AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strohm, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Milz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strohm, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Milz, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2701
AJR 2008; 190:1255-1259
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Detection of Bone Graft Failure in Lumbar Spondylodesis: Spatial Resolution with High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative CT

Peter C. Strohm1, David Kubosch2, Thorsten A. Bley2,3, Christoph M. Sprecher4, Norbert P. Südkamp1 and Stefan Milz4

1 Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg Medical Center, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106 Freiburg i Br., Germany.
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
3 Present address: Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
4 AO Research Institute, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.

Received June 8, 2007; accepted after revision November 7, 2007.

 
Address correspondence to P. C. Strohm (peter.strohm{at}uniklinik-freiburg.de).

P. C. Strohm received financial support from Tutogen Medical for animal investigation and implants (plates) from Aesculap.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. In spinal surgery, anterior spondylodesis is often combined with bone grafting, and graft integration is assessed with CT. High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT offers a resolution of 82 µm. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior spondylodesis as assessed with three radiologic procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Monosegmental lumbar spondylodesis with autologous iliac crest graft or solvent-preserved bovine cancellous bone was performed on seven sheep. The fused spinal segments were explanted after 24 weeks and examined with clinical 64-MDCT, high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT, and contact radiography. In 2D views, the area of the disk space bridged by bone was assessed, and the grafts were examined for fractures.

RESULTS. In three of seven sheep, clinical CT erroneously showed stable consolidation, whereas contact radiography revealed a clearly visible graft fracture, as did high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.038) between bone volume assessed with clinical CT and that assessed with contact radiography. There was an almost significant difference (p = 0.053) between volumes assessed with high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT and clinical MDCT.

CONCLUSION. High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT, a technique approved for clinical use, has higher resolution in imaging of bone structure than does 64-MDCT. Our results show that high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT is superior to 64-MDCT in assessing osseous implant integration after anterior spondylodesis. The specimen size limit, however, prohibits in vivo use of this method in evaluation of the human spine. Our results suggest that in clinical practice, persisting symptoms despite radiologic findings of consolidated spondylodesis may be related to graft failure, which cannot be detected with clinically available methods.

Keywords: bone graft • high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT • spinal surgery • spine • Xtreme CT


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Anterior stabilization is a procedure frequently performed in spinal surgery to manage traumatic or degenerative instability. Autologous bone transplants, such as iliac crest, fibula, and rib grafts, typically are used, but homogenous and xenogenous transplants also are used in selected cases [1, 2]. The reference standard for noninvasive clinical assessment of osseous implant integration is CT [3, 4]. MRI would theoretically also serve the purpose and provide valid results [5], but MRI is not suitable for visualizing bone because of the lack of water protons. In addition, osteosynthesis usually is performed with metal materials, such as internal fixators, plates, and hook-based systems, which also can interfere with the quality of CT images, increasing the difficulty of evaluation. The performance of clinical CT is constantly being improved, however; 64-MDCT has become standard at many hospitals.

Many of the decisions made during the treatment of spinal fusion patients consequently are based on results obtained from CT investigations, especially after the fusion operation has been performed. The time point for removal of an internal fixator is determined on the basis of CT findings. That is, the decision is based on a diagnosis of osseous integration of the implant and therefore the assumption of mechanically stable bridging between the two adjacent vertebral bodies. CT-based diagnosis also is important in cases in which decisions concerning rehabilitation have to be made or in which there is a need for an expert medical opinion. In many of these cases, the crucial parameter is resolution, and the diagnosis has to be made carefully with an imaging technique that has limited spatial resolution.

In experiments with micro-CT [611] and high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT [12], the influence of resolution on the validity of diagnosis has been studied with regard to the success of spinal fusion. Contact radiographs of serial sections of vertebrae embedded in methyl methacrylate have been evaluated as controls. This procedure can be regarded as almost equivalent to histologic investigation. The technique yields consecutive 2D views that can easily be compared with the results of 64-MDCT and high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT [4, 5]. The purpose of our investigation was to compare, in imaging of serial sections of an animal model of spinal fusion, the validity of results obtained with two CT techniques with that of findings on contact radiography.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Anterior spondylodesis with bone graft and anterior angular stable locking plate fixation (Macs TL, Aesculap) was performed on seven female sheep. The animal investigation protocol was approved by the local review board and was given the number G-04/16. In four sheep, bridging was achieved by insertion of a commercially available bovine cancellous bone block (Tutobone, Tutogen Medical). In three sheep, autologous tricortical iliac crest blocks were implanted. In all sheep, spondylodesis was performed between the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae through an anterolateral approach on the right side. After the operation, the sheep were kept and cared for in a natural environment of open and closed areas and sacrificed after 24 weeks.

Immediately after euthanasia, the section of the spine on which the operation had been per formed was explanted, and the osteosynthesis material removed. Clinical 64-MDCT was per formed on these specimens. The specimens were then fixed in 100% methanol, and high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT was performed. The next step was to embed the complete spinal segments in methyl methacrylate. After polymer ization of the blocks, 200-µm-thick serial sections were produced at an interval of 500 µm, and contact radiographs were obtained on high-resolution radiographic film. The contact radio graphs were first evaluated macro- scopically for assessment of bone bridging of the inter vertebral space. After acquisition of the contact radiographs, serial sections were stained with Giemsa eosin and evaluated for the presence of artificially produced microfractures. No such artifacts were detected, but the fracture gaps were filled with connective tissue.

Bone integration of the grafts was evaluated with the three imaging procedures. Special attention was paid to the extent of bone bridging across the former intervertebral space. The first step of the evaluation procedures was macroscopic assessment of the contact radiographs of the serial sections (reference standard) and of the two CT data sets with the focus on determining whether a graft was fractured. The second step of the evaluation was software-assisted analysis of all CT scans and radiographs 24 weeks after the operation to determine the absolute volume of the osseous parts of the graft in the region of the intervertebral space.

Imaging
All conventional CT scans were performed on a 64-MDCT scanner (Somatom Sensation 64, Siemens Medical Solutions) with a 0.37-second rotation time and the following parameters: X-ray tube potential, 120 kV; effective tube current, 680 mA; slice collimation, 64 x 0.6 mm; table feed, 9.2 mm/rotation; pitch, 0.24, allowing nominal isotropic resolution of 400 µm3; and result ing voxel dimension, 400 x 400 x 400 µm. High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (XtremeCT unit, SCANCO Medical) was performed with the following parameters: X-ray tube potential, 60 kV; effective tube current, 0.9 mA; 3,072 x 255 detector elements; pitch, 82 µm; matrix size, 3,072 x 3,072, allowing nominal isotropic resolution of 55 µm3; and resulting voxel dimension, 82 x 82 x 82 µm. Contact radiographs (Model No. 43855 A, Faxitron X-Ray) of serial sections of undecalcified vertebrae were obtained with high-resolution radiographic film (Struk turix-D3, Agfa-Gevaert). Images were ex posed with the following parameters: accelerator voltage, 20 kV; tube current, 3.0 mA; and resulting spatial resolution, approximately 1.2 x 1.2 µm [13].

Image Evaluation
The contact radiographs, which had almost the same resolution as histologic images, were evaluated to determine whether osseous bridging was present in the region of the intervertebral space. Because the contact radiographs originated from serial sections cut at constant intervals, volume size was determined by multiplication of the planimetric values by the interval (i.e., thickness) values. Morphometric analysis of the CT images (64-MDCT and high-resolution peripheral quan titative CT) was performed with OsiriX medical imaging software (OsiriX) and analysis of the contact radiographs with Axiovision LE software (Zeiss).

To guarantee precise detection of the outer borders of the graft in the sagittal sections, horizontal extension of the graft was assessed in the so-called "live synchronization mode" (simultaneous display of sagittal view and corresponding horizontal view). The volume was derived from the surface data combined with knowledge of the slice thickness. Because the clinical 64-MDCT image was recorded at a slice thickness of 2 mm and the graft had a total length of 10 mm, the analysis required a minimum of six sections.


Figure 1
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A Sheep 2, false-negative findings on 64-MDCT. 64-MDCT scan shows no fracture in region of graft.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B Sheep 2, false-negative findings on 64-MDCT. High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT scan (B) and contact radiograph (C) show delineation of fractured graft.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C Sheep 2, false-negative findings on 64-MDCT. High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT scan (B) and contact radiograph (C) show delineation of fractured graft.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A Sheep 6, consistently abnormal results among tested techniques. 64-MDCT scan (A), high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT scan (B), and contact radiograph (C) show lysis in region of graft.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B Sheep 6, consistently abnormal results among tested techniques. 64-MDCT scan (A), high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT scan (B), and contact radiograph (C) show lysis in region of graft.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C Sheep 6, consistently abnormal results among tested techniques. 64-MDCT scan (A), high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT scan (B), and contact radiograph (C) show lysis in region of graft.

 
To allow comparable evaluation modes for all three imaging procedures, high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT investigations were based on the same number of sections (slice thickness, 0.82 mm). Calculations for the contact radiographs also were based on six histologic sections from corresponding locations. For each 2D view, the corresponding volumes were calculated by multiplication of the area values with an interval thickness of 2 mm. Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney rank sum test.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In three of the seven sheep, conventional clinical 64-MDCT erroneously showed stable consolidation, whereas contact radiography showed a clearly visible but often very narrow fracture line. High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT likewise revealed graft fracture (Table 1). One sheep (sheep 6) had complete graft resorption. The extensive defect was correctly diagnosed with all three imaging techniques. Analysis showed that 50% of the graft fractures were not evident on clinical 64-MDCT and were classified as clinically consolidated with this method. In most of the sheep, sequestrum formation in the region of the intervertebral space was recorded as a bone bridge on 64-MDCT, whereas findings on high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT and contact radiography led to the correct diagnosis (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C). In two other sheep, the fracture gap was either large enough (Fig. 2A, 2B, 2C) to see it on 64-MDCT images, and in one sheep, the graft was not fractured (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bridging of Intervertebral Space

 

Figure 7
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A Sheep 7, consistent results with all tested techniques. 64-MDCT scan (A), high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT scan (B), and contact radiograph (C) show intact graft.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B Sheep 7, consistent results with all tested techniques. 64-MDCT scan (A), high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT scan (B), and contact radiograph (C) show intact graft.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C Sheep 7, consistent results with all tested techniques. 64-MDCT scan (A), high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT scan (B), and contact radiograph (C) show intact graft.

 

With bone volume calculated on the basis of the contact radiographs as the reference standard (Table 1), no significant differences were found in comparison with the values obtained with high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (p = 0.383). There was, however, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.038) between the values obtained with conventional clinical 64-MDCT and those obtained with contact radiography. With conventional CT, bone graft volume was overestimated. Some values recorded were more than twice as high as those obtained with contact radiography. Thus by a slight margin, an almost significant difference (p = 0.053) between high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT and conventional CT was found in this study (Fig. 4).


Figure 10
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Graph shows results of statistical comparison of three imaging techniques with Mann-Whitney rank sum test.

 

Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In clinical routine, CT is often used for detailed imaging of bone structures. This method has become established in particular for the visualization of mineralized osseous structures. Progress in technical design is leading to increasingly high resolutions for clinically approved devices so that questions can be addressed that were previously the prerogative of experimental CT. Bauer et al. [9], for example, performed comparative investigations in the context of osteoporosis diagnostics to evaluate clinical CT and micro CT and came to the conclusion that conventional clinical CT offers adequate characterization of trabecular structure.

Thomsen et al. [10] found high correlation between micro CT and histologic specimens whereby contact radiography was regarded as equivalent to histologic investigation [4]. Otsuki et al. [14] and Ho and Hutmacher [15] found that micro CT is a suitable instrument for the visualization of patterns of bone ingrowth into various bone substitutes. Nevertheless, distinct differences remain with regard to the clinical value of the resolutions available for each of the imaging technologies. High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT is, to our knowledge, the first clinically approved device with a resolution comparable with that of micro CT that can be used to scan larger specimens and even human extremities in vivo. Our literature search yielded only one study [12] of the use of such a device in the context of osteoporosis diagnostics.

The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of different imaging capabilities by direct comparison of 64-MDCT, high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT, and contact radiography in a clinically relevant animal model. For this purpose we analyzed images of graft incorporation of anterior spondylodesis of the lumber spine in sheep 24 weeks postoperatively. This temporal interval corresponded approximately to the clinical follow-up interval for this operation on human patients.

We found no significant difference between the bone volumes obtained with contact radiographs and those obtained with high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT. In contrast, the bone volumes obtained with clinical 64-MDCT differed significantly from the volumes obtained with contact radiographs and high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT. We concluded that with conventional clinical 64-MDCT, bone volume tends to be overestimated owing to large voxel size and the consequently large partial volume effects [16, 17]. As a result of this imaging characteristic, smaller mineralized objects (e.g., bone sequestra) are frequently merged with larger adjacent bone structures.

Our results clearly indicate that the resolution of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT is superior to that of conventional clinical 64-MDCT and that in anterior spondylodesis, these differences frequently led to incorrect qualitative assessment of bone bridging. This finding is especially important because resolutions that preclude incorrect diagnosis are not available for in vivo investigation of the human spine. In terms of clinical routine, there may be a relation between persistent pain and misleading diagnosis, which according to radiologic criteria suggest successful anterior spondylodesis. We believe that the success rates of graft-induced spinal fusion reported in the literature must be viewed critically in light of our findings. Evaluation of equally subtle osseous structures is at least possible in the extremities because high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT allows investigation of regions with a diameter of 125 mm. Our results show that there is clinical demand for the same technology for spinal in vivo diagnostics.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Briem D, Rueger JM, Linhart W. Osseous integration of autogenous bone grafts following combined dorso-ventral instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar spine fractures [in German]. Unfallchirurg 2003;106 : 195–203[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Kossmann T, Ertel W, Platz A, Trentz O. Combined surgery for fractures of the thoraco-lumbar junction using the inlay-span method [in German]. Orthopade 1999;28 : 432–440[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Moll R, Schindler G, Weckbach A. Evaluation of ventral stabilization techniques for thoracolumbar fractures by helical computer tomography [in German]. Rofo 2002;174 : 880–886[Medline]
  4. Link TM, Vieth V, Stehling C, et al. High-resolution MRI versus multislice helical CT: which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best? Eur Radiol 2003;13 : 663–671[Medline]
  5. Phan CM, Matsuura M, Bauer JS, et al. Trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus: comparison of MRI at 3.0 and 1.5 T with micro-CT as the standard of reference. Radiology 2006;239 : 488–496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Laib A, Barou O, Vico L, Lafage-Proust MH, Alexandre C, Rügsegger P. 3D microcomputed tomography of trabecular and cortical bone architecture with application to a rat model of immobilization osteoporosis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2000;38 : 326–332[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Laib A, Kumer JL, Majumdar S, Lane NE. The temporal changes of trabecular architecture in ovariectomized rats assessed by microCT. Osteoporos Int 2001;12 : 936–941[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Mulder L, Koolstra JH, Van Eijden TM. Accuracy of microCT in the quantitative determination of the degree and distribution of mineralization in developing bone. Acta Radiol 2004;45 : 769–777[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Bauer JS, Issever AS, Fischbeck M, et al. Multislice-CT for structure analysis of trabecular bone: a comparison with micro-CT and biomechanical strength [in German]. Rofo2004; 176:709 –718[Medline]
  10. Thomsen JS, Laib A, Koller B, Prohaska S, Mosekilde L, Gowin W. Stereological measures of trabecular bone structure: comparison of 3D micro CT with 2D histologic sections in human proximal tibial bone biopsies. J Microsc 2005;218 : 171–179[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Teo JC, Si-Hoe KM, Keh JE, Teoh SH. Relationship between CT intensity, microarchitecture and mechanical properties of porcine vertebral cancellous bone. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)2006; 21:235 –244[CrossRef]
  12. Sornay-Rendu E, Boutroy S, Munoz F, Delmas PD. Alterations of cortical and trabecular architecture are associated with fractures in postmenopausal women, partially independent of decreased BMD measured by DXA: the OFELY study. J Bone Miner Res 2007;22 : 425–433[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. El Ghazaly, M. X-ray phase contrast imaging at the Mainz microton MAMI [thesis]. Mainz, Germany: Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Institut für Physik, 2005
  14. Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials2006; 27:5892 –5900[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Ho ST, Hutmacher DW. A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials 2006;27 :1362 –1376[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Siegel MJ, Luker GD. Pediatric applications of helical (spiral) CT. Radiol Clin North Am 1995;33 : 997–1022[Medline]
  17. Wiemker R, Rogalla P, Blaffert T, et al. Aspects of computer-aided detection (CAD) and volumetry of pulmonary nodules using MDCT. Br J Radiol 2005; 78[spec no 1]: S46–S56[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strohm, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Milz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strohm, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Milz, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS