AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fan, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fan, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2763
AJR 2008; 190:748-754
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Identification and Quantification of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques: A Comparison of 64-MDCT and Intravascular Ultrasound

Junyan Sun1, Zhaoqi Zhang1, Biao Lu1, Wei Yu1, Ya Yang2, Yujie Zhou3, Yanhui Wang1 and Zhanming Fan1

1 Department of Radiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, An Ding Men Wai An Zhen Li, Chao Yang District, 100029, Beijing, China.
2 Department of Ultrasound, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
3 Department of Cardiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Received June 21, 2007; accepted after revision September 13, 2007.

 
Supported in part by the Wards of Cardiology in An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University.

Address correspondence to Z. Zhang (zhaoqi5000{at}vip.sohu.com).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of 64-MDCT with that of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for the identification and quantitative analysis of coronary atherosclerotic plaques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-six patients (17 men, nine women; mean age, 56 years) with suspected coronary atherosclerotic disease were studied using contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT and IVUS. The coronary arteries were divided into 10-mm segments and vascular cross-sectional area (CSA), luminal CSA, and plaque burden were measured in each segment. Plaque analysis software was used to automatically detect both plaques and vessel walls on CT images. Two investigators who were blinded to IVUS results independently determined the presence, classification, and quantitative measurement of atherosclerotic plaques on the CT images, which were then compared with the IVUS images.

RESULTS. Of 40 coronary arteries, 247 of 263 segments were imaged and analyzed by both contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT and IVUS. Sixteen segments were ruled out because of poor CT image quality. Compared with IVUS, 64-MDCT enabled correct detection in 86 of 89 (96.6%) segments containing noncalcified plaques, 25 of 27 (92.6%) segments containing calcified plaques, and 118 of 131 (90.1%) segments without atherosclerotic plaques. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the detection of plaques by 64-MDCT were 97.4%, 90.1%, 89.7%, and 97.5%, respectively. Plaque analysis software using predetermined Hounsfield unit ranges for different components of plaque was able to distinguish between fibrous, fibrous-soft, and calcified plaques to a significant degree, but was less able to distinguish between soft and fibrous, and between soft and fibrous-soft plaque. Cohen's kappa coefficient for the sole detection of atherosclerotic segments by observers was 0.91. The correlation coefficients to determine vascular CSA, luminal CSA, and plaque burden were r = 0.85, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION. Compared with IVUS, contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT has a good ability to identify and quantify coronary atherosclerotic plaques. However, the reliable differentiation of the composition of noncalcified plaques is still limited.

Keywords: atherosclerotic plaque • coronary artery • intravascular ultrasound • MDCT


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Detection, characterization, and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque can improve individualized risk stratification. Invasive coronary angiography, the clinical gold standard for assessing coronary arteries, provides excellent data regarding luminal size but is limited to detection of plaques in remodeling vessels and is not useful for the evaluation of wall thickness or plaque composition. Instead, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is considered an accurate method for visualizing the wall of the coronary artery [1]. However, IVUS is invasive and expensive and is unsuited for routine applications related to risk stratification. MDCT is a rapid, noninvasive imaging technique capable of providing high-resolution images for the assessment of the coronary arteries. Several studies using 16-and, more recently, 64-MDCT scanners have confirmed the ability of this technique to detect both calcified and noncalcified coronary artery plaques [2, 3]. In addition, once they are detected, it may be clinically important to determine the components of individual plaques and to measure the overall plaque burden. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of 64-MDCT, using new plaque analysis software, for the identification, classification, and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques compared with IVUS.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
From July 2006 to February 2007, 26 consecutive patients (17 men, nine women; mean age, 56 years) with coronary atherosclerotic disease underwent 64-MDCT and IVUS. Eleven patients had acute coronary syndrome and 15 patients had stable angina. All patients had abnormal ECG results. Coronary risk was assessed using the Framingham database [4]. The Framingham risk score of these patients ranged from 12 to 17 (average, 14.7). CT was performed within 3 days before or after the catheterization procedure. Patients with arrhythmias, previous bypass surgery, unstable clinical presentation, and contraindications to iodinated contrast media were excluded from enrollment. The institutional ethics committee approved the research protocols, and all patients gave informed consent.

64-MDCT Technique
Patients with heart rates greater than 70 beats per minute received 25–50 mg of metoprolol orally 60 minutes before MDCT (Aquilion 64, Toshiba). MDCT data were acquired using an X-ray beam collimation width of 32 mm (0.5-mm slice thickness x 64 rows) with the spatial resolution in x-, y-, and z-axes of 0.35 mm, a gantry rotation of 400 milliseconds, a pitch of 11.2–13.2, an electric current of 350–450 mAs, and a tube voltage of 120–135 kV (depending on patient size).

Contrast medium (70–85 mL, 370 mg I/mL, depending on patient size) was injected IV at 4 mL/s followed by a 40-mL saline flush at the same injection rate. The CT value of the area of interest in the ascending aorta was monitored from the start of the injection. As soon as the CT value in the ascending aorta reached 130–150 H, scanning was manually initiated, and imaging of the entire volume of the heart was acquired during one breath-hold with simultaneous recording of the ECG tracing.

Axial images (slice thickness, 0.5 mm; increment, 0.3 mm) were reconstructed using a multisector reconstruction algorithm. Using retrospective ECG gating, we routinely performed reconstructions at 75% of the R-R interval. If motion artifacts existed at these reconstructions, another, more optimal ECG phase was chosen to provide better image quality.

64-MDCT Image Analysis
The baseline axial images were postprocessed and analyzed by plaque analysis software (Sure Plaque, Toshiba) at the workstation (HP XW8200, Hewlett-Packard). The software detected both plaques and vessel walls on CT images. Different CT density ranges hypothesized to represent different components of plaque were displayed with various colors. Specifically, the lipid composition (range, –100 to 29 H) was represented by red; fibrous composition (range, 30–189 H) was represented by blue; calcification (range, 350–1,000 H) was represented by yellow; lumen (range, 190–349 H) was represented by green; and vessel wall (range, 30–189 H; same range as for fibrous composition) was represented by luteous. The Hounsfield unit ranges for plaque were preset by software and could be manually altered by the operator. The ranges should be adjusted slightly to avoid the influence of lumen density and obtain more accurate quantitative measurements. The mean density in the contrast-enhanced lumen of the proximal coronary artery (American Heart Association [AHA] segments 1, 5, 6, and 11) and the Hounsfield unit range of the vessel wall, adjusted to equal the IVUS image in size, were recorded. The results of this analysis revealed that when the average intensity in the lumen of the proximal artery is > 380 H, the optimal setting to detect plaque and the outer vessel boundaries is obtained at the CT vessel wall range of 30–189 H; however, when the average intensity of the proximal lumen is < 380 H, a CT vessel wall range of 20–179 H is optimal.

For comparisons with IVUS, the target coronary arteries were divided into 10-mm segments from the ostium or onset [2, 3]. Segments with artifacts or blur images were excluded. Plaque qualitative analysis included determinations of the presence and classification of plaque in each coronary segment. Atherosclerotic plaques were considered present when the vessel wall thickness exceeded 0.5 mm. Each plaque was classified according to the color displayed by the software. Plaques displayed as red or green were classified as noncalcified plaque. Plaques with yellow present were defined as calcified plaque without considering the calcified size. Luminal cross-sectional area (CSA) (mm2), vascular CSA—that is, external elastic membrane CSA in IVUS—and plaque burden (%) (defined as external elastic membrane CSA minus the luminal CSA and then divided by the external elastic membrane CSA again) were measured in each 10-mm interval cross section. Two investigators blinded to the IVUS results who were not involved in the later comparative analysis, performed these analyses independently [5].

64-MDCT Density Measurements
Five well-distributed regions of interest (ROIs), each with a 1 mm2 area, were selected in each plaque. The CT density of each ROI area was measured and recorded. The mean density was calculated by averaging the density measurements. Density measurements for calcification were performed only in hyperdense parts of the calcified plaques. To obtain accurate and complete density of noncalcified plaques, entire plaques were measured instead of hypodense tissue areas only [2]. Densities of different types (soft, fibrous, and fibrous-soft plaques) of noncalcified plaques corresponding to IVUS detection were retrospectively calculated.

Intravascular Ultrasound
IVUS was performed as part of the invasive diagnostic procedure. After coronary angiography, the patients were given intracoronary administration of 0.2 mg of nitroglycerin before introduction of the IVUS catheter. A Volcano Eagle Eye IVUS catheter (20-MHz, electronic transducer, Volcano) was used. The ultrasound catheter was positioned sufficiently distal (30 mm distal) to the targeted site, and motorized pullback at a speed of 0.5 mm/s was used.

The IVUS data were stored digitally and assessed offline by the software configuration of the IVUS system. As with MDCT, 10-mm segments were analyzed. The external elastic membrane CSA, equal to the vascular CSA in CT analysis, luminal CSA, and plaque burden were calculated by software after the borders of vessel intima and adventitia were depicted manually in each detectable cross section. These quantitative measurements were performed in accordance with the IVUS interpretation recommendations of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) [1]. According to the ACC recommendations, atherosclerotic plaques were defined as lesions located between the media and the intima with a thickness of at least 0.5 mm. Calcified plaques were defined as plaque tissue containing any tissue with an echogenicity as bright as, or brighter than, the adventitia causing acoustic shadows. Noncalcified plaques were defined as plaque tissue without acoustic shadows, including soft (hypoechoic) plaques, defined as plaque tissue revealing an echogenicity lower than the adventitia, and fibrous (hyperechoic) plaques, having an echogenicity as bright as, or brighter than, the adventitia. Plaques containing more than one acoustical subtype were considered mixed plaques. Fibrous-soft plaques were defined as plaques in which hypoechoic and hyperechoic lesion occupied approximately 50% of the plaque area, respectively, Two investigators, blinded to the CT results, independently determined the presence, classification, and quantitative measurement of athero-sclerotic plaque in IVUS images.

Comparison of IVUS Versus 64-MDCT
In this study, both 64-MDCT and IVUS were performed in 40 coronary arteries with moderate (50–75%) to significant (> 75%) coronary artery stenoses on conventional angiography, including three right coronary arteries (RCA), 14 left main arteries (LMA), 20 left anterior descending arteries (LAD), and three left circumflex arteries (LCX). Coronary atherosclerotic plaques often involve a large segment or the entire coronary vessel; therefore, the target coronary trees were divided into 10-mm segments on the basis of their distance to the ostium [2, 6]. The complete distance of the target artery from the distal reference point to the coronary ostium was measured using the longitudinally reconstructed IVUS data set and multiplanar reconstructions of the CT data set. Furthermore, we selected fiduciary points, such as side branches, characteristic calcifications, or stents, to ensure that the same corresponding coronary sections were compared. Each segment was morphologically classified according to IVUS and CT criteria. Noncalcified plaques defined by CT images included the soft, fibrous, and fibrous-soft plaques in IVUS; and calcified plaques defined by CT images were equal to the ones in IVUS, including fibrous calcified plaques. The comparison between 64-MDCT and IVUS was on a segmental basis for qualitative analysis and on a site-by-site basis for quantitative analysis. A measurement discrepancy of 1 mm per vessel section was tolerated.

Statistical Analysis
Sensitivity and specificity of MDCT for detection of any plaque were calculated on a segment-per-segment basis. Cohen's kappa statistic was calculated to determine interobserver agreement in detecting plaque. The interobserver variability for 64-MDCT quantitative measurements was calculated [3]. To compare the mean density values of different plaque types, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used. For comparison of the external elastic membrane CSA, luminal CSA, and plaque burden obtained by 64-MDCT and IVUS, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was determined. The paired Student's t test was used to test for potential differences between those parameters obtained by both methods. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All calculations were performed using the SPSS13 software package (SPSS).


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
No patients were excluded because of reduced MDCT image quality in this study. Of 40 coronary arteries, 247 of 263 segments were imaged by both contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT and IVUS. Sixteen segments were ruled out due to poor CT image quality. Nine sections with large or circular calcifications were excluded from quantitative analysis because of partial volume effects that made it impossible to measure the lumen. Table 1 shows that, compared with IVUS, 64-MDCT enabled a correct detection in 86 of 89 (96.6%) segments containing noncalcified plaques and 25 of 27 (92.6%) segments containing calcified plaques. In 118 of 131 (90.1%) segments, atherosclerotic lesions were correctly excluded. Eighteen of 247 segments were incorrectly classified: 13 were classified as normal by IVUS but misclassified as containing noncalcified plaque by CT; three classified as noncalcified plaque by IVUS were misclassified by CT as normal; and two containing small and superficial calcifications were misclassified as containing noncalcified plaque by CT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the detection of any plaque by 64-MDCT were 97.4%, 90.1%, 89.7%, and 97.5%, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Comparison of 64-MDCT and Intravascular Ultrasound for Detecting and Differentiating Coronary Plaque

 


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Box plot of CT density values for soft, fibrous, fibrous-soft, and calcified plaques. Differences of mean CT density values between calcified and remaining three categories of plaques were significant (p = 0.000, 0.000, and 0.000, respectively; p < 0.017). Difference between fibrous and fibrous-soft was significant (p = 0.004 [by statistical software], p < 0.017 [by Kruskal-Wallis test]). Differences between soft and fibrous, and between soft and fibrous-soft, were not significant (p = 0.030 and 0.317, respectively), with p > 0.017 (corrected value of Kruskal-Wallis test).

 
In 64-MDCT, mean contrast enhancement in the coronary lumen was 398 ± 74 H in normal proximal segments (AHA 1, 5, 6, and 11). The mean CT density values for soft (hypoechoic), fibrous (hyperechoic), fibrous-soft, and calcified plaques were 79 ± 34 H (range, 7–149 H), 90 ± 27 H (range, 22–154 H), 72 ± 36 H (range, 3–152 H), and 772 ± 251 H (range, 295–1,325 H), respectively (Fig. 1). The differences of the mean CT density values between fibrous, fibrous-soft, and calcified plaques were significant, with a p value < 0.01; however, the differences between soft and fibrous, and between soft and fibrous-soft, were not significant. Use of 64-MDCT enabled the visualization of lipid pools (hypodense spots) in three of five (60%) segments; and in these lipid pools, the hypodense area was at least 50 H less than the highest value of surrounding noncalcified plaque (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F and 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E). Fourteen segments that were homogeneous and hypo- or hyperechoic on IVUS were identified as hypodense areas on 64-MDCT, and all had a difference in CT density of less than 50 H.


Figure 2
View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 48-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Invasive angiogram shows stenosis (arrow) of left main artery (LMA) and indicates noncalcified lesion.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 48-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Curved multiplanar reconstructed image of 64-MDCT shows noncalcified plaque (arrow) in LMA. Red line created by software indicates length and each 10-mm segment of LMA. LV = left ventricle.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C 48-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Another curved multiplanar reconstructed CT image of LMA shows same noncalcified plaque (arrow) and quantitative results of plaque measured by software. LV = left ventricle.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D 48-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Cross section obtained by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) indicates fibrous area (hyperechoic, thick arrow) and lipid-rich area (hypoechoic, thin arrow). External elastic membrane area is 28.9 mm2 and luminal area is 5.9 mm2.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2E 48-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Cross-sectional view of noncalcified plaque obtained by 64-MDCT shows eccentric noncalcified plaque (straight arrow). Area of higher contrast enhancement is vessel lumen (curved arrow).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2F 48-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Same cross-sectional view of noncalcified plaque with color obtained by CT software. Red area indicates lipid-rich area (hypodensity, thin arrow) and blue area indicates fibrous area (hyperdensity, thick straight arrow). Green indicates contrast-enhanced vessel lumen (curved arrow). Vascular area is 30.5 mm2 and luminal area is 5.3 mm2.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 69-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Curved multiplanar reconstructed 64-MDCT image shows plaque containing spotty calcification (thin arrow) in left main artery (LMA) and a stent (thick arrow) in left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. LV = left ventricle.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 69-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Another curved multiplanar reconstructed 64-MDCT image shows same plaque (thin arrow) and stent (thick arrow). LAD = left anterior descending artery, LV = left ventricle.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C 69-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Cross-sectional view of same plaque obtained by 64-MDCT shows spotty calcium with hyperdensity (straight arrow) cannot be differentiated from contrast-enhanced vessel lumen (curved arrow).

 

Figure 11
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D 69-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Same cross-sectional view of calcified plaque obtained by software with color. Red area indicates lipid-rich or lipid pool area (hypodensity, thin arrow) and blue area indicates fibrous area (hyperdensity). Yellow indicates calcification (thick straight arrow) in this plaque. Green indicates contrast-enhanced vessel lumen (curved arrow).

 

Figure 12
View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3E 69-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Intravascular ultrasound cross section of same plaque indicates lipid-rich or lipid pool (hyperechoic and echolucent, thin arrow) and spotty calcification (hyperechoic with shadow, thick arrow).

 

The Spearman's rank correlation coefficients of vascular CSA (external elastic membrane CSA), luminal CSA, and plaque burden determined by 64-MDCT and IVUS were r = 0.85, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively (p < 0.01; Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C). The paired Student's t test showed that luminal CSA was underestimated by 64-MDCT (5.81 ± 3.32 mm2 vs 6.32 ± 3.04 mm2; p < 0.01). External elastic membrane CSA and plaque burden were overestimated by 64-MDCT (17.02 ± 5.79 mm2 vs 16.07 ±6.30 mm2 and 61.02% ± 16.02% vs 56.25% ± 16.07%, respectively; p < 0.05). The interobserver variability for plaque quantitative measurements by 64-MDCT was 12%. Cohen's kappa coefficient for the sole detection of atherosclerotic segments was 0.91, indicating good agreement.


Figure 13
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A Correlation of findings of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Graphs show vascular cross-sectional area (CSA) (external elastic membrane CSA) (A), luminal CSA (B), and plaque burden (C) per section determined on 64-MDCT versus IVUS. Spearman's correlation coefficients are r = 0.85, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively (p < 0.01).

 

Figure 14
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B Correlation of findings of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Graphs show vascular cross-sectional area (CSA) (external elastic membrane CSA) (A), luminal CSA (B), and plaque burden (C) per section determined on 64-MDCT versus IVUS. Spearman's correlation coefficients are r = 0.85, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively (p < 0.01).

 

Figure 15
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C Correlation of findings of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Graphs show vascular cross-sectional area (CSA) (external elastic membrane CSA) (A), luminal CSA (B), and plaque burden (C) per section determined on 64-MDCT versus IVUS. Spearman's correlation coefficients are r = 0.85, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively (p < 0.01).

 

Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Several studies using 16-MDCT scanners have confirmed the ability to detect noncalcified and calcified coronary artery plaques [2, 3]. The improved spatial and temporal resolution of 64-MDCT has facilitated evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques in coronary arteries. Achenbach et al. [7] reported a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 87% for the detection of noncalcified plaque in coronary artery segments by 16-MDCT. Leber et al. [5] found a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 91% in the detection of proximal coronary plaques by 64-MDCT. Our studyshowed excellent sensitivity (97.4%) and specificity (90.1%) of 64-MDCT for detection of coronary plaques and a sensitivity of 96.6% for noncalcified plaque in coronary arteries without considering degree of stenosis, representing a significantly increased accuracy compared with several previously reported studies.

Better results obtained in our study depended not only on high spatial and temporal resolution of 64-MDCT but also on the application of plaque analysis software. This semiautomatic tool can accurately detect plaque compared with IVUS and can also distinguish between calcified and noncalcified plaque. The morphology of coronary plaques could be visualized and quantified. Software assessment allowed detailed investigation of plaques by color-coding on preset Hounsfield unit ranges. Hence, contrast-enhanced lumen, vessel wall, and even plaque composition (soft, fibrous, or calcified) could be depicted in different colors according to their corresponding CT Hounsfield unit ranges. Furthermore, this software was able to describe plaque morphology more clearly and to perform quantitative analysis of plaque. Note that the lumen and vessel wall of coronary arteries had no obvious border on CT images because of limited spatial resolution and because of smaller vascular sections compared with the carotid and aortic arteries. Thus, software could provide more rapid and accurate detection of plaques by CT range settings than by a manual method of depicting the inner and outer borders of the vessel wall; the software was also less observer-dependent than manual adjustments of window and level [3, 8].

Noncalcified plaque may be more unstable and prone to rupture than calcified plaque. Recent studies have shown that CT can identify noncalcified plaques in the coronary arteries in vivo [911]; moreover, CT features of noncalcified and calcified plaques correlate well with histopathologic stages of atherosclerosis [12]. Research by Ehara et al. [13] suggested that spotty distribution of calcium is of greater predictive value for acute coronary syndromes than the overall quantity. Twenty-five of 27 (92.6%) calcified plaques were found in our study, which missed two plaques containing small calcifications. Such high sensitivity for the detection of calcium with 64-MDCT is helpful for risk stratification in patients with coronary atherosclerotic disease.

CT density of plaque correlates with echogenicity of IVUS, and CT attenuation reflects major plaque composition. 64-MDCT can assess the thickness of the athero-sclerotic wall directly and can identify a large lipid core, superficial calcified nodules, and outward remodeling as morphology characteristics of vulnerable plaque [1316]. Granted, improving CT detection of plaque with automated software is progress toward understanding plaque composition and its natural history. However, it is many steps away from identifying the high-risk "vulnerable" plaque.

Lipid-rich, fibrous, and calcified plaques displayed different CT densities and can be reliably differentiated. In our results, the mean CT density values for soft, fibrous, and calcified plaques were 72 ± 36 H, 90 ± 27 H, and 772 ± 251 H, respectively. Similar investigations showed these values to be 14 ± 26 H, 91 ± 21 H, and 419 ± 194 H, respectively [8], and 49 ± 22 H, 91 ± 22 H, and 391 ± 156 H [2]. However, it remains difficult to determine the definite composition of individual noncalcified plaques, even if there is a significant difference in CT Hounsfield units among components. For example, hypodense areas in plaque could represent various tissue types, including lipid pool, less dense fibrous tissue, neovascularized areas, and thrombus. Moreover, in our study, CT found some noncalcified plaques with homogeneous echogenicity in IVUS that showed inhomogeneous density on CT, detected lipid pools (hypodense spots) in three of five (60%) segments, and could not discriminate the fibrous cap. Therefore, the accuracy for identifying noncalcified plaque components such as lipid-rich (soft) or fibrotic components remains low [17, 18].

The mean CT density values measured in our study were higher than those of other studies [2, 8]. The reason may be that the concentration of contrast material we used (370 mg I/mL) was higher than that used in other studies (300 or 350 mg I/mL). With 370 mg I/mL, we obtained a mean contrast enhancement in the coronary lumen of normal proximal segments of 398 ± 74 H, higher than the 343 ± 55 H measured by Achenbach et al. [7] using 350 mg I/mL contrast medium. It was assumed that plaque density is partly influenced by contrast enhancement in the coronary lumen; the CT densities of smaller and soft plaques were often elevated by greater enhancement in the lumen.

A significant trend was seen to underestimate luminal CSA and overestimate plaque burden. However, this study was designed to determine the accuracy of 64-MDCT without excluding significant stenosis. Significant stenosis causes decreased contrast enhancement of the lumen in corresponding segments. If we analyze proximal coronary arteries without significant stenosis, it is possible that better correlation between IVUS and CT would be obtained.

Sure Plaque software has the following technical limitations. First, the maximum number of images on which Sure Plaque software can be performed is only 512. Second, the z-direction size is less than the x, y-direction size. There are no standard recommendations for absolute density results of Sure Plaque tools. It is difficult to further differentiate or classify the noncalcified plaque because of the overlap of CT values of different composition in noncalcified plaque. Several limitations are also inherent in contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT itself, including restrictions of its spatial and temporal resolution [2, 19, 20]. Partial volume effects caused by large coronary calcifications and lumen contrast enhancement are frequently considered to be false-positive and false-negative results. Furthermore, contrast enhancement of the lumen may overlap, and thus conceal, superficial and smaller areas of calcium with 64-MDCT.

In summary, 64-MDCT is a useful noninvasive method and has good ability to detect, differentiate, and quantify coronary athero-sclerotic plaques. It may be used to improve risk stratification in patients with suspected or known coronary atherosclerotic disease and to monitor progression or regression of coronary atherosclerosis. However, the reliable differentiation of the composition of individual noncalcified plaques is still limited.


Acknowledgments
 
We are indebted to the medical and technical staff members of the CT and ultrasound departments for their invaluable contribution, and in particular to Yike Zhao, Hong Jiang, Haixia Yang, and Yanhong Wang for their expert technical assistance.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS): a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37 :1478 –1492[Free Full Text]
  2. Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A, et al. Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43 :1241 –1247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:672 –677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pearson TA. New tools for coronary risk assessment: what are their advantages and limitations? Circulation2002; 105:886 –892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Leber AW, Knez A, Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46 : 147–154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Adamzik M, et al. Comparison of electron-beam computed tomography and intracoronary ultrasound in detecting calcified and noncalcified plaques in patients with acute coronary syndromes and no or minimal to moderate angiographic coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1998;81 : 141–146[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation2004; 109:14 –17[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A, et al. Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37 :1430 –1435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Budoff MJ, Cohen MC, Garcia MJ, et al. ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46 : 383–402[Free Full Text]
  10. Nikolaou K, Sagmeister S, Knez A, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography of the coronary arteries: predictive value and quantitative assessment of non-calcified vessel-wall changes. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:2505 –2512[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Kopp AF, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the prevalence of noncalcified atherosclerotic plaques by multi-slice detector computed tomography: results of a pilot study. Int J Cardiol 2003; 92:151 –155[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Becker CR, Nikolaou K, Muders M, et al. Ex vivo coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization with multi-detector-row CT. Eur Radiol 2003;13 :2094 –2098[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Ehara S, Kobayashi Y, Yoshiyama M, et al. Spotty calcification typifies the culprit plaque in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation2004; 110:3424 –3429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Nieman K, van der Lugt A, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ. Noninvasive visualization of athero-sclerotic plaque with electron beam and multislice spiral computed tomography. J Interv Cardiol2003; 16:123 –128[Medline]
  15. Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Litovsky S, Willerson JT, Casscells W. Finding vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques: is it worth the effort? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24 :1775 –1782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Chen JW, Wasserman BA. Vulnerable plaque imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005;15 : 609–621[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Wojak T, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of atherosclerosis with contrast enhanced 16 slice spiral computed tomography: results of ex vivo investigations. Heart2004; 90:1471 –1475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Nikolaou K, Becker CR, Muders M, et al. Multi-detector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic lesions in human ex vivo coronary arteries. Atherosclerosis2004; 174:243 –252[Medline]
  19. Kuettner A, Trabold T, Schroeder S, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:1230 –1237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation2003; 107:664 –666[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Bastarrika, Y. S. Lee, W. Huda, B. Ruzsics, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
CT of Coronary Artery Disease
Radiology, November 1, 2009; 253(2): 317 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H BRODOEFEL, C BURGSTAHLER, M HEUSCHMID, A REIMANN, F KHOSA, A KOPP, S SCHROEDER, C D CLAUSSEN, and M E CLOUSE
Accuracy of dual-source CT in the characterisation of non-calcified plaque: use of a colour-coded analysis compared with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2009; 82(982): 805 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. W. Bauer, C. Thilo, S. A. Chiaramida, T. J. Vogl, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
Noncalcified Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden at Coronary CT Angiography: A Better Predictor of Ischemia at Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Than Calcium Score and Stenosis Severity
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2009; 193(2): 410 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
F F Faletra, C Klersy, I D'Angeli, M Penco, V Procaccini, E Pasotti, A Marcolongo, G B Pedrazzini, S De Castro, M Scappaticci, et al.
Relation between coronary atherosclerotic plaques and traditional risk factors in people with no history of cardiovascular disease undergoing multi-detector computed coronary angiography
Heart, August 1, 2009; 95(15): 1265 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Brodoefel, C. Burgstahler, A. Sabir, C.-S. Yam, F. Khosa, C. D. Claussen, and M. E. Clouse
Coronary Plaque Quantification by Voxel Analysis: Dual-Source MDCT Angiography Versus Intravascular Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): W84 - W89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, P. A. Araoz, and E. E. Williamson
The year in cardiac imaging.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 6, 2009; 53(1): 54 - 70.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
S. Achenbach
Quantification of coronary artery stenoses by computed tomography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 472 - 474.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fan, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fan, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS