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Effects of gadoversetamide (0.1 mmol/kg) on measurement of serum calcium. Values represent mean and standard error of mean (n = 12). Asterisks denote statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences from baseline. Diamonds indicate orthocresolphthalein; squares, arsenazo III; circles, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Effects of gadodiamide (0.1 mmol/kg) on measurement of serum calcium. Values represent mean and standard error of mean (n = 12). Asterisks denote statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences from baseline. Diamonds indicate orthocresolphthalein; squares, arsenazo III; circles, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.

 

Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Calcium Analysis
IV administration of gadoversetamide caused no significant change in serum calcium values measured with the arsenazo III and ICP-MS methods (Fig. 1). However, serum calcium values measured with the orthocresolphthalein assay decreased significantly (p < 0.05) 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after administration of gadoversetamide. The calcium concentration reached a nadir within 5 minutes of injection and returned to baseline within 90 minutes of injection.

IV administration of gadodiamide produced no significant change in serum calcium values measured with the arsenazo III and ICP-MS techniques (Fig. 2). Serum calcium values measured with the orthocresolphthalein method decreased significantly (p < 0.05) 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes after injection of gadodiamide. The calcium concentration reached the lowest value approximately 15 minutes after injection and returned to baseline within 120 minutes of gadodiamide administration. After injection of gadodiamide, the arsenazo III method of measuring serum calcium showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase 5 minutes after injection.

IV administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoteridol caused no significant change in serum calcium values measured with the orthocresolphthalein, arsenazo III, and ICP-MS analytic techniques (Figs. 3A and 3B).


Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A Effects of gadopentetate and gadoteridol on measurement of serum calcium. Values represent mean and standard error of mean (n = 12). Diamonds indicate orthocresolphthalein; squares, arsenazo III; circles, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Gadopentetate 0.1 mmol/kg.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B Effects of gadopentetate and gadoteridol on measurement of serum calcium. Values represent mean and standard error of mean (n = 12). Diamonds indicate orthocresolphthalein; squares, arsenazo III; circles, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Gadoteridol 0.1 mmol/kg.

 
Pharmacokinetic Analysis
After IV administration of the gadolinium chelates, gadolinium concentration peaked immediately (at the first sampling time of 5 minutes) and then rapidly decreased (Fig. 4). The time–elimination curves had characteristics of a first-order elimination process from the serum. Visual examination of the pharmacokinetic curves showed that the curves of the four gadolinium chelates were almost super-imposable. Statistical analysis of the pharmacokinetic curves showed no significant difference between the gadolinium concentrations for the four gadolinium chelates at any of the time points measured.


Figure 5
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Mean serum concentration of gadolinium versus time. Values represent mean (n = 12). No statistical differences occurred between different gadolinium chelates. Diamonds indicate gadodiamide; squares, gadopentetate; circles, gadoversetamide; triangles, gadoteridol.

 
Statistical analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameters elimination t1/2, AUC0-t, VDSS, and CLT showed no significant differences between the four gadolinium chelates (Table 1). Results of pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that the elimination t1/2 for the gadolinium chelates ranged from 93 minutes for gadoversetamide to 119 minutes for gadoteridol. The pharmacokinetic results also showed that the gadolinium chelates were distributed throughout the extracellular space with a VDSS between 214 and 243 mL/kg. In addition, the gadolinium chelates cleared the plasma at similar rates with a range of 1.5–1.7 mL/min/kg.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Comparative Summary of Gadolinium Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Commercial Gadolinium Chelates

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
During the preclinical development of gadoversetamide, abnormally low serum and urinary calcium concentrations (measured with an orthocresolphthalein method) were observed after injection of gadoversetamide [20]. Animals appeared normal without any signs of severe hypocalcemia, such as muscle fasciculations, tetany, QT prolongation, or convulsions. Subsequent clinical studies [21] with human subjects were conducted with ICP plasma atomic emission spectrometry to measure serum calcium, and no effect on serum calcium concentrations was detected after gadoversetamide injection. Thus for the purposes of our study, the ICP measurement of calcium was used as a reference standard.

Our data confirm that IV gadoversetamide administration has no significant effect on true serum calcium level. Measured with either the arsenazo III or the ICP-MS method, serum calcium values remained constant after IV injection of each of the four gadolinium chelates tested in this study; however, the orthocresolphthalein technique showed transient artificially low calcium values after injection of gadoversetamide and gadodiamide. Injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoteridol did not interfere with the orthocresolphthalein method of measuring serum calcium. These observations in healthy volunteers are similar to those previously described in dogs [19].

Modified linear chelates of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, such as gadoversetamide and gadodiamide, have similar high affinity constants for gadolinium [22, 23]. Under the conditions of the orthocresolphthalein assay, however, the orthocresolphthalein dye has a higher affinity for gadolinium than does gadoversetamide or gadodiamide [6, 10]. Once it binds to gadolinium, the orthocresolphthalein dye can no longer interact with calcium to produce the appropriate color change indicating the amount of calcium present.

It is important to recognize this interference so that patients are not needlessly treated for what appears to be hypocalcemia [14, 15]. Severe hypocalcemia can be life-threatening if not promptly and properly controlled, making early detection critical [8]. However, managing spurious hypocalcemia with IV or oral calcium comes with the risk of hypercalcemia [9]. Thus it is important for practitioners to recognize the timing of spurious hypocalcemia associated with the administration of gadolinium chelates. The timing of the orthocresolphthalein-caused artifact is directly related to the elimination of the gadolinium chelate from the body. When the orthocresolphthalein technique was used, serum calcium values returned to baseline within 90 minutes of gadoversetamide injection and within 120 minutes of gadodiamide injection. The pharmacokinetic analysis showed similar characteristics for the different gadolinium agents with equivalent half-lives, volumes of distribution, and rates of clearance. These gadolinium chelates are small molecules that exhibit little plasma protein binding and are eliminated by glomerular filtration. Under normal conditions, gadolinium chelates are quickly removed from the body. This rapid elimination accounts for the transient nature of the orthocresolphthalein-caused artifact in the calcium determination.

Study Limitations
The absence of subjects with impaired renal function was a limitation of this study. Gadolinium contrast agents are eliminated from the body by the kidneys. In patients with poor renal function, gadolinium contrast agents remain in the body for a longer period than in those with normal renal function [2426]. Thus as renal function decreases, the duration of the orthocresolphthalein artifact is prolonged [11]. However, administration of gadolinium contrast agents has been associated with the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with end-stage renal disease, severe chronic renal disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and acute renal injury due to hepatorenal syndrome and in those in the perioperative period of liver transplantation [4, 5]. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has required new labeling for all approved gadolinium contrast agents. The labels suggest avoidance of gadolinium contrast agents in the renally at-risk patient population unless the diagnostic information is essential and not available with noncontrast-enhanced MRI (Food and Drug Administration alert 5–23-07). A second limitation of this study was the use of only one dose of gadolinium, 0.1 mmol/kg. Data from studies with dogs [19] show that an increase in the dose of gadolinium increases both the magnitude and the duration of orthocresolphthalein artifact for serum calcium concentration.

Practical Applications
Although gadoversetamide and gadodiamide caused a transient, spurious decrease in serum calcium concentration measured with the orthocresolphthalein method, the effect diminished as the gadolinium chelate was eliminated from the body. None of the gadolinium chelates studied caused a false serum calcium measurement in healthy patients 2 hours after contrast material was administered regardless of the analytic method used.

The orthocresolphthalein artifact is unlikely to cause clinical problems for most patients undergoing MRI with a gadolinium-based contrast agent [27]. However, it is important for radiologists to know the types of MRI contrast agents and serum calcium assays used at their facilities. According to a survey conducted by the College of American Pathologists [28], 46% of responding laboratories use the arsenazo III method and 54% use the orthocresolphthalein technique. It is relatively simple for laboratories to change techniques by replacing one modular analytic package with another. Changing the analytic method to a technique not influenced by the presence of any gadolinium chelate is a practical and consistent approach to assuring accurate measurement of serum calcium.

If the potential for erroneous serum calcium measurement exists, referring physicians and laboratory personnel should be informed and precautions undertaken to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. In patients who need close monitoring of serum calcium concentration, blood samples should be obtained before administration of gadoversetamide or gadodiamide. In patients with normal renal function, a reliable serum calcium level can be obtained 2 hours after administration of the contrast agent. In patients with decreased renal function, the time frame for a reliable serum calcium level after contrast administration is likely to be prolonged. The same is true of patients who receive a contrast dose greater than the standard 0.1 mmol/kg. If a spurious serum calcium concentration is suspected, most laboratories have the ability to retest the blood sample with an assay that is not susceptible to spurious measurements. If this retesting cannot be done, a second blood sample should be obtained.

In conclusion, the orthocresolphthalein method of measuring serum calcium produces an analytic artifact in the presence of gadoversetamide or gadodiamide. This artifact is transient in nature, peaking 5–15 minutes after contrast administration and returning to baseline within 2 hours of injection in patients with normal renal function. If serum calcium assessments are needed for patient monitoring, blood samples should be collected either before or more than 2 hours after injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Installation of an analytic method, such as arsenazo III or ICP-MS, not influenced by the presence of a gadolinium contrast agent also is a practical approach to ensuring accurate measurement of serum calcium.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Karen M. Coulson for efforts in the preparation of this manuscript and Jennifer C. Lee for statistical analysis of the data.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Rinck PA, Myhr G. Gadolinium chelates: clinical applications. In: Dawson P, Cosgrove DO, Grainger RG, eds. Textbook of contrast media. Oxford, United Kingdom: Isis Medical Media,1999 : 333-353
  2. Runge VM. Safety of magnetic resonance contrast media. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12 : 309-314[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Kirchin MA, Runge VM. Contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: safety update. Top Magn Reson Imaging2003; 14:426 -435[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Kuo PH, Kanal E, Abu-Alfa AK, Cowper SE. Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Radiology 2007;242 : 647-649[Free Full Text]
  5. Lin SP, Brown JJ. MR contrast agents: physical and pharmacologic basics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25 : 884-899[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Lin J, Idee JM, Port M, et al. Interference of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents with the serum calcium measurement technique using colorimetric reagents. J Pharm Biomed Anal1999; 21:931 -943[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Emerson J, Kost G. Spurious hypocalcemia after Omniscan- or OptiMARK-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: an algorithm for minimizing a false-positive laboratory value. Arch Pathol Lab Med2004; 128:1151 -1156[Medline]
  8. Tohme JF, Bilezikian JP. Hypocalcemic emergencies. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1993;22 : 363-375[Medline]
  9. Carroll MF, Shade DS. A practical approach to hypercalcemia. Am Fam Physician 2003;67 : 1959-1966[Medline]
  10. Normann PT, Frøysa A, Svaland M. Interference of gadodiamide injection (OMNISCAN®) on the colorimetric determination of serum calcium. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1995;55 : 421-426[Medline]
  11. Kang HP, Scott MG, Joe BN, Narra V, Heiken J, Parvin CA. Model for predicting the impact of gadolinium on plasma calcium measured by the o-cresolphthalein method. Clin Chem 2004;50 : 741-746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Proctor KA, Rao LV, Roberts WL. Gadolinium magnetic resonance contrast agents produce analytic interference in multiple serum assays. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;121 : 282-292[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Löwe A, Balzer T, Hirt U. Interference of gadolinium-containing contrast-enhancing agents with colorimetric calcium laboratory testing. Invest Radiol 2005;40 : 521-525[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Prince MR, Erel HE, Lent RW, et al. Gadodiamide administration causes spurious hypocalcemia. Radiology2003; 227:639 -646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Zhang HL, Ersoy H, Prince MR. Effects of gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadodiamide on serum calcium, magnesium, and creatinine measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23 : 383-387[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Doorenbos CJ, Ozyilmaz A, van Wijnen M. Severe pseudohypocalcemia after gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:817 -818[Free Full Text]
  17. Williams SF, Meek SE, Moraghan TJ. Spurious hypocalcemia after gadodiamide administration. Mayo Clin Proc2005; 80:1655 -1657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Davenport A, Whiting S. Profound pseudohypocalcemia due to gadolinium (Magnevist) contrast in a hemodialysis patient. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 47:350 -352[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Wible JH Jr, Hynes MR. Measurement of serum calcium concentration after administration of gadoversetamide in dogs. Radiology 2004;233 : 158-164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Wible JH Jr, Troup CM, Hynes MR, et al. Toxicological assessment of gadoversetamide injection (OptiMARK), a new contrast-enhancement agent for use in magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol2001; 36:401 -412[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Brown JJ, Kristy RM, Stevens GR, Pierro JA. The OptiMARK clinical development program: summary of safety data. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15:446 -455[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Cacheris WP, Quay SC, Rocklage SM. The relationship between thermodynamics and the toxicity of gadolinium complexes. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 8:467 -481[CrossRef]
  23. Periasamy M, White D, deLearie L, et al. The synthesis and screening of nonionic gadolinium (III) DTPA-bisamide complexes as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Invest Radiol1991; 26:S217 -S220[Medline]
  24. Schuhmann-Giampieri G, Krestin G. Pharmacokinetics of Gd-DTPA in patients with chronic renal failure. Invest Radiol1991; 26:975 -979[Medline]
  25. Swan SK, Baker JF, Free R, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of gadoversetamide injection (OptiMARK) in subjects with central nervous system or liver pathology and varying degrees of renal function. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9 : 317-321[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Joffe P, Thomsen HS, Meusel M. Pharmacokinetics of gadodiamide in patients with severe renal insufficiency and patients undergoing hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Acad Radiol 1998; 5:491 -502[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Choyke PL, Knopp MV. Pseudohypocalcemia with MR imaging contrast agents: a cautionary tale. Radiology2003; 227:627 -628[Free Full Text]
  28. College of American Pathologists. Participant summary: surveys 2003—C-A chemistry. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists, 2003:19

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. M. Colletti
Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis and Gadolinium: A Perfect Storm
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1150 - 1153.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wible, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wible, J. H., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS