AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Costa, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Rofsky, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Costa, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Rofsky, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3182
AJR 2008; 190:1076-1084
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

Body MRI Using IDEAL

Daniel N. Costa1,2, Ivan Pedrosa1, Charles McKenzie1,3, Scott B. Reeder4 and Neil M. Rofsky1

1 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
2 Present address: Departmento de Radiologia, Hospital Sirio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91, São Paulo – SP, Brazil 01308-050.
3 Present address: Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
4 Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

Received September 18, 2007; accepted after revision October 29, 2007.

 
N. M. Rofsky provides research support for GE Healthcare.

Address correspondence to D. N. Costa (dnobrega{at}gmail.com).

CME

This article is available for CME credit. See www.arrs.org for more information.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
The IDEAL Technique
Conclusion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The intrinsic differences of water and fat protons in the MR environment allow selective interrogation of their contribution to the MR signal. Fat-suppression techniques and chemical shift imaging are routinely used in clinical body MRI. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) is a novel imaging technique for separating fat and water.

CONCLUSION. This article describes the basic principles of IDEAL MRI and illustrates the use of IDEAL imaging as an alternative to fat-suppression techniques and chemical shift imaging for body MRI.

Keywords: body imaging • chemical shift • fat suppression • iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) • MRI


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
The IDEAL Technique
Conclusion
References
 
Fat suppression is a generic term referring to a variety of strategies designed to eliminate the sig nal from lipids. Fat-suppression techniques are routine in body MRI to accurately characterize adipose tissue, to mini mize chemical shift misregistration artifacts, and to expand the dynamic range of the MR images for better depiction of pathology on T2-weighted images and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. To date, the most commonly used MRI techniques for fat suppression include frequency-selective fat saturation, inversion recovery, water excitation, or a combination of these techniques [1].

Limitations of these popular techniques include failed or erroneous signal suppression when local magnetic field (B0) or radiofrequency (B1) inhomogeneities are encountered and the nonspecific suppression of a short T1 signal when it approximates that of fat [2].


The IDEAL Technique
Top
Abstract
Introduction
The IDEAL Technique
Conclusion
References
 
Different MR strategies have been developed over the years to characterize the independent contributions of water and fat protons to the overall MR signal. Chemical shift imaging techniques exploit the differences in precession velocities of fat and water protons to detect small amounts of intravoxel fat, a hallmark of certain disorders such as hepatic steatosis and adrenal adenomas. These imaging techniques are derived from the principles first described by Dixon [3]. They are based on decomposing fat and water proton signals according to their resonant frequency difference, or chemical shift, to isolate these two components into two separate images. By adding and subtracting the two complex images (images with both magnitude and phase information) from in-phase and opposedphase imaging, selective water and fat images are generated [3, 4]. Thus, instead of being a true fat-suppression technique, the Dixon method is a water–fat separation method.

Further modifications in the Dixon technique—for example, those implemented by Glover and Schneider [5] and Reeder et al. [4, 6]—have been proposed to overcome problems secondary to magnetic field inhomogeneities. Such modifications have resulted in the three-point Dixon method and, ultimately, in the so-called iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation, or IDEAL, technique. Instead of collecting just two images with opposed fat and water phases, both of these techniques acquire three images, each with a different relative phase between the water and fat signals. These approaches account for both B0 and B1 magnetic field inhomogeneities, thereby facilitating the fat–water separation process.

In the IDEAL technique, the echo times of the three images are carefully chosen so that the reconstructed fat-only and water-only images have the maximum possible signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [7]. IDEAL is compatible with essentially any pulse sequence, and it has been combined with a wide variety of clinically relevant sequences, including fast spin echo [4] (Figs. 1A, 1B, and 1C), steady-state free precession (SSFP) [8], and T1-weighted spoiled gradient-recalled echo (GRE) [6]. This flexibility in sequence combination provides fat- and water-separated images with any desired contrast, including T2-weighted, T1-weighted, and proton density–weighted images, with motion compensation—that is, respiratory gating (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D)—with either 2D or 3D acquisitions and with the use of contrast media [4].


Figure 1
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 23-year-old woman with inflammatory bowel disease and focal pancreatitis in pancreatic tail. Axial fast spin-echo T2-weighted iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) image (TR/TE, 4,000/90) shows clear transition between normal body of pancreas and edematous pancreatic tail (arrowheads).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 23-year-old woman with inflammatory bowel disease and focal pancreatitis in pancreatic tail. This finding is less conspicuous in corresponding single-shot fast spinecho (643/58) (B) and fast-recovery fast spin-echo (2,200/85) (C) T2-weighted images obtained during same examination.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 23-year-old woman with inflammatory bowel disease and focal pancreatitis in pancreatic tail. This finding is less conspicuous in corresponding single-shot fast spinecho (643/58) (B) and fast-recovery fast spin-echo (2,200/85) (C) T2-weighted images obtained during same examination.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 45-year-old woman with right adrenal myelolipoma. Because patient was unable to hold her breath, this 3D iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) sequence was respiratory-gated Axial gradient-recalled echo T1-weighted IDEAL water-only (A), fat-only (B), in-phase (C), and opposed-phase (D) images are derived from single acquisition (TR/TE, 6.8/2). Note area containing bulk fat (arrow, B) in lesion on fat-only image (B). Opposed-phase image (D) is easily recognized because of "edge artifact" (arrowheads, D) at fat–water interfaces.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 45-year-old woman with right adrenal myelolipoma. Because patient was unable to hold her breath, this 3D iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) sequence was respiratory-gated Axial gradient-recalled echo T1-weighted IDEAL water-only (A), fat-only (B), in-phase (C), and opposed-phase (D) images are derived from single acquisition (TR/TE, 6.8/2). Note area containing bulk fat (arrow, B) in lesion on fat-only image (B). Opposed-phase image (D) is easily recognized because of "edge artifact" (arrowheads, D) at fat–water interfaces.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C 45-year-old woman with right adrenal myelolipoma. Because patient was unable to hold her breath, this 3D iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) sequence was respiratory-gated Axial gradient-recalled echo T1-weighted IDEAL water-only (A), fat-only (B), in-phase (C), and opposed-phase (D) images are derived from single acquisition (TR/TE, 6.8/2). Note area containing bulk fat (arrow, B) in lesion on fat-only image (B). Opposed-phase image (D) is easily recognized because of "edge artifact" (arrowheads, D) at fat–water interfaces.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D 45-year-old woman with right adrenal myelolipoma. Because patient was unable to hold her breath, this 3D iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) sequence was respiratory-gated Axial gradient-recalled echo T1-weighted IDEAL water-only (A), fat-only (B), in-phase (C), and opposed-phase (D) images are derived from single acquisition (TR/TE, 6.8/2). Note area containing bulk fat (arrow, B) in lesion on fat-only image (B). Opposed-phase image (D) is easily recognized because of "edge artifact" (arrowheads, D) at fat–water interfaces.

 
IDEAL imaging provides uniform and reliable fat suppression throughout the body, including the head and neck [4], breast [9] (Figs. 3A and 3B), heart [8, 9], abdomen [4, 9], pelvis [4] (Figs. 4A and 4B), and extremities [4]. An additional advantage of IDEAL is that in-phase and opposed-phase images, and fat-only and water-only images, are obtained during a single acquisition (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D). Thus, a single acquisition with IDEAL imaging has the potential to simplify body MRI protocols by replacing separate acquisitions that use fat-saturation and chemical shift techniques. Furthermore, because all data emanate from a single acquisition, the resulting diverse image sets are inherently coregistered.


Figure 8
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 53-year-old woman with palpable nodule on right outer breast but no MRI correlation. Note that fat suppression, although subtle, is more uniform on sagittal T2-weighted iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) image (TR/TE, 6,750/98.8) (A) than on STIR (6,700/70.3) (B) sequence, especially in adipose areas surrounding glandular tissue (asterisks, B). This results in insensitivity of IDEAL to B1 inhomogeneities.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 53-year-old woman with palpable nodule on right outer breast but no MRI correlation. Note that fat suppression, although subtle, is more uniform on sagittal T2-weighted iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) image (TR/TE, 6,750/98.8) (A) than on STIR (6,700/70.3) (B) sequence, especially in adipose areas surrounding glandular tissue (asterisks, B). This results in insensitivity of IDEAL to B1 inhomogeneities.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A 35-year-old man with Crohn's disease and perianal fistula. Axial fast spin-echo 2D T2-weighted fat-suppressed iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) image (TR/TE, 5,117/116) (A) and corresponding non-IDEAL fat-saturated fast spin-echo image (10,000/119) (B) show fistula track (arrows) arising from left lateral wall of anus and coursing posteriorly to extend through internal and external sphincters. Note that fat suppression is less uniform in traditional chemically fat-suppressed image (asterisks, B).

 

Figure 11
View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B 35-year-old man with Crohn's disease and perianal fistula. Axial fast spin-echo 2D T2-weighted fat-suppressed iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) image (TR/TE, 5,117/116) (A) and corresponding non-IDEAL fat-saturated fast spin-echo image (10,000/119) (B) show fistula track (arrows) arising from left lateral wall of anus and coursing posteriorly to extend through internal and external sphincters. Note that fat suppression is less uniform in traditional chemically fat-suppressed image (asterisks, B).

 
In the following sections, we illustrate applications of the IDEAL technique in specific scenarios commonly observed in clinical body MRI.

Hepatic Steatosis
Hepatic steatosis, or fatty liver, is a term applied to a wide spectrum of conditions histologically characterized by triglyceride accumulation in hepatocytes. Its prevalence in the general population is approximately 20–30%, which is higher in patients with hyperlipidemia, obesity, or a history of alcohol consumption. Other relatively common conditions associated with fat accumulation in the liver include viral hepatitis and the use of certain drugs. A variant of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, which carries a 10–30% incidence of developing cirrhosis during the decade after the initial diagnosis [10]. The coexistence of edema and fibrosis frequently seen with this disorder can present challenges to CT and sonographic assessments, and fat quantification with these techniques is not reliable [11].

Chemical shift MRI may show diffuse and focal fat deposition in the liver. A signal decrease on opposed-phased images compared with in-phase images provides a specific diagnosis of fat deposition. However, fat quantification with opposed-phase imaging is limited because of the nonlinear relationship between signal intensity and fat concentration. IDEAL imaging provides robust water–fat separation in the liver, facilitating the visualization of fat-containing lesions (i.e., adenomas, hepatocellular carcinoma, myelolipoma), visualization of fat deposition (Figs. 5A, 5B, and 5C), and the quantification of fat in the liver [12].


Figure 12
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A 46-year-old woman with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. All images were obtained from single 20-second acquisition (TR/TE, 6.9/2). Note evident signal decrease between in-phase (A) and opposed-phase (B) iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) images, with some sparing of subcapsular anterior parenchyma (arrows, B).

 

Figure 13
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B 46-year-old woman with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. All images were obtained from single 20-second acquisition (TR/TE, 6.9/2). Note evident signal decrease between in-phase (A) and opposed-phase (B) iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) images, with some sparing of subcapsular anterior parenchyma (arrows, B).

 

Figure 14
View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5C 46-year-old woman with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. All images were obtained from single 20-second acquisition (TR/TE, 6.9/2). Fatty deposition is also clearly seen on IDEAL fat-only image, in which signal is much higher in liver than in spleen. Note that spared area appears to have lower signal (arrowheads), as expected in latter fat-only image. Water-only image is not shown.

 
Adrenal Adenoma
Adrenal adenomas are the most common lesion of the adrenal gland and are frequently seen as incidental lesions on cross-sectional imaging. Pathologically, adrenal adenomas are characterized by the presence of various amounts of intracytoplasmic lipids. Other features commonly used to support the diagnosis of adrenal adenoma are size, lack of invasiveness, and enhancement pattern. Detection of subvoxel fat in an adrenal lesion is the basis for a specific diagnosis of adenoma on MRI [13]. IDEAL imaging may facilitate this diagnosis by showing fat in the adrenal lesion, particularly small lesions in which partial volume with the retroperitoneal fat limits the interpretation of chemical shift images (Figs. 6A, 6B, and 6C).


Figure 15
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A 49-year-old woman with right adrenal adenoma. Note high signal indicating fat in the lesion (arrow) on the axial T1-weighted iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) fat-only image.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B 49-year-old woman with right adrenal adenoma. The presence of fat can also be inferred from signal decrease between in-phase (B) and opposed-phase (C) images. IDEAL water-only image is not shown (TR/TE, 6.1/2.2).

 

Figure 17
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6C 49-year-old woman with right adrenal adenoma. The presence of fat can also be inferred from signal decrease between in-phase (B) and opposed-phase (C) images. IDEAL water-only image is not shown (TR/TE, 6.1/2.2).

 
Renal Angiomyolipoma
Renal angiomyolipomas are the most com mon benign renal neoplasm. They are composed of varying amounts of fat, smooth muscle, and thick-walled blood vessels. Although all three tissue elements may be present, these tumors may be composed of only one of these components (Figs. 7A, 7B, 7C, and 7D). Calcification and necrosis are rare, but hemorrhage is frequent. Most angiomyolipomas are sporadic (80–90%), although multiple angiomyolipomas are common in patients with tuberous sclerosis. Although most are incidentally detected, some patients present with acute flank pain caused by spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage.


Figure 18
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A 70-year-old man with right renal angiomyolipoma. Lesion (L) consists of fat as shown in gradient-recalled echo T1-weighted iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) fat-only image (TR/TE, 6.1/2.2).

 

Figure 19
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B 70-year-old man with right renal angiomyolipoma. Marked low signal in IDEAL water-only image confirms this fat prevalence.

 

Figure 20
View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7C 70-year-old man with right renal angiomyolipoma. In-phase (C) and opposed-phase (D) images show india ink artifact at boundary with renal parenchyma (arrowhead, D) and no clear signal decrease in mass because it is predominantly macroscopic fat.

 

Figure 21
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7D 70-year-old man with right renal angiomyolipoma. In-phase (C) and opposed-phase (D) images show india ink artifact at boundary with renal parenchyma (arrowhead, D) and no clear signal decrease in mass because it is predominantly macroscopic fat.

 
A confident diagnosis of angiomyolipoma can be made on cross-sectional imaging when fat is unequivocally shown in a renal mass [14]. Differentiation of angiomyolipomas from hyperintense renal cysts with hemorrhagic or proteinaceous contents is best achieved by specifically showing fat in the lesion [14].

Ovarian Teratoma
Ovarian teratomas are the most common benign ovarian neoplasm [15]. They comprise a variety of histologic subtypes, with mature cystic teratoma (i.e., dermoid cyst) being the most common. Mature tissues of ectodermal, mesodermal, and endodermal origin are typically present. Depiction of fat in an ovarian mass is virtually diagnostic of dermoid, found in 93% of these cases [15]. A floating mass of hair or debris can sometimes be identified at the fat–aqueous fluid interface. Distinction between an ovarian dermoid, a cyst that contains hemorrhagic or proteinaceous fluid, and endometriomas is best accomplished when fat is unequivocally shown in the lesion [15]. IDEAL imaging can characterize these masses (Figs. 8A, 8B, 8C, and 8D) and is particularly helpful in lesions with small amounts of fat in which anatomic coregistration of the non–fat-saturated and fat-saturated images is critical.


Figure 22
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8A 48-year-old woman with ovarian dermoid. Gradient-recalled echo T1-weighted water-only image (TR/TE, 6.9/2) shows complex mass (M) posterior to uterus.

 

Figure 23
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8B 48-year-old woman with ovarian dermoid. Corresponding fat-only image shows that superior half of lesion is predominantly composed of fat, suggesting the specific diagnosis.

 

Figure 24
View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8C 48-year-old woman with ovarian dermoid. In-phase (C) and opposed-phase (D) images are shown, and india ink artifact is clearly seen at water–fat interfaces (arrowhead, D). Note also uterine enlargement and nabothian cyst in uterine cervix.

 

Figure 25
View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8D 48-year-old woman with ovarian dermoid. In-phase (C) and opposed-phase (D) images are shown, and india ink artifact is clearly seen at water–fat interfaces (arrowhead, D). Note also uterine enlargement and nabothian cyst in uterine cervix.

 
Soft-Tissue Lipoma
Soft-tissue lipomas account for almost 50% of all soft-tissue tumors. Radiologic evalu ation is diagnostic in up to 71% of cases. These lesions appear identical to subcutaneous fat on CT and MRI and may contain thin septa. Soft-tissue lipomas can be categorized as superficial or deep, with superficial lipomas being subcutaneous and common (Figs. 9A, 9B, 9C, and 9D).


Figure 26
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9A 60-year-old woman with subcutaneous lipoma in right anterosuperior chest wall. Lump (L) is fat-containing lesion as shown in axial single-shot T2-weighted fast spin-echo images without (TR/TE, 2,401/306) (A) and with (2,429/306) (B) fat suppression. Note some regions of poor fat suppression in posterior area (arrowhead, B).

 

Figure 27
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9B 60-year-old woman with subcutaneous lipoma in right anterosuperior chest wall. Lump (L) is fat-containing lesion as shown in axial single-shot T2-weighted fast spin-echo images without (TR/TE, 2,401/306) (A) and with (2,429/306) (B) fat suppression. Note some regions of poor fat suppression in posterior area (arrowhead, B).

 

Figure 28
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9C 60-year-old woman with subcutaneous lipoma in right anterosuperior chest wall. Thin capsule and septation (arrow) in lesion are better appreciated on axial gradient-recalled echo T1-weighted iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) fat-only image (7/2).

 

Figure 29
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9D 60-year-old woman with subcutaneous lipoma in right anterosuperior chest wall. As expected, no signal is seen in corresponding IDEAL water-only image.

 

Conclusion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
The IDEAL Technique
Conclusion
References
 
MR sequences that allow suppression or separation of fat signal are important for two major reasons: Suppression of the signal from normal adipose tissue decreases chemical shift artifact and better depicts uptake of contrast material; and it allows tissue characterization, which is a clear advantage of MRI over other imaging techniques.

The IDEAL technique—and the original Dixon technique [3]—is based on decomposing fat and water signals to discriminate between fat and water protons according to their resonant frequency difference, or chemical shift, to obtain these two components as two separate images.

IDEAL provides uniform and reliable fat suppression throughout the body, including the head and neck, breast, heart, abdomen, and extremities.

In conclusion, IDEAL is a promising imaging technique that provides uniform and reliable fat suppression with the potential to simplify body MR protocols.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
The IDEAL Technique
Conclusion
References
 

  1. Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G, Rousseau J, Marchandise X, Cotten A. Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls. RadioGraphics 1999;19 : 373-382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Krinsky G, Rofsky NM, Weinreb JC. Nonspecificity of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) as a technique of fat suppression: pitfalls in image interpretation. AJR 1996;166 : 523-526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Dixon WT. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1984;153 : 189-194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Reeder SB, Pineda AR, Wen Z, et al. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54:636 -644[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Glover GH, Schneider E. Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 1991; 18:371 -383[Medline]
  6. Reeder SB, McKenzie CA, Pineda AR, et al. Water–fat separation with IDEAL gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25:644 -652[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Pineda AR, Reeder SB, Wen A, Pelc AJ. Cramér-Rao bounds for three-point decomposition of water and fat. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54:625 -635[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Reeder SB, Markl M, Yu H, Hellinger JC, Herfkens RJ, Pelc NJ. Cardiac cine imaging with IDEAL water–fat separation and steady-state free precession. J Magn Reson Imaging2005; 22:44 -52[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Yu H, Reeder SB, McKenzie CA, et al. Single acquisition water–fat separation: feasibility study for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 2006;55 : 413-422[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Clark JM, Diehl AM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: an underrecognized cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis. JAMA2003; 289:3000 -3004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hamer OW, Aguirre DA, Casola G, Lavine JE, Woenckhaus M, Sirlin CB. Fatty liver: imaging patterns and pitfalls. RadioGraphics 2006;26 : 1637-1653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Reeder SB, Vu AT, Hargreaves BA, et al. Rapid 3D-SPGR imaging of the liver with multi-echo IDEAL. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Seattle, WA: ISMRM, 2006
  13. Krebs TL, Wagner BJ. MR imaging of the adrenal gland: radiologic–pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics1998; 18:1425 -1440[Abstract]
  14. Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, Horii S, Raghavendra BN. CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat. AJR 1988;151 : 497-501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Hunt JL. Ovarian teratomas: tumor types and imaging characteristics. RadioGraphics2001; 21:475 -490[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
radtechHome page
M. E BERRY
Adrenal Gland Disorders
Radiol. Technol., September 1, 2009; 81(1): 57 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Costa, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Rofsky, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Costa, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Rofsky, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS