AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lakadamyali, H.
Right arrow Articles by Agildere, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lakadamyali, H.
Right arrow Articles by Agildere, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2829
AJR 2008; 191:973-979
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

STIR Sequence for Depiction of Degenerative Changes in Posterior Stabilizing Elements in Patients with Lower Back Pain

Hatice Lakadamyali1, Nefise Cagla Tarhan2, Tarkan Ergun1, Banu Cakir2 and Ahmet Muhtesem Agildere2

1 Department of Radiology, Baskent University, Alanya Research Center, Antalya, Turkey.
2 Radiology Department, Baskent University School of Medicine, Fevzi Cakmak cad. 10. Sok, No 45 Bahcelievler 06490, Ankara, Turkey.

Received July 6, 2007; accepted after revision April 23, 2008.

 
Address correspondence to N. C. Tarhan (caglat{at}baskent-ank.edu.tr).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The aims of this study were to investigate whether degenerative posterior paraspinal changes are a cause of lower back pain and to determine the age- and sex-related distribution of these changes on MR images acquired with a STIR sequence.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The lumbar MRI findings of 372 patients (141 men, 231 women; mean age, 51.2 years) with nonradicular lower back pain and of 249 healthy persons acting as controls (126 men, 123 women; mean age, 49.3 years) were analyzed. The sagittal STIR sequence was used for all MRI examinations. Presence of interspinous ligament edema, facet joint effusion, neocysts, paraspinal muscle edema, subcutaneous edema, disk herniation, and disk degeneration was evaluated, and the incidence of each finding was determined. All findings were grouped according to age and sex. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and independent-samples Student's t tests and Spearman's rank correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS. The incidences of facet joint effusion, interspinous ligament edema, neocyst formation, and paraspinal muscle edema were found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with lower back pain than in controls. The incidences of intervertebral disk degeneration, disk herniation, and subcutaneous edema in persons with and those without lower back pain were similar. Intervertebral disk degeneration, disk herniation, subcutaneous edema, and muscle edema were found to increase with age in both persons with and those without symptoms.

CONCLUSION. Degenerative changes in the posterior paraspinal structures were found in a higher percentage of subjects with lower back pain than in controls. Use of a STIR sequence with homogeneous fat suppression facilitates visualization of these changes.

Keywords: lower back pain • MRI • posterior paraspinal soft tissue • STIR sequence


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Diffuse degenerative changes in the stabilizing elements of the posterior aspect of the spinal column, which include facet joints, interspinous ligaments, and paraspinal muscles, occur in patients with lower back pain (LBP). These degenerative changes also have been encountered in persons without symptoms, and debate continues concerning whether these changes are the cause of LBP [13]. Although it can easily depict evidence of the well-known causes of pain, such as in fection, fracture, and serious deformities, con ventional MRI does not show degenerative changes in the posterior elements [4, 5]. These changes can, however, be visualized if a fat-suppression technique [4], such as the STIR sequence, is used to acquire the images. Use of this sequence enables diffuse homog eneous fat suppression, and degeneration can be tracked as areas of high signal intensity within fat.

Conventional MRI is diagnostically insufficient in 85% of cases of LBP [5]. An explanation for this diagnostic difficulty is that pain can originate from any lumbar structure. In most cases, LBP is assumed to be due to muscular strain, injury to the ligaments, and degenerative changes in the spine [6]. This idea is debatable [1], however, because all of these abnormalities are encountered in persons without symptoms [2]. A small number of reports in the medical literature describe evaluation of the posterior elements on fat-suppressed images [7, 8]. In those studies, however, the investigators did not visualize all of the posterior elements and included only small numbers of patients.

The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of the presence of degenerative changes in posterior spinal elements in patients with LBP compared with the findings in persons without such changes and to see whether the changes are a cause of LBP. Another aim was to determine among persons with and those without LBP the age- and sex-related distribution of changes in the posterior elements on MR images obtained with the STIR sequence.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The study was conducted in two stages. During the first stage, lumbar MR images of patients with LBP without radiculopathy referred to our department during the years 2000–2004 were interpreted. Patients with previous lumbar spinal surgery, evidence of lumbar or sacral tumors at MRI, diffuse bone metastasis, serious congenital anomalies, severe scoliosis, diskitis, osteomyelitis, serious lumbar vertebral fracture, extruded or sequestered disks, spondylolysis, or spondylolisthesis were excluded from the study. The study group consisted of 372 patients. During the second stage, a control group was formed that included persons of the same ethnicity. This group consisted of 249 volunteer patients referred to our department for other MRI examinations who had no history of LBP or sciatica, trauma, or lumbar surgery within the last 6 months. Signed written consent was obtained from all subjects. The group with symptoms consisted of 231 women and 141 men (mean age, 51.2 ± 15.3 [SD] years; range, 15–85 years). The control group consisted of 123 women and 126 men (mean age, 49.3 ± 16.2 years; range, 15–96 years). The study was approved by the ethical committee of our institution.

The lumbar MR images of all subjects were evaluated for pathologic changes in the posterior elements of the spine. The MR images were obtained with a 1.5-T unit (Symphony, Siemens Medical Solutions) and a body coil. At conventional MRI, the following sequences were used: sagittal T1-weighted images (TR/TE, 600/10; number of signals acquired, 2; matrix size, 230 x 384; slice thickness, 4 mm; acquisition time, 2 minutes 32 seconds), sagittal T2-weighted images (3,250/92; number of signals acquired, 1; matrix size, 230 x 384; slice thickness, 4 mm; acquisition time, 1 minute 33 seconds), axial T2-weighted images (3,400/90; number of signals acquired, 2; matrix size, 230 x 384; slice thickness, 4 mm; acquisition time, 2 minutes 0 seconds). In addition to the conventional MRI sequences, a sagittal STIR sequence (6,120–7,040/60–70; inversion time, 150 milliseconds; number of signals acquired, 2; matrix size, 132 x 256; slice thickness, 4 mm; acquisition time, 2 minutes 26 seconds) was used for all MRI examinations.


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Graph shows percentages of posterior paraspinal degenerative changes according to sex in case group. White bars indicate men (141 of 372 subjects); gray bars, women (231 of 372 subjects). ISL = interspinous ligament.

 
Lumbar MR images were evaluated by two radiologists experienced in musculoskeletal radiology who made common decisions concerning pathologic changes. Findings of intervertebral disk degeneration, disk herniation (excluding extruded disk and sequestered disk), interspinous ligament degeneration or rupture, facet joint effusion, neocyst formation (including synovial cysts next to the facet joints and emanating from the interspinous neo arthrosis), intrinsic spinal muscular degen eration, and presence of subcutaneous edema were recorded for all subjects. The frequencies of the findings in each age group were calculated. The presence of interspinous ligament degeneration or rupture presenting as edema also was recorded for each lumbar level in both groups.

Intervertebral disk degeneration was assumed to be a loss of signal intensity of the disk or a reduction in the height of the disk. Disk herniation was defined as focal or diffuse extension of the disk beyond its end plate. Degeneration or rupture of the interspinous ligaments was seen as high signal intensity between the spinous processes of the lumbar vertebrae. Facet joint effusion was visualized as high-signal-intensity fluid between the superior and inferior facets at lumbar levels. Cyst formation next to the facet joints and emanating from the interspinous neoarthrosis was seen as a round cystic lesion with high signal intensity on STIR images. Intrinsic spinal muscle degeneration manifested as edema of the posterior paraspinal muscles with high signal intensity on STIR images at the lumbar level. Subcutaneous edema was visualized as a triangular area of increased signal intensity of subcutaneous fat behind the lumbar vertebrae and paraspinal muscles, especially on midline images obtained with the STIR sequence.


Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Graph shows percentages of posterior paraspinal degenerative changes according to age in case group. Group 1, 15–30 years; group 2, 31–40 years; group 3, 41–50 years; group 4, 51–60 years; group 5, 61–70 years; group 6, 71 years and older. ISL = interspinous ligament.

 
For data analysis, all subjects were divided into six groups according to age: 15–30 years, 43 case and 42 control subjects; 31–40 years, 49 case and 47 control subjects; 41–50 years, 94 case and 55 control subjects; 51–60 years, 87 case and 47 control subjects; 61–70 years, 50 case and 31 control subjects; and 71 years and older, 49 case and 27 control subjects. Interspinous ligament degeneration was evaluated according to the level at which the edema occurred: T12–L1, L1–L2, L2–L3, L3–L4, L4–L5, and L5–S1. The incidence of all findings was calculated.

The study data were entered into a statistical program (SPSS 11.0, SPSS) for data control. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare nominal data variables, such as sex and pathologic findings, in the two subject groups, the sex groups, and the age groups. The independent-samples Student's t test was used for finding the concordance of ages between the case and control groups. Correlation between grouped age-related pathologic findings was tested with Spearman's rank correlation analysis. A value of r < 0.4 was accepted as weak correlation, 0.4 < r < 0.7 as moderate correlation, and r > 0.7 as strong correlation. Values of p < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.


Figure 3
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 21-year-old man with lower back pain. Sagittal STIR MR image shows high-signal-intensity facet joint effusion (long arrows) at L3–L4, L4–L5, and L5–S1 and small neocyst formation (short arrow) next to L5–S1 facet joint.

 

Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Comparison of the case and control groups revealed no statistical difference regarding age but a significant difference (p = 0.02) re garding sex, women predominating. When pathologic changes in posterior spinal ele ments and pathologic changes in the disks (herniation or degeneration) were compared between sex groups, statistical significance was found only with regard to subcutaneous edema, the frequency of which was higher in women with and those without symptoms (control group, p = 0.03; case group, p = 0.07).

All patients with LBP without radiculopathy were given the diagnosis of pathologic change in at least one of the posterior elements stabilizing the vertebral column. The largest percentage of these patients (25%) were 41–50 years old. The distribution of the pathologic findings according to sex and age as percentages in the group with symptoms is shown in Figures 1 and 2. Posterior element abnormalities in order of frequency were facet joint effusion (85.5%) (Figs. 3, 4, 5), interspinous ligament degen eration or rupture with edema at L4–L5 (80.6%) and L5–S1 (79.8%) (Figs. 6 and 7), neocyst formation and synovial cysts (62.4%) (Figs. 3 and 4), subcutaneous edema (27.2%) (Fig. 7), and intrinsic spinal muscle degen eration (24.7%) (Fig. 5). Intervertebral disk herniation was encountered in 41.7% of all cases and degeneration in 65.1%.


Figure 4
View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 59-year-old man with lower back pain. Sagittal STIR MR image shows facet joint effusion (arrowhead) at L4–L5 with neocyst formation (long arrow) next to it. Another neocyst (short arrow) is present at higher level.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 40-year-old man with lower back pain due to multiple pathologic conditions. Sagittal STIR MR image shows disk degeneration of lowest three lumbar levels. Facet joint effusion (long arrows) is present at multiple levels. Paraspinal muscle edema (short arrows) is present at L4–S1.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6 43-year-old man with lower back pain. Sagittal STIR MR image shows interspinous ligament degeneration and rupture at L2–L3, L3–L4, and L4–L5 levels manifesting as increased signal intensity (arrows) between spinous processes. Disk degeneration is present at L4–L5 and L5–S1 levels.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7 50-year-old woman with lower back pain. Sagittal STIR MR image shows interspinous ligament edema (short arrows) at L2–L3, L3–L4, L4–L5, and L5–S1 levels. Subcutaneous edema (long arrow) also is present.

 

Degenerative changes in at least one posterior element were found in only 76.3% of the control group (190 subjects); 23.7% (59 subjects) had no changes. The frequency of pathologic changes in the posterior elements of the control group was as follows: facet joint effusion, 45.8%; interspinous ligament degeneration with edema at L4–L5, 32.5%; subcutaneous edema, 19.7%; neocyst formation and synovial cysts, 15.3%; and intrinsic spinal muscle degeneration, 4.8%. Intervertebral disk herniation and disk degeneration were encountered in 39.8% and 60.2% of this group, rates very close to the frequencies in the group with symptoms. The distribution of frequencies in the control group according to sex and age is summarized in Figures 8 and 9.


Figure 8
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8 Graph shows percentages of posterior paraspinal degenerative changes according to sex in control group. White bars indicate men (126 of 249 subjects); gray bars, women (123 of 249 subjects). ISL = interspinous ligament.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9 Graph shows percentages of posterior paraspinal degenerative changes according to age in control group. Group 1, 15–30 years; group 2, 31–40 years; group 3, 41–50 years; group 4, 51–60 years; group 5, 61–70 years; group 6, 71 years and older. ISL = interspinous ligament.

 
The most common imaging finding in subjects with LBP was facet joint effusion, which had a frequency of 85.5%. The frequency in the control group was 45.8%. Case–control group comparison of facet joint effusion by age group showed this finding to be more frequent in the case group than in the control group.

Most patients had interspinous ligament degeneration or rupture at more than one level, mostly at the L4–L5 and L5–S1 levels and in the 15- to 30-year and the 31- to 40-year age groups. In the 15- to 30-year group with symptoms, the incidence was 88.4% at the L4–L5 and L5–S1 levels; in the 31- to 40-year group, the incidence was 89.8% at the L4–L5 level and 73.5% at the L5–S1 level. Interspinous ligament edema was encoun tered mainly in the 41- to 50-year (41.8% at L4–L5) and 61- to 70-year (41.9% at L5–S1) age groups without symptoms. Seventy-eight percent of the patients with interspinous ligament edema had concomitant interver tebral disk degenera tive changes at the same level. The case–control group comparison of interspinous ligament edema based on age group and spinal level showed this finding to be more frequent in the case than in the control group.

Neocyst formation and synovial cysts were encountered mainly in the 15- to 30-year (69.8%) and 31- to 40-year (69.4%) age groups with symptoms. In the subjects without symptoms, these findings were made mostly in the 71-year and older group (22.2%). In the age-group comparison, these findings were more frequent in the case than in the control group. In most of the cases of symptomatic facet joint cysts (95%), there was concomitant effusion in the neighboring facet joint; effusion was present in only 69% of the subjects without symptoms.

Intrinsic spinal muscle injury was encountered most frequently in the 51- to 60-year-old (32.2%) and 61- to 70-year-old (32%) subjects in the case group. In the control group, this finding was most frequent in the 71-year and older age group (14.8%). The comparison of signal intensity increase in the intrinsic spinal muscles according to age group showed a higher frequency at all ages in the case group than in the control group. All intrinsic muscle injuries were accompanied by interspinous ligament edema in subjects with and those without symptoms.

The comparison of pathologic changes in intervertebral disks (degeneration, herniation) and structures other than disks (signal intensity increase in the intrinsic spinal muscles and subcutaneous edema) according to age within the case and control groups revealed a statistically significant relation. A weak positive correlation between age and pathologic condition was found for disk herniation (control group, r = 0.348, p = 0.0001; case group, r = 0.299, p = 0.0001), intrinsic spinal muscle injury (control group, r = 0.208, p = 0.001; case group: r = 0.159, p = 0.002), and subcutaneous edema (control group, r = 0.325, p = 0.0001; case group, r = 0.327, p = 0.0001). A statistically moderate positive correlation between age and intervertebral disk degeneration was found in both the case and control groups (case group, r = 0.462, p = 0.0001; control group, r = 0.508, p = 0.0001).

There was a statistically significant difference in interspinous ligament degeneration or rupture at L3–L4 and L4–L5 only between age groups of patients with symptoms (p < 0.05). No statistically sig nificant relation was found between age and interspinous ligament edema at T12–L1, L1–L2, L2–L3, or L5–S1, neocyst formation, or facet joint effusion.

Case–control comparison showed a statistically significant difference with regard to the following pathologic conditions: facet joint effusion (p = 0.0001), interspinous ligament edema at all lumbar levels (p = 0.001 for T12–L1, p = 0.0001 for all other levels), neocyst formation and synovial cysts (p = 0.0001), and intrinsic muscle degeneration (p = 0.0001). A similar relation was found with regard to subcutaneous edema (p = 0.03). Because, however, there was a significant sex difference between the case and control groups with regard to subcutaneous edema, which was statistically more frequent among women, a separate evaluation was performed for men and women. Thus within-sex comparison showed subcutaneous edema more frequent in patients with LBP than in those without LBP, but the difference was not statistically significant (men, p = 0.289; women, p = 0.180). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was found in a comparison of case and control groups with regard to both intervertebral disk degeneration and disk herniation (p > 0.05).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This study, performed with subjects with and subjects without symptoms who had findings on MR images obtained with STIR sequences, revealed that subjects reporting LBP had a statistically significantly higher ratio of facet joint effusion, interspinous ligament injury, neocyst formation and synovial cysts, and intrinsic spinal muscle edema than did subjects with asymptomatic changes. Intervertebral disk degeneration, disk herniation, and subcutaneous edema, however, were found to occur without a statistically significant difference between subjects with and those without symptoms. In addition, the frequency of intervertebral disk degeneration, disk herniation, subcutaneous edema, and intrinsic spinal muscle edema was found to increase with age whether or not symptoms were present; intervertebral disk degeneration was especially prominent.

The higher rates of facet joint edema, interspinous ligament injury, neocyst formation and synovial cysts, and intrinsic spinal muscle edema among persons with symptoms than among those without symptoms show that pathologic changes in the posterior osteoarticular elements and soft tissues of the spinal column may be the cause of or a manifestation of the cause of LBP. On the other hand, the similar rates of intervertebral disk degeneration, disk herniation, and subcutaneous edema in the case and control groups indicate that these findings may be found even if LBP is not present. The age-related increase in intervertebral disk degeneration, disk herniation, subcutaneous edema, and intrinsic spinal muscle edema observed in both groups indicates that those degenerative changes may develop with age. Conventional MRI is insufficient for visualizing these paraspinal changes [5]. On STIR images, however, these degenerative changes can be clearly visualized owing to homogeneous fat suppression and better depiction of edema than on conventional MR images.

In a study by Jensen et al. [3], disk herniation (diffuse or focal protrusion), being a frequently encountered asymptomatic finding, was assumed to be an incidental finding on MR images of patients with LBP. Savage et al. [9] conducted a study with 149 patients with and without LBP and found similar ratios and no statistically significant difference between the case and control groups regarding disk herniation (excluding extruded or sequestered disks) and disk degeneration. Similar findings were made in other studies [10, 11] and in ours. As a result, we conclude there is a poor correlation between LBP and disk degeneration or herniation.

The posterior paravertebral elements (facet joints, ligamentum flavum, interspinous ligaments, supraspinous ligaments, and para spinous muscle structures) have a large number of innervations. The interspinous ligament, which is one of the most important structures rendering stability to the spinal column, is innervated by the medial branch of the dorsal ramus [12, 13]. Acute trauma sprains the interspinous ligament, and chronic repetitive microtrauma usually results in subtotal degenerative rupture of the ligament. Degenerative changes in interspinous ligaments begin early in the second decade of life in healthy persons. Rupture usually is present in 20% of persons older than 20 years, especially at L4–L5 and L5–S1 [14]. In our study, interspinous ligament rupture at L4–L5 was found in 32% and at L5–S1 in 31% of healthy subjects older than 20 years. Before this study, only a limited number of studies reported in the literature evaluated whether an observed increase in interspinous ligament signal intensity indicates the presence of changes causing LBP. In a study conducted with a small number of subjects with LBP who had a mean age of 56 years, Jinkins [7] found an increase in interspinous ligament signal intensity on the fat-saturated T2-weighted images of 71% of the subjects. The control group was quite small, however, and age distribution was not reported. Our study revealed similar results with regard to presence of interspinous ligament edema in the 51- to 60-year age group with symptoms; this finding was most frequent at L4–L5 (75.9%) and L5–S1 (82.8%). Our study was conducted with a larger control group than Jinkins used, and the results revealed a significantly higher ratio of interspinous ligament edema in the case group than in the control group, indicating that the edema may be a cause of or a manifestation of the cause of LBP.

In patients with interspinous ligament injuries, the ligament becomes visible as an area of high signal intensity on T2-weighted images owing to inflammatory exudation and inflammation of the fibrous bands. This high signal intensity, however, resembles the fat tissue surrounding the ligament on conventional sequences, making it difficult to differentiate. This problem necessitates use of STIR [4] or fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences, both of which are effective at showing inflammatory soft-tissue lesions, for correct diagnosis [15, 16]. In their study correlating imaging and surgical findings in the cases of thoracolumbar trauma patients, Lee et al. [17] found that fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging was highly specific and sensitive for visualization of interspinous ligament injury and correctly showed the presence of the lesions. In our study, the edematous and degenerative changes in the posterior spinal elements not seen on conventional T1- and T2-weighted images—especially when the interspinous ligaments, synovia, neocysts, and muscles were surrounded by fat tissue—were easily visualized on STIR images. Although it took approximately 20 seconds longer than the fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequence, the STIR sequence was especially preferred in our study because it provided homogeneous fat suppression with out magnetic field inhomogeneity and with better depiction of edema.

It is thought [1] that degenerative changes in the facet joint and an increased amount of intraarticular fluid are among the important overlooked causes of LBP. Study results [18, 19] support this idea in that LBP in some patients was relieved after selective facet joint block or facet denervation. Our study revealed a higher frequency of facet joint effusion among subjects with symptoms (85.5%) than among subjects without symptoms (45.8%), supporting the hypothesis that effusion may be a possible cause or a manifestation of the cause of LBP. Most degenerative changes in the facet joint can be diagnosed with conventional MRI [1]. However, joint effusion can be clearly visualized with the STIR sequence, as found in our study. Our study showed that 78% of cases of facet joint effusion were accompanied by intervertebral disk degeneration at the same level. The explanation may be degenerative height reduction of the intervertebral disk leading to partial subluxation of the posterior facet joint, which is usually accompanied by intraarticular effusion [12].

Synovial cysts and neocysts of the posterior spinal facets are rare lesions related to degenerative lumbosacral changes [20]. These lesions may extend into the spinal canal or be located in the posterior paraspinal soft tissues. The number of studies in the literature in which the frequency of synovial cysts and neocysts was evaluated is small. In a study of conventional sequences for MRI of patients reporting back pain or sciatica, Doyle and Merrilees [21] found a 7.3% frequency of posterior synovial cysts. In our study group, the rate of these cysts was 62.4%. We consider the difference due to our use of the STIR technique, which can clearly depict even small cysts that are barely discernible from the fat tissue in which they are embedded.

It is well known that synovial cysts extending into the spinal canal can cause neurologic symptoms. The clinical findings of extraspinal cystic lesions, however, are debated unless they cause a pressure effect on the basic neurologic structures [1]. The contribution to LBP of synovial cysts and neocyst formation observed more frequently in persons with symptoms (62.4%) than in those without symptoms (15.3%) was probably due to degenerative and inflammatory changes in the corresponding facet joints. This supposition is supported by the results of our study revealing that most of the synovial cysts and neocyst formations in the group with symptoms, unlike the subjects without symptoms, were accompanied by effusion in the neighboring facet joint.

Intrinsic spinal muscle changes can have a direct (intrinsic spinal muscle strain or rupture) or indirect (intrinsic spinal muscle spasm) role in the pathogenesis of LBP [7]. Bennett and associates [8] used fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging to examine 20 gymnasts with a mean age of 16 years with and without LBP and visualized muscle strain only in those with LBP (19%). In our study, increased intrinsic spinal muscle signal intensity was observed in 12% of the subjects in the 15–30 year age group with LBP. In the other age groups, the rate of intrinsic spinal muscle edema was higher in subjects with symptoms (24.7%) than in those without symptoms (4.8%). Thus we believe is it highly probable that muscle strain is a cause of LBP. Our study also revealed a statistically significant age-related increase in intrinsic spinal muscle edema. The age-related statistically significant in crease in inter vertebral disk degeneration and disk herniation and of intrinsic spinal muscle edema shows that degenerative changes in these structures may appear with aging.

Acute or subacute degeneration of the intrinsic spinal muscles, which originate from and insert into the vertebrae (multifidus and interspinales), usually develops owing to intersegmental hypermobility, which leads to degenerative rupture of the interspinous ligament [22]. Jinkins [7] observed intrinsic spinal muscle (interspinales and multifidus) degeneration (abnormal signal intensity) in only 7% of patients, but all patients with increased muscle signal intensity had an increase in interspinous ligament signal intensity. In our study, the explanation for the lesser degree of degenerative changes observed in the intrinsic muscles than in the interspinous ligaments is probably that muscular tissue is stronger than ligamentous tissue. Both muscular strain (which has high signal intensity owing to muscle edema or hemorrhage) and interspinous ligament injury, can be overlooked, especially when STIR sequences are not used.

The number of reports of evaluation of edema of the subcutaneous soft tissues in the posterior lumbar vertebral column is limited [23, 24]. Furthermore, to our knowledge, there are no reports of evaluation of the presence of such edema in patients with LBP. Increased signal intensity, which is assumed to be subcutaneous tissue edema or fluid collection, is believed to be an incidental finding. The causes can be infectious, inflammatory, traumatic, hydrostatic, and even neoplastic. In their study involving obese and nonobese persons without LBP, Shi and associates [23] found that the rate of the high signal intensity on fat-suppressed T2-weighted images increased with age and weight and among women. Similarly, in our study, the incidence of subcutaneous edema significantly increased with age and among women. No statistically significant difference, however, was encountered between persons with and those without LBP with regard to sex distribution of subcutaneous edema. The higher ratio of subcutaneous edema in persons with than those without LBP might have been be due to poorer lymphatic drainage in patients with LBP as the result of pain-related restriction of physical activity.

Findings on MR images obtained with conventional sequences in the evaluation of patients with LBP who do not have evidence of disk herniation usually do not contribute to a definitive diagnosis, and patients receive symptomatic treatment with no pathoanatomic diagnosis [25]. An accurate diagnosis is important because it contributes to the patient's reassurance and trust in the clinician [26]. If these changes are found, patients can be treated and followed up accordingly. Thus STIR sequences are impor tant for clear evaluation of the posterior spinal structures as the possible cause of LBP and for determination of the therapeutic approach.

Despite the large population, our study had limitations. First, there was no correlation between the lesions and the intensity of symptoms (degree of pain). The lack of control MRI examinations for evaluation of the clinical and radiologic response to therapy was another limitation.

The results of our study suggest that, with high probability, degenerative changes in the posterior paraspinal soft-tissue structures, especially interspinous ligament edema, facet joint effusion, neocyst formation, and intrinsic spinal muscle edema, cause LBP in some patients. Because of homogeneous fat suppression and better depiction of soft-tissue edema, the STIR sequence is the best imaging technique for visualizing the aforementioned changes, and it adds only 2 minutes to the imaging examination. Therefore, we suggest that for patients with LBP without other obvious pathologic findings, the STIR sequence be added to the MRI evaluation to visualize degenerative changes in posterior spinal structures as a possible cause of pain.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Metin Karatas and Coskun Bakar for their help in performing the statistical analysis.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. D'Aprile P, Tarantino A, Jinkins JR, Brindicci D. The value of fat saturation sequences and contrast medium administration in MRI of degenerative disease of the posterior/perispinal elements of the lumbosacral spine. Eur Radiol 2007;17 : 523–531[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am1990; 72:403 –408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994;331 : 69–73[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pui MH, Goh PS, Choo HF, Fok EC. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences. Australas Radiol 1997;41 : 99–102[Medline]
  5. White AA 3rd, Gordon SL. Synopsis: workshop on idiopathic low-back pain. Spine 1982;7 : 141–149[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Jarvik JG, Deyo RA. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging. Ann Intern Med 2002;137 : 586–597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Jinkins JR. Lumbosacral interspinous ligament rupture associated with acute intrinsic spinal muscle degeneration. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2370 –2376[Medline]
  8. Bennett DL, Nassar L, DeLano MC. Lumbar spine MRI in the elite-level female gymnast with low back pain. Skeletal Radiol 2006; 35:503 –509[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Savage RA, Whitehouse GH, Roberts N. The relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the lumbar spine and low back pain, age and occupation in males. Eur Spine J1997; 6:106 –114[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Stadnik TW, Lee RR, Coen HL, Neirynck EC, Buisseret TS, Osteaux MJ. Annular tears and disk herniation: prevalence and contrast enhancement on MR images in the absence of low back pain or sciatica. Radiology 1998;206 : 49–55[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Erkintalo MO, Salminen JJ, Alanen AM, Paajanen HE, Kormano MJ. Development of degenerative changes in the lumbar intervertebral disc: results of a prospective MR imaging study in adolescents with and without low-back pain. Radiology 1995;196 : 529–533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Jinkins JR. Acquired degenerative changes of the intervertebral segments at and suprajacent to the lumbosacral junction: a radioanatomic analysis of the nondiscal structures of the spinal column and perispinal soft tissues. Eur J Radiol 2004;50 : 134–158[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Jiang H, Russell G, Raso VJ, Moreau MJ, Hill DL, Bagnall KM. The nature and distribution of the innervation of human supraspinal and interspinal ligaments. Spine 1995;20 : 869–876[Medline]
  14. Newman PH. Sprung back. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1952; 34:30 –37[Medline]
  15. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 1994; 3:184 –201[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Georgy BA, Hesselink JR. MR imaging of the spine: recent advances in pulse sequences and special techniques. AJR1994; 162:923 –934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lee HM, Kim HS, Kim DJ, Suk KS, Park JO, Kim NH. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting posterior ligament complex injury in thoracolumbar spinal fractures. Spine2000; 25:2079 –2084[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Mooney V, Robertson J. The facet syndrome. Clin Orthop 1976; 115:149 –156[Medline]
  19. Shealy CN. Facet denervation in the management of back pain and sciatic pain. Clin Orthop 1976;115 : 157–164[Medline]
  20. Liu SS, Williams KD, Drayer BP, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VK. Synovial cysts of the lumbosacral spine: diagnosis by MR imaging. AJR 1990; 154:163 –166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Doyle AJ, Merrilees M. Synovial cysts of the lumbar facet joints in a symptomatic population: prevalence on magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 2004; 29:874 –878[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J. Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine 1995;20 : 887–900[Medline]
  23. Shi H, Schweitzer ME, Carrino JA, Parker L. MR imaging of the lumbar spine: relation of posterior soft-tissue edema-like signal and body weight. AJR 2003;180 : 81–86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Cooper M, Hacking JC, Dixon AK. Sacral edema: computed tomographic and anatomical observations. Clin Anat1995; 8:56 –60[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Modic MT, Obuchowski NA, Ross JS, et al. Acute low back pain and radiculopathy: MR imaging findings and their prognostic role and effect on outcome. Radiology 2005;237 : 597–604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Sox HC Jr, Margulies I, Sox CH. Psychologically mediated effects of diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1981;95 : 680–685[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. N. Kraft, P. H. Pennekamp, U. Becker, M. Young, O. Diedrich, C. Luring, and M. von Falkenhausen
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of the Lumbar Spine in Elite Horseback Riders: Correlations With Back Pain, Body Mass Index, Trunk/Leg-Length Coefficient, and Riding Discipline
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2009; 37(11): 2205 - 2213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lakadamyali, H.
Right arrow Articles by Agildere, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lakadamyali, H.
Right arrow Articles by Agildere, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS