AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poon, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poon, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3117
AJR 2008; 190:956-965
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

Orbital Lesions: Differentiating Vascular and Nonvascular Etiologic Factors

Colin S. Poon1,2, Gordon Sze1 and Michele H. Johnson1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
2 Department of Radiology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St., Syracuse, NY 13210.

Received January 29, 2007; accepted after revision October 27, 2007.

 
Address correspondence to C. S. Poon (poonc{at}upstate.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Illustrative Cases
Summary
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Using a number of interesting cases, we illustrate how attention to vascular anatomic features and blood flow patterns can facilitate the diagnosis of an orbital lesion. True vascular lesions can be differentiated from nonvascular mimics, and normal variants of the orbital blood flow pattern can be differentiated from pathologic alterations.

CONCLUSION. Accuracy of radiologic diagnosis can be improved by an understanding of orbital vascular anatomy and blood flow patterns and with optimal use of imaging techniques.

Keywords: angiography • CT angiography • MRI • orbit • superior ophthalmic vein


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Illustrative Cases
Summary
References
 
Mass effect on the orbits can lead to clinical presentations such as proptosis, orbital pain, and diplopia. In most cases, the effect is caused by soft-tissue lesions. However, vascular lesions, either within the orbits or extraorbital, can alter the normal orbital blood flow pattern and lead to vascular engorgement and an orbital mass effect [1, 2]. More confusingly, soft-tissue lesions and vascular abnormalities can have similar imaging appearances, posing diagnostic difficulty for inexperienced radiologists. Differentiation of vascular and nonvascular lesions is important, because the difference can dictate completely different approaches to further evaluation and management. In most cases, differentiation can be accomplished with cross-sectional imaging. The vascular lesions can be further evaluated or managed with neurointerventional techniques.


Illustrative Cases
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Illustrative Cases
Summary
References
 
A good understanding of orbital anatomy [3, 4] is essential to correct diagnosis. Soft-tissue masses, such as neurofibroma, can appear fusiform. When they are located close to normal vascular structures, these masses can simulate vascular abnormalities. Figures 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, and 1H illustrates a case in which thrombosed varix was suspected on the basis of the clinical presentation and initial interpretation of an MRI study (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D). Orbital varix most often involves the superior ophthalmic vein. In the middle of its course, the superior ophthalmic vein is an intraconal structure. Careful review of MR images, however, shows the mass is extraconal and superior in relation to the levator palpebrae superioris and superior rectus muscles. In addition, the right superior ophthalmic vein is clearly identifiable on MR images. Apart from displacement by the mass, all the venous structures appear normal. The mass exhibits only mild peripheral enhancement, similar to that of the other orbital soft tissues. These findings make the presumptive diagnosis of thrombosed varix unlikely. The location suggests the mass may arise from the supraorbital nerve, leading to strong suspicion of neurofibroma or schwannoma.


Figure 1
View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 28-year-old man with right proptosis. MRI findings were initially interpreted as thrombosed varix. Neurofibroma was confirmed at surgery and surgical pathologic examination. Axial T2-weighted MR image shows fusiform lesion with homogeneous hyperintensity.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 28-year-old man with right proptosis. MRI findings were initially interpreted as thrombosed varix. Neurofibroma was confirmed at surgery and surgical pathologic examination. Axial gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows only minimal peripheral enhancement.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 28-year-old man with right proptosis. MRI findings were initially interpreted as thrombosed varix. Neurofibroma was confirmed at surgery and surgical pathologic examination. Coronal gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image with fat suppression shows both superior ophthalmic veins (arrows) are of normal caliber. M = mass.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D 28-year-old man with right proptosis. MRI findings were initially interpreted as thrombosed varix. Neurofibroma was confirmed at surgery and surgical pathologic examination. Sagittal gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image with fat suppression shows mass (M) is clearly extraconal.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E 28-year-old man with right proptosis. MRI findings were initially interpreted as thrombosed varix. Neurofibroma was confirmed at surgery and surgical pathologic examination. Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan shows no change with Valsalva maneuver and lack of enhancement make vascular lesion unlikely. E is cranial to F. M = mass.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F 28-year-old man with right proptosis. MRI findings were initially interpreted as thrombosed varix. Neurofibroma was confirmed at surgery and surgical pathologic examination. Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan shows no change with Valsalva maneuver and lack of enhancement make vascular lesion unlikely. E is cranial to F. M = mass.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1G 28-year-old man with right proptosis. MRI findings were initially interpreted as thrombosed varix. Neurofibroma was confirmed at surgery and surgical pathologic examination. Coronal reformatted image shows superior ophthalmic veins (arrows). M = mass.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1H 28-year-old man with right proptosis. MRI findings were initially interpreted as thrombosed varix. Neurofibroma was confirmed at surgery and surgical pathologic examination. Sagittal reformatted image obtained with bone window shows smooth erosion of orbital roof (arrow). M = mass.

 
Orbital CT can provide additional diagnostic information (Figs. 1E, 1F, 1G, and 1H). Unenhanced thin-section scanning was followed by contrast-enhanced scanning without and with a Valsalva maneuver. Enlargement with a Valsalva maneuver is often associated with venous orbital disease, such as orbital varix, but this finding was absent in this case. The mass has minimal enhancement and no evidence of calcifications or phleboliths, which can be indicative of a vascular lesion. The cavernous sinuses are symmetric and unremarkable. Smooth eros ion of the orbital roof is present, but there is no evidence of aggressive bone destruction (Fig. 1H). The overall imaging appearance is most compatible with a benign lesion of a non vascular cause. Pathologic examination con firmed neurofibroma. The complementary roles of MRI and CT well shown in this case. The superior soft-tissue contrast are intrinsic to MRI is comple mented by the better depiction of calcification and bone changes with CT. Both MRI and MDCT yield high-resolution images in multiple planes. These techniques should be used to optimize visualization of fine anatomic structures.

When vascular lesions are suspected, CT angiography can be helpful for directing further evaluation and management [57]. In the case in Figures 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, and 2E, initial suspicion of carotid–cavernous fistula by the clinician prompted further evaluation with CT angiography. On CT angiograms and other cross-sectional images, the appearance of carotid–cavernous fistula is secondary to arterialization of blood flow in the cavernous sinus, the ophthalmic veins, and other venous structures in communication with the cavernous sinus. This condition leads to engorgement or bulging of the cavernous sinus and dilation of connected venous structures. In the less common cases of low-flow fistula and late-stage fistula in which the superior ophthalmic vein is stenosed or thrombosed, these imaging features may be less evident. However, the absence of all of these imaging findings in this case made the possibility of carotid–cavernous fistula un likely, practically obviating conventional angiography. The CT angiographic and MRI findings pointed toward diffuse infiltrative disease rather than a vascular disorder. Given the clinical history of lung carcinoma, a presumptive diagnosis of orbital metastasis was made.


Figure 9
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 73-year-old man with history of lung cancer who presented with chemosis of right eye. Clinician had suspected carotid–cavernous fistula. CT angiogram shows superior ophthalmic veins and ophthalmic arteries are within normal limits. Cavernous sinuses (arrows, A) are bilaterally normal and symmetric. No other dilated vascular structures are evident. These findings make carotid–cavernous fistula and arteriovenous malformation unlikely. Subtle scleral thickening and infiltration of intraconal fat are evident.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 73-year-old man with history of lung cancer who presented with chemosis of right eye. Clinician had suspected carotid–cavernous fistula. CT angiogram shows superior ophthalmic veins and ophthalmic arteries are within normal limits. Cavernous sinuses (arrows, A) are bilaterally normal and symmetric. No other dilated vascular structures are evident. These findings make carotid–cavernous fistula and arteriovenous malformation unlikely. Subtle scleral thickening and infiltration of intraconal fat are evident.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C 73-year-old man with history of lung cancer who presented with chemosis of right eye. Clinician had suspected carotid–cavernous fistula. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image with fat suppression shows superior ophthalmic veins appear normal bilaterally. Right orbit exhibits proptosis. Diffuse enlargement of all right extraocular muscles is evident, but tendon insertions are spared. Subtle enhancement is present within intraconal fat. Enhancement along right optic nerve sheath extends to orbital apex (long arrow). Subtle thickening of sclera with mild nodularity (short arrow, C) is evident.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D 73-year-old man with history of lung cancer who presented with chemosis of right eye. Clinician had suspected carotid–cavernous fistula. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image with fat suppression shows superior ophthalmic veins appear normal bilaterally. Right orbit exhibits proptosis. Diffuse enlargement of all right extraocular muscles is evident, but tendon insertions are spared. Subtle enhancement is present within intraconal fat. Enhancement along right optic nerve sheath extends to orbital apex (long arrow). Subtle thickening of sclera with mild nodularity (short arrow, C) is evident.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2E 73-year-old man with history of lung cancer who presented with chemosis of right eye. Clinician had suspected carotid–cavernous fistula. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image with fat suppression shows soft-tissue stranding and enhancement in right orbital fat. All extraocular muscles are enlarged and enhanced. Contrast findings to those in Figures 3A, 3B, 3C, and 3D.

 
The differential diagnosis of the diffuse infiltrative pattern should include nonvascular etiologic factors. Granulomatous diseases such as sarcoidosis can be associated with enlarge ment of the extrao cular muscles, scleral thicken ing, and uveal–scleral no du larity. Sarco idosis, however, commonly in volves the lacrimal glands. In addition, bilateral involve ment and extra orbital manifestations of the disease often are present. These features were absent in this case. Thyroid ophthalmo pathy can have a similar appearance, but it is unusual for uni lateral disease to have such extensive involvement. Pseudo tumor is also a strong differential consideration, but sparing of the muscle tendon insertions is atypical. Studies [6, 7] have shown that when carotid–cavernous fistula is present, CT angiography can delineate the lesion well (Figs. 3A, 3B, 3C, and 3D). The lesion can then be confirmed and managed with neurangio graphic techniques.


Figure 14
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 21-year-old man who sustained head trauma 5 months previously presenting with proptosis in left eye secondary to direct carotid–cavernous fistula. Correlation between CT angiographic and conventional angiographic findings is excellent. Unenhanced CT scan shows dilated left superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) and asymmetric engorgement of left cavernous sinus (arrow).

 

Figure 15
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 21-year-old man who sustained head trauma 5 months previously presenting with proptosis in left eye secondary to direct carotid–cavernous fistula. Correlation between CT angiographic and conventional angiographic findings is excellent. CT angiograms from superior to inferior planes show left proptosis. Left superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) is markedly dilated throughout its course. Left facial vein (FV) and angular veins (arrow, C) that communicate with left superior ophthalmic vein are dilated. Engorgement of left cavernous sinus is evident. OA = ophthalmic artery.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C 21-year-old man who sustained head trauma 5 months previously presenting with proptosis in left eye secondary to direct carotid–cavernous fistula. Correlation between CT angiographic and conventional angiographic findings is excellent. CT angiograms from superior to inferior planes show left proptosis. Left superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) is markedly dilated throughout its course. Left facial vein (FV) and angular veins (arrow, C) that communicate with left superior ophthalmic vein are dilated. Engorgement of left cavernous sinus is evident. OA = ophthalmic artery.

 

Figure 17
View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D 21-year-old man who sustained head trauma 5 months previously presenting with proptosis in left eye secondary to direct carotid–cavernous fistula. Correlation between CT angiographic and conventional angiographic findings is excellent. Midarterial phase left common carotid arteriogram in lateral projection shows prominent cavernous sinus (arrow) with immediate retrograde filling of superior ophthalmic vein. Retrograde filling in angular vein accounts for venous dilatation at nasal bridge and left face, as in B and C.

 
Vascular orbital lesions tend to have much stronger contrast enhancement than soft-tissue lesions. In addition, attention to morph ologic details of the lesions can help differentiate the various types of vascular lesions. The presence of fine serpiginous enhancing structures suggests the presence of the fine vasculature often associated with an arteriovenous malformation or hypervascular mass lesion (Figs. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, and 4F). In contrast, an aneurysm is expected to have smooth well-defined margins and be round. Although an aneurysm can contain thrombosis that would make its appearance hetero geneous, fine serpiginous hyper vascularity is rarely seen.


Figure 18
View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A 51-year-old man with progressive visual loss in right eye over 18 months. CT angiograms show enhancing lesion at right aspect of suprasellar cistern (arrow). Initial interpretation was aneurysm. More careful examination revealed lesion has elongated shape and extends to right orbital apex. Lesion contains fine linear enhancing structures indicative of small vessels, making diagnosis of arteriovenous malformation or hypervascular mass more likely. Findings were confirmed on MRI and MR angiography. A is cranial to B.

 

Figure 19
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B 51-year-old man with progressive visual loss in right eye over 18 months. CT angiograms show enhancing lesion at right aspect of suprasellar cistern (arrow). Initial interpretation was aneurysm. More careful examination revealed lesion has elongated shape and extends to right orbital apex. Lesion contains fine linear enhancing structures indicative of small vessels, making diagnosis of arteriovenous malformation or hypervascular mass more likely. Findings were confirmed on MRI and MR angiography. A is cranial to B.

 

Figure 20
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C 51-year-old man with progressive visual loss in right eye over 18 months. T2-weighted MR image shows lesion (arrows) contains serpiginous flow voids and extends from right suprasellar cistern along proximal ophthalmic artery to right orbital apex.

 

Figure 21
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D 51-year-old man with progressive visual loss in right eye over 18 months. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image with fat suppression shows lesion has strong serpiginous enhancement (arrow). Right superior ophthalmic vein (not shown) was slightly larger than left, probably because of increased blood flow.

 

Figure 22
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4E 51-year-old man with progressive visual loss in right eye over 18 months. MR angiogram shows vascular lesion (arrow) arising at origin of right ophthalmic artery and extending to right orbital apex along ophthalmic artery. High signal intensity of lesion suggests it receives arterial supply from circle of Willis or its major branches.

 

Figure 23
View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4F 51-year-old man with progressive visual loss in right eye over 18 months. Right internal carotid arteriogram (lateral projection) confirms diagnosis of arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Lesion (arrows) arises at origin of ophthalmic artery and extends to orbital apex. Venous drainage through cavernous sinus and petrosal sinuses is evident. Vascular blush supplied from distal ophthalmic artery is present at anterior orbit. This finding is secondary to hyperemia or secondary nidus.

 
Apart from intense contrast enhancement, prominent vessels within or leading to a mass suggest the presence of a vascular lesion (Figs. 5A, 5B, and 5C). Capillary hemangioma commonly has a prominent arterial supply from either the external or the internal carotid circulation. This diagnosis is also supported by the patient's age (capillary hemangioma is the most common benign orbital tumor of infancy) and the extraconal location of the lesion. Although venolymphatic malformation (previously known as lymphangioma) is a differential consideration, the prominent flow voids and vessel associated with this lesion do not favor this diagnosis [1, 812].


Figure 24
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A 30-day-old girl with right orbital mass. Axial T2-weighted MR image shows hyperintense extraconal mass (H) situated primarily in lateral and anterior aspects of right orbit. Mass contains multiple small flow voids and hypointense septa.

 

Figure 25
View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B 30-day-old girl with right orbital mass. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image with fat-suppression shows intense homogeneous enhancement. Prominent vessel (arrow) is evident on superior aspect of mass.

 

Figure 26
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5C 30-day-old girl with right orbital mass. MR angiogram shows prominent vessel (arrow), presence of which favors diagnosis of capillary hemangioma as opposed to venolymphatic malformation.

 
Abnormality of orbital vessels often suggests orbital or extraorbital disease and prompts a search for the cause. Enlargement of the ophthalmic veins can be caused by increased anterograde flow, obstruction of distal venous drainage, abnormal retrograde flow, increased intracranial pressure, or a normal variant [1, 2, 13, 14]. Increased anterograde flow through the ophthalmic veins can result from vascular malformations of the face and scalp. Distal obstruction of ophthalmic venous drainage can be caused by orbital masses or inflammatory disease leading to enlargement of the orbital contents and extraorbital lesions such as cavernous sinus thrombosis. Extraorbital vascular abnorma lity, such as carotid–cavernous fistula, can lead to retrograde flow through the ophthalmic veins. A word of caution is that variant blood flow patterns can occasionally lead to abnormal dilation of orbital vessels. This phenomenon is illustrated in Figures 6A, 6B, 6C, and 6D and to our knowledge has not been documented in the angiography literature.


Figure 27
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A 53-year-old woman with right-sided diplopia. Conventional angiographic findings suggested lesion represented presence of normal variant in venous drainage of brain. Drainage of supratentorial venous blood into anterior cavernous sinus caused transient venous overflow in anterior cavernous sinus and reflux of venous blood into proximal superior and inferior ophthalmic veins. Coronal fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows bilateral dilatation of superior ophthalmic veins. Right inferior ophthalmic vein is patulous. Findings suggest presence of vascular lesion such as carotid cavernous fistula.

 

Figure 28
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B 53-year-old woman with right-sided diplopia. Conventional angiographic findings suggested lesion represented presence of normal variant in venous drainage of brain. Drainage of supratentorial venous blood into anterior cavernous sinus caused transient venous overflow in anterior cavernous sinus and reflux of venous blood into proximal superior and inferior ophthalmic veins. Coronal T2-weighted MR image clearly shows symmetric and normal cavernous sinuses (arrows) on both sides.

 

Figure 29
View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6C 53-year-old woman with right-sided diplopia. Conventional angiographic findings suggested lesion represented presence of normal variant in venous drainage of brain. Drainage of supratentorial venous blood into anterior cavernous sinus caused transient venous overflow in anterior cavernous sinus and reflux of venous blood into proximal superior and inferior ophthalmic veins. Right internal carotid arteriogram in early venous phase shows superficial middle cerebral vein drains into sphenoparietal sinus and then into anterior cavernous sinus. Proximal superior ophthalmic vein is faintly evident. Cavernous sinus drains into sigmoid sinus and transverse sinus through petrosal sinuses.

 

Figure 30
View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6D 53-year-old woman with right-sided diplopia. Conventional angiographic findings suggested lesion represented presence of normal variant in venous drainage of brain. Drainage of supratentorial venous blood into anterior cavernous sinus caused transient venous overflow in anterior cavernous sinus and reflux of venous blood into proximal superior and inferior ophthalmic veins. Magnified later venous phase carotid arteriogram shows patulous proximal portion of superior ophthalmic vein, but no filling of distal superior ophthalmic vein or facial veins or evidence of arteriovenous shunting. Contrast findings to carotid–cavernous fistula in Figures 3A, 3B, 3C, and 3D.

 
Most cases of orbital vascular abnormality can be evaluated initially with noninvasive imaging studies. Conventional angiography, which is the imaging method of choice for evaluation of blood flow dynamics, generally is warranted only when no structural cause is identified in patients who have symptoms or when pathologic alteration of the blood flow dynamics is suspected and further characterization is necessary.


Summary
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Illustrative Cases
Summary
References
 
Orbital symptoms and signs are nonspecific. They can be associated with intraorbital or extraorbital disease and can have a vascular or nonvascular cause. In rare instances, even variants of orbital blood flow patterns can cause orbital signs and symptoms. Understanding orbital anatomy and vascular blood flow patterns and optimal use of imaging techniques facilitate confident evaluation of the fine structures of the orbit and improve diagnostic accuracy. The key imaging features are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Key Imaging Features for Differentiating Orbital Lesions

 


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Illustrative Cases
Summary
References
 

  1. Rootman J. Vascular malformations of the orbit: hemodynamic concepts. Orbit 2003;22 : 103-120[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Stiebel-Kalish H, Setton A, Nimii Y, et al. Cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous malformations: patterns of venous drainage are related to clinical signs and symptoms. Ophthalmology2002; 109:1685 -1691[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Ettl A, Krammer J, Daxer A, et al. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of neurovascular orbital anatomy. Ophthalmology 1997;104 : 869-877[Medline]
  4. Aviv RI, Casselman J. Orbital imaging: Part 1. Normal anatomy. Clin Radiol 2005;60 : 279-287[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. White JH, Fox AJ, Symons SP. Diagnosis and anatomic mapping of an orbital varix by computed tomographic angiography. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140:945 -947[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Coskun O, Hamon M, Catroux G, et al. Carotidcavernous fistulas: diagnosis with spiral CT angiography. Am J Neuroradiol2000; 21:712 -716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Chen CC, Chang PC, Shy C, et al. CT angiography and MR angiography in the evaluation of carotid cavernous sinus fistula prior to embolization: a comparison of techniques. Am J Neuroradiol2005; 26:2349 -2356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bilaniuk LT. Vascular lesions of the orbit in children. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005;15 : 107-120[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Forbes G. Vascular lesions of the orbit. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 1996; 6:113 -122
  10. Rootman J. Distribution and differential diagnosis of orbital disease. In: Diseases of the orbit: a multidisciplinary approach, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2003: 52-84
  11. Katz SE, Rootman J, Vangveeravong S, et al. Combined venous lymphatic malformations of the orbit (so-called lymphangiomas): association with noncontiguous intracranial vascular anomalies. Ophthalmology 1998;105 : 176-184[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Selva D, Fraco DS, Bonavoconta G, et al. Orbital venous-lymphatic malformations (lymph angiomas) mimicking cavernous hemangiomas. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 131:364 -370[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Lirng JF, Fuh JL, Wu ZA, et al. Diameter of the superior ophthalmic vein in relation to intracranial pressure. Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24:700 -703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Khanna RK, Pham CJ, Malik GM, Spickler EM, Metha B, Rosenblum ML. Bilateral superior ophthalmic vein enlargement associated with diffuse cerebral swelling: report of 11 cases. J Neurosurg1997; 86:893 -897[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poon, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poon, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS