AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2163
AJR 2008; 190:32-39
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

MRI Findings in Deep and Generalized Morphea (Localized Scleroderma)

Marius Horger1, Gerhard Fierlbeck2, Jasmin Kuemmerle-Deschner3, Nikolay Tzaribachev3, Manfred Wehrmann4, Claus D. Claussen1 and Jan Fritz1,5

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
2 Department of Dermatology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen 72070, Germany.
3 Department of Pediatrics, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
4 Department of Pathology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
5 Present address: Russel H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.

Received March 1, 2007; accepted after revision August 7, 2007.

 
Address correspondence to M. Horger.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Clinical Features in Generalized...
Histologic Features in...
Imaging Features in Generalized...
Differential Diagnoses
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to describe the spectrum of MRI features in patients with deep and generalized morphea.

CONCLUSION. Imaging features of morphea are not specific and usually overlap with those of other disorders involving the skin, fascia, and musculature, such as some types of fasciitis, myositis, and so forth. Nevertheless, the imaging features of morphea reflect pathomorphologic changes of this rare disorder and enable a complete assessment of the disease extent, including depth of infiltration and disease activity.

Keywords: deep morphea • generalized morphea • localized scleroderma • morphea • MRI


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Clinical Features in Generalized...
Histologic Features in...
Imaging Features in Generalized...
Differential Diagnoses
References
 
Localized scleroderma, often termed "morphea" in the dermatology literature, refers to a number of autoimmune conditions characterized by skin thickening and increased collagen deposition. It is the most common form of scleroderma, occurs generally in young adults, and has a predominance in the female sex.

In morphea, the lesions are usually limited to the skin and subcutaneous fatty tissue, but they can extend over muscular fascia, muscle tissue, tendons, joint synovia, and even bone marrow. Other symptoms such as arthralgia, synovitis, and infrequent ipsilateral uveitis, or even Raynaud's phenomenon, sometimes accompany skin involvement. Visceral involvement, affecting pulmonary function or esophageal motility, is generally considered an attribute of systemic sclerosis and is rare in patients with morphea. Therefore, prognosis of patients with morphea is usually good [1, 2]. Histopathologic examination reveals different degrees of collagenization of the dermis and extension of fibrous tissue into the subcutaneous fat, musculature, fascia, and, rarely, late in the course of the disease, into the bone marrow. However, depth of infiltration by collagen bundles is expected mainly in the deep and generalized types of morphea.

Autoimmune abnormalities of localized scleroderma have been well recognized during the past two decades, and recently this disease has been considered to have an autoimmune background because of the high frequency of antinuclear antibodies encountered [3].

According to the Mayo Clinic classification, there are additional subtypes of morphea: plaque morphea, linear morphea, bullous morphea, deep morphea (including disabling pansclerotic morphea of children), and generalized morphea (including eosinophilic fasciitis) [4].

Radiologic diagnosis aims to determine the depth of collagen infiltration involving the musculature, synovia, and bone marrow; the degree of activity of this disorder; and related abnormalities such as polyarticular inflammation. Imaging of morphea shows no specific findings, but involvement of the skin, subcutaneous fatty tissue, and muscle fasciae can be easily recognized on imaging, especially MRI, which is mandatory for accurate classification and treatment.

Our objective was to describe the spectrum of imaging features in patients with deep and generalized morphea.


Clinical Features in Generalized and Deep Morphea
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Clinical Features in Generalized...
Histologic Features in...
Imaging Features in Generalized...
Differential Diagnoses
References
 
Generalized morphea is the most severe form of localized morphea [5, 6]. The following clinical diagnostic criteria for this subtype of morphea must be fulfilled: four or more lesions larger than 3 cm in diameter or involvement of two or more of the seven body areas (the head and neck, the right and left upper extremities, the anterior and posterior trunks, and the right and left lower extremities). In these patients, the limbs are primarily involved, followed by the trunk and the head. The acral areas are usually spared, contrary to systemic sclerosis [1].

As opposed to generalized morphea, deep morphea is confined to a single or a few anatomic areas. Dermatologic examination shows diffuse binding down of skin over the extremities of the trunk, which is more prominent in the extremities than in the trunk. Clinically, nodular or more keloidlike skin changes are seen. The muscles are also firm at palpation. The induration may extend into the deep tissue and lead to fibrosis and fixation of paraarticular structures, which can interfere with joint motion and cause severe disability. Reduced elasticity, vascular dysfunction, and increased vulnerability of the skin also favor the development of ulcers. Later in the course of the disease, progressive limb atrophy and contractures occur [5, 7, 8].


Histologic Features in Generalized and Deep Morphea
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Clinical Features in Generalized...
Histologic Features in...
Imaging Features in Generalized...
Differential Diagnoses
References
 
Generalized morphea and deep morphea are characterized by sclerosis in the septal portions of the subcutaneous fatty tissue and the deeper layers of the dermis (Fig. 1A, 1B). After the inflammatory phase, extensive sclerosis and hyalinization extend into the underlying fascia. During the course of the disease, even the underlying muscles, tendons, synovia, and bone might be involved in the process of replacement of the differentiated tissue by collagen bundles [7].


Figure 1
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —9-year-old boy with deep pansclerotic disabling morphea. Photomicrographs show dermis is increased in thickness and composed of broad sclerotic collagen bundles. Collagen has replaced fat around sweat glands (arrowhead, A) and extends into subcutis. Eccrine glands are situated at relatively high level in dermis as a result of collagen deposited below them. Scattered lymphocytes are located around blood vessels (long black arrow, A). Note dense collagenization of dermis and extension of fibrous tissue (short black arrow, A) into subcutaneous fat (white arrow) (A) (H and E, x50) and musculature (long arrow, B) are shown in this patient with deep morphea. Below sclerotic subcutis, collagen bundles (short arrows, B) are located between skeletal muscle fibers (long arrow, B) in deep morphea (B) (Van Gieson stain, x100).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —9-year-old boy with deep pansclerotic disabling morphea. Photomicrographs show dermis is increased in thickness and composed of broad sclerotic collagen bundles. Collagen has replaced fat around sweat glands (arrowhead, A) and extends into subcutis. Eccrine glands are situated at relatively high level in dermis as a result of collagen deposited below them. Scattered lymphocytes are located around blood vessels (long black arrow, A). Note dense collagenization of dermis and extension of fibrous tissue (short black arrow, A) into subcutaneous fat (white arrow) (A) (H and E, x50) and musculature (long arrow, B) are shown in this patient with deep morphea. Below sclerotic subcutis, collagen bundles (short arrows, B) are located between skeletal muscle fibers (long arrow, B) in deep morphea (B) (Van Gieson stain, x100).

 

Imaging Features in Generalized and Deep Morphea
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Clinical Features in Generalized...
Histologic Features in...
Imaging Features in Generalized...
Differential Diagnoses
References
 
Among the major imaging techniques (radiography, sonography, CT, MRI, and scintigraphy), MRI plays a pivotal role. MRI findings in the inflammatory stage of this disorder consist of thickening of the dermis and infiltration of the subcutaneous fatty tissue with an increase in signal intensity on STIR sequences in the adult (Fig. 2A) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (Fig. 2B), whereas hypointense signal is seen on unenhanced T1-weighted images (Fig. 2C). Beneath the infiltrated skin, collagen tissue involves fascia and musculature, showing different degrees of infiltration expressed similarly by increased signal intensity on STIR (Fig. 3A) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images and signal hypointensity on unenhanced T1-weighted images (Fig. 3B).


Figure 3
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —43-year-old man with deep morphea. Note increased signal on axial STIR (TR/TE, 7,763/70; inversion time, 150 milliseconds) image along posterior part of left forearm (arrow) due to infiltration of dermis, subcutaneous tissue, and part of muscular fascia.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —43-year-old man with deep morphea. Note corresponding moderate enhancement (arrow) in involved dermis and subcutis on T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 655/17) image acquired after IV administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C —43-year-old man with deep morphea. Effacement of normal high signal of subcutaneous fatty tissue and skin thickening caused by collagen infiltration show hypointense signal (arrow) on T1-weighted unenhanced spin-echo (TR/TE, 561/12) image. There is no relevant binding down of skin over involved forearm in this patient with short history of morphea.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —9-year-old boy with deep pansclerotic disabling morphea (same patient as in Figure 1A, 1B). Axial STIR (TR/TE, 6,210/35; inversion time, 150 milliseconds) image shows mild signal hyperintensity of thickened skin in right calf (short arrow). In addition, high signal intensity is seen in posterior muscle compartment (arrowhead) and tibial bone marrow (long arrow).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —9-year-old boy with deep pansclerotic disabling morphea (same patient as in Figure 1A, 1B). Axial T1-weighted spin-echo (TR/TE, 470/17) image also shows thickening of skin and reticular infiltration of subcutaneous fatty tissue over tibial bone due to collagen (arrows). There was only mild enhancement of involved musculature on T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 646/17) image acquired after IV administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (not shown).

 
In time, the bone becomes involved, showing particular MRI features. A bandlike intense signal is seen on T2-weighted (Figs. 3C and 3D) and contrast-enhanced (Fig. 3E) T1-weighted images, usually following the sub-cortical bone. On both T1- and T2-weighted images, the signal is usually opposite that of normal bone marrow (Figs. 3A and 3B). Correspondingly, hypersclerosis is seen on late follow-up radiographs. Bone biopsy is of limited value because the disease has no characteristic pathologic features, but biopsy is sometimes used to exclude tumor.


Figure 8
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C —9-year-old boy with deep pansclerotic disabling morphea (same patient as in Figure 1A, 1B). Coronal STIR (TR/TE, 7,640/58; inversion time, 150 milliseconds) image of right tibia illustrates diffuse bone marrow infiltration by highly cellular fibrous tissue with increased signal.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D —9-year-old boy with deep pansclerotic disabling morphea (same patient as in Figure 1A, 1B). Furthermore, left hindfoot shows diffuse bone marrow infiltration on STIR (TR/TE, 8,910/58; inversion time, 150 milliseconds) image (short arrow). T2 and STIR signals are more intense than expected in patients with bone marrow edema, and distribution does not follow expected pattern for edema. Longer arrow indicates bone marrow edema in contralateral heel.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3E —9-year-old boy with deep pansclerotic disabling morphea (same patient as in Figure 1A, 1B). After IV administration of gadolinium, moderate to intense enhancement is seen in involved bone marrow of femoral (not shown) and tibial bone (small arrow) as well as in left heel bone (large arrow).

 
After skin induration and contractures, malalignment of the fingers and toes occurs, as shown on radiographs (Fig. 4A) or MR images. Mild joint and tendon sheath synovitis is usually found in these patients and can be well documented on MRI (Figs. 4B, 4C, and 5). Despite generalized synovial inflammation, bone erosions are not expected in patients with morphea. Synovial enhancement and thickening is less aggressive than other rheumatic and connective tissue disorders. Cutaneous, muscular, fascial, and even osseous changes are in part reversible in patients with a favorable response to therapy—for example, after chemotherapy with subsequent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (Fig. 6A, 6B).


Figure 11
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —17-year-old girl with generalized morphea. Jaccoud-like deformity of right hand is seen on radiograph. Note decreased periarticular X-ray absorption due to osteopenia. Unlike patients presenting with systemic sclerosis, in patients with morphea acroosteolysis is unusual. Note also flexion contracture of right hand.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —17-year-old girl with generalized morphea. Axial T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 620/17) gadolinium-enhanced image obtained at level of right wrist joint reveals synovitis (short arrow) of distal radioulnar joint and mild tendon sheath synovitis of flexor (long arrow) and especially extensor muscles, including all compartments.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C —17-year-old girl with generalized morphea. Coronal T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 646/17) gadolinium-enhanced image shows mild thickening and synovial enhancement of flexor sheaths (arrows). There were no erosions in hand joints (not shown).

 

Figure 14
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 —43-year-old man with deep morphea (same patient as in Fig. 2A, 2B, 2C). Note tendon sheath synovitis including all compartments of forearm musculature (short and long arrows) as shown on this axial T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 512/11) image. Note intense gadolinium enhancement, especially in tendon sheaths of flexor digitorum muscles (long arrow).

 

Figure 15
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A —9-year-old boy with deep pansclerotic disabling morphea who presented with bone involvement (same patient as in Fig. 1A, 1B). Coronal T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 892/11) gadolinium-enhanced image shows medullar infiltration of right tibial diaphysis (arrows) with inhomogeneous moderate enhancement before therapy.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B —9-year-old boy with deep pansclerotic disabling morphea who presented with bone involvement (same patient as in Fig. 1A, 1B). Coronal T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 531/11) gadolinium-enhanced image shows almost entire resolution of this infiltrate (arrows) after high-dose chemotherapy and subsequent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

 
As with generalized morphea (Fig. 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D, 7E), in deep morphea and its subtypes (subcutaneous morphea, morphea profunda, disabling pansclerotic morphea, and eosinophilic fasciitis), depth of infiltration can be better assessed by imaging techniques (especially MRI) than by clinical inspection because of the impediment of skin induration (Fig. 8A, 8B, 8C). This is especially true in the diagnosis of trunk involvement by morphea. For that reason, signal intensity depends on the degree of disease activity [9].


Figure 17
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A —77-year-old woman with generalized morphea. Axial T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 670/11) gadolinium-enhanced image shows fascial thickening and curvilinear enhancement (arrow) in left thigh and involvement of biceps femoris muscle.

 

Figure 18
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B —77-year-old woman with generalized morphea. Axial T1-weighted fat-suppressed 2D gradient-echo (TR/TE, 130/4.13) gadolinium-enhanced images show linear thickening and reticulation of subcutaneous fatty tissue (arrows), fascial thickening (arrows, B and long arrow, C), and gadolinium enhancement in pelvic region. Lower arrowhead in C indicates collagen septal thickening.

 

Figure 19
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7C —77-year-old woman with generalized morphea. Axial T1-weighted fat-suppressed 2D gradient-echo (TR/TE, 130/4.13) gadolinium-enhanced images show linear thickening and reticulation of subcutaneous fatty tissue (arrows), fascial thickening (arrows, B and long arrow, C), and gadolinium enhancement in pelvic region. Lower arrowhead in C indicates collagen septal thickening.

 

Figure 20
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7D —77-year-old woman with generalized morphea. Axial T1-weighted fat-suppressed 2D gradient-echo (TR/TE, 130/4.76) enhanced image shows strong gadolinium enhancement by involvement of muscular fasciae at torso (arrows). Fascial involvement follows distribution of skin changes in patients with morphea, unlike other diseases that mimic morphea.

 

Figure 21
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7E —77-year-old woman with generalized morphea. Axial T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 708/11) gadolinium-enhanced axial image of left knee joint (arrow). Note also fascial thickening over biceps femoris muscle (arrowhead).

 

Figure 22
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8A —71-year-old woman with deep morphea. Axial STIR (TR/TE, 7,070/70; inversion time, 150 milliseconds) image of right thigh shows increased signal intensity in fascia of biceps femoris muscle and adductor muscles (arrows).

 

Figure 23
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8B —71-year-old woman with deep morphea. On T1-weighted unenhanced spin-echo sequence, these changes are not that obvious.

 

Figure 24
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8C —71-year-old woman with deep morphea. However, axial T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 6,708/10) gadolinium-enhanced image shows strong fascial enhancement resembling eosinophilic fasciitis (arrows). In this particular case, eosinophilic infiltration could not be seen at biopsy, and there was no peripheral eosinophilia.

 
Although fascial thickening is present in most patients with morphea, its extent is more generalized in the eosinophilic fasciitis subtype (Shulman's syndrome), which is characterized also by peripheral eosinophilia, hypergammaglobulinemia, and an elevated sedimentation rate accompanying skin findings of scleroderma (Figs. 9 and 10A, 10B).


Figure 25
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9 —60-year-old woman with eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman's syndrome). Note generalized thickening of skin and intense fascial enhancement on axial T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 670/10) gadolinium-enhanced image, corresponding to locations of T2 signal abnormalities (not shown). Fascial thickening (arrows) is leading MRI feature in this case. Note resemblance to findings in Figure 7D. Muscular involvement, if any, in this disorder is located along superficial and deep fascial layers and superficial muscle fibers adjacent to fascia. There is usually no synovial thickening or enhancement and no tenosynovial abnormality. Bone signal abnormalities do not belong to typical imaging features of this disorder.

 

Figure 26
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10A —67-year-old man with Shulman's syndrome who presented clinically with generalized puckered skin changes and functional disability due to skin tightness. Whole-body STIR image (TR/TE, 7,960/87; inversion time, 150 milliseconds), acquired before institution of steroid therapy in this patient with eosinophilic fasciitis, shows generalized thickening and increased signal of all muscular fasciae. Note also increased signal of subcutaneous tissue.

 

Figure 27
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10B —67-year-old man with Shulman's syndrome who presented clinically with generalized puckered skin changes and functional disability due to skin tightness. Whole-body coronal STIR image (TR/TE, 7,960/87; inversion time, 150 milliseconds) 12 months later shows entire resolution of subcutaneous and fascial thickening and accompanying signal abnormalities. Signal abnormalities in muscle fasciae and subcutaneous tissue parallel those on T1-weighted fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced images (not shown).

 

Differential Diagnoses
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Clinical Features in Generalized...
Histologic Features in...
Imaging Features in Generalized...
Differential Diagnoses
References
 
Conditions that mimic morphea include mainly connective tissue diseases with skin, fascial, and musculature involvement such as systemic sclerosis, which should first be excluded in all patients with localized morphea, and dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, overlapping syndromes, and other forms of fasciitis [10] (Fig. 11A, 11B). Unlike morphea, dermatomyositis is characterized clinically by gradual onset of muscle weakness and radiologically by muscle edema, with progression of the latter to fatty infiltration. Predominance of myositis in the vastus musculature and sparing of the biceps femoris muscle have been noted in patients with dermatomyositis, which is different from the distribution pattern usually found in morphea [11] (Figs. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D, 7E, and 8A, 8B, 8C). Fasciitis is rare and usually mild, whereas osseous infiltration has not been reported. The most characteristic soft-tissue abnormality in dermatomyositis is calcification, which is absent in morphea.


Figure 28
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11A —17-year-old girl with juvenile dermatomyositis. Despite discrete cutaneous lesions (clinically corresponding to specific skin rash) over pelvic region, leading MRI finding in this patient is abnormally increased T2 signal (arrows, A) in musculature as shown on these axial STIR (TR/TE, 7,390/87; inversion time, 150 milliseconds) (A) and coronal STIR (TR/TE, 9,760/87; inversion time, 150 milliseconds) (B) images. Short arrow in A indicates increased signal in psoas and iliacus muscles due to myositis. Long arrow therefore indicates only moderate involvement of gluteus medius muscle. Arrows in B indicate signal enhancement in upper girdle musculature, thigh, and calf. Similar findings are seen in patients with polymyositis. Contrary to morphea, polymyositis and dermatomyositis have more symmetric distribution, initially involving proximal lower limb girdle and progressing to involve proximal upper limb girdle, neck flexors, and pharyngeal muscles. Patients with juvenile dermatomyositis develop calcinosis later in course of disease (not shown). In patients with morphea, muscular abnormalities are confined only to muscle groups lying below typical skin lesions.

 

Figure 29
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11B —17-year-old girl with juvenile dermatomyositis. Despite discrete cutaneous lesions (clinically corresponding to specific skin rash) over pelvic region, leading MRI finding in this patient is abnormally increased T2 signal (arrows, A) in musculature as shown on these axial STIR (TR/TE, 7,390/87; inversion time, 150 milliseconds) (A) and coronal STIR (TR/TE, 9,760/87; inversion time, 150 milliseconds) (B) images. Short arrow in A indicates increased signal in psoas and iliacus muscles due to myositis. Long arrow therefore indicates only moderate involvement of gluteus medius muscle. Arrows in B indicate signal enhancement in upper girdle musculature, thigh, and calf. Similar findings are seen in patients with polymyositis. Contrary to morphea, polymyositis and dermatomyositis have more symmetric distribution, initially involving proximal lower limb girdle and progressing to involve proximal upper limb girdle, neck flexors, and pharyngeal muscles. Patients with juvenile dermatomyositis develop calcinosis later in course of disease (not shown). In patients with morphea, muscular abnormalities are confined only to muscle groups lying below typical skin lesions.

 
Rarer differential diagnoses are pseudo-scleroderma related to inflammatory syndromes induced by toxins, drugs, radiation, silicon, or paraffin implants and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the skin. Fasciitis in chronic GVHD shares many clinicopathologic features with morphea, including skin edema, induration, fascial thickening, and myopathy, but the clinical setting makes differentiation easy [12, 13] (Fig. 12). Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis has recently been described, and this disorder should also now be included among the differential diagnoses of morphea [14].


Figure 30
View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12 —59-year-old man with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia. Skin thickening and induration (arrows) were obvious in this patient; however, note also fascial thickening and markedly increased enhancement in thigh musculature as shown on this axial T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (TR/TE, 691/13) gadolinium-enhanced image. Note striking resemblance to Figure 7A, representing morphea. MRI findings are almost similar in patients with GVHD and morphea; therefore, differentiation by means of imaging alone is not possible. Nevertheless, clinical setting is usually different, and both disorders have low prevalence.

 
Bone marrow abnormalities mimicking those in morphea are expected mainly in patients with venous stasis, chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis, shin splint, or diverse hematologic disorders (e.g., lymphoma).

Various therapeutic techniques have been reported, but controlled trials are rare. In patients showing no depth of infiltration, improvement can be achieved by both psoralen ultraviolet A-range photochemotherapy and ultraviolet A-1 (narrowband ultraviolet radiation) therapy. However, fascial, muscular, and osseous involvement generally requires systemic therapy (e.g., steroids in eosinophilic fasciitis). Immunosuppressive therapies such as oral corticosteroids or methotrexate can be helpful in the inflammatory stage. Therefore, imaging diagnosis is beneficial for the complete assessment of the extent of disease, including depth of infiltration and disease activity, and might also serve as a marker for appropriate response to therapy [9].


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Clinical Features in Generalized...
Histologic Features in...
Imaging Features in Generalized...
Differential Diagnoses
References
 

  1. Takehara K, Sato S. Review: localized scleroderma is an autoimmune disorder. Rheumatology 2005;44 : 274-279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Dehen L, Roujeau JC, Cosnes A, et al. Internal involvement in localized scleroderma. Medicine (Baltimore)1994; 73:241 -245[Medline]
  3. Sato S, Fujimoto M, Ihn H, et al. Clinical characteristics associated with antihistone antibodies in patients with localized scleroderma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31 : 567-571[Medline]
  4. Peterson LS, Nelson AM, Su WPD. Classification of morphea (localized scleroderma). Mayo Clin Proc1995; 70:1068 -1076[Abstract]
  5. Devidayal, Singh S, Kumar L, Radotra BD. Disabling pansclerotic morphea of childhood and hypogammaglobulinemia: a curious association. Rheumatol Int 2002;21 : 158-160[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Doede T, Wollina U, Hindermann W, et al. Pansclerotic morphea in childhood: a case report. Pediatr Surg Int2003; 19:406 -408[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Stücker M, Schreiber D, Gruss C, et al. Schwerer Verlauf einer mutilierenden pansklerotischen zirkumskripten Sklerodermie im Kindesalter. Hautarzt 1999; 50:131 -135[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Zulian F, Athreya BH, Nelson AM, et al. Juvenile localized scleroderma: clinical and epidemiological features in 750 children—an international study. Rheumatology 2006;45 : 614-620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Moulton SJ, Kransdorf MJ, Ginsburg WW, et al. Eosinophilic fasciitis: spectrum of MRI findings. AJR2005; 184:975 -978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Al Attia HM, Ezzeddin H, Khader T, Aref MAS. A localized morphea/idiopathic polymyositis overlap. Clin Rheumatol 1996; 15:307 -309[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Park JH, Vansant JP, Kumar NG, et al. Dermatomyositis: correlative MR imaging and P-31 MR spectroscopy for quantitative characterization of inflammatory disease. Radiology 1990;177 : 473-479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Janin A, Socie G, Devergie A, et al. Fasciitis in chronic graft-versus-host disease: a clinicopathologic study of 14 cases. Ann Intern Med 1994;120 : 993-998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Urbano-Marquez A, Estruch R, Grau MJ, et al. Inflammatory myopathia associated with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Neurology 1986;36 : 1091-1093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Broome DR, Girguis MS, Baron BW, et al. Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. AJR 2007; 188:586 -592[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS