DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3444
AJR 2008; 191:569-577
© American Roentgen Ray Society
Neoaortoiliac Reconstructions Using Femoropopliteal Veins: MDCT Angiography Findings
Jorge E. Lopera1,2,
Clayton K. Trimmer1,
Shellie Josephs1,
Bart Dolmatch1,
R. James Valentine3 and
G. Patrick Clagett3
1 Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, UT Health Science Center at San
Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78229-3900.
3 Department of Vascular Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas,
TX.
Received November 18, 2007;
accepted after revision February 11, 2008.
Address correspondence to J. E. Lopera
(Lopera{at}uthscsa.edu).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. In this article, we discuss the neoaortoiliac system
procedure, a surgical procedure that uses femoropopliteal vein segments for
arterial reconstructions in patients with aortofemoral prosthetic graft
infections.
CONCLUSION. CT angiography (CTA) is a powerful imaging tool that can
be used in the follow-up of patients after this complex surgery. CTA
accurately detects early and late complications that may develop after the
neoaortoiliac system procedure.
Keywords: aortic bypass infected aortic graft MDCT angiography neoaortoiliac system superficial femoral vein vascular imaging
Introduction
Prosthetic graft infection continues to be a significant challenge to the
vascular surgeon because of high mortality (10–36%), high limb
amputation rates (10–45%), and high incidence of reinfection of any new
prosthetic graft (10–15%)
[1,
2]. Definitive treatment of
graft infection requires removal of the infected graft material and
revascularization of the affected extremities or viscera. The most common
surgical approach is extraanatomic bypass with staged removal of the infected
vascular prosthesis; in many cases aortic ligation is required, thus placing
the patient at risk for aortic stump blowout
[3]. An extraanatomic bypass
with prosthetic material is at risk of reinfection and is associated also with
poor patency rates. Thrombosis of these conduits often leads to major
amputation [1,
3]. Other techniques that can
be used in cases of prosthetic graft infection include in situ replacement
with aortic allografts, autogenous veins and arteries, or antibiotic-coated
synthetic prostheses. Aortic allografts are prone to reinfection, graft
blowout, and late deterioration
[3]. Antibiotic-coated
prostheses appear to be promising in the treatment of low-grade infections but
probably are not the ideal solution for infections with an aggressive organism
[2]. Conservative measures
include antibiotic administration and percutaneous drainage.
The neoaortoiliac system procedure is a complex surgical procedure that
uses femoropopliteal vein segments for arterial reconstructions to treat
aortofemoral prosthetic infections in patients in whom an extraanatomic bypass
is not an option, patients with an already-infected extraanatomic bypass, and
patients with infections of the lower abdomen or groins. The greater saphenous
vein can also be used for the arterial reconstructions, but long-term patency
is poor because of the small caliber of the veins and severe intimal
hyperplasia [3,
4]. Despite its initial
complexity, the neoaortoiliac system procedure has been shown to be a valuable
alternative in treating cases of graft infections. Advantages of the
neoaortoiliac system procedure include the native veins' natural resistance to
infection, which is superior to any prosthetic material; excellent long-term
patency; and acceptable lower extremity venous morbidity. Another promising
indication is the use of the neoaortoiliac system for vascular reconstructions
in young patients (< 55 years) with small aortas in whom the incidence of
prosthetic graft failures is high with very high amputation rates
[5].
Disadvantages of the neoaortoiliac system procedure include the extensive
operative times (mean ± SD, 8 ± 2 hours), significant blood
loss, difficulty in controlling body core temperature during such long
operative times, and residual compromise of extremity venous drainage. The
neoaortoiliac system procedure is not appropriate for very sick patients with
severe medical comorbidities or severe sepsis and is not indicated for rapid
control of active bleeding. The neoaortoiliac system procedure also requires
adequate femoropopliteal vein segments and is contraindicated in patients with
a history of deep venous thrombosis
[3,
4].
Operative Planning and Surgical Technique
Duplex sonography is used to evaluate the quality of the femoropopliteal
veins. Recanalized veins are not used. Most duplicated systems (25% of
patients) work well as arterial conduits
[3]. Catheter angiography had
an important role for preoperative planning to determine adequate sites for
distal revascularization and was used routinely in the past
[3]. In our institution, CT
angiography (CTA) has completely replaced catheter angiography for the
preoperative assessment of patients with prosthetic graft infections because
it is less invasive, is less expensive, and is quicker than catheter
angiography and gives anatomic definition of the vascular structures as well
as the soft tissues. CTA allows precise localization of the extent of the
graft infection, identifies the anatomy of previous operations, and helps
determine the sites that will require future revascularization after graft
removal [6].
The three main surgical steps of the neoaortoiliac system procedure are
vein harvesting, removal of the infected prosthetic material, and arterial
reconstruction. Usually a two-team approach is used to decrease operative
times. After the femoropopliteal vein is harvested, multiple branches of the
femoropopliteal vein are carefully ligated. Valvulotomy or valve excision is
performed so the vein segment is used in a nonreversed direction; this
facilitates anastomosis of the large proximal end of the vein to the terminal
abdominal aorta [4]. The
infected prosthetic material is then removed, and after aggressive
débridement of septic material, the aortofemoral reconstruction is
performed. Different combinations of anastomoses are created according to the
previous vascular anatomy and surgical reconstructions and the caliber of the
native arteries and femoropopliteal veins (Figs.
1A,
1B,
1C,
1D,
1E, and
1F). Figures
2,
3,
4,
5,
6, and
7 illustrate normal CTA images
showing different combinations of neoaortoiliac systems.

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2 —68-year-old man with history of neoaortoiliac system
procedure for infected aortobifemoral graft and left nephrectomy.
Volume-rendered semitransparent coronal projection shows proximal anastomosis
with aorta (yellow arrow). Two limbs of superficial femoropopliteal
veins (white arrows) extend into distal anastomoses with common
femoral artery (arrowheads). Left kidney is absent. Note
characteristic appearance of native veins in limbs of bypass.
|
|

View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3 —77-year-old man who underwent neoaortoiliac system procedure
for infection of right aortofemoral and left aortoiliac grafts.
Volume-rendered coronal image shows right aortofemoral neoaortoiliac system
bypass (white arrows) with left aortoiliac limb (yellow
arrow). Left kidney had severe hydronephrosis with delayed excretion of
contrast material.
|
|

View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 4 —60-year-old woman after neoaortoiliac system procedure for
occluded and infected aortobifemoral graft. Volume-rendered coronal image
shows unilateral left aortofemoral bypass with end-to-end anastomosis between
left limb of neoaortoiliac system and aorta (arrow) and shows
left-to-right femorofemoral crossover bypass.
|
|

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 5 —56-year-old man who underwent neoaortoiliac system procedure
with right femoropopliteal bypass. Volume-rendered right anterior oblique
image shows left aortofemoral neoaortoiliac system bypass with left-to-right
femorofemoral crossover bypass. Note proximal end-to-side anastomosis with
aorta (straight arrow). Patient also has patent right femoropopliteal
bypass (curved arrows).
|
|

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 6 —57-year-old man who had history of infected aortobifemoral
bypass graft with occlusion of left limb that required previous amputation.
Volume-rendered coronal image shows unilateral right aortofemoral
neoaortoiliac system or hemineoaortoiliac system.
|
|

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 7 —62-year-old woman who underwent neoaortoiliac system
procedure for thrombosed and infected aortobifemoral graft. Volume-rendered
coronal image shows neoaortoiliac system with right aortofemoral bypass
(arrows). Left limb is anastomosed in end-to-side fashion to right
limb of bypass (arrowheads).
|
|
Results
The main advantage of the neoaortoiliac system is the use of large-caliber
femoropopliteal veins (8–15 mm) that allow a better size match with the
aorta. This technique has a better patency rate than the use of greater
saphenous vein grafts, where veins smaller than 8 mm are prone to intimal
hyperplasia and kinks and have a poor long-term patency of 36% at 2 years
versus 100% for femoropopliteal veins
[4]. Even in cases of poor
outflow runoff, the 5-year cumulative primary patency of the neoaortoiliac
system with femoropopliteal veins is 83% and secondary or assisted patency is
close to 100%. The limb-salvage rate is 86%
[4]. The reported mortality
(8–24%) and amputation (6–24%) rates after the neoaortoiliac
system procedure are high in this group of patients. These results are not
surprising given that this patient population is a severely ill group of
patients with sepsis and multiple previous operations to treat prosthetic
infections. By comparison, graft excision with extraanatomic bypass has a
mortality rate of 20–48% and amputation rates of 11–23%. Mortality
is even higher in patients with active bleeding from aortoenteric fistulas
[3,
4].
Venous Outcomes
During the period immediately after the neoaortoiliac system procedure,
venous hypertension has been associated with compartment syndrome requiring
fasciotomy in 17.8% of patients
[7]. Using duplex scanning and
venous function tests, functional obstruction is identified in 80–90% of
patients and mild reflux in 11%
[8,
9]. Extensive collaterals
develop between the popliteal stump and the profunda femoris vein. Clinical
problems are minimal even in patients in whom the greater saphenous vein is
absent. Approximately 35% of patients experience transient mild to moderate
lower extremity edema, which is usually treated with compression stockings
[8]. Signs of chronic
hypertension such as skin pigmentation, venous claudication, or venous
ulceration are rare [7].
Chronic venous insufficiency is more common if concomitant femoropopliteal
veins and great er saphenous vein harvests are performed
[7]. During the early
postoperative period, thrombus formation is common at the popliteal stumps,
but because the vein is ligated, the thrombus cannot propagate proximally
[4] (Figs.
8A and
8B).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 8A —65-year-old man who underwent neoaortoiliac system procedure
for infected aortobifemoral graft. Axial CT image after administration of IV
contrast material shows popliteal veins distended with clots at stumps
(arrows) after superficial femoropopliteal vein harvesting.
|
|

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 8B —65-year-old man who underwent neoaortoiliac system procedure
for infected aortobifemoral graft. Axial CT image obtained at more superior
level than A, at area of vein harvesting, shows that superficial
femoropopliteal veins are absent.
|
|
Neoaortoiliac System
Surveillance—Follow-up after the neoaortoiliac system
procedure includes periodical physical examination with ankle–brachial
index and duplex sonography. Further evaluation is performed using CTA if
abnormalities are found on the duplex scan. We have almost completely replaced
catheter angiography with CTA for the evaluation of any problems after the
neoaortoiliac system procedure. We used the same protocol for CTA of the
neoaortoiliac system as the protocol we use for the detection of abdominal
aorta aneurysm on 16-MDCT scanners (Light-Speed, GE Healthcare). Each patient
received 120 mL of iohexol (Omnipaque, Amersham Health) IV at a rate of 4 mL/s
via a 20-gauge or larger IV canula using an automated dual-head injector with
a saline chaser bolus of 75–80 mL. Images were reconstructed at an
effective slice thickness of 2.5 mm, and a reconstruction interval of 1.25 mm
was used. The scanning parameters used were as follows: tube voltage setting,
120 kV; tube current, 200 mAs with dose modulation (SmartmA, GE Healthcare);
display field of view, 35.0 cm; table pitch, 1.375:1; and rotation time, 0.8
second. For optimal intraluminal contrast material enhancement, the delay time
between the start of contrast material administration and the start of
scanning was obtained for each patient individually using a bolus-tracking
technique (SmartPrepare, GE Healthcare) with the threshold set to
approximately 100 H near the area of the celiac abdominal aorta. All abdominal
scans were obtained during breath-holding.
Image interpretation included axial images and 3D reconstructions using
volume-rendering techniques and maximum intensity projections. All acquired
image data were sent to a 3D workstation (Vitrea workstation, Vital Images)
and evaluated predominately using planar reformations and volume-rendering
techniques. Volume-rendered 3D images can over- or underestimate the degree of
stenosis, so vessel analysis software is commonly used to further assess the
degree of stenosis [6]. In many
cases, patients present clinically with recurrent claudication; in those
cases, a bilateral runoff protocol is added to the CTA protocol to evaluate
the distal circulation. Reviewing the specific type of surgery each patient
has undergone is important for adequate interpretation of CTA because most of
the stenotic complications occur at anastomotic sites.
Complications—The incidence of major complications can be as
high as 49%; these complications can include major amputations, compartment
syndrome requiring fasciotomy, lower extremity paresis or paralysis, wound
infections, and death [3,
4,
9,
10]. Neoaortoiliac system limb
thrombosis can occur early in the postoperative period and usually occurs
because of technical factors (Figs.
9A and
9B). Acute limb thrombosis can
be associated with distal embolization, and the CTA protocol should include
evaluation of the distal circulation (Figs.
10A,
10B, and
10C). Intimal hyperplasia at
the anastomotic sites is not rare and requires surgical or endovascular
reintervention [2] (Figs.
11A,
11B,
11C,
11D,
12A,
12B,
12C,
13A,
13B,
13C, and
13D). Other problems related
to the use to native veins include retained valves
(Fig. 14), small-caliber
veins, and kinks. Development of aneurysmal degeneration of the native veins
is rare (Fig. 15). Reinfection
is uncommon because of the natural resistance of native veins to infection.
However, patients with aggressive infections with gram-negative organisms,
especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are at risk for anastomotic
disruption with reinfection and bleeding
[3].

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 9A —48-year-old woman with severe aortoiliac disease and
bilateral lower extremity claudication. Volume-rendered coronal projection
before neoaortoiliac system procedure shows severe aortoiliac disease with
diffuse stenosis of both iliac systems (arrows) with patent right
femoropopliteal bypass (arrowheads). Left distal superior femoral
artery and popliteal arteries are occluded. Patient underwent neoaortoiliac
system procedure, but it was complicated by thrombosis of left limb of
neoaortoiliac system. Leg amputation was performed 1 week after procedure.
|
|

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 9B —48-year-old woman with severe aortoiliac disease and
bilateral lower extremity claudication. Volume-rendered coronal image shows
patent right limb of neoaortoiliac system and occluded left limb with proximal
stump (arrow). Note also thrombosis of right femoropopliteal
bypass.
|
|

View larger version (188K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 10A —60-year-old woman who underwent neoaortoiliac system
procedure for infected aortobifemoral graft placed 1 year earlier presenting
with acute ischemia of right leg lower extremity. Axial CT image shows partial
thrombosis of right limb of neoaortoiliac system (arrow).
|
|

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 10B —60-year-old woman who underwent neoaortoiliac system
procedure for infected aortobifemoral graft placed 1 year earlier presenting
with acute ischemia of right leg lower extremity. Volume-rendered right
anterior oblique projection shows right limb stenosis (arrow);
thrombus is not shown in 3D reconstruction.
|
|

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 10C —60-year-old woman who underwent neoaortoiliac system
procedure for infected aortobifemoral graft placed 1 year earlier presenting
with acute ischemia of right leg lower extremity. Volume-rendered posterior
view of lower legs shows abrupt cutoff of right anterior and posterior tibial
arteries related to distal embolization (arrowheads). Patient was
treated with anticoagulation therapy and symptoms resolved thereafter.
|
|

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 11A —58-year-old woman who underwent neoaortoiliac system
procedure 3 years before presenting with bilateral lower extremity
claudication. Duplex sonogram shows tapering of abdominal aorta at proximal
anastomosis of neoaortoiliac system (arrow). Note high velocities of
3.92 m/s at area of stenosis.
|
|

View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 11B —58-year-old woman who underwent neoaortoiliac system
procedure 3 years before presenting with bilateral lower extremity
claudication. Axial image shows severe decrease in caliber at area of stenosis
(arrow).
|
|

View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 11C —58-year-old woman who underwent neoaortoiliac system
procedure 3 years before presenting with bilateral lower extremity
claudication. Volume-rendered oblique projection shows severe stenosis of
proximal anastomosis with infrarenal aorta (arrow).
|
|

View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 11D —58-year-old woman who underwent neoaortoiliac system
procedure 3 years before presenting with bilateral lower extremity
claudication. Volume-rendered coronal image shows tube graft composed of
synthetic polyester (Dacron, DuPont) extending from descending thoracic aorta
into distal body of vein graft (arrows) and bypassing stenosis of
proximal anastomosis of neoaortoiliac system.
|
|

View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 12A —87-year-old woman who had undergone neoaortoiliac system
procedure 5 months earlier presenting with severe left lower extremity
claudication. Axial CT image (A) and volume-rendered coronal image
(B) show severe stenosis of left limb of graft at end-to-side proximal
anastomosis (arrows). Patient underwent right-to-left femoral
crossover bypass graft with greater saphenous vein.
|
|

View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 12B —87-year-old woman who had undergone neoaortoiliac system
procedure 5 months earlier presenting with severe left lower extremity
claudication. Axial CT image (A) and volume-rendered coronal image
(B) show severe stenosis of left limb of graft at end-to-side proximal
anastomosis (arrows). Patient underwent right-to-left femoral
crossover bypass graft with greater saphenous vein.
|
|

View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 12C —87-year-old woman who had undergone neoaortoiliac system
procedure 5 months earlier presenting with severe left lower extremity
claudication. Volume-rendered coronal image after surgical revision shows that
left limb is now occluded. Severe stenosis is seen in midportion of
femorofemoral bypass (arrow). Additional revision with angioplasty
and stent placement was later performed.
|
|

View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 13A —53-year-old woman who had undergone neoaortoiliac system
procedure due to aortoiliac occlusive disease 1 year earlier presenting with
limiting right leg claudication. Routine sonography shows very high velocities
in right limb of neoaortoiliac system. Axial (A) and volume-rendered
coronal (B) images show two high-grade stenoses in right limb of
neoaortoiliac system (arrows). Native aorta (arrowhead,
A) is occluded. Patient was treated with angioplasty of right limb
stenosis, which resulted in vessel rupture; stent-graft was then placed.
|
|

View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 13B —53-year-old woman who had undergone neoaortoiliac system
procedure due to aortoiliac occlusive disease 1 year earlier presenting with
limiting right leg claudication. Routine sonography shows very high velocities
in right limb of neoaortoiliac system. Axial (A) and volume-rendered
coronal (B) images show two high-grade stenoses in right limb of
neoaortoiliac system (arrows). Native aorta (arrowhead,
A) is occluded. Patient was treated with angioplasty of right limb
stenosis, which resulted in vessel rupture; stent-graft was then placed.
|
|

View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 13C —53-year-old woman who had undergone neoaortoiliac system
procedure due to aortoiliac occlusive disease 1 year earlier presenting with
limiting right leg claudication. Routine sonography shows very high velocities
in right limb of neoaortoiliac system. Volume-rendered coronal image after
endovascular treatment shows metallic stent (arrows). Only surface of
stent is visualized in 3D reconstruction.
|
|

View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 13D —53-year-old woman who had undergone neoaortoiliac system
procedure due to aortoiliac occlusive disease 1 year earlier presenting with
limiting right leg claudication. Routine sonography shows very high velocities
in right limb of neoaortoiliac system. Maximal-intensity-projection
reconstruction image with vessel analysis shows that metallic stent is widely
patent.
|
|

View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 14 —65-year-old woman who had undergone neoaortoiliac system
procedure for infected aortobifemoral graft presenting with left leg
claudication. Volume-rendered oblique image shows severe stenosis of left
distal limb of neoaortoiliac system (arrow) and mild to moderate
stenosis in distal right limb (arrowhead). Retrograde filling of
native right iliac system (I) is present. Right superficial femoral artery is
occluded in short segment. Patient underwent patch angioplasty with greater
saphenous vein. Lesion was produced by neointimal hyperplasia related to
retained valve cusp.
|
|

View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 15 —Neoaortoiliac system procedure was performed 6 years earlier
in 45-year-old man for severe aortoiliac disease. Volume-rendered coronal
projection shows diffuse aneurysmal dilatation of right aortofemoral bypass
(arrows). Right-to-left femorofemoral bypass has normal caliber.
|
|
Conclusion
The neoaortoiliac system procedure is a limb- and life-salvage procedure
created with different complex surgical reconstructions using femoropopliteal
veins. Although the procedure is complex and the operative times are
extensive, the excellent long-term patency and low reinfection rates indicate
that the neoaortoiliac system procedure, with the use of femoropopliteal
veins, is a valuable surgical alternative for the treatment of aortofemoral
prosthetic graft infections. A basic understanding of the surgical techniques
used in the neoaortoiliac system procedure is essential for adequate
interpretation of CTA. CTA is a powerful tool for the detection of early and
late complications that may develop after neoaortoiliac system procedure.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to Glen Katz for his excellent
artistic work with the illustrations in Figures
1A,
1B,
1C,
1D,
1E, and
1F.
References
- Cardozo MA, Frankini AD, Bonamigo TP. Use of superficial femoral
vein in the treatment of infected aortoiliofemoral prosthetic grafts.
Cardiovasc Surg 2002;10
: 304-310[CrossRef][Medline]
- Gibbons CP, Ferguson CJ, Edwards K, Roberts DE, Osman H. Use of
superficial femoropopliteal vein for suprainguinal arterial reconstruction in
the presence of infection. Br J Surg2000; 87:771
-776[CrossRef][Medline]
- Valentine RJ, Clagett GP. Aortic graft infections: replacement with
autogenous vein. Cardiovasc Surg 2001;9
: 419-425[CrossRef][Medline]
- Clagett GP, Valentine RJ, Hagino RT. Autogenous aortoiliac/femoral
reconstruction from superficial femoral-popliteal veins: feasibility and
durability. J Vasc Surg 1997;25
: 255-266[CrossRef][Medline]
- Jackson MR, Ali AT, Bell C, et al. Aortofemoral bypass in young
patients with premature atherosclerosis: is superficial femoral vein superior
to Dacron? J Vasc Surg 2004;40
: 17-23[CrossRef][Medline]
- Toomay SM, Dolmatch BL. CT angiography of lower extremity vascular
bypass grafts. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol2006; 9:172
-179[CrossRef][Medline]
- Modrall JG, Hocking JA, Timaran CH, et al. Late incidence of
chronic venous insufficiency after deep vein harvest. J Vasc
Surg 2007; 46:520
-525[CrossRef][Medline]
- Wells JK, Hagino RT, Bargmann KM, et al. Venous morbidity after
superficial femoral-popliteal vein harvest. J Vasc
Surg 1999; 29:282
-289[CrossRef][Medline]
- Nevelsteen A, Lacroix H, Suy R. Autogenous reconstruction with the
lower extremity deep veins: an alternative treatment of prosthetic infection
after reconstructive surgery for aortoiliac disease. J Vasc
Surg 1995; 22:129
-134[CrossRef][Medline]
- Gordon LL, Hagino RT, Jackson MR, Modrall JG, Valentine RJ, Clagett
GP. Complex aortofemoral prosthetic infections: the role of autogenous
superficial femoropopliteal vein reconstruction. Arch
Surg 1999; 134:615
-620[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?