DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3089
AJR 2008; 191:862-869
© American Roentgen Ray Society
MRI of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Basal and Subepicardial Localization of Myocardial Lesions and Their Effect on Left Ventricular Function
Azusa Ichinose1,
Hiroki Otani2,
Minako Oikawa2,
Kei Takase1,
Haruo Saito1,
Hiroaki Shimokawa2 and
Shoki Takahashi1
1 Department of Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine,
Seiryomachi, Aobaku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan.
2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of
Medicine, Aobaku, Sendai, Japan.
Received August 25, 2007;
accepted after revision March 17, 2008.
Address correspondence to A. Ichinose
(azusa{at}rad.med.tohoku.ac.jp).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to use MRI to analyze the
topographic localization of myocardial lesions and their relationship to
plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and several cardiac function
parameters in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI was performed
in 40 patients with sarcoidosis (11 cardiac, 29 extracardiac cases). Using a
29-segment model of the left ventricle (LV), the extent of myocardial
hyperenhancement was visually scored (0 = no hyperenhancement, 1 =
1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%, 4 = 76–100%
hyperenhancement) and was compared with plasma BNP level and several
parameters of cardiac function.
RESULTS. Ten of the 11 patients with cardiac sarcoidosis showed
myocardial hyperenhancement, whereas none of the 29 patients without cardiac
sarcoidosis did. In patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, hyperenhancement was
significantly more extensive in basal short axis slices than in apical short
axis slices (p < 0.0005). Myocardial hyperenhancement was
significantly more frequent in subepicardial layers than in subendocardial
layers. The global extent of myocardial hyperenhancement was significantly
correlated with plasma BNP levels and the LV end-diastolic volume index and
was negatively correlated with the LV ejection fraction.
CONCLUSION. In patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, myocardial lesions
detected on delayed contrast-enhanced MRI were predominantly localized in the
basal and subepicardial myocardium. The extent of myocardial lesions may be
related to LV dysfunction and plasma BNP level in patients with cardiac
sarcoidosis.
Keywords: delayed contrast enhancement left ventricular function MRI myocardium myocardial infarction noncaseating granulomas sarcoidosis
Introduction
Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder of unknown cause characterized by the
infiltration of noncaseating granulomas. The overall prognosis for patients
with sarcoidosis is good because there is usually no organ involvement and the
disease is often self-limiting
[1]. However, sarcoidosis with
cardiac involvement can cause fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmias, conduction
disturbances, and left ventricle (LV) dysfunction
[2].
Although cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis has been reported to be
clinically evident in fewer than 5% of patients with sarcoidosis
[3], postmortem studies have
revealed cardiac involvement in 20–27% of such patients in the United
States [2]. In Japan, cardiac
involvement is frequently present in up to 58% of patients with sarcoidosis at
autopsy and is responsible for as many as 85% of the deaths from sarcoidosis
[4]. Current diagnostic imaging
techniques such as 2D echocardiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging
have the disadvantages of low sensitivity or low specificity (or both) for
diagnosing cardiac sarcoidosis
[5,
6].
Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI with an inversion recovery sequence allows
visualization of scar tissue in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) or
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
[7–9].
Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI is also useful for evaluating and monitoring
inflammatory heart disease
[10]. Several reports have
shown the usefulness of delayed contrast-enhanced MRI with an inversion
recovery sequence in patients with card iac sarcoidosis
[11–13],
but the topographic and intramural localization of myocardial lesions, shown
as regions of hyperenhancement, is poorly understood. Furthermore, the
association between the extent of hyperenhancement and LV global function has
not been clarified.
In the present study, we examined whether delayed contrast-enhanced MRI is
useful for determining the topographic and intramural localization of
myocardial lesions in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. We also tested the
hypothesis that the extent of myocardial lesions is correlated with LV
enlargement, LV systolic dysfunction, and plasma concentrations of brain
natriuretic peptide (BNP), all of which are useful prognostic markers in
patients with heart failure
[14,
15].
Materials and Methods
Patient Population
Written informed consent was obtained from every subject before commencing
the study. The purpose and nature of this study were approved by the ethics
committees of our institute.
We retrospectively studied 40 consecutive patients with systemic
sarcoidosis who underwent MRI between June 2002 and May 2005. All patients
were diagnosed with sarcoidosis on the basis of histologic evidence of
noncaseating epithelioid granulomas with giant cells. Biopsies were obtained
from lung (n = 16), lymph nodes (n = 11), skin (n =
10), muscle (n = 2), and bone (n = 1). The patients either
had cardiac symptoms (n = 16) or were screened for cardiac
involvement in the absence of cardiac symptoms (n = 24). All patients
underwent standard 12-lead ECG, 24-hour Holter monitoring, and
echocardiography.
According to the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare guidelines
[16] (Appendix 1), 11 patients
in the study were clinically diagnosed with cardiac sarcoidosis. Coronary
angiography excluded coronary artery disease in all patients. Confirmation of
cardiac sarcoidosis by endomyocardial biopsy was not obtained for any of the
patients. Plasma BNP level was measured in all 11 patients with cardiac
sarcoidosis and in 22 of the 29 patients without cardiac sarcoidosis within 2
weeks of the MRI study. Plasma BNP levels were not measured in the seven
remaining patients without cardiac sarcoidosis.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1A —29-segment model of left ventricle. Diagrams illustrate basal
and mid short-axis slices (A), apical short-axis slice (B), and
horizontal long-axis slice (C). In diagrams that correspond to basal
slices 1 and 2 (A) and mid slices 3 and 4 (C), left ventricular
(LV) myocardium is divided into six segments including anterior, lateral,
inferior, and septal walls, whereas it is divided into four segments in slice
5 of diagram (B), which corresponds to apical slice 5 in diagram
(C). LV myocardium at extreme tip of ventricle apex (gray
shading, C), where there is no longer cavity, is defined as
another segment, apex. RV= right ventricle.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1B —29-segment model of left ventricle. Diagrams illustrate basal
and mid short-axis slices (A), apical short-axis slice (B), and
horizontal long-axis slice (C). In diagrams that correspond to basal
slices 1 and 2 (A) and mid slices 3 and 4 (C), left ventricular
(LV) myocardium is divided into six segments including anterior, lateral,
inferior, and septal walls, whereas it is divided into four segments in slice
5 of diagram (B), which corresponds to apical slice 5 in diagram
(C). LV myocardium at extreme tip of ventricle apex (gray
shading, C), where there is no longer cavity, is defined as
another segment, apex. RV= right ventricle.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1C —29-segment model of left ventricle. Diagrams illustrate basal
and mid short-axis slices (A), apical short-axis slice (B), and
horizontal long-axis slice (C). In diagrams that correspond to basal
slices 1 and 2 (A) and mid slices 3 and 4 (C), left ventricular
(LV) myocardium is divided into six segments including anterior, lateral,
inferior, and septal walls, whereas it is divided into four segments in slice
5 of diagram (B), which corresponds to apical slice 5 in diagram
(C). LV myocardium at extreme tip of ventricle apex (gray
shading, C), where there is no longer cavity, is defined as
another segment, apex. RV= right ventricle.
|
|
MRI Protocol
MRI was performed after the patients had been clinically stabilized after
heart failure. ECG-gated MR images were obtained in all patients during
breath-holding on a 1.5-T imager (Magnetom Vision, Siemens Medical Solutions)
using a body array coil. To evaluate LV anatomy and function, cine MR images
of the LV in one horizontal, one vertical long, and five short axis slices
were obtained using a gradient-echo sequence (FLASH). Five short axis slices
at 14-mm intervals were set from 1 cm below the level of the mitral valve
insertion to the apex, roughly covering the entire LV. The acquisition
parameters were TR/TE, 11.3/6.1; flip angle, 25°; field of view, 300 mm; 7
lines per segment; matrix, 182 x 256; and slice thickness, 5 mm.
Using the same slice levels as described, delay ed contrast-enhanced MR
images using inversion recovery turbo FLASH with a segmented inversion
recovery gradient-echo pulse sequence
[17] were acquired 15 minutes
after the injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.15 mmol/kg). The
acquisition parameters were 7.5/3.4; flip angle, 15°; field of view, 300
mm; 33 lines per segment; matrix, 220 x 256; and slice thickness, 6 mm.
The inversion time (200–300 milliseconds) was adjusted to null signal
from normal myocardium.
MRI Analysis
Cine MR images were analyzed to determine LV function. Using a software
system (MASS, version 4.0, MEDIS Medical Imaging Systems), endo cardial and
epicardial borders in both end-diastolic and end-systolic phases were outlined
manually on all short axes and the horizontal long axis in the cine MR images.
For global LV function, the LV volume and ejection fraction were derived from
all short-axis images and the horizontal long-axis images using a modified
Simpson rule model [18]. The
LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) index (LVEDV / body surface area ratio) was
calculated for normalization. For assessment of regional parameters, MR images
were analyzed according to a 29-segment model of the LV (Fig.
1A,
1B,
1C).
Using MASS, version 4.0, we measured the regional end-diastolic wall
thickness; the wall motion, indicating the extent of movement of the inner
ventricular wall relative to the center of the cavity between the
end-diastolic and end-systolic phases; and the wall thickening, indicating the
increased rate (per centage) of wall thickness between the end-systolic and
end-diastolic phases. We analyzed the relationship of the regional myocardial
function results to the regional myocardial hyperenhancement.
Regional hyperenhancement was scored by consensus of two radiologists based
on the proportion of hyperenhanced myocardial area to the total segmental area
(0 = no hyperenhancement, 1 = 1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%,
and 4 = 76–100% hyperenhancement). First, the hyperenhancement scores
for each short axis slice and for each myocardial wall (septal, anterior,
lateral, and inferior walls in Fig.
1A,
1B,
1C) were averaged for each
patient. Then, the total sum of hyperenhancement scores for all 29 segments
was obtained for each patient. For example, a patient with a hyperenhancement
score of 4 in all segments would have a hyperenhancement score sum of 116.
Each segment was further divided into three layers—subepicardial,
midmyocardial, and subendocardial—and each layer was assessed for hyper
enhancement. Partially hyperenhanced layers were deemed hyperenhanced. The
patterns of hyperenhancement within each segment were defined as follows: A,
no hyperenhancement; B, transmural hyperenhancement; C, subepicardial
layer–dominant hyperenhancement; D, mid myocardial layer–dominant
hyperenhance ment; E, subendocardial layer–dominant hyperenhancement;
and F, hyperenhancement of subepicardial and subendocardial layers with an
intervening zone of nonenhanced midmyocardial layer. Subepicardial
layer–dominant hyperenhancement was defined as hyperenhancement
predominant ly involving the subepicardial layer with possible extension into
the midmyocardial layer. Similarly, subendocardial layer–dominant
hyperenhancement was defined as involving the subendocardial layer with
possible extension into the midmyocardial layer. Midmyocardial
layer–dominant hyperenhancement was defined as being confined to the
midmyocardial layer. To more clearly compare the predominant hyperenhancement
among the three layers, the number of hyper enhanced segments was counted for
each layer per patient.
Statistical Analyses
All values are expressed as means ± SD. We used analysis of variance
with repeated measures followed by a post-hoc Bonferroni test to analyze
statistical differences among different myocardial regions. We used analysis
of variance to analyze statistical differences among regions with different
hyperenhancement scores, whereas differences between the two groups were
analyzed using an unpaired Student's t test. We used simple linear
regression analysis for correlations between the global extent of
hyperenhanced myocardium and the LVEDV index, the LV ejection fraction, or the
plasma concentration of BNP. The proportion of subgroups in the nontransmural
hyperenhanced group was compared using the chi-square test for goodness of
fit. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
Results
The clinical characteristics of the patients with and without cardiac
sarcoidosis are shown in Table
1. Although the mean age of the patients with cardiac sarcoidosis
was 9 years greater than that of the patients without cardiac sarcoidosis, the
difference was not significant. None of the patients without cardiac
sarcoidosis had previous heart failure, whereas six of the 11 patients with
cardiac sarcoidosis had a history of heart failure. The markers associated
with cardiac function (plasma BNP level; and abnormal findings on 12-lead ECG,
24-hour Holter ECG, or echocardiography) were significantly higher in patients
with cardiac sarcoidosis than in those without cardiac sarcoidosis (p
< 0.0001, p < 0.00001, p < 0.005, and p
< 0.00005, respectively). Other symptoms of the 11 patients with cardiac
sarcoidosis included dyspnea (n = 4), chest pain (n = 2),
syncope (n = 1), and palpitations (n = 5). Two patients with
cardiac sarcoidosis were asymptomatic. The representative ECG findings
included atrioventricular block (n = 6), ST-T wave abnormality
(n = 2), abnormal Q wave (n = 1), bundle branch block
(n = 1), and premature ventricular contraction (n = 1). The
MRI indexes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis were the LVEDV index (mean
± SD, 102 ± 26 mL/m2), the LV ejection fraction (42%
± 14%), and the sum of the hyperenhancement score (47 ± 22).
Representative MR images are shown in Figures
2 and
3. Ten of the 11 cardiac
sarcoidosis patients showed myocardial hyperenhancement (positive in 202 of
319 segments), whereas none of the 29 patients without cardiac sarcoidosis
showed hyperenhancement.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2 —27-year-old man with cardiac sarcoidosis and intact coronary
arteries on coronary angiography (patient 1). Delayed contrast-enhanced MR
images (A–C) and corresponding (by slice) cine MR images
(D–F). Delayed contrast-enhanced MR images show apparent
hyperenhancement that primarily involves basal side at interventricular
septum, inferior wall, and lateral wall (arrowheads, A) and
extends to inferior to lateral portions of mid slices and apical slices
(arrows, B and C). Hyperenhancement is predominantly
present in epicardial layer of myocardium. Wall with hyperenhancement does not
show thinning and is of normal thickness on cine MR images.
|
|

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3 —76-year-old woman with cardiac sarcoidosis and intact
coronary arteries on coronary angiography (patient 6). Delayed
contrast-enhanced MR images (A–D) and corresponding (by slice)
cine MR images (E–H). Basal mid anterior wall with
hyperenhancement shows decreased thickness of myocardium (arrowheads,
E and F) on cine MR images. Arrows = hyperenhancement of
myocardium.
|
|
In patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, myocardial hyperenhancement was
significantly more extensive in the basal-side short axis slices than in the
apical-side short axis slices (p < 0.0005,
Fig. 4A). The extent of
myocardial hyperenhancement was not significantly different among the septal,
anterior, lateral, and inferior walls in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis
(Fig. 4B). Myocardial
hyperenhancement was significantly more frequent in the subepicardial layers
than in the subendocardial layers in cardiac sarcoidosis patients (p
< 0.0001, Fig. 4C).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 4A —Localization of myocardial hyperenhancement, which was scored
as follows: 0 = no hyperenhancement, 1 = 1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 =
51–75%, and 4 = 76–100% hyperenhancement. Horizontal lines
("whiskers") above each bar show standard error. ANOVA = analysis
of variance. Bar graph shows average hyperenhancement score for short axis
slices. For slice 1, p < 0.05 versus slice 4 and p <
0.005 versus slice 5; for slice 2, p < 0.05 versus slice 5.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 4B —Localization of myocardial hyperenhancement, which was scored
as follows: 0 = no hyperenhancement, 1 = 1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 =
51–75%, and 4 = 76–100% hyperenhancement. Horizontal lines
("whiskers") above each bar show standard error. ANOVA = analysis
of variance. Bar graph shows average hyperenhancement score for each
myocardial wall.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 4C —Localization of myocardial hyperenhancement, which was scored
as follows: 0 = no hyperenhancement, 1 = 1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 =
51–75%, and 4 = 76–100% hyperenhancement. Horizontal lines
("whiskers") above each bar show standard error. ANOVA = analysis
of variance. Bar graph shows average number of hyperenhanced segments in
subepicardial, midmyocardial, and subendocardial layers per patient. For
subepicardial layer, p < 0.05 versus subendocardial layer.
|
|
In patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, 71 myocardial segments showed
transmural hyperenhancement (pattern B), and 131 myocardial segments showed
nontransmural hyperenhancement (patterns C–F,
Table 2). Among the
nontransmural patterns, subepicardial layer–dominant hyperenhancement
(pattern C) was the most frequent (p < 0.01).
Regional wall thickening and regional wall motion were significantly
reduced in the segments with a hyperenhancement score of 4 compared with
segments with hyperenhancement scores of 0–3 (p < 0.0001,
Fig. 5A and p <
0.0001, Fig. 5B,
respectively). Regional wall thickness did not differ significantly among the
segments with different scores (Fig.
5C). In patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, the sum of the
hyperenhancement scores was significantly correlated with the plasma
concentration of BNP and the LVEDV index (r = 0.75, p <
0.01, and r = 0.61, p < 0.05, respectively) and was
negatively correlated with the LV ejection fraction (r = –0.76,
p < 0.01; Fig. 6A,
6B,
6C).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 5A —Bar graphs show relationship of hyperenhancement score (0 =
no hyperenhancement, 1 = 1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%, and
4 = 76–100% hyperenhancement) to characteristics of myocardial wall.
Horizontal lines ("whiskers") above each bar show standard error.
Relationship of hyperenhancement score to regional myocardial wall thickening
(A), wall motion (B), and wall thickness (C). Single
asterisk indicates p < 0.0001 versus score of 4, double asterisk
indicates p < 0.005 versus score of 4.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 5B —Bar graphs show relationship of hyperenhancement score (0 =
no hyperenhancement, 1 = 1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%, and
4 = 76–100% hyperenhancement) to characteristics of myocardial wall.
Horizontal lines ("whiskers") above each bar show standard error.
Relationship of hyperenhancement score to regional myocardial wall thickening
(A), wall motion (B), and wall thickness (C). Single
asterisk indicates p < 0.0001 versus score of 4, double asterisk
indicates p < 0.005 versus score of 4.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 5C —Bar graphs show relationship of hyperenhancement score (0 =
no hyperenhancement, 1 = 1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%, and
4 = 76–100% hyperenhancement) to characteristics of myocardial wall.
Horizontal lines ("whiskers") above each bar show standard error.
Relationship of hyperenhancement score to regional myocardial wall thickening
(A), wall motion (B), and wall thickness (C). Single
asterisk indicates p < 0.0001 versus score of 4, double asterisk
indicates p < 0.005 versus score of 4.
|
|

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 6A —Graphs show correlation between sum of hyperenhancement score
(0 = no hyperenhancement, 1 = 1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%,
and 4 = 76–100% hyperenhancement) and other indicators of cardiac
function. Correlation between sum of hyperenhancement score and plasma
concentration of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (A), left ventricular
ejection fraction (LVEF) (B), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume
(LVEDV) index (C).
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 6B —Graphs show correlation between sum of hyperenhancement score
(0 = no hyperenhancement, 1 = 1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%,
and 4 = 76–100% hyperenhancement) and other indicators of cardiac
function. Correlation between sum of hyperenhancement score and plasma
concentration of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (A), left ventricular
ejection fraction (LVEF) (B), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume
(LVEDV) index (C).
|
|

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 6C —Graphs show correlation between sum of hyperenhancement score
(0 = no hyperenhancement, 1 = 1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%,
and 4 = 76–100% hyperenhancement) and other indicators of cardiac
function. Correlation between sum of hyperenhancement score and plasma
concentration of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (A), left ventricular
ejection fraction (LVEF) (B), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume
(LVEDV) index (C).
|
|
Discussion
Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis by MRI
Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI with an inversion recovery technique detects
infarcted lesions with greater sensitivity and accuracy than conventional
contrast spin-echo imaging [7].
Furthermore, because delayed contrast-enhanced MRI has higher spatial
resolution than SPECT, it can detect small subendocardial infarcts often
missed by SPECT [9]. In
addition, in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, hyperenhancement of myocardial
lesions has been reported
[11–13,
19–21].
Recently, Smedema et al. [11]
and Tadamura et al. [13]
studied MR images from cardiac sarcoidosis patients; however, neither group of
investigators statistically analyzed the extent or distribution of
hyperenhancement in cardiac sarcoidosis using delayed contrast-enhanced MRI
with an inversion recovery technique. Furthermore, we have found no studies to
date that examine the association between hyperenhancement and LV global
function or neurohumoral activation in cardiac sarcoidosis patients. For the
first time, using delayed contrast-enhanced MRI with an inversion recovery
technique, we have identified a characteristic distribution of
hyperenhancement and a significant correlation between hyperenhancement and LV
global function and increased plasma BNP in patients with cardiac
sarcoidosis.
Our results indicate that cardiac sarcoidosis predominantly affects the
basal myocardium and the subepicardial layer. Moreover, the extent of
myocardial hyperenhancement is significantly correlated with the plasma
concentration of BNP and the LVEDV index and is negatively correlated with the
LV ejection fraction.
The Mechanism of Myocardial Hyperenhancement in Cardiac Sarcoidosis
Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI is well established for visualizing lesions
in patients with MI [7,
8]. Although the mechanism of
myocardial hyperenhancement may differ between acute and chronic MI,
hyperenhancement is associated with an increased volume of gadolinium chelates
secondary to extracellular space expansion in acute MI and chronic myocardial
lesions [7,
8]. Mahrholdt et al.
[10] reported that the region
of myocardial hyperenhancement was closely related to the histopathology of
active myocarditis. They hypothesized that necrotic cells, characterized by
ruptured membranes, may be responsible for hyperenhancement in patients with
myocarditis.
Results from several studies have shown hyperenhancement of myocardial
lesions in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis
[11–13,
19–21];
however, histologic evidence showing hyperenhancement has not been reported in
cardiac sarcoidosis patients to date. Pathologic studies have shown that the
histologic features of cardiac sarcoidosis consist of nonspecific inflammatory
changes such as infiltration of lymphocytes, interstitial edema, and damaged
cardiac myocytes, resulting in interstitial fibrosis or scarring
[21]. We suspect myocardial
hyperenhancement in cardiac sarcoidosis may share common histologic features
with myocardial hyperenhancement in MI and myocarditis (i.e., scars and
inflammatory changes).
In the present study, we found that myocardial wall thickening and wall
motion were decreased with an increase in hyperenhancement score, as has been
reported in patients with MI
[22,
23], whereas wall thickness
was not significantly decreased in extensively enhanced myocardial segments.
Scarring in cardiac sarcoidosis is known to be associated with granulomatous
changes [24], being quite
different from that in MI, and thus it may not necessarily result in wall
thinning.
The Topographic Localization of Myocardial Hyperenhancement
In the present study, the analysis of regional myocardial hyperenhancement
revealed that myocardial lesions were frequently located in the basal
myocardium rather than in the apical myocardium. The localization of
hyperenhancement in the basal myocardium is consistent with earlier
morphologic and pathologic studies showing the basal localization of sarcoid
lesions [13,
24]. Several echocardiographic
studies have shown that the interventricular septum is frequently affected in
sarcoidosis [5,
25]; and in a necropsy study,
Roberts et al. [24] reported
that the LV-free wall was the most common location. In contrast, we did not
find any significant differences in the extent of hyperenhancement between the
septal, anterior, lateral, and inferior walls; this result may be explained by
differences in the diagnostic techniques between the two studies.
Echocardiography may be limited to showing the entire LV myocardium because it
is often better for depicting the interventricular septum than the LV-free
wall. This approach could lead to a disproportionate detection of
abnormalities in the interventricular septum.
The Intramural Localization of Myocardial Hyperenhancement
Echocardiography is unable to detect the intramural localization of sarcoid
lesions. It is also difficult to identify the intramural localization of
sarcoid lesions using SPECT or PET because of their limited spatial
resolution. Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI with an inversion recovery technique
has good spatial resolution and a good contrast ratio between diseased and
normal myocardium, making it suitable for analyzing the intramural
localization of small myocardial lesions
[17]. We have found, using
delayed contrast-enhanced MRI, that the myocardial hyperenhancement in cardiac
sarcoidosis was predominantly located transmurally or in the subepicardial
layer of the LV myocardium. This relatively higher frequency of subepicardial
involvement is consistent with the results of an autopsy study
[4] and a recent MRI study of
patients with myocarditis
[10].
Although the cause of sarcoidosis is unknown, histology of sarcoid lesions
shows a variety of inflammatory cells
[4,
26]. We speculate that the
relatively frequent localization of hyperenhancement in the subepicardial
layer might represent a characteristic feature of inflammatory myocardial
diseases distinct from ischemic heart disease, in which preferential
hyperenhancement of the subendocardial layer has been repeatedly reported
[7,
8].
Correlations Between Hyperenhancement and LV Enlargement and LV Systolic Dysfunction
In the present study, the extent of hyperenhancement was significantly
correlated with the LVEDV index and was negatively correlated with the LV
ejection fraction. These results may be analogous to the observation that
infarct size is one of the most important determinants of LV enlargement and
LV systolic dysfunction after MI
[27]. The extent of
hyperenhancement was positively correlated with plasma BNP level, which is
correlated with the extent of ventricular dysfunction
[28], development of cardiac
arrhythmias [29], and
long-term survival [15] in
patients with heart failure. Although the mechanism of myocardial
hyperenhancement in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis is not fully understood,
these results suggest that the extent of hyperenhancement may be related to
impaired LV function in cardiac sarcoidosis, as seen in patients after MI. In
support of this theory, the plasma concentration of BNP has recently been
reported to be a useful marker for identifying patients with cardiac
sarcoidosis [30].
Clinical Implications
Our results suggest that delayed contrast-enhanced MRI with an inversion
recovery technique is useful for diagnosing myocardial lesions in patients
with cardiac sarcoidosis and that the myocardial lesions are predominantly
localized in the basal and subepicardial myocardium. Localization of
myocardial hyperenhancement to these regions may be a characteristic feature
of cardiac sarcoidosis and may be useful for differentiating cardiac
sarcoidosis from MI, which typically shows preferential hyperenhancement of
the subendocardial layer [7,
8]. Although cardiac MRI is a
useful tool for assessing myocardial damage and cardiac function in patients
with clinically suspicious cardiac sarcoidosis, MRI is not indicated for
evaluating those with sarcoidosis and no clinical signs of cardiac
involvement. Because our results show that the sum of the hyperenhancement
scores significantly correlated with LV function, more extensive
hyperenhancement may indicate worsened LV function in patients with cardiac
sarcoidosis. The long-term prognosis of patients with and those without
cardiac sarcoidosis was not evaluated in the present study and needs further
study.
Study Limitations
We could not obtain histologic confirmation of myocardial sarcoid lesions
in individual patients; therefore, it remains unclear whether subacute or
chronic myocardial sarcoid lesions might have influenced LV function
parameters and plasma levels of BNP.
Our MRI protocol did not include T2-weighted MRI, which has been shown to
be useful for detecting the acute inflammatory process of myocardial
sarcoidosis in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis
[20]. Thus, a combination of
segmented inversion recovery gradient-echo pulse sequences and T2-weighted
sequences might provide increased sensitivity for detecting myocardial sarcoid
lesions compared with our imaging protocol.
The relationship between the presence of heart failure in patients with
cardiac sarcoidosis and the MRI findings was not assessed in this study
because MRI was performed after the patients had been clinically stabilized by
treatment for heart failure.
Conclusion
In patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, lesions detected by delayed
contrast-enhanced MRI were predominantly localized in the basal side of the
myocardium and tended to show subepicardial or transmural involvement.
Hyperenhancement may be related to LV dysfunction in patients with cardiac
sarcoidosis.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Ichiro Tsuji for his support in statistical analysis and
Tatsuo Nagasaka and the other radiologic technologists for their support in
performing the MRI examinations.
References
- Newman LS, Rose CS, Maier LA. Sarcoidosis. N Engl J
Med 1997; 336:1224
–1234[Free Full Text]
- Silverman KJ, Hutchins GM, Bulkley BH. Cardiac sarcoid: a
clinicopathologic study of 84 unselected patients with systemic sarcoidosis.
Circulation 1978;58
:1204
–1211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sharma OP, Maheshwari A, Thaker K. Myocardial sarcoidosis.
Chest 1993; 103:253
–258[CrossRef][Medline]
- Matsui Y, Iwai K, Tachibana T, et al. Clinicopathological study of
fatal myocardial sarcoidosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci1976; 278:455
–469[Medline]
- Hyodo E, Hozumi T, Takemoto Y, et al. Early detection of cardiac
involvement in patients with sarcoidosis by a non-invasive method with
ultrasonic tissue characterisation. Heart2004; 90:1275
–1280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kinney EL, Caldwell JW. Do thallium myocardial perfusion scan
abnormalities predict survival in sarcoid patients without cardiac symptoms?
Angiology 1990;41
: 573–576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced
magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction.
N Engl J Med 2000;343
:1445
–1453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and
routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging
for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study.
Lancet 2003; 361:374
–379[CrossRef][Medline]
- Choudhury L, Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, et al. Myocardial scarring in
asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40
:2156
–2164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Mahrholdt H, Goedecke C, Wagner A, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic
resonance assessment of human myocarditis: a comparison to histology and
molecular pathology. Circulation 2004;109
:1250
–1258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Smedema JP, Snoep G, van Kroonenburgh MP, et al. Evaluation of the
accuracy of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the
diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol2005; 45:1683
–1690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vignaux O. Cardiac sarcoidosis: spectrum of MRI features.
AJR 2005; 184:249
–254[Free Full Text]
- Tadamura E, Yamamuro M, Kubo S, et al. Effectiveness of delayed
enhanced MRI for identification of cardiac sarcoidosis: comparison with
radionuclide imaging. AJR 2005;185
: 110–115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Rihal CS, Nishimura RA, Hatle LK, et al. Systolic and diastolic
dysfunction in patients with clinical diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy:
relation to symptoms and prognosis. Circulation1994; 90:2772
–2779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tsutamoto T, Wada A, Maeda K, et al. Attenuation of compensation of
endogenous cardiac natriuretic peptide system in chronic heart failure:
prognostic role of plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration in patients
with chronic symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction.
Circulation 1997;96
: 509–516[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hiraga H, Yuwai K, Hiroe M, et al. Guideline for the
diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis: study report on diffuse pulmonary
diseases [in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: The Japanese Ministry of
Health and Welfare, 1993:23
–24
- Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging
technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction.
Radiology 2001;218
: 215–223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dulce MC, Mostbeck GH, Friese KK, et al. Quantification of the left
ventricular volumes and function with cine MR imaging: comparison of geometric
models with three-dimensional data. Radiology1993; 188:371
–376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shimada T, Shimada K, Sakane T, et al. Diagnosis of cardiac
sarcoidosis and evaluation of the effects of steroid therapy by
gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Am J
Med 2001; 110:520
–527[CrossRef][Medline]
- Vignaux O, Dhote R, Duboc D, et al. Detection of myocardial
involvement in patients with sarcoidosis applying T2-weighted,
contrast-enhanced, and cine magnetic resonance imaging: initial results of a
prospective study. J Comput Assist Tomogr2002; 26:762
–767[CrossRef][Medline]
- Vignaux O, Dhote R, Duboc D, et al. Clinical significance of
myocardial magnetic resonance abnormalities in patients with sarcoidosis: a
1-year follow-up study. Chest 2002;122
:1895
–1901[CrossRef][Medline]
- Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed
contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile
function. Circulation 1999;100
:1992
–2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Amano Y, Takayama M, Takahama K, et al. Delayed hyper-enhancement
of myocardium in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with asymmetrical septal
hypertrophy: comparison with global and regional cardiac MR imaging
appearances. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20
: 595–600[CrossRef][Medline]
- Roberts WC, McAllister HA Jr, Ferrans VJ. Sarcoidosis of the heart:
a clinicopathologic study of 35 necropsy patients (group 1) and review of 78
previously described necropsy patients (group 11). Am J
Med 1977; 63:86
–108[CrossRef][Medline]
- Lewin RF, Mor R, Spitzer S, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of
patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Am Heart J1985; 110:116
–122[CrossRef][Medline]
- Sekiguchi M, Yazaki Y, Isobe M, et al. Cardiac sarcoidosis:
diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic considerations. Cardiovasc
Drugs Ther 1996; 10:495
–510[CrossRef][Medline]
- Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial
infarction: experimental observations and clinical implications.
Circulation 1990;81
:1161
–1172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yamamoto K, Burnett JC Jr, Jougasaki M, et al. Superiority of brain
natriuretic peptide as a hormonal marker of ventricular systolic and diastolic
dysfunction and ventricular hypertrophy. Hypertension1996; 28:988
–994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Berger R, Huelsman M, Strecker K, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide
predicts sudden death in patients with chronic heart failure.
Circulation 2002;105
:2392
–2397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yasutake H, Seino Y, Kashiwagi M, et al. Detection of cardiac
sarcoidosis using cardiac markers and myocardial integrated backscatter.
Int J Cardiol 2005;102
: 259–268[CrossRef][Medline]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?