AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saokar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saokar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3808
AJR 2008; 191:1352-1358
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Fluid Collections: Results, Expectations, and Experience

Anuradha Saokar1,2, Ronald S. Arellano1, Debra A. Gervais1, Peter R. Mueller1, Peter F. Hahn1 and Susanna I. Lee1

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, 820 Harrison Ave., FGH Bldg. 3rd Fl., Boston, MA 02118.

Received February 8, 2008; accepted after revision June 5, 2008.

 
Address correspondence to A. Saokar Rebello.

P. R. Mueller is a consultant for Cook Medical.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to review our 13-year experience with sonographically guided transvaginal drainage procedures in terms of type of transvaginal procedure, that is, aspiration or catheter drainage, complication rate, and long-term success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A search of an interventional radiology database identified 85 transvaginal drainage procedures on 67 patients. Pertinent medical records and images were reviewed. Clinical success was defined as no need for surgery.

RESULTS. The mean follow-up period was 36.6 months (range, 7 days–132 months). Forty-five aspiration and 40 catheter drainage procedures were performed on 67 patients. Indications for the procedures included postoperative fluid collection (n = 25), tuboovarian abscess unresponsive to medical therapy (n = 17), symptomatic ovarian cyst (n = 17), and miscellaneous causes (n = 8). Clinical success was achieved in 50 of 67 cases (75%), including all cases of 25 postoperative fluid collection, 12 of 17 tuboovarian abscesses (71%), and seven of 17 ovarian cysts (41%). No complications were found in patients who underwent aspiration alone. The following minor complications occurred in patients who underwent catheter drainage: two cases of bladder transgression, one case of infection, and one case of catheter-related pain. Premature dislodgment of the catheter was an issue for four of 40 patients (10%).

CONCLUSION. Postoperative fluid collections can be managed with a high rate of success by means of transvaginal aspiration or catheter drainage. Transvaginal catheter drainage is an alternative to surgery in the management of tuboovarian abscesses unresponsive to medical management. Aspiration alone is sufficient to drain ovarian cysts and provide symptomatic relief. Most cysts recur, however, ultimately necessitating surgery. Aspiration is safe, but catheter drainage is associated with a 10% rate of minor complications.

Keywords: drainage • pelvis • transvaginal sonography


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Drainage of a fluid collection deep in the pelvis of a woman presents unique technical and clinical challenges to interventional radiol ogists [18]. The most common cause of fluid collection is surgery whereby collections such as abscesses and hematomas develop after gynecologic or distal colorectal surgery. Tuboovarian abscess is another common cause. A course of intensive antibiotic therapy is the preferred first-line treatment, but medical management alone is successful for only 37–88% of patients with a pelvic abscess [9]. In these patients, imaging-guided drainage rather than surgical excision is undertaken as a less invasive second-line treatment. Imaging-guided drainage of benign symptomatic ovarian cysts often is performed for palliation and to decrease the risk of ovarian torsion in patients who are poor candidates for surgery. Such patients include elderly or pregnant women, those with associated comorbid conditions, and those, such as women with a single ovary, in whom surgical excision may compromise ovarian function or fertility.

Interventional radiologists can gain access to pelvic fluid collections by the anterior trans abdominal, transgluteal, endo rectal, and transvaginal routes [18]. The anterior percutaneous transabdominal approach is prefer red because it maximizes patient com fort and ease of catheter placement and care. Deep pelvic lesions occasionally are inaccessible by the transabdominal or transgluteal approach because of intervening viscera, such as bowel, bladder, and uterus, or vascular and osseous structures [4]. In these situations, the endorectal approach and, in women, the transvaginal route are useful alternatives. The endorectal method is a relatively nonsterile technique with limited range of motion for the radiologist. This route is useful for gaining access to pelvic fluid collections posterior to or abutting the rectum.

Sonographically guided transvaginal drainage of pelvic fluid collections was described in the early 1990s [4, 5]. This approach is not widely used, however, owing to radiologists' lack of familiarity with the procedure and the paucity of data to guide case selection and prediction of long-term clinical outcome. We review our 13-year experience with sonographically guided transvaginal procedures, including the technique, whether aspiration or catheter drainage was used, the complication rate, and whether long-term success was achieved.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The hospital institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Informed consent from patients was not required. The study was HIPAA-compliant.

Medical Record Review
A search of the interventional radiology database at our institution for records of all women who underwent sonographically guided transvaginal procedures from 1994 to 2006 identified 85 transvaginal procedures performed on 67 patients. One radiologist retrospectively reviewed and abstracted data from all institutional medical records, including outpatient, emergency department, and hospital admission and discharge notes; relevant diagnostic and procedure-related imaging reports; and surgical, pathologic, microbiologic, and other laboratory reports. The following data were abstracted: patient demographic character istics; underlying cause, size, and location of cyst or fluid collection; type of transvaginal inter vention (aspiration alone or catheter placement); needle or catheter size; volume of fluid aspirated; duration of catheter drainage; presence or absence of resi dual fluid; and procedure complications. Follow-up clinical data documenting recurrent fluid collection, symptoms, and subsequent imaging-guided procedures or surgery were recorded.

Sonographically Guided Transvaginal Procedure
The sonographically guided transvaginal drainage procedures were performed as pre viously described [10]. A team consisting of one of 19 attending staff interventional radiologists (a pool that included five of the authors) and an interventional radiology fellow performed the procedures. All procedures were performed with conscious sedation induced by IV administration of 1–4 mg of midazolam hydrochloride and 20–100 µg of fentanyl citrate. Immediately before the procedure, 1 g of ampicillin, 80 mg of gentamicin, and 600 mg of clindamycin were administered IV. Patients not undergoing long-term IV antibiotic therapy were treated with 150 mg clindamycin orally every 8 hours for 5 days after the procedure.

The patient was asked to drain her bladder immediately before the procedure, or a Foley catheter was placed. The patient was placed in the lithotomy position, and the perineum and vaginal vault were cleaned with 10% povidone–iodine (Betadine, Purdue Frederick). A sheathed transvaginal ultrasound probe with a guide was placed in the vaginal fornix closest to the lesion, and the projected drainage path was scrutinized for intervening structures, such as intestine, bladder, and blood vessels. Once the probe was well positioned, the needle guide was aligned in the center of the lesion, and a 16- to 20-gauge needle or an 8- to 12-French trocar locking pigtail catheter (Dawson-Mueller Drainage Catheter, Cook) was advanced into the fluid collection under continuous sonographic visualization. No incision was made in the vaginal fornix before needle or catheter placement. In patients who underwent aspiration alone, with either needle or catheter, the fluid was completely drained to minimize the risk of superinfection of the residual contents. Specimens of all fluid collections were obtained for microbiologic examination. Specimens of ovarian cysts and of fluid collections after resection of malignant tumors were obtained for cytologic examination.

Catheter Care
The catheter was attached to a gravity drainage system and secured to the anterior aspect of the thigh with a rubber leg band. The catheter was flushed every 8 hours with 10 mL of sterile saline solution and was removed once output decreased to less than 10 mL/24 hours and symptoms diminished. Imaging with CT or sonography usually was performed to document complete drainage before catheter removal.

Criteria for Patient Selection
The decision to intervene was initiated by a referring clinician on the basis of the patient's clinical presentation and after consultation with the interventional radiologist. Postoperative fluid collections were drained if symptomatic, that is, pain or signs of infection were present, and if the collection seen at imaging was the likely cause of the symptoms. Tuboovarian abscesses caused by pelvic inflammatory disease were drained if the patient did not respond to medical treatment alone. Tuboovarian abscesses caused by bowel lesions were drained if the patient had symptoms and signs of infection, such as fever and an elevated WBC. Definitive surgery, such as sigmoid colectomy or appendectomy, was performed after the inflammatory process sub sided. Aspiration of ovarian cysts was considered if the clinical team considered the cyst the likely cause of pelvic pain. The imaging appearance of the ovarian cyst also was considered before aspiration. Except in a few unusual circumstances, only simple benign-appearing ovarian cysts were considered for aspiration.

Type of Transvaginal Procedure: Aspiration or Catheter Drainage
The choice of aspiration alone or catheter drainage was made by the attending radiologist performing the procedure in consultation with the referring clinical service. All fluid was initially aspirated with a needle. A catheter was left in place if the aspirated material was purulent, if residual fluid was present after an attempt at complete aspiration was unsuccessful, or if bowel communication was suspected.

Data Analysis and Statistics
Technical success was defined as complete drainage of the fluid. Clinical success was defined as long-term avoidance of surgery. Complications were classified as major or minor according to the Society of Interventional Radiology criteria [11]. Tests and summary measures of association were performed with the chi-square test (www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/chisquared1.cfm). A bayes ian calculator (www.causascientia.org/math_stat/ProportionCI.html) was used to calculate the 95% CI of proportions.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Descriptive Statistics of Study Population
Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the patients and fluid collections drained. Eighty-five transvaginal procedures (45 aspirations, 40 catheter placements) were performed on 67 patients. Ten patients under went two transvaginal procedures in the same session to address two separate fluid collections managed with two catheter place ments (six patients), two aspirations (three patients), and an aspiration and a catheter placement (one patient). Five patients underwent a second transvaginal procedure because of recurrence (four patients) or because the catheter was dis lodged (one patient).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Study Population

 

Type of Transvaginal Procedure: Aspiration Alone or Catheter Drainage
The transvaginal route was chosen only if the fluid collection was inaccessible with the percutaneous method, that is, the transabdominal or transgluteal approach. Table 2 categorizes the procedures by underlying cause and type of procedure, that is, aspiration or catheter placement. For complete drainage, aspiration alone sufficed for all 23 symptomatic ovarian cysts (Fig. 1A, 1B); catheter placement was needed for 91% (20 of 22) of tuboovarian abscesses persis tent after medical therapy (Fig. 2A, 2B). Post operative fluid collections were managed with aspira tion for 45% (14 of 31) of patients and with catheter drainage for 55% (17 of 31) of patients. The mean duration of catheter drainage was 4.5 days (range, 2–12 days). Catheter placement was successful in every case in which it was attempted. In the case of one tuboovarian abscess, although initial aspira tion yielded pus, a catheter was not left in place because intervening vessels pre cluded a safe trajectory for catheter placement.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Aspiration Versus Catheter Drainage

 

Figure 1
View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 38-year-old woman with ovarian cyst. Transvaginal sonographic images show features before (A) and during (B) needle aspiration of symptomatic complex right ovarian cyst.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 38-year-old woman with ovarian cyst. Transvaginal sonographic images show features before (A) and during (B) needle aspiration of symptomatic complex right ovarian cyst.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 20-year-old woman with pelvic inflammatory disease who underwent catheter drainage of right tuboovarian abscesses. Transvaginal sonographic images show tuboovarian abscess before (A) and after (B) catheter deployment into fluid collection.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 20-year-old woman with pelvic inflammatory disease who underwent catheter drainage of right tuboovarian abscesses. Transvaginal sonographic images show tuboovarian abscess before (A) and after (B) catheter deployment into fluid collection.

 

Complications
According to the Society of Interventional Radiology criteria, no complications occurred in patients who underwent aspiration alone. Among patients who underwent catheter placement, there were no major complications but four minor complications. In two cases, the catheter transgressed the urinary bladder and was discovered on days 1 and 7 after the procedure. The first patient presented with urinary leak through the transvaginal catheter on postprocedure day 1. Bladder transgression was confirmed with CT of the abdomen and pelvis and catheter injection (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D). The patient was treated conservatively with re moval of the pigtail catheter and placement of a Foley catheter for 10 days. The second patient had a transvaginal catheter in place because of a tuboovarian abscess secondary to sigmoid diverticulitis. This patient had no symptoms related to bladder transgression, which was an incidental finding on postprocedure day 7 at cystoscopy performed for stent placement. The pigtail catheter was removed, and the patient was treated conservatively with placement of a Foley catheter for 21 days. In one case, infection introduced into a postoperative fluid collection via the transvaginal catheter necessitated additional antibiotic therapy. The fluid was initially sterile and grew Escherichia coli on day 7. One patient had severe catheter-related pain presumably due to irritation at the catheter insertion site that was relieved with catheter removal.


Figure 5
View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 30-year-old woman with pelvic inflammatory disease who underwent catheter drainage of tuboovarian abscess located posterior to uterus. Transvaginal sonographic images show abscess before (A) and during (B) catheter placement. In A, calipers Aand B measure lesion dimensions as 3.9 and 3.0 cm, respectively.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 30-year-old woman with pelvic inflammatory disease who underwent catheter drainage of tuboovarian abscess located posterior to uterus. Transvaginal sonographic images show abscess before (A) and during (B) catheter placement. In A, calipers Aand B measure lesion dimensions as 3.9 and 3.0 cm, respectively.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C 30-year-old woman with pelvic inflammatory disease who underwent catheter drainage of tuboovarian abscess located posterior to uterus. Axial CT scan obtained 1 day after procedure shows that catheter has transgressed urinary bladder (opacified with contrast medium).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D 30-year-old woman with pelvic inflammatory disease who underwent catheter drainage of tuboovarian abscess located posterior to uterus. Fluoroscopic image from catheter injection study performed 1 day after CT shows opacification of urinary bladder (long arrow) on injection of inferior catheter (short arrow). Superior catheter (arrowhead) was placed under CT guidance and did not communicate with urinary bladder or bowel.

 
In addition to the foregoing complications, the catheter was dislodged prematurely after 10% of drainage procedures (four of 40), in one case on the day of the procedure and in three cases on postprocedure days 1, 2, and 6. Imaging showed no residual fluid in two of these cases, so no further intervention was needed. In one case the residual fluid collection was managed with repeated transvaginal catheter placement, and in the other case, with percutaneous drainage under CT guidance.

Long-Term Clinical Success
Table 3 shows clinical success in avoidance of surgery. Overall, surgery was avoided by 75% (50 of 67) of patients, including all patients with postoperative fluid collections, 71% (12 of 17) of patients with tuboovarian abscesses unresponsive to medical therapy, and 41% (seven of 17) of patients with symptomatic ovarian cysts.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3: Clinical Success Rate

 

Twenty-five percent (17 of 67) of patients needed surgery, including five patients with tuboovarian abscesses, 10 with symptomatic ovarian cysts, one with hydrosalpinx, and one with pyometra. Four patients with tubo ovarian abscess were unsuccessfully treated and had recurrence of the fluid collection after catheter removal, which necessitated surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis (n = 3) and pelvic inflammatory disease (n = 1). One patient with a tuboovarian abscess secondary to sigmoid diverticulitis was successfully treated but needed sigmoid colectomy for definitive management. One case of hydro salpinx and one of pyometra necessitated surgery. Ten patients with ovarian cysts reported symptom relief immediately after aspiration but needed surgery for cyst and symptom recurrence.

Two patients with serous tumors of borderline malignant tumors were referred by an experienced gynecologist specializing in gynecologic oncology with full understanding that the tumors might not be benign. The lesion in a 56-year-old patient with multiple myeloma and breast cancer was discovered at staging CT. We aspirated this lesion both for diagnosis and to stabilize the patient's condition until she became fit for laparoscopic resection. The second patient was 23 years old at presentation and had a history of left oophorectomy and right cystectomy for serous borderline tumor. Beginning in 1992, she underwent aspiration of recurrent cysts on four occasions in a successful effort to preserve fertility until elective surgical resection in 2006 (Fig. 4). Neither patient with borderline tumor had evidence of tumor recurrence after 5 years and 1 year of follow-up.


Figure 9
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 33-year-old woman with history of borderline malignant tumor of ovary. Sonographic image obtained immediately before sonographically guided transvaginal aspiration of complex ovarian cystic lesion shows thick irregular walls and septations that had recurred after four transvaginal aspirations. Lesion was surgically removed and at pathologic examination proved to be serous ovarian tumor of borderline malignancy. Calipers 1 and 2 measure lesion dimensions as 7.1 and 4.6 cm, respectively.

 
The mean follow-up period was 36.6 months (range, 7 days–132 months). The mean follow-up periods were 7.9 months (range, 7 days–60 months) for patients who needed surgery and 47.4 months (range, 2–132 months) for those who did not need surgery.

Requirement for Additional Imaging-Guided Procedures
Table 4 shows the imaging-guided procedures performed after the initial transvaginal drainage procedure. Overall, 10% (seven of 67) of the patients needed additional imaging-guided procedures. Three patients with postoperative fluid collections needed a second procedure because the catheter was dislodged prematurely (n = 2) or because of the presence of residual undrained fluid (n = 1). All of these patients avoided surgery. Three patients with symptomatic ovarian cysts underwent repeated transvaginal aspiration because of cyst recurrence but ultimately needed surgical resection. In two of the three patients, cysts recurred 3 and 5 months after the procedure. The third patient was the 23-year-old patient with borderline malignancy discussed earlier, and she needed four transvaginal aspiration procedures. The patient with pyometra underwent repeated transvaginal catheter drainage 3 months after the initial procedure because of reaccumulation of fluid and eventually underwent hysterectomy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4: Number of Patients Needing Additional Imaging-Guided Procedure After Initial Transvaginal Drainage

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Previous studies have proved the feasibility and clinical efficacy of sonographically guided transvaginal drainage of deep pelvic fluid collections of various underlying causes [4, 5, 1215]. These reports present differing recommendations on the technique required, that is, aspiration alone versus continuous catheter drainage, for effective management of pelvic fluid collections with either short- or long-term success. We report on, to our knowledge, the largest series of transvaginal catheter placement procedures to date and analyze the efficacy of the technique on the basis of the cause of the fluid collection, complication rate, and long-term clinical success.

Postoperative fluid collections were amenable to transvaginal drainage, and all patients avoided additional surgery. Neither aspiration nor catheter placement was used preferentially. However, additional drainage procedures were needed by a small proportion of these patients (12%, three of 25) because of premature catheter displacement or presence of residual undrained fluid. Our high success rate with transvaginal drainage of postoperative pelvic fluid collections is similar to that reported for percutaneous drainage under sonographic or CT guidance [1618].

Uncomplicated tuboovarian abscesses are typically managed with broad-spectrum IV anti biotics. The rate of success of medical treatment alone has been reported to range from 34% to 87.5% [14]. When symptoms persist or if rupture is suspected, surgical intervention, either laparoscopy or laparotomy, is required. Percutaneous or transvaginal drainage has proved to be a useful alternative to surgery if an abscess persists despite medical therapy [14, 15, 1921]. In a large series of 302 patients with tuboovarian abscess who were treated at presentation with a combination of IV antibiotics and transvaginal aspiration, Gjelland et al. [14] reported an overall success rate of 93.4%, with 34.8% of patients needing repeated aspiration procedures. In contrast, in our study, all patients with a tuboovarian abscess had already undergone a course of IV antibiotic therapy. In this setting, most of the fluid collections in our series (91%, 20 of 22) necessitated catheter placement for complete drainage; 71% patients (12 of 17) avoided surgery. No additional imaging-guided procedures were needed by any of the patients treated successfully. Thus, even in patients with tuboovarian abscesses unresponsive to medical management, transvaginal catheter drainage remains a relatively effective therapeutic option for avoiding surgery.

Results of some studies [2226] support the use of sonographically guided therapeutic aspiration of symptomatic ovarian cysts as a viable alterative to surgical excision. Those authors emphasize the need for careful patient selection and recommend that the procedure be attempted only on patients with cysts thought to be benign after thorough clinical and imaging evaluation. Some authors [22, 2731] argue against therapeutic aspiration of ovarian cysts, citing high recurrence rates and concern about peritoneal spillage of malignant cells should an occult malignant tumor be drained. The reported recurrence rates after sonographically guided aspiration of symptomatic ovarian cysts range from 25% to 75% [2226, 32]. In our series, aspiration alone completely drained all ovarian cysts and led to symptomatic relief for all patients. However, more than one half of these patients (59%, 10 of 17) ultimately needed surgery because of recurrence. Noting similarly high rates of cyst recurrence, previous investigators [33, 34] have proposed the use of alcohol as a sclerosing agent. Because cyst recurrence can indicate that a lesion is not benign, as in the cases of two lesions in our series, surgical resection of a recurrent cyst rather than repetition of drainage with sclerosis is indicated.

Previous results [4, 5, 1215, 35, 36] on transvaginal drainage show it to be a relatively safe procedure. In our series, no complications occurred after aspiration alone. Catheter drainage, however, was associated with a 10% complication rate (four of 40 patients). All complications were classified as minor according to the Society of Interventional Radiology criteria. In general, the potential complications of trans vaginal drainage are similar to those of the percutaneous approach, including bleed ing and bowel or bladder injury. Two cases of bladder injury were encountered in our series. One case of bladder transgression occurred during drainage of a 6-cm-diameter cul-de-sac collection, and the second during drainage of a 3-cm right adnexal collection. Both patients had tuboovarian abscesses. Super infection and fistula formation are complications specifically related to trans vaginal drainage. One case of the former occurred in our series [4]. Premature dislodgment of the catheter is a management issue likely more common in transvaginal drainage because the catheter cannot be secured with sutures. Five percent (two of 40) of catheter drainage patients in our study needed a second imaging-guided drainage procedure because the catheter was dis lodged prematurely. Therefore, the transvaginal route is less desirable if long-term drainage is anticipated.

Limitations of this study were the retrospective nature and the relatively small population in comparison with previous series of percutaneous drainage procedures. Because at our institution surgery is the therapeutic option of choice for tuboovarian abscesses unresponsive to medical therapy and for any symptomatic ovarian cysts, our cohort of patients referred for imaging-guided drainage favored those who declined surgery or were considered poor candidates for surgery. This selection bias would likely have increased the incidence of comorbid conditions in our study population, for which we have not accounted. The relatively small sample size in each subcategory restricted our ability to draw conclusions with reasonable statistical certainty to only the three most common causes. We did not contact the referring clinicians to determine whether any of their patients underwent follow-up with additional procedures or surgery at an institution other than ours. Finally, our cases were acquired over a period spanning several generations of sonography and other imaging techniques and included a large pool of interventional radiologists with a range of procedural experience. However, throughout the study, common guidelines were followed in case selection, choice of technique, procedure performance, and postprocedure follow-up.

Sonographically guided transvaginal aspiration or catheter drainage of pelvic fluid collections is a useful alternative when the percutaneous approach is not feasible. Postoperative fluid collections can be managed successfully with this approach. Transvaginal drainage appears to be a reasonable option for avoiding surgery on tuboovarian ab scesses that are unresponsive to medical management. Cath eter placement usually is necessary to avoid repeated drainage procedures. In our series, catheter drainage was associated with minor complications in 10% of patients. Ovarian cysts were reliably drained, and symptomatic relief was achieved with aspiration alone. However, most cysts recur, and those that do should be surgically resected to exclude the possibility that they are lowgrade or frankly malignant neoplasms.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. vanSonnenberg E, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT Jr. Percutaneous drainage of 250 abdominal abscesses and fluid collections. Part I. Results, failures, and complications. Radiology 1984;151 : 337–341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mueller PR, vanSonnenberg E, Ferrucci JT Jr. Percutaneous drainage of 250 abdominal abscesses and fluid collections. Part II. Current procedural concepts. Radiology 1984;151 : 343–347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sudakoff GS, Lundeen SJ, Otterson MF. Transrectal and transvaginal sonographic intervention of infected pelvic fluid collections: a complete approach. Ultrasound Q 2005;21 : 175–185[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Feld R, Eschelman DJ, Sagerman JE, Segal S, Hovsepian DM, Sullivan KL. Treatment of pelvic abscesses and other fluid collections: efficacy of transvaginal sonographically guided aspiration and drainage. AJR 1994; 163:1141 –1145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. vanSonnenberg E, D'Agostino HB, Casola G, Goodacre BW, Sanchez RB, Taylor B. US-guided transvaginal drainage of pelvic abscesses and fluid collections. Radiology 1991;181 : 53–56[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kuligowska E, Keller E, Ferrucci JT. Treatment of pelvic abscesses: value of one-step sonographically guided transrectal needle aspiration and lavage. AJR 1995;164 : 201–206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Harisinghani MG, Gervais DA, Maher MM, et al. Transgluteal approach for percutaneous drainage of deep pelvic abscesses: 154 cases. Radiology 2003;228 : 701–705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Nielsen MB, Torp-Pedersen S. Sonographically guided transrectal or transvaginal one-step catheter placement in deep pelvic and perirectal abscesses. AJR 2004;183 :1035 –1036[Free Full Text]
  9. McNeeley SG, Hendrix SL, Mazzoni MM, Kmak DC, Ransom SB. Medically sound, cost-effective treatment for pelvic inflammatory disease and tuboovarian abscess. Am J Obstet Gynecol1998; 178:1272 –1278[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. O'Neill MJ, Rafferty EA, Lee SI, et al. Transvaginal interventional procedures: aspiration, biopsy, and catheter drainage. RadioGraphics 2001;21 : 657–672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Omary RA, Bettmann MA, Cardella JF, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for the reporting and archiving of interventional radiology procedures, J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13 : 879–881[Medline]
  12. Abbitt PL, Goldwag S, Urbanski S. Endovaginal sonography for guidance in draining pelvic fluid collections. AJR1990; 154:849 –850[Free Full Text]
  13. Corsi PJ, Johnson SC, Gonik B, Hendrix SL, McNeeley SG Jr, Diamond MP. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided aspiration of pelvic abscesses. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1999;7 : 216–221[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Gjelland K, Ekerhovd E, Granberg S. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided aspiration for treatment of tubo-ovarian abscess: a study of 302 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193 :1323 –1330[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Perez-Medina T, Huertas MA, Bajo JM. Early ultrasound-guided transvaginal drainage of tuboovarian abscesses: a randomized study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7 : 435–438[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Martin EC, Karlson KB, Fankuchen EI, Cooperman A, Casarella WJ. Percutaneous drainage of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses. AJR 1982; 138:13 –15[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Khurrum Baig M, Hua Zhao R, Batista O, et al. Percutaneous postoperative intraabdominal abscess drainage after elective colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2002;6 : 159–164[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Cinat ME, Wilson SE, Din AM. Determinants for successful percutaneous imaging-guided drainage of intraabdominal abscess. Arch Surg 2002;137 : 845–849[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Casola G, vanSonnenberg E, D'Agostino HB, Harker CP, Varney RR, Smith D. Percutaneous drainage of tubo-ovarian abscesses. Radiology 1992;182 : 399–402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Tyrrel RT, Murphy FB, Bernardino ME. Tuboovarian abscesses: CT-guided percutaneous drainage. Radiology1990; 175:87 –89[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Teisala K, Heinonen PK, Punnonen R. Transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of tubo-ovarian abscess. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97:178 –180[Medline]
  22. Troiano RN, Taylor KJ. Sonographically guided therapeutic aspiration of benign-appearing ovarian cysts and endometriomas. AJR 1998; 171:1601 –1605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bret PM, Guibaud L, Atri M, Gillett P, Seymour RJ, Senterman MK. Transvaginal US-guided aspiration of ovarian cysts and solid pelvic masses. Radiology 1992;185 : 377–380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Caspi B, Goldchmit R, Zalel Y, Appelman Z, Insler V. Sonographically guided aspiration of ovarian cyst with simple appearance. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15 : 297–300[Abstract]
  25. Bonilla-Musoles F, Ballester MJ, Simon C, Serra V, Raga F. Is avoidance of surgery possible in patients with perimenopausal ovarian tumors using transvaginal ultrasound and duplex color Doppler sonography? J Ultrasound Med 1993;12 : 33–39[Abstract]
  26. de Crespigny LC, Robinson HP, Davoren RA, Fortune D. The "simple" ovarian cyst: aspirate or operate? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96:1035 –1039[Medline]
  27. Lipitz S, Seidman DS, Menczer J, et al. Recurrence rate after fluid aspiration from sonographically benign-appearing ovarian cysts. J Reprod Med 1992; 37:845 –848[Medline]
  28. Weinraub Z, Avrech O, Fuchs C, et al. Transvaginal aspiration of ovarian cysts: prognosis based on outcome over a 12-month period. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13:275 –279[Abstract]
  29. Dordoni D, Zaglio S, Zucca S, Favalli G. The role of sonographically guided aspiration in the clinical management of ovarian cysts. J Ultrasound Med 1993;12 : 27–31[Abstract]
  30. Trimbos JB, Hacker NF. The case against aspirating ovarian cysts. Cancer 1993; 72:828 –831[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Diernaes E, Rasmussen J, Soerensen T, Hasch E. Ovarian cysts: management by puncture? Lancet 1987;1 : 1084[Medline]
  32. Duke D, Colville J, Keeling A, Broe D, Fotheringham T, Lee MJ. Transvaginal aspiration of ovarian cysts: long-term follow-up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006;29 : 401–405[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Messalli EM, Cobellis G, Pecori E, et al. Alcohol sclerosis of endometriomas after ultrasound-guided aspiration. Minerva Ginecol 2003; 55:359 –362[Medline]
  34. Bret PM, Atri M, Guibaud L, Gillett P, Seymour RJ, Senterman MK. Ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women: preliminary results with transvaginal alcohol sclerosis—work in progress. Radiology1992; 184:661 –663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Nosher JL, Winchman HK, Needell GS. Transvaginal pelvic abscess drainage with US guidance. Radiology1987; 165:872 –873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. McGahan JP, Brown B, Jones CD, Stein M. Pelvic abscesses: transvaginal US-guided drainage with the trocar method. Radiology 1996;200 : 579–581[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saokar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saokar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS