AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saremi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Milliken, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saremi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Milliken, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3127
AJR 2008; 190:1569-1575
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

MDCT of the S-Shaped Sinoatrial Node Artery

Farhood Saremi1, Stephanie Channual1, Amir Abolhoda2, Swaminatha V. Gurudevan3, Jagat Narula3 and Jeffrey C. Milliken2

1 Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, UCI Medical Center, 101 The City Dr., Route 140, Orange, CA 92868-3298.
2 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, UCI Medical Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA.
3 Department of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine, UCI Medical Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA.

Received September 8, 2007; accepted after revision December 25, 2007.

 
Address correspondence to F. Saremi (fsaremi{at}uci.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to use 64-MDCT to investigate the anatomic characteristics of the S-shaped variant of the sinoatrial node (SAN) artery and to describe the clinical implications of the findings in ablative procedures involving the left atrium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Coronary CT angiograms of 250 patients (152 men, 98 women; mean age, 60 ± 12 [SD] years) were retrospectively analyzed for identification of the origin, number, anatomic course, mode of termination, and S-shaped variant of the SAN artery.

RESULTS. At least one SAN artery was detected in 244 patients. The S-shaped variant was seen in 35 (14.3%) of these patients. Thirty-four of the variants (30.6% of all left SAN arteries) arose from the proximal to middle portion of the left circumflex artery (mean distance between the ostium of the left circumflex artery and the origin of S-shaped variant, 28.7 ± 13.1 mm). The other variant (0.7% of all right SAN arteries) originated from the distal right coronary artery. The S-shaped variant was the only artery supplying the SAN in 28 (11.4%) of the patients. In patients with two arteries supplying the SAN, the right SAN artery and the S-shaped variant of the left SAN artery were seen together in seven patients. The S-shaped SAN artery (mean distance from atrial wall, 2.43 ± 0.992 mm) had a predictable proximal course, lying in the posterior aspect in a groove between the orifices of the left superior pulmonary vein and the left atrial appendage close to the left atrial wall. The terminal segment of the artery approached the nodal tissue posterior to the superior vena cava in 22 patients, anterior to the vena cava in 10 patients, and through branches surrounding the vena cava in two patients.

CONCLUSION. The S-shaped variation of the SAN artery is common and has a characteristic anatomic course. MDCT can be used to plan surgical and catheter-based left atrial interventions in which this artery is at risk of injury.

Keywords: ablation • coronary artery • coronary CT angiography • left atrium • sinoatrial node artery


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Reports of cadaveric dissections and angiographic studies of the human heart describe the S-shaped sinoatrial node (SAN) artery, an anatomic variant of the left SAN artery, as a relatively large vessel arising from the left circumflex (LCX) artery and coursing posteriorly between the left atrial appendage (LAA) and the ostium of the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) and then anteriorly close to the anterior wall of the left atrium [1-7]. The unusual anatomic course and proximity to the left atrial wall predispose this vessel to injury during cardiac interventions. Accurate anatomic imaging of this variant blood vessel can influence planning for surgical and catheter-based ablation of the left atrium.

Coronary CT angiography has been found useful for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis, anomalous coronary anatomic features, and the arterial supply of the cardiac conduction system [8-13]. Newer-generation 64-MDCT scanners provide enough temporal and spatial resolution for evaluation of epicardial coronary arteries and their smaller branch vessels [14, 15]. We have described our experience with MDCT for detailing the anatomic features of the arterial blood supply of the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes [13]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our extended results with 64-MDCT for imaging of this variant of the SAN artery.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
A retrospective analysis of ECG-gated MDCT (Aquilion unit, Toshiba) examinations of the coronary artery was conducted over 4 months (February-June 2007) with 265 consecutively registered subjects, either self-referred (n = 130) because of personal interest in participating in research, for which they had given consent, or referred by a physician because of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Two hundred fifty patients were included in the study. Fifteen patients were excluded because of severe artifacts produced by low contrast-to-noise ratio (n = 4), motion (n = 10), or pacemaker leads (n = 1).

Completed clinical history questionnaires were reviewed: 16.1% of the patients reported a history of atrial fibrillation, 8.6% had structural heart disease such as heart failure or cardiomyopathy, 6.8% had a history of coronary artery stent placement, 5.4% had undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), surgery, and 5.4% had a history of myocardial infarction. The mean age of the patients was 60 ± 12 (SD) years (range, 27-86 years). One hundred fifty-two (60.8%) of the patients were men, and 98 (39.2%) were women. The mean weight of the entire cohort was 176.3 ± 37.3 lb (80.0 ± 16.9 kg) (range, 100-280 lb [45.4-127.0 kg]). The study was approved by the institutional review board at our institution. Informed consent was waived, and the study was in compliance with HIPAA regulations.

Patient Preparation
ECG was performed and vital signs were obtained for all patients when they arrived in the imaging suite. When necessary, patients were given oral and IV metoprolol to achieve a target heart rate less than 65 beats/min. Unless contraindicated, a sublingual nitroglycerin tablet (0.4-0.8 mg) was given 1 minute before image acquisition. The mean heart rate before data acquisition was 58 ± 6 beats/min (range, 40-73 beats/min).

Scan Protocol and Image Reconstruction
The 64-MDCT scanner had an individual detector width of 0.5 mm. Contrast enhancement was achieved with a mean dose of 74.91 ± 3.32 mL (range, 65-92 mL) of iohexol (Omnipaque 350 mg/mL, GE Healthcare) injected at 4-5 mL/s and followed by an injection of 50 mL of saline solution at 5 mL/s through an 18-gauge catheter into an antecubital vein to allow washout of contrast material from the right side of the heart and the superior vena cava (SVC). The scan parameters were collimation, 64 x 0.5 mm; table feed per rotation, 7.2 mm; gantry rotation time, 400 milliseconds; tube voltage, 120 kVp; tube current, 400 mA. Start delay was defined with bolus tracking in the descending aorta at the level of tracheal bifurcation, and scan start was automatically initiated 4 seconds after a threshold of 180 H was reached. Retrospective ECG-gated volumetric data sets were acquired during a single breath-hold. The mean scan duration was 9.0 ± 1.3 seconds with a range of 7.4-15 seconds.

Axial slices were reconstructed and synchronized to the ECG with a nonsegmented (≤ 65 beats/min) or segmented (> 65 beats/min) image reconstruction algorithm based on the heart rate throughout the examination. When necessary, R-wave indicators were manually repositioned to improve the quality of synchronization. On the basis of a relative delay strategy, diastolic data sets were reconstructed at 70%, 75%, and 80% of R-R intervals. In case of persistence of artifacts related to coronary motion at the atrioventricular groove, a second reconstruction approach was made, and systolic images were reconstructed with an absolute delay strategy with a 350- to 400-millisecond delay after the previous R wave. Data sets reconstructed during the diastolic phase were used for all patients. Axial slices with a thickness of 0.5 mm (increment, 0.3 mm) and a cardiac CT angiography algorithm were used for evaluating coronary vessels and conduction system branches. The data set least affected by cardiac motion was transferred to an off-line 3D workstation (Vitrea, Vital Images) for further analysis.

CT Data Analysis
A radiologist and a cardiologist with advanced training in cardiovascular CT interpretation rendered and evaluated multiplanar reformations of the contrast-enhanced axial images according to training guidelines published by a task force of the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association [16]. Visualization techniques such as maximum intensity projection and 3D reconstruction with tissue sculpting depended on individual coronary anatomy and image quality. Overall image quality was qualitatively evaluated and classified as excellent, good, or adequate primarily on the basis of common image-degrading artifacts related to metal, motion, and background noise. The imaging findings related to CAD were graded as normal, mild (any vessel with less than 50% stenosis), moderate (any vessel with 50-70% stenosis), or severe (any vessel with greater than 70% stenosis).

Axial images were reviewed. Coronary vessels were examined to identify the SAN artery. Images were analyzed for identification of the origin, number, anatomic course, and anatomic variants of the arteries to the SAN with specific attention to the S-shaped variant of the SAN artery. The diameter for all SAN arteries was measured close to the origin of the artery. The distance between the ostium of the LCX artery and the origin of the S-shaped SAN artery also was measured. The anatomic course of the S-shaped SAN artery was assessed, and its closest distance from the left atrial wall in the groove between the ostium of the LSPV and the mouth of the LAA was measured. The diameter of the left S-shaped SAN artery in this groove also was measured. The mode of termination of the S-shaped SAN artery in relation to the SVC was classified as retrocaval (posterior to the SVC), precaval (anterior to the SVC), or pericaval (through multiple branches surrounding the SVC). Each set of images was evaluated for the presence of additional anatomic findings, including unusual origin of the S-shaped SAN artery, atrial branches, and dual blood supply to the SAN.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with SAS software (version 9.1.3, SAS Institute). Mean ± standard deviation was used to report univariate statistics for all continuous data. In addition, 95% CI estimates of percentages were reported. Statistical analysis for bivariate comparisons was performed. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Image Quality and Vessel Visualization
Image quality was classified as excellent in 76% of the cases, good in 20%, and adequate in 4%. Axial and 3D images were the optimal views for visualization of the anatomic course of the SAN arteries and their atrial branches.

S-Shaped Posterior SAN Artery
Among the 250 patients in the study, the SAN artery was not visualized in six patients. In the other 244 patients, a single SAN artery originated from the right coronary artery (RCA) in 133 (54.5%) of the patients and from the LCX artery in 99 (40.6%) of the patients (Table 1). A dual blood supply to the SAN from the RCA and LCX arteries was seen in 12 (4.9%) of the patients. Among 250 coronary CT angiograms, 46.2% were normal, 30.5% had evidence of mild CAD, 13.3% evidence of moderate CAD, and 10.0% evidence of severe CAD in any vessel.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Incidence and Measurements of Arteries Supplying the Sinoatrial Node and Their Associated Branches (n = 244)

 

An S-shaped SAN artery was seen in 35 (14.3%) of the 244 patients with SAN arteries. Thirty-four (30.6%) of the 111 left SAN arteries (99 single, 12 part of a dual supply) originated from the proximal to middle portion of the LCX artery (mean distance from the LCX ostium, 28.7 ± 13.1 mm; range, 12.2-65.0 mm). One (0.7%) of the 145 right SAN arteries (133 single, 12 part of a dual supply) originated from the distal RCA. Among the 34 patients with a left-sided S-shaped SAN artery, 67.6% had normal findings on coronary CT angiography, whereas 29.4% had mild CAD and 2.94% had moderate CAD in the LCX artery. There was no relation between the dominance of the coronary system and the origin of the S-shaped SAN artery. Among 35 S-shaped vessels, 27 were from a right-dominant, seven from a left-dominant, and one from a balanced coronary system. Women were less likely than men to have the S-shaped variant (relative risk, 0.4596; 95% CI, 0.2177-0.9700; chi-square value, 4.56; p = 0.0327).


Figure 1
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 62-year-old man with chest pain. Anatomic course of S-shaped SAN artery. Axial CT scan at level of left atrial appendage (LAA) (A) and left lateral 3D CT scans in two different projections (B and C) of heart show that on axial images, S-shaped posterior sinoatrial node (SAN) artery (large arrows, A-C) can easily be identified where it courses between LAA and left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV). Artery arises from proximal left circumflex artery and courses along lateral wall of left atrium. It usually gives off branches to atrial wall (small arrows, B) before making U-turn toward LAA-LSPV groove. In groove, SAN artery is very close to atrial wall (arrow, A) and can be damaged in surgical procedures on LAA or pulmonary vein isolation procedures. From this point, anatomic course of S-shaped SAN artery is similar to that of left SAN artery, which courses toward superior vena cava along anterior wall of left atrium. LPV = left pulmonary vein trunk, AA = ascending aorta.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 62-year-old man with chest pain. Anatomic course of S-shaped SAN artery. Axial CT scan at level of left atrial appendage (LAA) (A) and left lateral 3D CT scans in two different projections (B and C) of heart show that on axial images, S-shaped posterior sinoatrial node (SAN) artery (large arrows, A-C) can easily be identified where it courses between LAA and left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV). Artery arises from proximal left circumflex artery and courses along lateral wall of left atrium. It usually gives off branches to atrial wall (small arrows, B) before making U-turn toward LAA-LSPV groove. In groove, SAN artery is very close to atrial wall (arrow, A) and can be damaged in surgical procedures on LAA or pulmonary vein isolation procedures. From this point, anatomic course of S-shaped SAN artery is similar to that of left SAN artery, which courses toward superior vena cava along anterior wall of left atrium. LPV = left pulmonary vein trunk, AA = ascending aorta.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 62-year-old man with chest pain. Anatomic course of S-shaped SAN artery. Axial CT scan at level of left atrial appendage (LAA) (A) and left lateral 3D CT scans in two different projections (B and C) of heart show that on axial images, S-shaped posterior sinoatrial node (SAN) artery (large arrows, A-C) can easily be identified where it courses between LAA and left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV). Artery arises from proximal left circumflex artery and courses along lateral wall of left atrium. It usually gives off branches to atrial wall (small arrows, B) before making U-turn toward LAA-LSPV groove. In groove, SAN artery is very close to atrial wall (arrow, A) and can be damaged in surgical procedures on LAA or pulmonary vein isolation procedures. From this point, anatomic course of S-shaped SAN artery is similar to that of left SAN artery, which courses toward superior vena cava along anterior wall of left atrium. LPV = left pulmonary vein trunk, AA = ascending aorta.

 
The S-shaped variant was the only artery supplying the SAN in 28 patients; 27 of these variants were from the LCX artery and one from the RCA. These 28 cases were 11.4% of all 244 SAN arteries, 27.3% of 99 single SAN arteries arising from the LCX artery, and 0.8% of 133 single SAN arteries arising from the RCA. In the 12 cases of dual blood supply to the SAN, the right SAN artery and left SAN artery were seen together in five (41%) of the patients, and the right SAN artery and the S-shaped variant of the left SAN artery were seen together in seven (58.3%) of the patients. This dual supply involving the S-shaped SAN variant was seen in 2.9% of all 244 patients with SAN arteries.

The S-shaped variant of the left SAN artery appeared larger and longer than the usual SAN artery. Whereas the mean diameters of the regular right and left SAN arteries were 1.58 ± 0.287 mm (range, 0.90-2.2 mm) and 1.40 ± 0.314 mm (range, 0.70-1.9 mm), respectively, the mean diameter of the left S-shaped SAN artery was 2.12 ± 0.347 mm (range, 1.3-2.8 mm) close to its origin. The left S-shaped SAN artery invariably coursed posteriorly in a groove at the junction between the orifice of the LSPV and the mouth of the LAA and had a mean diameter of 1.90 ± 0.331 mm (range, 1.4-2.7 mm) within the groove (Figs. 1A, 1B and 1C). In this groove, the artery was close (mean distance, 2.43 ± 0.992 mm; range, 1.0-4.8 mm) to the left atrial wall. The course of the artery continued toward the SVC along the transverse sinus anterior to the left atrium and interatrial groove.

The terminal segment of the S-shaped variant of the left SAN artery approached the SAN by three different routes (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D): posterior to the SVC (retrocaval) in 22 (64.7%) of the patients, anterior to the SVC (precaval) in 10 (29.4%), and through multiple branches surrounding the SVC (pericaval) in two (5.9%) of the patients. The retrocaval mode of termination was therefore the most common pattern, and there was a significant difference between this mode and the precaval mode of termination (chi-square value, 4.50; p = 0.0339). At the level of the interatrial groove, the S-shaped SAN artery typically sent multiple branches to supply the interatrial Bachmann's bundle. In the retrocaval mode of termination, the S-shaped SAN artery penetrated the interatrial bundle before reaching the SAN in the lateral aspect of the superior cavoatrial junction.


Figure 4
View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A Terminal anatomic course of S-shaped sinoatrial node (SAN) artery. 85-year-old man with retrocaval (A and B) and 61-year-old woman with precaval (C and D) mode of termination of artery. Sculptured 3D CT images (A and C) and corresponding axial images (B and D) at level of superior cavoatrial junction show S-shaped SAN arteries (short arrows, A and C). Proximal courses of artery are similar in most cases. Arising from proximal left circumflex artery, S-shaped SAN artery turns posteriorly and courses in groove between left atrial appendage (LAA) and left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) orifices (short arrows, B and D). We found that in most cases distal artery coursed close to interatrial groove, penetrated interatrial muscle bundle, and followed its course behind superior vena cava (SVC) (retrocaval) to reach SAN area on lateral aspect of cavoatrial junction (long arrows, A and B). This variant is prone to injury in superior septal approach to mitral valve repair. In precaval mode of termination (long arrows, C and D), artery courses away from interatrial groove to reach anterior margin of superior cavoatrial junction and is less susceptible to injury. AA = ascending aorta, RSPV = right superior pulmonary vein.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B Terminal anatomic course of S-shaped sinoatrial node (SAN) artery. 85-year-old man with retrocaval (A and B) and 61-year-old woman with precaval (C and D) mode of termination of artery. Sculptured 3D CT images (A and C) and corresponding axial images (B and D) at level of superior cavoatrial junction show S-shaped SAN arteries (short arrows, A and C). Proximal courses of artery are similar in most cases. Arising from proximal left circumflex artery, S-shaped SAN artery turns posteriorly and courses in groove between left atrial appendage (LAA) and left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) orifices (short arrows, B and D). We found that in most cases distal artery coursed close to interatrial groove, penetrated interatrial muscle bundle, and followed its course behind superior vena cava (SVC) (retrocaval) to reach SAN area on lateral aspect of cavoatrial junction (long arrows, A and B). This variant is prone to injury in superior septal approach to mitral valve repair. In precaval mode of termination (long arrows, C and D), artery courses away from interatrial groove to reach anterior margin of superior cavoatrial junction and is less susceptible to injury. AA = ascending aorta, RSPV = right superior pulmonary vein.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C Terminal anatomic course of S-shaped sinoatrial node (SAN) artery. 85-year-old man with retrocaval (A and B) and 61-year-old woman with precaval (C and D) mode of termination of artery. Sculptured 3D CT images (A and C) and corresponding axial images (B and D) at level of superior cavoatrial junction show S-shaped SAN arteries (short arrows, A and C). Proximal courses of artery are similar in most cases. Arising from proximal left circumflex artery, S-shaped SAN artery turns posteriorly and courses in groove between left atrial appendage (LAA) and left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) orifices (short arrows, B and D). We found that in most cases distal artery coursed close to interatrial groove, penetrated interatrial muscle bundle, and followed its course behind superior vena cava (SVC) (retrocaval) to reach SAN area on lateral aspect of cavoatrial junction (long arrows, A and B). This variant is prone to injury in superior septal approach to mitral valve repair. In precaval mode of termination (long arrows, C and D), artery courses away from interatrial groove to reach anterior margin of superior cavoatrial junction and is less susceptible to injury. AA = ascending aorta, RSPV = right superior pulmonary vein.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D Terminal anatomic course of S-shaped sinoatrial node (SAN) artery. 85-year-old man with retrocaval (A and B) and 61-year-old woman with precaval (C and D) mode of termination of artery. Sculptured 3D CT images (A and C) and corresponding axial images (B and D) at level of superior cavoatrial junction show S-shaped SAN arteries (short arrows, A and C). Proximal courses of artery are similar in most cases. Arising from proximal left circumflex artery, S-shaped SAN artery turns posteriorly and courses in groove between left atrial appendage (LAA) and left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) orifices (short arrows, B and D). We found that in most cases distal artery coursed close to interatrial groove, penetrated interatrial muscle bundle, and followed its course behind superior vena cava (SVC) (retrocaval) to reach SAN area on lateral aspect of cavoatrial junction (long arrows, A and B). This variant is prone to injury in superior septal approach to mitral valve repair. In precaval mode of termination (long arrows, C and D), artery courses away from interatrial groove to reach anterior margin of superior cavoatrial junction and is less susceptible to injury. AA = ascending aorta, RSPV = right superior pulmonary vein.

 

An unusual variant of the S-shaped SAN artery originating from the RCA distal to the origin of the posterolateral artery was identified in one (0.4%) of the 244 patients with SAN arteries. This artery coursed posteriorly around the posterior aspect of the coronary sinus and left atrium and then anteriorly toward the ostium of the left inferior pulmonary vein and then the LSPV (Fig. 3). The course was 1.2 mm from the left atrial wall in the groove between the LAA and the LSPV and along the transverse sinus, terminating precavally to supply the SAN.


Figure 8
Figure 8
View larger version (195K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 45-year-old woman with S-shaped sinoatrial node artery (short black arrows, C) arising from right coronary artery (RCA).

A-C, Axial CT images at level of left atrial appendage (LAA) (A) and coronary sinus (B) and 3D posterior CT scan (C) of heart show rare variant found in one patient. S-shaped sinoatrial node artery originates from terminal branches of dominant right coronary artery posterior to coronary sinus (CS) (B and C) and courses along posterolateral wall of left atrium toward groove between LAA and left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV). IVC = inferior vena cava, LIPV = left inferior pulmonary vein, PLA = posterolateral artery (long black arrows, C), RA = right atrium. White arrows indicate areas of A and B that correspond to C.

 
An atrial branch from the S-shaped posterior SAN artery was found in 6.0% of all 250 cases reviewed. The proximal portion of this branch was commonly seen supplying the posterior wall of the left atrium (Figs. 1A, 1B and 1C). In two patients, an atrial branch was seen arising from the proximal LCX artery, which had a course similar to that of the S-shaped artery between the LAA and the LSPV but did not reach the SAN area. The SAN was supplied by the right SAN artery in one of these patients and by the left SAN artery in the other (Figs. 4A, 4B, 4C and 4D).


Figure 9
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A Findings to be differentiated from S-shaped sinoatrial node artery. S-shaped sinoatrial node artery invariably courses in groove between left atrial appendage and left superior pulmonary vein and is best localized on axial images. 65-year-old man with a history of coronary artery disease and chest pain. CT scan shows independent small atrial branch arising from left circumflex artery (not shown) and coursing in groove between left atrial appendage and left superior pulmonary vein and behind left atrium (white arrows) but not reaching sinoatrial node area. True sinoatrial node artery is left-sided artery arising from left circumflex artery (black arrows).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B Findings to be differentiated from S-shaped sinoatrial node artery. S-shaped sinoatrial node artery invariably courses in groove between left atrial appendage and left superior pulmonary vein and is best localized on axial images. 56-year-old woman with recanalized ligament of Marshall. CT scan shows ligament of Marshall (arrow) is recanalized because left brachiocephalic vein is occluded (not shown).

 

Figure 11
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C Findings to be differentiated from S-shaped sinoatrial node artery. S-shaped sinoatrial node artery invariably courses in groove between left atrial appendage and left superior pulmonary vein and is best localized on axial images. 61-year-old man with persistent left superior vena cava. CT scan shows superior vena cava (arrow) partially filled by collateral vessels. Cardiac chambers are poorly filled with contrast material.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D Findings to be differentiated from S-shaped sinoatrial node artery. S-shaped sinoatrial node artery invariably courses in groove between left atrial appendage and left superior pulmonary vein and is best localized on axial images. 72-year-old man who has undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery. CT scan shows typical course of saphenous vein graft to obtuse marginal artery. Graft usually courses behind left atrial appendage but with enough distance from groove (white arrow) and should not be mistaken for S-shaped sinoatrial node artery on axial images. S-shaped variant of sinoatrial node artery (black arrows) is evident.

 

Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Several previously published reports [1-6, 17, 18] provide anatomic descriptions of the blood supply to the cardiac conduction system. These reports, however, are based solely on findings at invasive transarterial angiography or cadaveric dissection of the human heart. These descriptions also focus primarily on the main named epicardial vessels supplying the nodal tissues, such as the left or right SAN arteries. We have reported [13] our experience with noninvasive MDCT of the arterial supply to the SAN and the atrioventricular node. To our knowledge, the current report is the first of noninvasive anatomic imaging of a common variant of the left SAN artery, namely, the S-shaped SAN artery, with 64-MDCT (0.5-mm isotropic resolution) of living human subjects. Our results are in concordance with the previous angiographic and cadaveric findings. We found that the S-shaped variant of the left SAN artery accounts for approximately 30% of SAN arteries arising from the LCX coronary artery and 14.3% of all SAN arteries. Kyriakidis et al. [19] and Nerantzis and Avgoustakis [2] have similarly reported that this variant can be seen in 27% and 21%, respectively, of left SAN arteries. These angiographic and cadaveric findings confirm the accuracy of our observations.

McAlpine [1] extensively described the S-shaped variant as a posterior SAN artery arising from the proximal 50 mm of the LCX artery coursing over the lateral wall of the left atrium between the orifices of the LAA and LSPV and then commonly proceeding intramurally through the interatrial septal bundle to the superior cavoatrial junction. This artery supplies the SAN and surrounding area, including a large part of the right atrial free wall and interatrial septum, the dome of the left atrium, and, on occasion, a portion of the atrioventricular nodal area [2, 3]. McAlpine's descriptions of the S-shaped variant in cadavers mirror our noninvasive imaging findings. It is of interest that the S-shaped SAN artery follows a course similar to that of the left superior cardinal vein of the fetus and the oblique vein of Marshall in adults. Therefore, structures such as a persistent left SVC or a recanalized Marshall ligament should be considered in the differential diagnosis of an enhancing structure passing between the LAA and the LSPV (Figs. 4A, 4B, 4C and 4D). In addition, although saphenous vein grafts usually lie behind the LAA in patients who have undergone CABG graft surgery, the proximity of the graft to the LSPV-LAA groove can cause the graft to be mistaken for the S-shaped SAN artery (Figs. 4A, 4B, 4C and 4D).

Potential clinical implications of our imaging findings in patients undergoing invasive procedures on the left and right atria are beyond anatomic curiosity. For instance, the long, aberrant, yet predictable course of the S-shaped variant of the SAN artery can expose this vessel to injury during epicardial or endocardial ablation performed in proximity to the posterosuperior left atrial wall and the base of the LAA. These procedures include epicardial pulmonary vein isolation and ligation of the LAA as part of any modified Cox maze operation for correction of atrial fibrillation [20-26]. The consequence of such injury, especially if the vessel is the sole blood supply to the SAN, can be sinus node dysfunction and even junctional escape rhythm, negating the potential therapeutic benefit of the ablation procedure. Therefore, atrial fibrillation ablation procedures should be care fully planned with this anatomic variant in mind.

Imaging information on the mode of termination of the SAN artery, the S-shaped variant in particular, can be of clinical relevance [27]. For example, in the popular transseptal superior dome approach to the mitral valve apparatus, cardiac surgeons deliberately extend the septal incision toward the roof the left atrium and the LAA [28]. The left SAN artery traverses the transverse sinus and reaches the nodal tissue by a retrocaval route and becomes susceptible to injury. It is clinically well documented that patients who undergo the superior transseptal surgical approach to mitral valve surgery often have postoperative disturbances in sinus node function, but these changes are transient [29, 30]. Our study revealed that the termination mode of the S-shaped variant of the SAN artery can differ from that of normal SAN arteries. We observed that the S-shaped variant most often (64.7%) has a retrocaval termination, followed by precaval (29.4%) and pericaval (5.9%) terminations. This pattern of termination is different for normal left-sided SAN arteries, for which the precaval route is most common.

Busquet et al. [31] conducted a cadaveric study on the normal SAN artery and described its termination as precaval (58%), retrocaval (36%), or encircling (6%). We [13] reported that the terminal SAN arteries (right or left) approached the SAN retrocavally in 47.5% of the patients, precavally in 42.5%, and pericavally in 10%. Berdajs et al. [27] analyzed 50 human cadaveric hearts that did not have previous pathologic alterations and found that the sinus node artery crossed the superior posterior border of the interatrial septum in 54% of the hearts. Because retrocaval variants course in proximity to the interatrial groove [13], the S-shaped posterior SAN artery may be more prone than normal SAN arteries to surgical trauma during superior transseptal incisions. Intraoperative damage to the SAN artery can be avoided if preoperative MDCT angiography accurately depicts the course and mode of termination of the artery, leading to modification of the surgical approach as indicated.

Several previous reports [2, 4, 31] have described a blood supply to the SAN through the common variants of the right and left SAN arteries. Kyriakidis et al. [19] reported a dual supply to the SAN involving the right SAN artery and the S-shaped variant of the left SAN artery. To our knowledge, our report is the first on the MDCT findings of this unusual variant of a dual blood supply to the SAN. The presence of a dual blood supply to the same anatomic cardiac region may serve as a protective mechanism against ischemia in patients with progressive coronary artery atherosclerosis. For instance, the collateral arcade between the right SAN artery and the S-shaped left SAN artery arising from the mid-portion of the LCX coronary artery may lessen coronary ischemia in the LCX territory in the case of development of hemodynamically significant proximal LCX stenosis. Furthermore, a patient with a dual blood supply would be potentially less vulnerable to ischemia-mediated sick sinus syndrome.

Hutchinson [32] reported that the S-shaped posterior SAN artery originated from the terminal part of the RCA and coursed in a clockwise direction around the walls of the right and left atria to the SAN in one (2.5%) of 40 hearts. We found this variant of the S-shaped posterior SAN artery branching from the terminal branches of the RCA in one (0.4%) of 244 patients with SAN arteries. This rare variant also coursed in a clockwise direction around the posterior wall of the left atrium. We also identified multiple posterior atrial branches arising from the S-shaped variant of the left SAN artery in 6% of the patients. In addition, we found two atrial branches arising directly from the LCX artery and having an anatomic course similar to that of the S-shaped variant. These atrial branches should not be confused with the S-shaped SAN artery because they do not extend to the SAN area (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D).

Our study had the expected limitations of a retrospective observational review, and our data were primarily collected from patients with structurally normal hearts. The latter limitation may make our findings difficult to generalize to patients with cardiac anomalies or pathologic heart conditions. Nevertheless, our results are in accordance with those of historical angiographic studies and cadaveric dissections of the human heart, emphasizing the validity of our observations. In addition, the number of patients included in our study was larger than in past studies of SAN arteries [3, 7, 27, 31, 32], which may allow greater generalization of our results.

The S-shaped variant of the SAN artery as imaged with 64-MDCT is a common variant of the left SAN artery in patients undergoing noninvasive evaluation for CAD. MDCT is a useful imaging adjunct for precise description of the course and mode of termination of the S-shaped variant of the SAN artery. This imaging technique can be used to avoid injury to this vessel during surgical or catheter-based procedures on the atrial chambers of the human heart.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. McAlpine WA. Heart and coronary arteries: an anatomic atlas for clinical diagnosis, radiologic investigation, and surgical treatment. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1975:151 -162
  2. Nerantzis C, Avgoustakis D. An S-shaped atrial artery supplying the sinus node area: an anatomic study. Chest1980; 78:274 -278[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Tanaka S, Lee HY, Mizukami S, Nakatani T, Chung IH. Posterior sinus node artery and accessory atrioventricular node artery arising by a common origin: a case report. Clin Anat 1998;11 : 106-111[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Kyriakidis M, Vyssoulis G, Barbetseas J, Toutouzas P. A clinical angiographic study of the arterial blood supply to the sinus node. Chest 1988; 94:1054 -1057[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Anderson KR, Ho SY, Anderson RH. Location and vascular supply of sinus node in human heart. Br Heart J1979; 41:28 -32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Sow ML, Ndoye JM, Lo EA. The artery of the sinuatrial node: anatomic considerations based on 45 injection-dissections of the heart. Surg Radiol Anat 1996;18 : 103-109[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Ortale JR, Paganoti Cde F, Marchiori GF. Anatomic variations in the human sinuatrial nodal artery. Clinics2006; 61:551 -558[Medline]
  8. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice helical CT. Circulation 2001;103 : 2535-2538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Vogl TJ, Abolmaali ND, Diebold T, et al. Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multidetector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology 2002;223 : 212-220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multidetector row helical CT and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003;107 : 664-666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Duran C, Kantarci M, Durur Subasi I, et al. Remarkable anatomic anomalies of coronary arteries and their clinical importance: a MDCT angiographic study. J Comput Assist Tomogr2006; 30:939 -948[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Stratznig P, Groell R, Rienmueller R. Detection of the sinus node artery using electron beam CT of the heart. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002; 18:457 -461[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Saremi F, Abolhoda A, Ashikyan O, et al. Arterial supply to sinuatrial and atrioventricular nodes: imaging with multidetector CT. Radiology 2008;246 : 99-107[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1482 -1487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46 : 552-557[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Fayad Z, et al. Task force 12: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (CT)—endorsed by the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol2006; 47:915 -920[Free Full Text]
  17. Sow ML, Ndoye JM, Lo EA. The artery of the atrioventricular node: an anatomic study based on 38 injection-dissections. Surg Radiol Anat 2000; 22:93 -96[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Anderson KR, Murphy JG. The atrio-ventricular node artery in the human heart. Angiology 1983;34 : 711-716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kyriakidis MK, Kourouklis CB, Papaioannou JT, Christakos SG, Spanos GP, Avgoustakis DG. Sinus node coronary arteries studied with angiography. Am J Cardiol 1983;51 : 749-750[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Rigatelli G, Tranquillo M, Stefano P. Abnormally huge S-shaped sinus node artery: a possible caveat for mitral valve surgery. Int J Cardiol 2007; 116:401 -402[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, et al. Electro-physiological end point for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation initiated from multiple pulmonary venous foci. Circulation 2000;101 : 1409-1417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Khaykin Y, Marrouche NF, Saliba W, et al. Pulmonary vein antrum isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with valvular heart disease or prior open heart surgery. Heart Rhythm2004 : 1:33 -39[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Sueda T, Nagata H, Orihashi K, et al. Efficacy of a simple left atrial procedure for chronic atrial fibrillation in mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63 : 1070-1075[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wang JZ, Du RY, Ding HX, et al. Limited posterior left atrial linear radiofrequency ablation for patients with chronic atrial fibrillation undergoing rheumatic valvular heart surgery. Chin Med J (Engl) 2004; 117:758 -760[Medline]
  25. Cox JL, Schuessler RB, D'Agostino HJ Jr, et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Part III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1991; 101:569 -583[Abstract]
  26. Cox JL, Jaquaiss RD, Schuessler RB, Boineau JP. Modification of the maze procedure for atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Part II. Surgical technique of the maze III procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110:485 -495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Berdajs D, Patonay L, Turina MI. The clinical anatomy of the sinus node artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76 : 732-735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Gaudino M, Alessandrini F, Glieca F, et al. Conventional left atrial versus superior septal approach for mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63 : 1123-1127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Misawa Y, Fuse K, Kawahito K, Saito T, Konishi H. Conduction disturbances after superior septal approach for mitral valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68 : 1262-1264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Garcia-Villarreal OA, Gonzalez-Oviedo R, Rodriguez-Gonzalez H, Martinez-Chapa HD. Superior septal approach for mitral valve surgery: a word of caution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24 : 862-867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Busquet J, Fontan F, Anderson RH, Ho SY, Davies MJ. The surgical significance of the atrial branches of the coronary arteries. Int J Cardiol 1984; 6:223 -236[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Hutchinson MC. A study of the atrial arteries in man. J Anat 1978; 125:39 -54[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saremi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Milliken, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saremi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Milliken, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS