AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hatfield, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zaleski, G. X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hatfield, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zaleski, G. X.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3351
AJR 2008; 190:1686-1689
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Blood Patch Rates After Lumbar Puncture with Whitacre Versus Quincke 22- and 20-Gauge Spinal Needles

Malcolm K. Hatfield1,2,3, Stephen J. Handrich1,2,3, Jeffrey A. Willis1,2,3, Robert A. Beres1,2,3 and George X. Zaleski1,2,3

1 Milwaukee Radiologists, Ltd., 2901 W Kinnickinnic River Pkwy. LL9, Milwaukee, WI 53215.
2 Department of Radiology, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI.
3 Department of Radiology, Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare Racine, St. Mary's Medical Center, Racine, WI.

Received October 26, 2007; accepted after revision December 1, 2007.

 
Address correspondence to M. K. Hatfield (hatfield{at}pol.net).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare the incidence of blood patch as the best objective indicator of postdural puncture headache after elective fluoroscopic lumbar puncture with the use of a 22-gauge Whitacre (pencil point) needle versus standard 22- and 20-gauge Quincke (bevel-tip) needles and to determine the best level of puncture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The records of 724 consecutive patients who were referred to St. Mary's Medical Center department of radiology for fluoroscopic lumbar puncture from January 2003 through April 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Emergency requests (191) were discarded along with those for patients with clinical signs of pseudotumor cerebri (21), normal pressure hydrocephalus (3), and failed attempts (4). The collective total was 505 elective lumbar punctures.

RESULTS. The blood patch rate for the 22-gauge Whitacre needle was 4.2%. The result for the 22-gauge Quincke point needle was 15.1% whereas that for the 20-gauge Quincke point needle was 29.6%. In addition, the level of puncture showed a blood patch rate that increased as the level of lumbar puncture lowered. The highest level of lumbar puncture was L1-L2 with the lowest recorded level being L5-S1.

CONCLUSION. The Whitacre needle is associated with a significantly lower incidence of blood patch rate after lumbar puncture. The highest level of puncture (L1-L2) also provides the lowest level of blood patch rate.

Keywords: complications • CSF leak • headache after dural puncture • lumbar puncture • Whitacre needle


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Postdural puncture headache is the most common complication of both lumbar punctures and lumbar myelography. The rate of occurrence has been reported to be 2-75% [1]. For 22-gauge Quincke needles (BD Medical), the rate of postdural puncture headaches ranges from 36% to 58% [2-3]. The headaches that occur are at their worst in the morning after first getting out of bed. Postdural puncture headaches are relieved when the patient is supine [4-6]. The accepted mechanism of postdural puncture headache is persistent drainage of CSF through the hole created by the dural puncture [6, 7]. Reducing the size of the dural perforation reduces the loss of CSF and diminishes the incidence of headaches [8].

CSF production occurs mainly in the choroid plexus. About 500 mL of CSF is produced daily. The total CSF volume in the adult is approximately 150 mL, of which half is within the cranial cavity. The CSF pressure in the lumbar region in the horizontal position is between 5 and 15 cm of water. On assuming the erect posture, this increases to more than 40 cm of water [8]. Puncture of the dura has the potential to allow the development of excessive leakage of CSF. Excess loss of CSF leads to intracranial hypotension and a demonstrable reduction in CSF volume [9]. After the development of postdural puncture headache, the presence of a CSF leak has been confirmed with manometric studies. The adult subarachnoid pressure is reduced to 4 cm of water or less [10]. The higher the level of lumbar puncture, the less the hydrostatic pressure at the dural puncture site. This explains why postdural puncture headaches are not associated with cervical punctures. The rate of CSF loss through the dural perforation is generally greater than the rate of CSF production, particularly with needle sizes larger than 25 gauge [11, 12].

The actual mechanism producing the postdural puncture headache is unclear. There are two possible explanations. First, the lowering of CSF pressure causes traction on the intracranial structures in the upright position. These structures are pain-sensitive, leading to the characteristic headache. Second, the loss of CSF produces a compensatory vasodilatation. The con sequence of a decrease in CSF volume is a compensatory increase in blood volume. The vasodilatation is then responsible for the headache [9]. The primary treatment is bed rest, which limits the patient's daily activities for several days. The onset is typically within the first 48 hours after the dural puncture; it is usually noticed the following morning on arising from sleep. Rarely, the headache develops between 5 and 14 days after the procedure or immediately after the procedure. The headache is described as severe.

The common distribution is over the frontal and occipital areas radiating to the neck and shoulders. The pain is exacerbated by head movement and adoption of the upright posture and is relieved by lying down. An increase in severity of the headache on standing is the primary attribute of postdural puncture headache. Other symptoms associated with dural puncture headache include nausea, vomiting, hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo, dizziness, paresthesia of the scalp, and upper and lower limb pain. Visual disturbances such as diplopia or cortical blindness have been reported. Most headaches resolve within 7 days, but in rare cases they can persist for several months [13].

Other than bed rest, caffeine has been shown to be an effective therapy for postdural puncture headache [14]. Caffeine is a CNS stimulant that among other properties produces cerebral vasoconstriction. When severe enough, the epidural blood patch has been shown to have a high success rate with a low incidence of complications. The theory is that the blood, once introduced into the epidural space, will clot and occlude the perforation, preventing further CSF leak [15]. Fever, infection on the back, coagulopathy, or patient refusal are contraindications to the performance of an epidural blood patch. The procedure consists of placing a needle within the epidural space near the site of the dural defect and then slowly injecting up to 30 mL of homologous blood. Success rates have been reported as high as 98%. Repeating the blood patch for refractory headaches also has a similarly high success rate [16].

The use of fine-gauge pencil-point needles such as the Whitacre needle (BD Medical) has produced a great reduction in the incidence of postdural puncture headache, which varies with the type of procedure and patient involved. It is related to the size and design of the spinal needle used, the experience of the personnel performing the dural puncture, and the age and sex of the patient [13]. This article describes our experience with elective lumbar punctures and compares the incidence of blood patch with the size and type of needle used and the level of puncture. Note should be made that lumbar punctures for myelography were not included in this study because in our experience using needles smaller than 22 gauge did not allow a fast enough flow rate of CSF to be clinically practical.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The medical records of 724 consecutive patients from January 2003 through April 2007 who presented at St. Mary's Medical Center department of medical imaging for a fluoroscopic-guided lumbar puncture for CSF collection were reviewed. Records of lumbar puncture for myelography were not reviewed. Of these 724 patients, 191 referrals from the emergency department were discarded because these patients typically have comorbid conditions. There were 21 patients who were excluded from the study because of an elevated opening pressure (> 30 cm of water). These patients may have their postdural puncture headaches masked by the elevated pressure. Three patients were excluded who underwent radionuclide injections for normal pressure hydrocephalus and four patients were excluded due to unsuccessful attempts. This gave a total of 505 elective lumbar punctures performed under fluoroscopic guidance. All but 54 punctures were performed by board-certified radiologists. One experienced physician's assistant performed the remaining 54.

All patients were discharged within 2 hours after lumbar puncture. They were given our department's telephone number to call if they felt they had problems relating to the procedure. They were told to get as much bed rest as possible over the next 24 hours and to drink a lot of fluids, especially caffeinated fluids. Laboratory testing for bleeding disorders was not routinely performed unless patients stated they had been told in the past that they had a bleeding disorder or if they were currently taking warfarin (Coumadin, Bristol-Myers Squibb) or enoxaparin (Lovenox, Aventis). Aspirin and antiplatelet medications were not withheld. Allergy histories were noted but rarely mattered. Latex allergies were the one exception. Our department nurse attempted to contact the patient on the next business day to determine what if any complications had developed.

Patients with headaches that developed but were not severe enough to require a blood patch were reassured by telephone and no further treatment was rendered. Rarely, patients were given a prescription for pain medication, typ i cally hydrocodone 5/500 (Vicodin, Abbott Laboratories). Those patients who had a severe persistent headache after 48 hours were always given the option of undergoing a blood patch procedure, either in our department by a trained neuroradiologist or interventionalist or in the operative suite by an anesthesiologist pain specialist. These were the only two options for blood patches in our community.

To perform a blood patch, we use sterile technique and fluoroscopic guidance to place a 22-gauge Whitaker needle within the lumbar epidural space via a translaminar approach. We choose one level above or below the dural puncture site. Confirmation of proper tip placement is made by hand injection of 2-3 mL of iohexol (Omnipaque 180, GE Healthcare) and spot views in orthogonal projections. After this, 20-25 mL of autologous blood is injected and the needle removed. The blood is obtained from an 18-gauge intracatheter IV within the antecubital fossa. The blood is injected immediately before clotting. We do this without sedation and allow the patient to recover for 10 minutes before discharge.

All medical and hospital records were reviewed, and the level of puncture was noted along with the size and type of needle used. One of three needles was always used, a 22-gauge Whitacre needle, a 22-gauge Quincke needle, or a 20-gauge Quincke needle. The size and type of needle used and the level of puncture were always recorded, as well as how many attempts were made, in all but 15 patients. In addition, to accurately quantify the incidence and severity of postdural puncture headaches, the incidence of blood patch was noted. The data were stratified according to an ascending level of puncture along with the size and type of needle and incidence of blood patch.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The results are summarized in Table 1. The incidence of blood patch was significantly lower with the 22-gauge Whitacre needle (4.2%) compared with the 22-gauge Quincke point needle (15.2%) (chi-square analysis, p = 0001). The results are also higher for the 20-gauge Quincke needle (29.6%) compared with both the 22-gauge Whitacre needle (p < 0001) and the 22-gauge Quincke point needle (p = 0.0384). This makes sense because of the proposed mechanism of postdural puncture spinal headache described earlier. In addition, the incidence of headache also decreases the higher up the spine that the dural puncture is performed. Puncturing at the L1-L2 level created an overall blood patch rate of 5.2% compared with a blood patch rate at the L2-L3 level of 9.2%, at the L3-L4 level of 12.2%, and at the L4-L5 level of 16.2%. This again is in keeping with the proposed mechanism of postdural puncture headache described earlier.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Overall Blood Patch Rate

 

This also explains why cervical punctures are not associated with postdural puncture headaches. The highest percentage of blood patch was in the multiple-level group (57.1%). This small group of patients underwent punctures at several levels. The reasons for several punctures were typically anatomic and inability to obtain a sufficient CSF sample.

Of the 505 patients included in the study group, there were a total of 49 patients who fulfilled the criteria and elected to undergo a blood patch. The incidence was higher for female patients (40) versus male patients (9). The overall female-to-male ratio for all lumbar punctures performed was equal. The average age of patients undergoing a blood patch was 38 years. The typical blood patch patient was a female between the ages of 15 and 60 years (39 patients). All blood patches were successful in relieving the dural puncture headache. One patient had to undergo two blood patch procedures to achieve satisfactory relief.

There were no additional complications that required additional treatment or imaging. As shown in Table 2, the overall incidence of blood patch was slightly lower for our experienced physician's assistant (7.4%) than with board-certified radiologists (9.7%). The lowest incidence of blood patch was accomplished by our physician's assistant using a 22-gauge Whitaker needle (2%). This com pared with the overall blood patch rate of 4.2% for the Whitaker needle. There was no correlation between the volume of CSF withdrawn and the rate of spinal headache.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Blood Patch Rate for Our Physician's Assistant

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
With the advent of MRI and the ability to detect diseases of the CNS, there has been an increasing need for CSF sampling. The lumbar puncture has become more and more mainstream medicine and is used routinely by neurologists for diagnosis and follow-up care and to quantify the levels of success for various drug regimens for several diseases including but not limited to multiple sclerosis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and HIV [17]. Our study shows that CSF sampling can be performed safely and quickly in the outpatient setting with minimal morbidity. The major reason is the use of the 22-gauge Whitaker needle with its lower incidence of blood patch and using a higher level of puncture.

If one punctures at the L1-L2 level, the actual point of puncture is approximately the mid L2 level. The location of the conus medullaris according to age and sex was retrospectively evaluated with MRI [18]. A total of 639 adult subjects without any conspicuous spinal canal abnormality on the lumbar MRI examination were selected. The level of the conus medullaris was most commonly located at the T12-L1 intervertebral disk level. No significant difference in the conus level was found with increasing age. In our experience with 97 punctures per formed at the L1-L2 level, there was no report of complication from puncturing the conus medullaris. Operators did typically puncture off the midline to avoid this complication.

One drawback to using a 22-gauge needle compared with a 20-gauge needle is the time it takes to obtain CSF. In addition to other laboratory tests, a multiple sclerosis panel will usually be ordered for a typical patient referred for an elective lumbar puncture. This frequently requires up to 13 mL of spinal fluid. In our experience, this can be accomplished in less than 5 minutes by tipping the patient to a 45° position with the feet on the footboard for support. Coughing and Valsalva maneuvers were also used. Patients who experienced a minor vasovagal reaction were treated by lowering the table and placing a pillow under the feet until they felt they were able to proceed. No cases were canceled due to vasovagal reactions. Four cases were canceled due to inability to obtain fluid. These involved patients with extensive degenerative disk disease and an extensive operative history. For these rare cases, a C1-C2 puncture was used to obtain CSF.

In our experience in performing a lumbar myelogram, if no fluid is requested we typically use either a 25- or 27-gauge Whitaker needle. Our incidence of blood patch after lumbar myelography with either of these needles is zero. Most patients were small enough for 3.5-inch (8.9-cm) needles; however, when necessary 5-inch (12.7-cm) Whitaker and Quincke needles were used.

CSF sampling is being requested more and more for drug treatment protocols and diagnosis, clinical correlation, and follow-up after treatment. This procedure can be per formed on an outpatient basis with little morbidity and inconvenience to the patient. Postdural puncture headache is a complication that should not be treated lightly because of the potential for considerable morbidity. In the majority of cases, the problem will resolve spontaneously. In some patients, the headache lasts for months or even years. The use of a pencil-point needle, such as the Whitacre needle, significantly decreases the incidence of blood patch and postdural puncture headache. In addition, puncturing as high as possible, especially the L1-L2 level, also significantly decreases morbidity. Physician's assistants may also be trained to perform this procedure.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Madonna Bahr, Lexi Antonchorgy, and Gina Weiser for their help in the preparation of this article.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Leibold RA, Yealy DM, Coppola M, Cantees KK. Post-dural-puncture headache: characteristics, man agement, and prevention. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1863 -1870[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Jones MJ, Selby IR, Gwinnutt CL, Hughes DG. Technical note: the influence of using an atraumatic needle on the incidence of post-myelography headache. Br J Radiol 1994;67 : 396-398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tourteliotte WW, Henderson WG, Tucker RP, Gilland O, Walker JE, Kokman E. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the 22 versus 26 gauge needle in the production of the post-lumbar puncture syndrome in normal individuals. Headache 1972;12 : 73-78[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Morewood GH. A rational approach to the cause, prevention, and treatment of postdural puncture headache. CMAJ1993; 149:1087 -1093[Abstract]
  5. Wiesel S, Tessler MJ, Easdown LJ. Post dural puncture headache: a randomized prospective comparison of the 24 gauge Sprotte and the 27 gauge Quincke needles in young patients. Can J Anaesth1993; 40:607 -611[Medline]
  6. Hess JH. Postdural puncture headache: a literature review. AANA J 1991; 59:549 -555[Medline]
  7. Peterman SB. Postmyelography headache rates with Whitacre versus Quincke 22-gauge spinal needles. Radiology1996; 200:771 -778[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Turnbull DK, Shepherd DB. Post-dural puncture headache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Br J Anaesth2003; 91:718 -729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Grant R, Condon B, Hart I, Teasdale GM. Changes in intracranial CSF volume after lumbar puncture and their relationship to post-LP headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991;54 : 440-442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Rando TA, Fishman RA. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: report of two cases and review of the literature. Neurology1992; 42:481 -487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cruickshank RH, Hopkinson JM. Fluid flow through dural puncture sites: an in vitro comparison of needle point types. Anaesthesia 1989;44 : 415-418[Medline]
  12. Ready LB, Cuplin S, Haschke RH, Nessly M. Spinal needle determinants of rate of transdural fluid leak. Anesth Analg 1989; 69:457 -460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Vandam LD, Dripps RD. Long-term follow-up of patients who received 10,098 spinal anesthetics: syndrome of decreased intracranial pressure (headache and ocular and auditory difficulties). JAMA1956; 161:586 -591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Sechzer PH. Post-spinal anesthesia headache treated with caffeine: evaluation with demand method. Part 2. Curr Ther Res1979; 26:440 -448
  15. Crawford JS. Experiences with epidural blood patch. Anaesthesia 1980;35 : 513-515[Medline]
  16. Abouleish E, Vega S, Blendinger I, Tio TO. Long-term follow-up of epidural blood patch. Anesth Analg 1975;54 : 459-463[Medline]
  17. Marzocchetti A, Di Giambenedetto S, Cingolani A, Ammassari A, Cauda R, De Luca A. Reduced rate of diagnostic positive detection of JC virus DNA in cerebrospinal fluid in cases of suspected progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43:4175 -4177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Demiryürek D, Aydingüz U, Aksit MD, Yener N, Geyik PO. MR imaging determination of the normal level of conus medullaris. Clin Imaging 2002; 26:375 -377[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hatfield, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zaleski, G. X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hatfield, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zaleski, G. X.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS