AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imamura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Uesugi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Imamura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Uesugi, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2610
AJR 2008; 190:W234-W236
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Technical Innovation

Microcalcifications of Breast Tissue: Appearance on Synchrotron Radiation Imaging with 6-µm Resolution

Keiko Imamura1, Norishige Ehara1, Yoichi Inada2, Yoshihide Kanemaki1, Joji Okamoto3, Ichiro Maeda4, Keiko Miyamoto3, Haruki Ogata3, Hisanori Kawamoto3, Yasuo Nakajima1, Mamoru Fukuda3, Keiji Umetani5 and Kentarou Uesugi5

1 Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ward, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 216-8511, Japan.
2 Department of Physics, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
3 Department of Breast Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
4 Department of Pathology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
5 Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, Kouto, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan.

Received May 11, 2007; accepted after revision November 9, 2007.

 
Address correspondence to K. Imamura (keiko401{at}marianna-u.ac.jp).

WEB

This is a Web exclusive article.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to use synchrotron radiation imaging with 6-µm resolution to evaluate amorphous and pleomorphic breast tissue microcalcifications.

CONCLUSION. Synchrotron radiation imaging depicted microcalcifications as small as 24 µm. Imaging with this technique revealed that most amorphous and pleomorphic calcifications on conventional mammograms are clusters of fine specks and that in addition to the shape or density of a speck, the distribution density of clustered specks is a factor determining the apparent shape.

Keywords: breast imaging • mammogram • microcalcification • morphology • synchrotron radiation imaging


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The shape and distribution of individual microcalcifications are important in classification of benign or malignant behavior on conventional mammograms. Studies [1, 2] of the diagnostic role of microcalcifications have shown the superior effectiveness of the distribution factor over the shape factor in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. The fuzzy nature of the morphologic features of microcalcifications on conventional mammograms partially explains the poor reliability of the shape of microcalcifications in predicting the presence of malignancy.

Synchrotron radiation imaging has had promising results in imaging of specimens of human breast tissue [3]. The greater visibility with synchrotron radiation imaging is due to refraction enhancement in the experimental setup of a long sample-to-detector distance [4, 5] and the development of electronic detectors with small pixels that enable high-resolution imaging [6]. Using contrast enhancement by X-ray refraction for small (< 150 µm) specks, we attained a minimum detectable speck size of 24 µm in breast specimens (Imamura K, et al., presented at the 2004 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). We can therefore expect further improvement in the visibility of calcifications with synchrotron radiation imaging. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of synchrotron radiation imaging with refraction enhancement for visualization of microcalcification details in breast tissue and to assess fuzzy morphologic findings on conventional mammograms.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Breast specimens fixed in wax blocks were examined with both conventional mammography and radiography performed with a synchrotron radiation source.

Materials
The specimens were from 107 patients with pathologically proven breast lesions (53 benign, 54 malignant). Wax blocks had been originally prepared for pathologic examination (131 blocks; 62 benign and 69 malignant; size, 25 x 35 x 8 mm). Patient consent was obtained in a written format approved by the institutional review board of our institution.

Conventional Imaging
Conventional mammograms were acquired with a dedicated mammographic X-ray unit (MGU 100B, Toshiba; Mo target, Mo filter; tube voltage, 22 kV; screen film, MinR-EV, Kodak).

Synchrotron Radiation Imaging with Refraction Enhancement
Synchrotron radiation imaging was performed at a synchrotron radiation facility in Harima, Japan. The experimental parameters were as follows: beam line, 20B2; monochromatic 20-keV X-rays; sample-to-detector distance, 11 m; 6 x 6 µm pixel charged-coupled device camera (C4742-95-12HR, Hamamatsu Photonics); exposure time, 200 seconds.

Image Analysis
Two qualified mammogram reviewers assessed the morphologic features of the microcalcifications on the conventional mammograms according to BI-RADS. The two readers evaluated the images independently; in cases of disagreement, classification was determined by discussion. Microcalcifications with amorphous and pleo morphic morphologic features were subjected to further analysis on the synchrotron radiation images. The smaller specks detected solely on the synchrotron radiation images were counted visually. Speck size was measured on the synchrotron radiation images with image-processing software (IPLab, Scanalytics).


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The detection limit of the conventional technique and the multiple characteristics of microcalcifications on conventional mammograms were assessed by comparing them with the high-resolution synchrotron radiation images. Regarding the detection power of the conventional technique, all specks larger than 300 µm were recognizable, and those smaller than 180 µm were barely visible. Specks in the range of 180–300 µm were partly detectable depending on the density or thickness of the specks. Synchrotron radiation imaging, which had a detectability of 24 µm, showed 12,141 fine specks that were not visible on the conventional mammograms of 131 blocks. This finding suggests the feasibility of this imaging technique for exploring the detailed features of calcifications within breast tissue.

Synchrotron radiation imaging showed that amorphous or pleomorphic microcalcifications on conventional mammograms were not necessarily solitary specks but frequently occurred as clusters of multiple fine specks with various degrees of compactness. Synchrotron radiation images and conventional mammograms are compared in Figures 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B, which show a specimen with clusters of small microcalcifications (Figs. 1A and 1B) and one with bordering or separate moderate-sized microcalcifications (Figs. 2A and 2B).


Figure 1
View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 55-year-old woman with intraductal calcification with no malignancy found. Synchrotron radiation image shows two clusters of specks. Compact cluster of 1.4 x 2.1 mm on left is composed of numerous specks; 1.3 x 3.5-mm cluster on right is less compact. Image size is 6.8 x 6.8 mm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (189K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 55-year-old woman with intraductal calcification with no malignancy found. Conventional mammogram shows 10 microcalcifications (five pleomorphic, five amorphous) in group on left and 18 microcalcifications (two pleomorphic, 16 amorphous) in group on right. Image size is 6.8 x 6.8 mm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 79-year-old woman with mastopathy. Synchrotron radiation with refraction mode image of biopsy specimen shows seven separate round specks measuring 260–310 µm within region measuring 1.6 x 0.7 mm. Image size is 4.8 x 3.9 mm.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (178K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 79-year-old woman with mastopathy. Conventional mammogram of biopsy specimen shows three microcalcifications (one pleomorphic [arrow], two amorphous). Five closely distributed specks in A are not resolved but were interpreted as irregularly shaped pleomorphic microcalcification (arrow). Two others are individually categorized as having amorphous shape. Image size is 4.8 x 3.9 mm.

 
Most microcalcifications of moderate size that were well-separated from neighboring calcifications on conventional mammograms were identified in approximately one-to-one correspondence with specks on the synchro tron radiation images. Despite similarities in the shapes of individual specks, radiographic density appeared to affect morphologic classification on mammograms. Brighter radiographic densities corresponded to a pleomorphic shape, whereas moderate or weak radiographic densities corresponded to an amorphous or indistinct shape (not shown).

On the conventional mammogram in Figure 1B, the pleomorphic-to-amorphous ratio is 5 to 5 in the left cluster and 2 to 16 in the right cluster. The synchrotron radiation image (Fig. 1A) shows that all of the microcalcifications on the conventional mammogram (Fig. 1B) correspond to clusters or coagulations of multiple fine specks on the synchrotron radiation image and that a compact cluster of specks tends to have a pleomorphic appearance on the conventional mammogram. The five clustered specks on the synchrotron radiation image in Figure 2A were depicted together as one microcalcification and defined as an irregularly shaped pleomorphic structure on the conventional mammogram (Fig. 2B, arrow). In contrast, the other two specks on the synchrotron radiation image (Fig. 2A) were visibly separate and defined as amorphous microcalcifications on the conventional mammogram (Fig. 2B).

The statistics are shown in Table 1. In benign cases, 77.6% of amorphous specks and 87.7% of pleomorphic specks were clusters of multiple specks (chi-square result, 5.39; p < 0.025). In malignant cases, 81.4% of amorphous findings and 86.4% of pleomorphic findings were clusters of multiple specks (no statistical difference). For the benign and malignant cases combined, pleomorphic mor phologic features had a higher ratio of clustering than did amorphous morphologic features: 87.0% (260/299) versus 79.9% (819/1,025) (chisquare result, 7.18; p < 0.01). The radiation dose in this experimental setup was measured as 5.9 mGy/s with a dosimetric chamber.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Number of Microcalcifications in Wax Blocks Containing Breast Specimens Detected on Conventional Mammograms and Synchrotron Radiation Images with Refraction Enhancement

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Morphologic features and distribution pattern characterize the benign or malignant nature of microcalcifications on conventional mammograms; however, it is sometimes a fuzzy process to determine the morphologic features of microcalcifications. It has been thought that the morphologic features of a microcalcification are determined by the shape, size, and radiographic density of an individual speck. This study with high-resolution synchrotron radiation imaging showed that on conventional mammograms, in addition to factors inherent in individual specks, the effects of neighboring specks influence visualization of morphologic features because of the limited resolution of the technique. Despite the similarity of the intrinsic characteristics of individual specks, some specks are classified as pleomorphic and some as amorphous or indistinct depending on radiographic density, the distribution density of fine specks in the cluster (Figs. 1A and 1B), and the presence or absence of bordering specks (Figs. 2A and 2B).

It appears, therefore, that there is not always an essential difference between amorphous and pleomorphic morphologic features. It is also evident that most microcalcifications with amorphous and pleomorphic morphologic features on conventional mammograms are clusters of multiple specks. Most of the microcalcifications with pleomorphic features were found to be clusters of specks (87.0%). The difference compared with the ratio of amorphous clusters found was statistically significant (p < 0.01). There was little difference in incidence between benign and malignant cases.

Imaging with various exposure times has shown that a 24-µm speck, the smallest on a 200-second image, is visible on a 10-second image. The radiation dose of a 10-second exposure is estimated to be 59 mGy, which is accordingly high for detector resolution. Limited distribution of synchrotron radiation systems and the high dose of 6-µm imaging are issues for clinical utility.

In conclusion, this study showed that amorphous or indistinct and pleomorphic microcalcifications on conventional mammograms actually have only a fuzzy difference. This finding should enhance understanding of characteristics of microcalcifications hidden on clinical mammograms.


Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Drs. Nobuteru Nariayam and Junichiro Tada of Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute for radiation dose measurement.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Leichter I, Lederman R, Buchbinder SS, Bamberger P, Novak B, Fields S. Computerized evaluation of mammographic lesions: what diagnostic role does the shape of the individual microcalcifications play compared with the geometry of the cluster? AJR 2004;182 : 705-712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sakka E, Prentza A, Koutsouris D. Classification algorithms for microcalcifications in mammograms. Oncol Rep2006; 15:1049 -1055[Medline]
  3. Yu Q, Takeda T, Umetani K, et al. First experiment by two-dimensional digital mammography with synchrotron radiation. J Synchrotron Rad 1999; 6:1148 -1152[CrossRef]
  4. Umetani K, Yagi N, Suzuki Y, et al. X-ray refraction-contrast imaging using synchrotron radiation at Spring-8. Physics of medical imaging: proceedings of SPIE medical imaging 1999, vol.3659 . Bellingham, WA: SPIE, 1999:560 -571
  5. Yagi N, Suzuki Y, Umetani K, et al. Refraction-enhanced X-ray imaging of mouse lung using synchrotron radiation source. Med Phys 1999; 26:2190 -2193[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Imamura K, Ehara N, Umetani K, et al. Sensitive detection of voids in solid materials by refraction-enhanced synchrotron radiation imaging. App Phys Lett 2002;81 : 2559-2560[CrossRef]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imamura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Uesugi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Imamura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Uesugi, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS