The following table or figure may be downloaded to PowerPoint for personal use in teaching and presentations. This feature is available to all subscribers to the journal.
You MUST read and follow the guidelines at Request to Reproduce AJR Content if you are distributing or using AJR content beyond academic use (limited distribution, non-revenue producing, or educational purposes).
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.
Fig. 3 —Cumulative percentage of radiologists who interpret within
each volume category and cumulative percentage of mammograms interpreted by
volume category, stratified by urban and rural locations. Ninety percent of
rural radiologists (point a) versus 70% of urban radiologists
(point b) read < 2,000 mammograms annually. In urban locations,
cutoff of 2,000 mammograms would result in 42% of mammograms (point
c) needing to be redistributed to high-volume radiologists if low-volume
radiologists stopped interpreting mammograms. In rural locations, this cutoff
would mean that majority of mammograms (63%, point d) would have to
be redistributed to high-volume radiologists.
