AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bozgeyik, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Kocakoc, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bozgeyik, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Kocakoc, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3865
AJR 2008; 191:980-986
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Role of Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Detection of Early Active Sacroiliitis

Zulkif Bozgeyik1, Salih Ozgocmen2 and Ercan Kocakoc1

1 Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey.
2 Division of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.

Received February 18, 2008; accepted after revision May 6, 2008.

 
Address correspondence to Z. Bozgeyik (bozgeyik4{at}hotmail.com).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. This study proposed to evaluate the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) to detect active inflammatory changes in the sacroiliac joints of patients with early axial spondyloarthritis (also spelled spondylarthritis).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-two patients with chronic low back pain underwent clinical and MRI evaluation for axial spondyloarthritis or early ankylosing spondylitis. STIR, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, fat-saturated T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted (b values: 100, 600, 1,000 s/mm2) images were obtained. The presence of subchondral bone marrow edema, subchondral fatty marrow infiltration, or contrast enhancement in the sacroiliac joints or adjacent enthesitis sites was considered a marker for active inflammatory changes. All MRI sequences were evaluated for the presence of acute inflammatory changes and inter- and intrarater reliability of the sequences. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of diffusion-weighted images were calculated from normal and involved iliac and sacral bones of sacroiliac joints.

RESULTS. ADC values measured from the lesions at b values of 1,000 and 600 s/mm2 in patients with sacroiliitis (n = 13) were significantly higher than values measured from iliac and sacral bones in patients with low back pain of mechanical origin (n = 29). DWI showed sensitivity for detecting acute lesions in early sacroiliitis similar to that of T1-weighted gadolinium images (area under the curve, 0.843–0.971). Intra- and interrater reliability of DWI was acceptable.

CONCLUSION. DWI is a sensitive, fast sequence and does not require a contrast agent, which makes it a good and cost-effective alternative for imaging sacroiliac joints. DWI also offers the possibility of quantifying diffusion coefficients of the lesions, which helps to discriminate between normal and involved subchondral bone.

Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis • diffusion-weighted imaging • MRI • sacroiliitis • spondylarthritis • spondyloarthritis


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is based on the tissue-dependent signal attenuation caused by incoherent thermal motion of water molecules, which is the brownian water motion of the spins in biologic tissue [1]. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), a quantitative parameter calculated from diffusion-weighted images, combines the effects of capillary perfusion and water diffusion in the extracellular extravascular space [2]. DWI has been successfully used in neuroradiologic settings [3] and widely used in intracranial tumors, demyelination diseases, and abscesses of the brain [4, 5].

Muscle, cartilage, and soft-tissue abnormalities have been also examined with diffusion-weighted images [68], as well as traumatic bone marrow edema [9] and several spinal abnormalities [1]. DWI may be helpful in detecting skull metastasis and bone marrow changes of the cranium [10, 11] and has been shown to be a useful tool to differentiate pyogenic spondylitis and erosive osteochondritis or spinal infection from malignancy [12, 13].

Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown cause that affects mainly young adults. Inflammatory back pain and alternating gluteal pain related to sacroiliitis are the leading symptoms in adults with early ankylosing spondylitis and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis [1416]. Pain arising from an inflamed sacroiliac joint is typical in ankylosing spondylitis and is always considered a diagnostic criterion [15]. Although sacroiliitis is the most important element of the classification criteria, it requires 2–5 years to become evident on conventional radiographs, resulting in a delay in the diagnosis of the ankylosing spondylitis [14, 15]. Therefore, advanced MRI techniques such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) or DWI may provide opportunities for the early detection of sacroiliitis. A recent study has shown that DWI and DCE-MRI might be effective in quantifying inflammatory changes at involved skeletal sites and useful for assessing treatment efficacy in ankylosing spondylitis [17].

The aim of this study was to assess whether DWI can detect bone marrow and subchondral bone changes in early active sacroiliitis and to compare the reliability of DWI with other validated methods such as contrast-enhanced and STIR images. To our knowledge, ours is the first study validating DWI in early active sacroiliitis.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients with chronic low back pain (symptoms for > 3 months) were recruited from the outpatient clinic of our department. Inclusion criteria for the study required the presence of chronic low back pain without a confirmed diagnosis and an age of 18–45 years. Exclusion criteria were current infections (including brucellosis) of the bone and joints, pregnancy, metallic implants, and claustrophobia. We followed the diagnostic algorithm suggested by the Berlin group for the early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis [16]. The Berlin algorithm is based on the probability of early axial spondyloarthritis in patients with chronic back pain according to the absence or presence of certain clinical features, laboratory tests, and skeletal imaging. The entry criteria were inflammatory back pain and the presence of at least three of seven spondyloarthritis features: family history of spondyloarthritis, heel pain, uveitis, synovitis, dactylitis, good response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and HLA (human leukocyte antigen)-B27 positivity. This algorithm is also followed when using MRI to evaluate the sacroiliac joints. The result of the algorithm is express ed as a percentage of probability of axial spondylo arthritis. The rate above which axial spondylo arthritis is considered a definite diagnosis is 90% [16]. All patients were informed of the study pro cedure and gave their written informed consent.


Figure 1
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 26-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. STIR (A) and fat-saturated fast spin-echo T2-weighted (B) images show hyperintense lesions consistent with bone marrow edema in sacral and iliac aspects of sacroiliac joints.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 26-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. STIR (A) and fat-saturated fast spin-echo T2-weighted (B) images show hyperintense lesions consistent with bone marrow edema in sacral and iliac aspects of sacroiliac joints.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 26-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. Contrast enhanced T1-weighted image shows enhancement in lesions.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D 26-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. Lesions are hyperintense on diffusion-weighted images at b values of 1,000 (D), 600 (E), and 100 (F) s/mm2.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E 26-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. Lesions are hyperintense on diffusion-weighted images at b values of 1,000 (D), 600 (E), and 100 (F) s/mm2.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F 26-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. Lesions are hyperintense on diffusion-weighted images at b values of 1,000 (D), 600 (E), and 100 (F) s/mm2.

 
MRI
All patients underwent MRI of the sacroiliac joints with and without IV administration of gadolinium. MRI was performed using a 1.5-T whole-body superconducting MR scanner (Signa Excite, GE Healthcare) equipped with high-speed gradients. All sequences were obtained in the oblique coronal (parallel to the long axis of the sacroiliac joint) and axial planes using a 4-channel surface coil. The following sequences were ob tained from the sacroiliac joints: fast spin-echo T1-weighted (TR/TE, 625/minimum), STIR (4,975/35), fat-saturated fast spin-echo T2-weighted (4,650/120), and fat-saturated contrast-enhanced fast spin-echo T1-weighted (625/minimum) se quences. The fat-saturated contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were obtained after the admin istration of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The field of view was 20 x 20 cm; slice thickness, 5 mm; number of excitations, 2; and intersection gap, none. The lumbar spine was also shown using the afore mentioned MRI parameters for visualiza tion of spinal abnormalities. In addition to the mentioned sequences, T2-weighted sagittal and axial im ages were obtained for the lumbar spine. On lumbar spine images, disk lesions, paravert ebral soft-tissue structures, and bone structures were evaluated.


Figure 7
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 34-year-old woman with chronic low back pain of mechanical origin. Sacroiliac joints and subarticular areas were normal. Black-and-white apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map shows 12 regions of interest (ROIs) placed in subarticular surface of sacroiliac joints.

 


Figure 8
View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 34-year-old woman with chronic low back pain of mechanical origin. Sacroiliac joints and subarticular areas were normal. Color ADC map shows ADC values of ROIs in normal-appearing areas.

 
DWI was performed using single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequences with diffusion gradient b values of 100, 600, and 1,000 s/mm2. The following DWI parameters were used: 8,000/minimum; field of view, 20 x 20 cm; number of excitations, 2; matrix size, 128 x 128; slice thickness, 5 mm; intersection gap, none. The DWI sequences required a total of 96 seconds.

Image Interpretation
The sacroiliac joints were evaluated for signal intensity characteristics involving the joint space, surrounding bone, and bone marrow adjacent to the joint on each imaging sequence. The presence of subchondral bone marrow edema or contrast enhancement in the sacroiliac joints or adjacent enthesitis sites was considered a marker for active inflammatory changes. Chronic changes—defined as changes that were low signal on T1- and T2-weighted sequences—subchondral sclerosis, narrowing of the joint spaces, bone bridging, and ankylosis, were noted if present.

Patients' identities were removed from STIR images, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, fat-saturated T2-weighted images, and diffusion-weighted images at b values of 100, 600, and 1,000 s/mm2. Two radiologists with 6 and 10 years of experience in musculoskeletal diseases assessed these images for the presence of active inflammatory lesions (at either the iliac or the sacral bone) on the right and left sacroiliac joints in separate sessions. Each radiologist assessed only one MRI sequence (i.e., one radiologist assessed STIR sequences and the other assessed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences in one session) each day; an interim of at least 2 days was required before another session. Radiologists assessed images in random order. One of the radiologists reassessed these images using the same protocol 2 months after the first assessment.


Figure 9
View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 26-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. Black-and-white apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map shows placement of regions of interest over affected areas.

 


Figure 10
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 26-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. Color ADC map shows increased ADC values in affected areas (lesions).

 
After completing the inter- and intraobserver procedure, the presence of acute or active sacroiliitis was decided by consensus between a radiologist and a rheumatologist after the examination of the STIR, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, and fat-saturated T2-weighted images as well as the diffusion-weighted images at b values of 100, 600, and 1,000 s/mm2 (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 1F). The diffusion-weighted image data were transferred to a work station (Advantage Windows, software version 2.0, GE Healthcare). A circular region of interest (ROI) having an area of 73–88 mm2 was placed in the subarticular surface of the sacroiliac joint. Six ADC measurements were taken from sacroi liac joints (superior, middle, and inferior por tions of the sacral and iliac bones) of all the patients (Fig. 2A, 2B). In patients with bone marrow or subchondral bone changes, ADC measurements were taken from all apparent lesions as well (Figs. 3A, 3B and 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D). All measurements were repeated for the three b values (100, 600, 1,000 s/mm2). ADC maps were calculated automatically by the MR system; ADC values are expressed in square millimeters per second.


Figure 11
View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A 20-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. STIR (A) and fat-saturated fast spin-echo T2-weighted (B) images show hyperintense lesions in sacral and iliac bones of right sacroiliac joint.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B 20-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. STIR (A) and fat-saturated fast spin-echo T2-weighted (B) images show hyperintense lesions in sacral and iliac bones of right sacroiliac joint.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C 20-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. Black-and-white apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map shows hyperintense lesions in affected areas.

 

Figure 14
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D 20-year-old man with early active sacroiliitis. Color ADC map shows increased ADC values in affected areas.

 
Statistical Methods
Statistical calculations were performed on a PC using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Differences between groups were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. For right and left scans, the percentage of agreement between the two assessors and the kappa coefficients were calculated with 95% CIs.

Two-by-two contingency tables were formed, and specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated for independent diffusion-weighted MR sequences in 95% CIs. The reference standard for the presence of acute changes was the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. For all separate MR sequences, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were formed and areas under the curve were obtained. Values for the area under the curve that are near 1.0 represent better results; values less than or equal to 0.5 are equivalent or worse results than expected by random chance. A value greater than 0.7 can be interpreted as reasonable or fair, and values greater than 0.8, as good, meaning the test has the capacity to discriminate.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Forty-two patients were included in the study. Patients' characteristics are given in Table 1. Thirteen patients with chronic low back pain were diagnosed with inflammatory low back pain and sacroiliitis suggesting axial spondyloarthritis, and 29 patients were diagnosed with chronic low back pain of mechanical origin. Thirteen of these 42 patients had acute inflammatory changes on MR images of the sacroiliac joints. Of these 13 patients, two had erosions on right sacral and iliac bone surfaces, six had sclerosis either on the right or the left sacral or iliac subchondral bone or both, and seven had no chronic change on the sacroiliac joints. Two patients with chronic low back pain of mechanical origin had sclerosis on the right subchondral surfaces (one on the right iliac bone, one right iliac and sacral subchondral bones). None of the patients with either sacroiliitis or low back pain of mechanical origin had ankylosis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Patients' Demographic Data

 

ADC Values Between Groups
Table 2 shows ADC values measured from the iliac and sacral bones on the right and left sides in patients with sacroiliitis and mechanical low back pain. Patients with acute early sacroiliitis had significantly different b values only in the right iliac and sacral bones at a b value of 1,000 s/mm2 and only on the right iliac bone at a b value of 100 s/mm2 compared with patients with mechanical low back pain. ADC values measured at a b value of 600 s/mm2 did not have a significant difference between groups. However, ADC values measured from the lesions at b values of 1,000 and 600 s/mm2 in patients with sacroiliitis were significantly higher than values measured from the iliac and sacral bones in patients with mechanical low back pain (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values (x 10-3 mm2/s) at b Values of 1,000, 600, and 100 s/mm2

 

Comparison of T1-Weighted Gadolinium-Enhanced and DWI Sequences
The presence or absence of the lesions on T1-weighted gadolinium images was compared with the diffusion-weighted images obtained at b factors of 100, 600, and 1,000 s/mm2. Using the T1-weighted gadolinium images as the reference standard, ROC curves were formed and values for area under the curve were obtained. For b values of 1,000 s/mm2, values for area under the curve on the right iliac and sacral and left iliac and sacral bones were 0.899, 0.908, 0.929, and 0.843, respectively; for b of 600 s/mm2, 0.971, 0.908, 0.929, and 0.914; and for b of 100 s/mm2, 0.971, 0.908, 0.929, and 0.914. These good values mean DWI in all three b gradients can discriminate acute lesions in sacroiliitis as well as T1-weighted gadolinium images can.

Inter- and Intrarater Reliability
Interrater reliability for T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced images and diffusion-weighted images is shown in Table 3. Intrarater reliability on the right and left sides was good to excellent for both T1-weighted gadolinium images and diffusion-weighted images at b values of 1,000, 600, and 100 s/mm2 ({kappa} = 0.62–0.93).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3: Interrater Reliability When Interpreting Diffusion-Weighted Images

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Ankylosing spondylitis is a common form of spondyloarthritis. MRI of the sacroiliac joint was sensitive in depicting sacroiliitis. STIR, fat-saturated T2-weighted images, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images have been used to detect inflammation. Many studies have evaluated the capabilities of these sequences. Most of those studies showed that contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were more sensitive for detecting the presence and extent of acute inflammatory changes than STIR and fat-saturated T2-weighted images [1820].

DWI has become widely available in recent years. This technique has proven to be a valuable method for tracing the microscopic structure of tissue [21]. Molecular diffusion is a physical process that is used to describe the brownian motion of water molecules [22]. The ADC is used as a measure of diffusion in biologic systems because the measured diffusion coefficient may depend on factors other than brownian water motion, such as perfusion [23]. When only high b values are applied, the ADC value approximates the true diffusion. Low b values are influenced by both perfusion and diffusion [24].

More recently, DWI has been increasingly used in musculoskeletal structures and diseases. Ward et al. [9] analyzed the diffusion characteristics of normal and posttraumatic bone marrow and concluded that increased ADC values in traumatized bone marrow compared with ADC values of normal bone.

Some DWI studies in the literature relate to spine abnormalities. Baur et al. [25] evaluated the usefulness of DWI of the bone marrow for differentiating benign and abnormal vertebral compression fractures. Signal intensity characteristics of bone marrow were analyzed for DWI, STIR, and T1-weighted spin-echo images. On DWI, benign vertebral compression fractures were hypo- to isointense with respect to adjacent normal vertebral bodies. Pathologic compression fractures were hyperintense in comparison with normal-appearing vertebral bodies. Those authors concluded that DWI provided excellent distinction between abnormal and benign vertebral compression fractures [25].

Chan et al. [26] showed that normal vertebral bone marrow had a mean ADC value of 0.23 x 10–3 mm2/s (only diffusion-weighted images with a b value of 1,000 s/mm2 were used). They also reported the mean ADC value of benign vertebral fracture to be 1.94 x 10–3 mm2/s, whereas the mean ADC value for vertebral fracture caused by neoplasm was 0.82 x 10–3 s/mm2 [26]. Dietrich et al. [27] reported a similar result of normal vertebral bone marrow having an ADC value of 0.3 x 10–3 mm2/s (four b values between 50 and 500 s/mm2 were used). Our mean ADC values of sacroiliac bone marrow obtained from the subarticular surface of the sacroiliac joint at different b values are shown in Table 2.

DWI is also useful in infectious disease of the bone marrow. Buyn [12] evaluated 10 patients with pyogenic spondylitis and 50 patients with erosive osteochondritis. All 10 patients with spondylitis showed a hyperintense signal as compared with normal surrounding bone marrow on DWI. The mean combined ADC value in two patients with tuberculous spondylitis was 0.98 x 10–3 mm2/s [12]. Pui et al. [13] investigated the value of DWI in differentiating spinal infection from malignancy. Cutoff ADC values of tuberculosis-related vertebral marrow lesions were 1.2 x 10–3 mm2/s; those of pyogenic lesions were 1.3 x 10–3 mm2/s. Normal bone marrow showed an ADC of 0.38 x 10–3 mm2/s [13]. The ADC value of an area with a spinal infection was higher than a normal area of bone marrow. We found higher ADC values in the affected areas (lesions) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis compared with iliac and sacral areas in patients with mechanical low back pain. Bone marrow edema causes a local increase in water movement, resulting in increased local diffusion that is expressed by high ADC values of the lesions.

In a recently published report, Gaspersic et al. [17] evaluated the effects of different therapies on enthesitis and osteitis in active ankylosing spondylitis using DWI and DCE-MRI. They concluded that quantitative MRI parameters diminished significantly with regression of the inflammatory activity. DWI and DCE-MRI were shown to be effective in quantifying changes in inflammation during the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and may be convenient for assessing treatment efficacy [17].

In conclusion, DWI is a sensitive, fast sequence and does not require a contrast agent, which makes it a good and cost-effective alternative for imaging sacroiliac joints. DWI also offers the possibility of quantifying diffusion coefficients of the lesions, which can discriminate between normal and involved subchondral bone, and it offers a new alternative for follow-up. DWI may be useful in the early diagnosis and follow-up of the acute inflammatory lesions that occur in early axial spondyloarthritis.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Raya JG, Dietrich O, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk A. Methods and applications of diffusion imaging of vertebral bone marrow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24:1207 –1220[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MRI. Radiology 1988;168 : 497–505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Mintorovitch J, Moseley ME, Chileuitt L, Shimizu H, Cohen Y, Weinstein PR. Comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI for the early detection of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats. Magn Reson Med 1991; 18:39 –50[Medline]
  4. Warach S, Chien D, Li W, Ronthal M, Edelman RR. Fast MR diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke. Neurology 1992;42 :1717 –1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Moseley ME, Cohen Y, Mintorovitch J, et al. Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med1990; 14:330 –346[Medline]
  6. Cleveland GG, Chang DC, Hazlewood CF, Rorschach HE. Nuclear MR measurement of skeletal muscle: anisotropy of the diffusion coefficient of the intracellular water. Biophys J 1976;16 :1043 –1053[Medline]
  7. Knauss R, Schiller J, Fleischer G, Kärger J, Arnold K. Self-diffusion of water in cartilage and cartilage components as studied by pulsed field gradient NMR. Magn Reson Med1999; 41:285 –292[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Baur A, Huber A, Arbogast S, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of tumor recurrences and post-therapeutical soft-tissue changes in humans. Eur Radiol 2001;11 : 828–833[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Ward R, Caruthers S, Yablon C, Blake M, DiMasi M, Eustace S. Analysis of diffusion changes in posttraumatic bone marrow using navigator-corrected diffusion gradients. AJR2000; 174:731 –734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Nemeth AJ, Henson JW, Mullins ME, Gonzalez RG, Schaefer PW. Improved detection of skull metastasis with diffusion-weighted MRI. Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28 :1088 –1092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Moon WJ, Lee MH, Chung EC. Diffusion-weighted imaging with sensitivity-encoding (SENSE) for detecting cranial bone marrow metastases: comparison with T1-weighted images. Korean J Radiol2007; 8:185 –191[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Buyn WM. Diffusion-weighted MRI of vertebral bone marrow: differentiation of degenerative spines and spondylitis involving bone marrow adjacent to end plates. (abstr) Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2001; 9:1626
  13. Pui MH, Mitha A, Rae WI, Corr P. Diffusion-weighted MRI of spinal infection and malignancy. J Neuroimaging2005; 15:164 –170[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Braun J, Sieper J. The sacroiliac joint in the spondyloarthropathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol1996; 8:275 –287[Medline]
  15. Rudwaleit M, Metter A, Listing J, Sieper J, Braun J. Inflammatory back pain in ankylosing spondylitis: a reassessment of the clinical history for application as classification and diagnostic criteria. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54 : 569–578[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Khan MA, Braun J, Sieper J. How to diagnose axial spondylarthritis early. Ann Rheum Dis2004; 63:535 –543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gaspersic N, Sersa I, Jevtic V, Tomsic M, Praprotnik S. Monitoring ankylosing spondylitis therapy by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI. Skeletal Radiol2008; 37:123 –131[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Bredella MA, Steinbach LS, Morgan S, Ward M, Davis JC. MRI of the sacroiliac joints in patients with moderate to severe ankylosing spondylitis. AJR 2006; 187:1420 –1426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Maksymowych WP, Inman RD, Salonen D, et al. Spondyloarthritis research Consortium of Canada MRI index for assessment of sacroiliac joint inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53:703 –709[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Baraliakos X, Landewe R, Braun J. MRI in ankylosing spondylitis. Future Rheumatol 2006;1 : 423–431[CrossRef]
  21. Baur A, Dietrich O, Reiser M. Diffusion-weighted imaging of bone marrow: current status. Eur Radiol 2003;13 :1699 –1708[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Chan JH, Tsui EY, Luk SH, et al. MR diffusion-weighted imaging of kidney: differentiation between hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis. Clin Imaging 2001;25 : 110–113[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Le Bihan D, Delannoy J, Levin RL. Temperature mapping with MRI of molecular diffusion: application to hyperthermia. Radiology 1989;171 : 853–857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, Oyen RH, Peeters RR. Diffusion-weighted MRI of kidneys in healthy volunteers and patients with parenchymal diseases: initial experience. Radiology 2005;235 : 911–917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Baur A, Stäbler A, Brüning R, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology 1998;207 : 349–356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Chan JH, Peh WC, Tsui EY, et al. Acute vertebral body compression fractures: discrimination between benign and malignant causes using apparent diffusion coefficients. Br J Radiol 2002;75 : 207–214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Dietrich O, Herlihy A, Dannels WR, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spine using radial k-space trajectories. MAGMA 2001; 12:23 –31[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bozgeyik, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Kocakoc, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bozgeyik, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Kocakoc, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS