DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.4052
AJR 2008; 190:W383
© American Roentgen Ray Society
Reply to "Unenhanced MDCT Findings of Acute Bowel Ischemia"
Ah Young Kim
University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul,
Korea
WEB—This is a Web exclusive article.
My colleagues and I thank Dr. De Filippo and colleagues
[1] for their interest in our
article [2]. They commented
that in some small-bowel disease, there may be benefit in performing
unenhanced CT before performing contrast-enhanced CT
[1].
We completely agree with De Filippo et al.
[1] on the value of unenhanced
CT in evaluating some small-bowel disease such as gastrointestinal bleeding or
bowel ischemia. As is well known, acute hematoma or acute vascular occlusion
showing relatively higher attenuation can be easily depicted on unenhanced CT.
In assessing chronic mesenteric ischemia, the presence of atherosclerotic
calcified plaque at or near the origins of proximal splanchnic arteries is
also easily shown on unenhanced CT
[3]. However, we do not think
that successful evaluation of patients with suspected bowel ischemia can be
made using unenhanced CT alone. Although the presence of portomesenteric
venous gas and pneumatosis of the bowel indicates an acute bowel infarct and
can be depicted on unenhanced CT as mentioned, contrast-enhanced CT is
essential to determine and manage the primary cause of bowel infarction
[4].
For these reasons, we routinely perform unenhanced CT in patients with
suspected gastrointestinal bleeding or bowel ischemia. Details of the CT
protocol for this purpose were described in our article
[2]: To evaluate mesenteric
ischemia and gastrointestinal bleeding, three-phase CT (unenhanced, arterial,
and delayed) is performed without oral contrast material. Additionally, as
described in the same article
[2], in patients with suspected
small-bowel obstruction, two-phase CT (unenhanced and delayed
contrast-enhanced) is performed to exclude bowel infarction. Actually, we use
three patterns of CT protocols in evaluating patients with suspected
small-bowel disease (3D CT intestine_general, 3D CT intestine_ bowel
obstruction, and 3D CT intestine_GI bleeding or ischemia) and tailor the CT
protocol and 3D reconstruction techniques in detail to each patient to obtain
optimal diagnostic images.
Nevertheless, in our article
[2], the value of unenhanced CT
might be underestimated because it was not our intention to address the
well-known significance of CT in evaluating small-bowel disease but to stress
the value of 3D imaging and positive oral contrast material as a new
technique. We thank Dr. De Filippo and colleagues
[1] for their timely comments
reminding readers of the diagnostic value of unenhanced CT.
References
- De Filippo M, Sagone C, Zompatori M. Unenhanced MDCT findings of
acute bowel ischemia. (letter) AJR 2008;190; [web] W271[Free Full Text]
- Hong SS, Kim AY, Byun JH, et al. MDCT of small-bowel disease: value
of 3D imaging. AJR 2006;187
: 1212-1221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kim AY, Ha HK. Evaluation of suspected mesenteric ischemia:
efficacy of radiologic studies. Radiol Clin North Am2003; 41:327
-342[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rha SE, Ha HK, Lee SH, et al. CT and MR imaging findings of bowel
ischemia from various primary causes. RadioGraphics2000; 20:29
-42[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?