AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soyer, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rymer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soyer, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rymer, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3646
AJR 2008; 191:1483-1492
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Review

Celiac Disease in Adults: Evaluation with MDCT Enteroclysis

Philippe Soyer1, Mourad Boudiaf1, Yann Fargeaudou1, Xavier Dray2, Lounis Hamzi1, Kouroche Vahedi2, Anne Lavergne-Slove3 and Roland Rymer1

1 Department of Abdominal Imaging, Hôpital Lariboisière-AP-HP-GHU Nord and University Diderot-Paris 7, 2, rue Ambroise Paré, 75475 Paris Cedex 10, France.
2 Department of Digestive Diseases, Hôpital Lariboisière-AP-HP-GHU Nord and University Diderot-Paris, Paris, France.
3 Department of Pathology, Hôpital Lariboisière-AP-HP-GHU Nord and University Diderot-Paris, Paris, France.

Received January 9, 2008; accepted after revision June 3, 2008.

 
Address correspondence to P. Soyer (philippe.soyer{at}lrb.aphp.fr).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Celiac Disease
Basic MDCT Enteroclysis Features...
Complications of Celiac Disease
Advantages and Limitations of...
Conclusion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to present the MDCT enteroclysis features of the multiple complications of celiac disease and illustrate why this technique is helpful to adult patients with celiac disease.

CONCLUSION. MDCT enteroclysis findings can suggest the diagnosis in adult patients with unknown celiac disease, and many complications of celiac disease can be recognized because of their characteristic appearance. Familiarity with these signs can help in appropriate planning of further diagnostic procedures.

Keywords: celiac disease • celiac sprue • CT-enteroclysis • enteroclysis • MDCT • nontropical sprue • refractory sprue • small-bowel disease • sprue


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Celiac Disease
Basic MDCT Enteroclysis Features...
Complications of Celiac Disease
Advantages and Limitations of...
Conclusion
References
 
Celiac disease is chronic intol erance of gluten that induces intestinal mucosal lesions in genetically predisposed patients. Although in most cases the symptoms and histologic abnormalities completely resolve with use of a strict gluten-free diet, com plications occur in some patients. The com plications include small-bowel intus sus ception, ulcerative jejunoileitis, lymphoma, adenocarcinoma, hyposplenism, cavitating lymphadenopathy syndrome, and pneu matosis intestinalis. Therefore, once the diagnosis is made, patients with celiac disease need regular monitoring. Although MDCT enteroclysis has been found effective for the diagnosis of a variety of small-bowel diseases, little is known about the utility of this examination in monitoring adult patients with celiac disease.

The goal of this article is threefold. First, we want to describe the MDCT enteroclysis features of celiac disease in adults. Second, we aim to discuss and illustrate the utility of MDCT enteroclysis in the study of complicated celiac disease. Third, we want to help readers understand the advantages and limitations of MDCT enteroclysis compared with push enteroscopy and wireless capsule endoscopy in the appro priate clinical setting.


Celiac Disease
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Celiac Disease
Basic MDCT Enteroclysis Features...
Complications of Celiac Disease
Advantages and Limitations of...
Conclusion
References
 
Pathophysiology
The gliadin fraction of wheat gluten and similar alcohol-soluble proteins (so-called protamins) that are present in other grains, such as barley and rye, are environmental factors responsible for the gastrointestinal damage of celiac disease [1, 2]. Celiac disease is an autoimmune enteropathy caused by an inappropriate T-cell–mediated immune response to ingested gluten [3]. The effective treatment of adult patients with celiac disease is based on total lifelong elimination of food products containing gluten.

Celiac disease is significantly associated with two specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes [4]. Celiac disease is detected with assays for antihuman tissue transglutaminase antibodies (AtTG) and antiendomysium antibodies (anti-EMA), which are serum-specific [5]. One of the targets of the autoimmune response in celiac disease is tissue transglutaminase (tTG) [6]. Celiac disease may be responsible for chronic inflammation and hyperhomocystinemia related to folic acid malabsorption, which may explain the trend toward deep venous thrombosis in these patients [7].

Histopathology
The pathologic changes of celiac disease are predominantly seen in the duodenum and proximal jejunum. However, the extent of the disease is extremely variable, ranging from segmental to full involvement of the small bowel. Histologic examination of at least four specimens obtained during endoscopic duodenal biopsy and from the third part of the duodenum is needed to fully ascertain the diagnosis [3]. Histologic lesions are classified into three main groups (Figs. 1, 2, 3) according to the Marsh criteria as modified by Oberhuber et al. [8, 9]. Type 1 corresponds to infiltrative inflammatory lesions with a normal villous architecture; type 2 is characterized by cryptic hyperplastic lesions; and type 3 corresponds to an increased number of intraepithelial lymphocytes with crypt hyperplasia in association with mild villous atrophy (type 3A), moderate villous atrophy (type 3B), or total villous atrophy (type 3C) [9].


Figure 1
View larger version (175K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 39-year-old woman with celiac disease. Photograph of histologic specimen obtained during duodenal biopsy reveals Marsh type 1 lesions consisting of numerous intraepithelial lymphocytes (infiltrative inflammatory lesions) (arrowheads) in absence of atrophic lesions. V = villi of normal size and absence of atrophy, C = crypts, which are free of hyperplasia. (H and E, x100)

 

Figure 2
View larger version (193K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 42-year-old woman with celiac disease. Photograph of histologic specimen obtained during duodenal biopsy shows Marsh type 2 lesions, which are cryptic and hyperplastic (arrows) and have increased number of mitoses (arrowheads) (up to three per crypt). (H and E, x100)

 

Figure 3
View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 53-year-old man with celiac disease. Photograph of histologic specimen obtained during duodenal biopsy shows Marsh type 3C lesions, which are characterized by total absence of villi (total villous atrophy), and numerous intraepithelial lymphocytes that have hyperplastic granular components (arrows) and distorted profile. (H and E, x100)

 

Clinical Features
Celiac disease can cause a spectrum of symptoms ranging from a subclinical form, which may be incidentally detected in patients without symptoms, to the classic malabsorptive form [10, 11]. Laboratory tests show variable degrees of malabsorption, including ane mia secondary to mal absorption of iron, folic acid, or vitamin B12; hypocalcemia; hypo albuminemia; and vitamin deficit. Celiac disease also can be associated with thrombocytosis, thrombocytopenia, leuko penia, venous thromboembolism, hypo splenism, and immunoglob ulin A deficiency. Gastro intestinal neoplasms especially are found in patients with persisting mucosal injury who do not completely adhere to a gluten-free diet [12].

Refractory celiac disease (also called refractory sprue) is defined as symptomatic severe enteritis that does not respond to at least 6 months of a strict gluten-free diet. Patients with this condition are at high risk of complications. Refractory celiac disease syndromes are classified into types 1 and 2. Type 1 has a normal intraepithelial lymphocyte phenotype, and type 2 is characterized by clonal expansion of an aberrant intraepithelial lymphocyte population [3]. Unlike type 1 refractory celiac disease, which has a relatively benign course, type 2 refractory celiac disease has prelymphoma potential [13]. Besides the general complications of celiac disease, which include intestinal ulcerations, pneu matosis intestinalis, pneumo peritoneum, hypo splenism, hepatobiliary disease, neurop athy, and malignant neoplasms, com pli cations such as ulcerative jejunoileitis, cavi t ating mesenteric lymphadenopathy syn drome, and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma are found only in patients with refractory celiac disease [14, 15]. It also has been found [13] that the increased risk of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma specifically involves patients with type 2 refractory celiac disease and not patients with type 1 disease (52% vs 0%).

Malignant neoplasms are the most common cause of death in celiac disease [12, 16]. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma is the cause of death in 46% of patients with type 2 refractory celiac disease [13]. Because of an increased incidence of gastrointestinal neoplasms, mainly adeno carcinoma of the small bowel and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, the mortality rate among adult patients with celiac disease is almost double the rate in the general population [16]. Therefore, among patients with known celiac disease who strictly follow a gluten-free diet, abdominal pain should always raise suspicion of malignant neoplasia.

Definitive Diagnosis of Celiac Disease
The definitive diagnosis of celiac disease in adults requires both endoscopic duodenal biopsy that shows characteristic histologic findings and a favorable response to a gluten-free diet [3, 17]. It is important to understand that because the histologic findings in celiac disease are characteristic but not specific, a favorable response to a gluten-free diet is needed for a definite diagnosis. Total villous atrophy, which was the only histologic feature compatible with the diagnosis of celiac disease in the past, is now considered the terminal stage of evolving intestinal mucosal damage [1, 17].


Basic MDCT Enteroclysis Features and Correlation with Histopathologic and Endoscopic Findings
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Celiac Disease
Basic MDCT Enteroclysis Features...
Complications of Celiac Disease
Advantages and Limitations of...
Conclusion
References
 
MDCT Enteroclysis Protocol
MDCT enteroclysis examinations are routinely performed with the same protocol. A dedicated 8-French nasojejunal tube (815 NF, Biosphere Medical) is advanced beyond the duodenojejunal flexure under fluoroscopic guidance. Room temperature water is infused with a pressure-controlled electric pump at a rate of 150–160 mL/min. The pressure is controlled to be less than 1,600 mm Hg. The mean quantity of water is 1,600 mL with a total water volume less than 2,000 mL. Approximately 1 minute before the start of image acquisition, 15 mL of an antispasmodic solution that contains 10 mg of tiemonium methylsulphate (Viscéralgine, Laboratoires Organon) is administered IV to reduce motion artifacts caused by small-bowel peristalsis [18, 19]. Other antispasmodic a gents, such as N-butylscopolammonium bro mide (Buscopan, Boehringer Ingelheim) at a dose of 20 mg or glucagon (GlucaGen, Novo Nordisk) at a dose of 1 mg [20, 21], are available for reducing small-bowel peristalsis. Anti spasmodic agents must be used with caution, however, because of possible contra indications.


Figure 4
View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A 47-year-old man with unknown celiac disease. Coronal CT reformation of MDCT enteroclysis scan shows reversed jejunoileal fold pattern consisting of rarity of jejunal folds (arrows) associated with greater number of ileal folds (arrowheads). Appearance suggests celiac disease.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B 47-year-old man with unknown celiac disease. Endoscopic image corroborating MDCT enteroclysis findings shows atrophic jejunal mucosa.

 
Patients are placed in the supine position headfirst with respect to the scanner gantry. We use a single-source 4-MDCT scanner (Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom, Siemens Medical Solutions) with the following parameters: field of view, 279–380 mm; beam collimation, 10 mm (4 x 2.5 mm configuration); tube potential, 120 kVp; gantry revolution time, 0.5 second; table speed, 12.5 mm per rotation, resulting in a beam pitch of 1.25. An online real-time anatomy-adapted attenuation-based tube-current modulation technique (CareDose, Siemens Medical Solutions) is used with the tube current set to 120–170 effective mAs. At the start of the procedure, an automated power injector is used for IV injection of 120 mL of nonionic iodinated contrast material through a 20-gauge catheter into an antecubital vein at a rate of 3 mL/s.

The delay between the start of contrast administration and the start of CT acquisition varies depending on the clinical indication. For patients referred because of suspected tumor complicating celiac disease, two imaging passes are performed: one pass during the arterial phase with bolus tracking and automated triggering (CARE Bolus, Siemens Medical Solutions) and the other pass during the enteric phase. For patients with no suspected tumor, a single pass is performed 50 seconds after the start of bolus injection, when bowel-wall enhancement is optimal (enteric phase) [22]. The bolus-tracking technique is used to define the optimal time after IV administration of iodinated contrast material that would provide optimal contrast enhancement of the small bowel during the arterial phase. MDCT enteroclysis is performed from the dome of the liver to the lower margin of the symphysis pubis in a cephalocaudal direction after breath-hold instruction is given.

Continuous infusion of water through the nasojejunal tube is maintained during image acquisition. Most patients tolerate the procedure well [18]. The axial data are reconstructed twice with a B30 soft-tissue reconstruction kernel, first with 5-mm thickness at 5-mm intervals and then with a 2.5-mm thickness at 3-mm intervals. The second set of reconstructed axial images is reformatted in the coronal and sagittal planes with a thickness of 3 mm at 3-mm intervals. Multiplanar reformatted views are rapidly made interactively with a commercially available attached workstation. Processing of reformatted images takes less than 10 minutes. Both transverse and multiplanar reformatted MDCT enteroclysis images are originally acquired with a standard window level (50 HU) and width (350 HU); specific adjustments are made for the patient being examined.

Basic MDCT Enteroclysis Features: Small-Bowel Abnormalities
A reversed jejunoileal fold pattern, which presumably is caused by a compensatory response of the ileum to severe villous atrophy of the proximal small bowel, is highly suggestive of celiac disease [23]. This feature associates ileal jejunization with a major loss of jejunal folds. A greater number of ileal folds are observed in contrast to a rarity or even absence of jejunal folds. Loss of jejunal folds are radiologic evidence of celiac disease with total villous atrophy in most cases [24]. These features are well visualized at MDCT enteroclysis (Fig. 4A, 4B).

Other intraabdominal abnormalities can be found in adult patients with celiac disease. The most frequent abnormalities include mesenteric lymphadenopathy and engorge ment of mesenteric vessels [25, 26] (Fig. 5). Engorgement of mesenteric vessels correlates with increased blood flow on Doppler studies [27]. Findings such as bowel-wall thickening and ascites are less frequent [23, 25, 26, 28]. Lymphadenopathy is more frequently found in patients with refractory type 2 celiac disease and in patients with enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma [26]. On conventional MDCT (without enteroclysis), loops of small bowel have an abnormally enlarged diameter, most often in conjunction with an excess of intraintestinal fluid. Because the technique distends the small bowel, spontaneous distention due to disease cannot be evaluated with MDCT enteroclysis [25]. The presence of intramural fat in the submucosal layers of the duodenum and jejunum has been reported to be a feature suggestive of the diagnosis of celiac disease, being found in 13.4% of 82 patients with celiac disease in one study [29].


Figure 6
View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 58-year-old man with celiac disease. Axial MDCT enteroclysis scan shows engorged mesenteric vessels (arrowheads) frequently found in adult patients with celiac disease.

 

Histopathologic, Push Enteroscopic, and Wireless Capsule Endoscopic Findings
The typical intestinal endoscopic features of celiac disease include a duodenal micronodular or mosaic pattern, reduction of duodenal and jejunal folds, and loss or scalloping of duodenal and jejunal folds. No definite correlation exists between the histologic and endoscopic findings. Wireless capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy reveal various features when atrophic lesions are histologically present. The mosaic pattern is more frequent than the nodular pattern (Figs. 6 and 7).


Figure 7
View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6 57-year-old man with celiac disease. Push enteroscopic image shows nodular pattern (arrowheads) of jejunal mucosa consistent with celiac disease. Diagnosis was confirmed at histopathologic analysis of biopsy specimen.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7 37-year-old woman with celiac disease. Wireless capsule endoscopic image shows atrophic jejunal mucosa (arrowheads), which suggests presence of celiac disease. Diagnosis was confirmed at histopathologic analysis.

 


Complications of Celiac Disease
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Celiac Disease
Basic MDCT Enteroclysis Features...
Complications of Celiac Disease
Advantages and Limitations of...
Conclusion
References
 
Transient Small-Bowel Intussusception
Transient intussusception in celiac disease is rarely symptomatic and presumably is related to uncoordinated peristalsis in dilated flaccid loops of small bowel [24]. It must be emphasized that transient small-bowel intussusception also is visible on CT images obtained without enteroclysis, having an estimated frequency of 21% [25]. On MDCT enteroclysis scans, transient small-bowel intussusception is correctly identified owing to the presence of a typical bowel-within-bowel feature, which produces a target sign with or without a fatty component [30]. Transient intussusception is more frequently found in patients with severe celiac disease (i.e., type 2 refractory celiac disease) [26]. When the intussusception is less than 3 cm long, occurs in the absence of a lead-point tumor, and is not responsible for small-bowel obstruction at MDCT enteroclysis, the findings are consistent with transient self-limiting small-bowel intussusception [31] (Fig. 8). However, because gastrointestinal malignant tumors can cause intussusception in adult patients with celiac disease, MDCT enteroclysis images have to be carefully analyzed for confident exclusion of lymphoma and carcinoma [18] (Fig. 9A, 9B, 9C).


Figure 9
View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8 70-year-old man with transient small-bowel intussusception in association with celiac disease. Axial MDCT enteroclysis scan shows target sign (arrowheads) corresponding to transient small-bowel intussusception. No tumor is present.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9A 82-year-old woman with ileal lymphoma-associated celiac disease. Axial MDCT enteroclysis scan shows target sign (arrows) corresponding to small-bowel intussusception secondary to lymphoma (arrowhead). Tumor was located in ileum.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9B 82-year-old woman with ileal lymphoma-associated celiac disease. Axial MDCT enteroclysis scan at lower level than A shows typical bowel-within-bowel feature (arrows) and intussusception longer than 3 cm.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9C 82-year-old woman with ileal lymphoma-associated celiac disease. Endoscopic findings confirm diagnosis of intussusception secondary to small-bowel tumor (arrowheads).

 

Ulcerative Jejunoileitis
Ulcerative jejunoileitis consists of mul tiple benign ulcers of variable depth. The exact origin of these ulcers is unclear. This condition can manifest acutely or develop gradually. It occurs predominantly in the jejunum, occasionally in the ileum, and rarely in the colon, and it mostly appears in patients with type 2 refractory celiac disease [14, 15]. Patients most frequently present with fever, weight loss, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and anorexia. The symptoms of ulcerative jejunoileitis are similar to those of celiac disease complicated by a malignant neoplasm [32]. On small-bowel follow-through images, the ulcers may be visible as focal constrictions. A spiculated pattern and alternating areas of narrowing and dilatation also have been seen with this technique [24]. It is commonly acknowledged, however, that small-bowel enteroclysis is more efficient than small-bowel follow-through for the detection of ulcerations [33]. On MDCT enteroclysis scans, ulcerative jejunoileitis appears as circumferential thickening of the bowel wall with a bilaminar configuration that combines mucosal hyperenhancement and thickening of the small-bowel wall with soft-tissue attenuation [18] (Fig. 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D). This MDCT enteroclysis finding is highly suggestive of the diagnosis of ulcerative jejunoileitis in adult patients with celiac disease [18]. Complications of ulcerative jejunoileitis include hemorrhage, perforation, and small-bowel obstruction. Some patients have coexisting lymphoma, or lymphoma develops later. Therefore, careful histopathologic examination and immunologic staining of specimens from patients with ulcerative jejunoileitis are recommended to identify occult lymphoma that may necessitate additional therapy.


Figure 13
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10A 48-year-old man with ulcerative jejunoileitis associated with refractory celiac disease. Axial MDCT enteroclysis scan depicts circumferential thickening (arrows) of ileal wall that exhibits stratification with bilaminar appearance. Hyperenhancing internal layer is present in association with soft-tissue-attenuation external layer. There is no evidence of malignancy. (Reprinted with permission from Boudiaf M, Jaff A, Soyer P, Bouhnik Y, Hamzi L, Rymer R. Small-bowel diseases: prospective evaluation of multi-detector row helical CT enteroclysis in 107 consecutive patients. Radiology 2004; 233:338–344 [18])

 

Figure 14
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10B 48-year-old man with ulcerative jejunoileitis associated with refractory celiac disease. Wireless capsule endoscopic image shows ulceration (arrow) that suggests diagnosis.

 

Figure 15
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10C 48-year-old man with ulcerative jejunoileitis associated with refractory celiac disease. Photograph of gross specimen shows ulceration (arrow). Diagnosis was confirmed after surgery.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10D 48-year-old man with ulcerative jejunoileitis associated with refractory celiac disease. Axial MDCT enteroclysis scan obtained after partial resection of ileum shows findings (arrowheads) similar to those observed preoperatively (i.e., stratification with bilaminar appearance) and that are highly suggestive of recurrence at site of anastomosis. Diagnosis of recurrence was confirmed histologically.

 

Enteropathy-Associated T-Cell Lymphoma
Lymphoma is the most common malignant disease complicating celiac disease [12, 34]. Most lymphomas are of T-cell origin, but gastrointestinal B-cell lymphoma and extraintestinal lymphoma also are found [35]. In the general population, T-cell lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract is rare, representing fewer than 1% of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas [32, 36]. In patients with celiac disease, lymphoma has three clinical patterns. It can cause abdominal pain and diarrhea despite strict adherence to a gluten-free diet; it can cause bowel perforation, obstruction, and hemorrhage; or it can antedate clinical recognition of celiac disease [37]. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma typically forms circumferential ulcers with short strictures in the proximal small bowel.

The MDCT enteroclysis appearance of intestinal lymphoma complicating celiac disease is variable, including a nodular appearance, an exophytic mass, or circumferential thickening of the small-bowel wall. An aneurysmal pattern, which combines cavitary dilatation of the small-bowel lumen and annular wall thickening, can be observed (Fig. 11A, 11B, 11C). The presence of this so-called aneurysmal dilatation sign [38] suggests the diagnosis of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma [39] but also is found in cases of small-bowel tumors not related to celiac disease, such as adenocarcinoma [19], lymphoma not related to enteropathy [39], and mesenchymal tumors [40]. Lymphoma usually involves the small bowel in either a multifocal or a diffuse distribution. A short segment occasionally is involved.


Figure 17
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11A 77-year-old woman with jejunal T-cell lymphoma associated with refractory celiac disease. Axial MDCT enteroclysis scan shows proximal jejunal mass (arrowheads) with pseudoaneurysmal pattern suggesting malignant tumor.

 

Figure 18
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11B 77-year-old woman with jejunal T-cell lymphoma associated with refractory celiac disease. Coronal CT reformation of MDCT enteroclysis scan clarifies presence of tumor (arrowheads) with irregular margins.

 

Figure 19
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11C 77-year-old woman with jejunal T-cell lymphoma associated with refractory celiac disease. Wireless capsule endoscopic image shows irregular mass (arrows) in proximal jejunum.

 
Although detection of enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes on MDCT enteroclysis does not necessarily indicate the presence of lymphoma in patients with celiac disease and can be found in cases of mesenteric panniculitis [41], this finding raises suspicion of lymphoma that has to be ruled out (Fig. 12). In some cases, enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes may be the single clue to the diagnosis of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma in the absence of endoscopically visible small-bowel tumor [42]. Therefore, in the evaluation of patients with type 2 refractory celiac disease who are at high risk of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, biopsy of enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes is mandatory to exclude this serious complication [42].


Figure 20
View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12 40-year-old man with enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma associated with celiac disease. Axial MDCT enteroclysis scan obtained without small-bowel distention shows multiple enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes (arrowheads), which correspond to T-cell lymphomatous involvement. Histopathologic analysis after small-bowel biopsy showed total villous atrophy and major intraepithelial infiltration by aberrant (CD3 positive, CD8 negative) clonal intraepithelial proliferation of T cells.

 

Carcinoma
Carcinomas of the esophagus, pharynx, duodenum, jejunum, and rectum are found more frequently in patients with celiac disease than in the general population [12]. Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel may arise through an adenoma–carcinoma sequence [43]. Therefore, MDCT enteroclysis should be performed to rule out carcinoma in patients with celiac disease who have symptoms despite adherence to a strict gluten-free diet (Fig. 13A, 13B).


Figure 21
View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 13A 55-year-old woman with jejunal adenocarcinoma associated with celiac disease. Axial MDCT enteroclysis scan shows large jejunal mass (arrowheads) displaying aneurysmal pattern suggestive of malignant small-bowel tumor. Tip of nasojejunal tube (arrow) is evident.

 

Figure 22
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 13B 55-year-old woman with jejunal adenocarcinoma associated with celiac disease. Push enteroscopic image confirms presence of jejunal tumor (arrowheads).

 
Hyposplenism
Celiac disease is a well-known cause of splenic atrophy, found in 30–50% of adult patients with celiac disease [24] (Fig. 14A, 14B, 14C). It has been found [44] that the mean splenic volume in a population of adult patients with celiac disease is 162 cm3 (range, 37–321 cm3); in the healthy population, the mean volume is 215 cm3 (range, 107–341 cm3). The degree of splenic atrophy correlates with the severity of disease [26]. Because splenic size has been found to correlate with splenic function, it is not surprising that there is a trend toward serious infectious diseases due to Streptococcus pneumoniae in these patients [45, 46].


Figure 23
View larger version (178K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 14A 37-year-old man with cavitating mesenteric lymphadenopathy syndrome and splenic atrophy associated with celiac disease. Cavitating lymphadenopathy is most often mesenteric, but other locations are possible. Axial MDCT enteroclysis scan shows mesenteric lymph node with markedly hypoattenuating center (arrowhead).

 

Figure 24
View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 14B 37-year-old man with cavitating mesenteric lymphadenopathy syndrome and splenic atrophy associated with celiac disease. Cavitating lymphadenopathy is most often mesenteric, but other locations are possible. Axial MDCT enteroclysis scan shows associated small spleen (arrowhead).

 

Figure 25
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 14C 37-year-old man with cavitating mesenteric lymphadenopathy syndrome and splenic atrophy associated with celiac disease. Cavitating lymphadenopathy is most often mesenteric, but other locations are possible. Histologic photograph shows lymph node with central acidophilic necrosis in association with peripheral rim (arrowheads). (H and E, x25)

 
Cavitating Mesenteric Lymphadenopathy Syndrome
As described by Matuchansky et al. [47] the association of villous atrophy, splenic atrophy, and mesenteric cavitating lymphadenopathy is highly suggestive of the diagnosis of celiac disease. If the association is present, lymph nodes in the jejunal and ileal mesentery are affected by acidophilic central liquid necrosis and have a peripheral fibrotic rim (Fig. 14A, 14B, 14C). At MDCT enteroclysis, the central areas of such involved lymph nodes have an attenuation of 0 HU or less. In general, such lymphadenopathy is found in association with marked villous atrophy. Detection of these findings should raise suspicion of lymphoma, but an association between the two entities is not the rule [37].

Pneumatosis
Pneumatosis intestinalis is defined by the presence of gas within the bowel wall. In the general population, pneumatosis intestinalis is a rare finding suggesting the presence of potentially alarming conditions, such as acute small-bowel ischemia, that necessitate surgery [48]. In the setting of celiac disease, it is speculated that pneumatosis may reflect dissection of intraluminal gas into the inflamed small-bowel wall without accompanying intraabdominal abnorm alities [49]. In addition, in patients with celiac disease, MDCT can show pneumoperitoneum, which may be due to subserosal rupture of bubbles into the peritoneum. Therefore, in patients with celiac disease, pneumatosis intestinalis may be found in association with pneumoperitoneum in the absence of small-bowel ischemia or perforation [49]. On abdominal radiographs, follow-through studies, and barium enema images, it may be difficult to differentiate gas within the gastrointestinal wall from intraluminal gas. In this regard, MDCT is more discriminating than conventional imaging.

In adult patients with celiac disease, pneumatosis intestinalis is not always an indication for bowel resection; as a rule, the presence of pneumatosis intestinalis does not correlate with the presence of bowel ische mia. A literature review [49] on the rare finding of pneumatosis intestinalis in the setting of celiac disease showed that in all reported cases, even when pneumatosis was accom panied by pneumoperitoneum, these alarm ing findings were proven to be of benign origin; that is, there was no evidence of bowel ischemia, perforation, or peritonitis (Fig. 15). As a consequence, the presence of pneumo peritoneum in adult patients with celiac disease must be integrated into a more com prehensive evaluation that includes clinical examination of the abdomen to avoid unnec essary surgery. Conservative management is needed when no clinical features consistent with peritonitis are present [50].


Figure 26
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 15 33-year-old woman with celiac disease. Axial MDCT scan obtained without small-bowel distention shows gas (arrowheads) in bowel wall that resolved spontaneously. Patient was treated conservatively in absence of clinical symptoms.

 
Associated Hepatobiliary Disease
Celiac disease can be associated with a variety of hepatobiliary diseases. Hepatic steatosis can be associated with or be the revealing symptom of celiac disease. It manifests as mild biochemical ab normalities in the absence of clinically visible cholestasis [51]. Venous thrombosis involving the portal vein or hepatic veins [7] also may be found. A possible association between celiac disease and primary biliary cirrhosis has been suggested [52] because the two diseases have been found together in a few cases. When primary biliary cirrhosis is suspected because of alterations in results of hepatic tests, MR cholangiography is more effective than MDCT enteroclysis for discerning the biliary disease. Cases have been reported [53] in which nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver has been found in patients with celiac disease.


Advantages and Limitations of MDCT Enteroclysis over Other Techniques
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Celiac Disease
Basic MDCT Enteroclysis Features...
Complications of Celiac Disease
Advantages and Limitations of...
Conclusion
References
 
In addition to MDCT enteroclysis, CT enterography and MR enterography have shown promise in the evaluation of the small bowel of adult patients with celiac disease [5456]. In both techniques, effective small-bowel distention is achieved with oral hyperhydration, obviating nasojejunal tube placement and increasing patient tolerance. The role and potential of the two techniques in the elective investigation of celiac disease have to be further determined and compared with those of MDCT enteroclysis. MDCT enteroclysis can depict extraintestinal features, such as enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes corresponding to cavitating lymphadenopathy and lymphomatous involvement, that are not seen with small-bowel radiography, small-bowel enteroclysis, or endoscopic examination [57]. MDCT enteroclysis can be used to exclude small-bowel stricture before wireless capsule endoscopy, limiting the risk of capsule retention [33]. Finally, MDCT enteroclysis findings suggest the diagnosis in patients with unknown celiac disease because the images show the typical reversed jejunoileal fold pattern and other suggestive features. A limitation, however, is that MDCT enteroclysis does not depict subtle mucosal changes such as ulcerations, which can be seen with endoscopy [42]. This limitation is important because these ulcerations may indicate the presence of ulcerative jejunoileitis or enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma.

Wireless capsule endoscopy shows promise in the evaluation of adult patients with celiac disease [42, 58]. Early reports showed that wireless capsule endoscopy reveals subtle mucosal changes such as ulcerations in 45% of cases [59] and facilitates detection of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, which is not seen with MDCT enteroclysis in the early stage [42]. As a consequence, it may be possible that in the near future, wireless capsule endoscopy will be used to screen for cancer. To our knowledge, however, no study results validate this strategy. Wireless capsule endoscopy has proven utility in the evaluation of patients with celiac disease who report abdominal pain or present with occult bleeding [59]. In addition, findings at wireless capsule endoscopy are helpful for planning further diagnostic procedures, especially push or double-balloon enteroscopy, to obtain specimens for confirming the presence of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma or adenocarcinoma [42, 60, 61]. The use of wireless endoscopy is limited because assessment is incomplete in 36% of cases [33, 42]. In addition, wireless capsule endoscopy may have nonspecific findings, such as mucosal scratches and nonspecific ulcerations, that necessitate further diag nostic tests for a definite diagnosis [33]. In this regard, small-bowel enteroclysis is performed to confirm or exclude the presence of mucosal abnormality [62].

We and others [18, 33, 63] have found conventional small-bowel radiography without enteroclysis to be of limited value. This lack of value is especially true in cases of subtle mucosal lesions, which are frequently missed with radiography but are well depicted with small-bowel enteroclysis [63]. For this reason, we no longer use small-bowel radiography in the evaluation of patients with celiac disease.

Double-balloon enteroscopy and push enteroscopy are promising approaches to investigation of the small bowel [59, 64], but their value and the complications in adult patients with celiac disease are not known [33, 42]. Both techniques are effective in detection of ulceration and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma of the proximal jejunum or distal ileum [65], but study of the small bowel is incomplete in as many as 40% of cases [61], so serious complications can be overlooked. This limitation also applies to push enteroscopy, which does not show signs of focal superimposed disease such as lymphoma, carcinoma, and ulcerative jejunoileitis when the disease is located too far from the duodenojejunal junction or too far from the ileocecal valve [33]. Because of invasiveness, both techniques are reserved for patients with refractory celiac disease and for patients with a history of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma [66].


Conclusion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Celiac Disease
Basic MDCT Enteroclysis Features...
Complications of Celiac Disease
Advantages and Limitations of...
Conclusion
References
 
The value of MDCT enteroclysis in the diagnosis of complicated celiac disease is not fully known because comparative studies, including enteroclysis, wireless capsule endo scopy, and MDCT enteroclysis, are lacking. Many of the complications of celiac disease, however, can be recognized because of their characteristic appearance at MDCT enteroclysis. Familiarity with the appearance of the complications of celiac disease can aid in appropriate planning of further diagnostic procedures and may improve patient care.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Celiac Disease
Basic MDCT Enteroclysis Features...
Complications of Celiac Disease
Advantages and Limitations of...
Conclusion
References
 

  1. Farrell RJ, Kelly CP. Celiac sprue. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:180 –188[Free Full Text]
  2. Fasano A, Catassi C. Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease: an evolving spectrum. Gastroenterology 2001;120 : 636–651[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Green PH, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:1731 –1743[Free Full Text]
  4. Sollid LM, Thorsby E. HLA susceptibility genes in celiac disease: genetic mapping and role in pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 1993;105 : 910–922[Medline]
  5. Sulkanen S, Halttunen T, Laurila K, et al. Tissue transglutaminase autoantibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in detecting celiac disease. Gastroenterology 1998;115 :1322 –1328[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Dieterich W, Ehnis T, Bauer M, et al. Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease. Nat Med 1997; 3:797 –801[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Ludvigsson JF, Welander A, Lassila R, Ekbom A, Montgomery SM. Risk of thromboembolism in 14,000 individuals with coeliac disease. Br J Haematol 2007; 139:121 –127[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Dickson BC, Streutker CJ, Chetty R. Coeliac disease: an update for pathologists. J Clin Pathol 2006;59 :1008 –1016[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999;11 :1185 –1194[Medline]
  10. Corazza GR, Frisoni M, Treggiari EA, et al. Subclinical celiac sprue: increasing occurrence and clues to its diagnosis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1993; 16:16 –21[Medline]
  11. Green PH, Jabri B. Coeliac disease. Lancet2003; 362:383 –391[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Swinson CM, Slavin G, Coles EC, Booth CC. Coeliac disease and malignancy. Lancet 1983;1 : 111–115[Medline]
  13. Al-Toma A, Verbeek WH, Hadithi M, von Blomberg BM, Mulder CJ. Survival in refractory coeliac disease and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: retrospective evaluation of single-centre experience. Gut 2007; 56:1373 –1378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Cellier C, Patey N, Mauvieux L, et al. Abnormal intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes in refractory sprue. Gastroenterology 1998;114 : 471–481[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Cellier C, Delabesse E, Helmer C, et al. Refractory sprue, celiac disease, and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. Lancet 2000; 256:203 –208
  16. Logan RF, Rifkind EA, Turner ID, Ferguson A. Mortality rate in celiac disease. Gastroenterology 1989;97 : 265–271[Medline]
  17. Walker-Smith JA, Guandalini S, Schmitz J, Shmerling DH, Visakorpi JK, and the Working Group of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac disease: Report of Working Group of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. Arch Dis Child 1990;65 : 909–911[Free Full Text]
  18. Boudiaf M, Jaff A, Soyer P, Bouhnik Y, Hamzi L, Rymer R. Small-bowel diseases: prospective evaluation of multi-detector row helical CT enteroclysis in 107 consecutive patients. Radiology2004; 233:338 –344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Pilleul F, Penigaud M, Milot L, Saurin JC, Chayvialle JA, Valette PJ. Possible small-bowel neoplasms: contrast-enhanced and water-enhanced multidetector CT enteroclysis. Radiology2006; 241:796 –801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Schmidt S, Felley C, Meuwly JY, Schnyder P, Denys A. CT enteroclysis: technique and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:648 –660[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Romano S, De Lutio E, Rollandi GA, Romano L, Grassi R, Maglinte DD. Multidetector computed tomography enteroclysis (MDCT-E) with neutral enteral and IV contrast enhancement in tumor detection. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:1178 –1183[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Schindera ST, Nelson RC, DeLong DM, et al. Multi-detector row CT of the small bowel: peak enhancement temporal window—initial experience. Radiology 2007;243 : 438–444[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Tomei E, Marini M, Messineo D, et al. Computed tomography of the small bowel in adult celiac disease: the jejunoileal fold pattern reversal. Eur Radiol 2000;10 : 119–122[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Rubesin SE, Herlinger H, Saul SH, Grumbach K, Laufer I, Levine MS. Adult celiac disease and its complications. RadioGraphics 1989;9 : 1045–1066[Abstract]
  25. Tomei E, Diacinti D, Marini M, et al. Abdominal CT findings may suggest coeliac disease. Dig Liver Dis2005; 37:402 –406[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Mallant M, Hadithi M, Al-Toma AB, et al. Abdominal computed tomography in refractory coeliac disease and enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13 :1696 –1700[Medline]
  27. Giovagnorio F, Picarelli A, Di Giovambattista F, Mastracchio J. Evaluation with Doppler sonography of mesenteric blood flow in celiac disease. AJR 1998; 171:629 –632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Strobl PW, Warshauer DM. CT diagnosis of celiac disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19 : 319–320[Medline]
  29. Scholz FJ, Behr SC, Scheirey CD. Intramural fat in the duodenum and proximal small intestine in patients with celiac disease. AJR 2007; 189:786 –790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Gayer G, Apter S, Hofmann C, et al. Intussusception in adult: CT diagnosis. Clin Radiol 1998;53 : 53–57[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Kim YH, Blake MA, Harisinghani MG, et al. Adult intestinal intussusception: CT appearances and identification of a causative lead point. RadioGraphics 2006;26 : 733–744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Isaacson PG. Gastrointestinal lymphoma. Hum Pathol 1994; 25:1020 –1029[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Maglinte DD. Capsule imaging and the role of radiology in the evaluation of diseases of the small bowel. Radiology2005; 236:763 –767[Free Full Text]
  34. Perret RS, Borne J. Case 3: T-cell lymphoma of the small bowel developing in long-standing celiac disease (nontropical sprue). AJR 1998; 171:854, 858 –860
  35. Halfdanarson TR, Litzow MR, Murray JA. Hematologic manifestations of celiac disease. Blood 2007;109 : 412–421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Byun JH, Ha HK, Kim AY, et al. CT findings in peripheral T-cell lymphoma involving the gastrointestinal tract. Radiology 2003;227 : 59–67[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Freeman HJ, Chiu BK. Small bowel malignant lymphoma complicating celiac sprue and the mesenteric lymph node cavitation syndrome. Gastroenterology 1986;90 :2008 –2012[Medline]
  38. Balthazar EJ, Noordhoorn M, Megibow AJ, Gordon RB. CT of small-bowel lymphoma in immunocompetent patients and patients with AIDS: comparison of findings. AJR 1997;168 : 675–680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Lohan DG, Alhajeri AN, Cronin CG, Roche CJ, Murphy JM. MR enterography of small-bowel lymphoma: potential for suggestion of histologic subtype and the presence of underlying celiac disease. AJR 2008; 190:287 –293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Horton KM, Juluru K, Montogomery E, Fishman EK. Computed tomography imaging of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with pathology correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28 : 811–817[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Horton KM, Lawler LP, Fishman EK. CT findings in sclerosing mesenteritis (panniculitis): spectrum of disease. RadioGraphics 2003;23 :1561 –1567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Daum S, Wahnschaffe U, Glasenapp R, et al. Capsule endoscopy in refractory celiac disease. Endoscopy2007; 39:455 –458[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Rampertab SD, Forde KA, Green PH. Small bowel neoplasia in coeliac disease. Gut 2003;52 :1211 –1214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Prassopoulos P, Daskalogiannaki M, Raissaki M, Hatjidakis A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Determination of normal splenic volume on computed tomography in relation to age, gender and body habitus. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:246 –248[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. McKinley M, Leibowitz S, Bronzo R, Zanzi I, Weissman G, Schiffman G. Appropriate response to pneumococcal vaccine in celiac sprue. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995; 20:113 –116[Medline]
  46. Johnston SD, Robinson J. Fatal pneumococcal septicaemia in a coeliac patient. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol1998; 10:353 –354[Medline]
  47. Matuchansky C, Colin R, Hemet J, et al. Cavitation of mesenteric lymph nodes, splenic atrophy and a flat small intestinal mucosa: report of six cases. Gastroenterology 1984;87 : 606–614[Medline]
  48. Ho LM, Paulson EK, Thompson WM. Pneumatosis intestinalis in the adult: benign to life-threatening causes. AJR2007; 188:1604 –1613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Nathan H, Singhal S, Cameron JL. Benign pneumatosis intestinalis in the setting of celiac disease. J Gastrointest Surg2006; 10:890 –894[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Terzic A, Holzinger F, Klaiber C. Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis as a complication of celiac disease. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:1360 –1361[Medline]
  51. Capron J, Sevenet F, Quenum C, Doutrellot C, Capron-Chivrac D, Delamarre J. Massive hepatic steatosis disclosing adult celiac disease: study of a case and review of the literature [in French]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1983; 7:256 –260[Medline]
  52. Logan RF, Ferguson A, Finlayson ND, Weir DG. Primary biliary cirrhosis and coeliac disease: an association? Lancet1978; 1:230 –233[Medline]
  53. Riestra S, Domínguez F, Rodrigo L. Nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver in a patient with celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 33:323 –326[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Paulsen SR, Huprich JE, Fletcher JG, et al. CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. RadioGraphics2006; 26:641 –657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Tomei E, Semelka RC, Braga L, et al. Adult celiac disease: what is the role of MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging2006; 24:625 –629[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Paolantonio P, Tomei E, Rengo M, Ferrari R, Lucchesi P, Laghi A. Adult celiac disease: MRI findings. Abdom Imaging2007; 32:433 –440[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Voderholzer WA, Ortner M, Rogalla P, Beinholzl J, Lochs H. Diagnostic yield of wireless capsule enteroscopy in comparison with computed tomography enteroclysis. Endoscopy 2003;35 : 1009–1014[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Apostolopoulos P, Alexandrakis G, Giannakoulopoulou E, et al. M2A wireless capsule endoscopy for diagnosing ulcerative jejunoileitis complicating celiac disease. Endoscopy2004; 36:247[Medline]
  59. Culliford A, Daly J, Diamond B, Rubin M, Green PH. The value of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with complicated celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62 : 55–61[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Schuppan D, Kelly CP, Krauss N. Monitoring non-responsive patients with celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am2006; 16:593 –603[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Heine GD, Hadithi M, Groenen MJ, Kuipers EJ, Jacobs MA, Mulder CJ. Double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, diagnostic yield, and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease. Endoscopy 2006;38 : 42–48[Medline]
  62. Van den Bosch HC, Tjon A Tham RT, Gooszen AW, Fauquenot-Nollen JM, Lamers CB. Celiac disease: small-bowel enteroclysis findings in adult patients treated with a gluten-free diet. Radiology1996; 201:803 –808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Herlinger H, Maglinte DD. Jejunal fold separation in adult celiac disease: relevance of enteroclysis. Radiology1986; 158:605 –611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y, et al. Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53:216 –220[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Cellier C, Cuillerier E, Patey-Mariaud de Serre N, et al. Push enteroscopy in celiac sprue and refractory sprue. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 613–617[CrossRef][Medline]
  66. Hadithi M, Al-toma A, Oudejans J, van Bodegraven AA, Mulder CJ, Jacobs M. The value of double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with refractory celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102 : 987–996[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Soyer, M. Boudiaf, X. Dray, Y. Fargeaudou, K. Vahedi, M. Aout, E. Vicaut, L. Hamzi, and R. Rymer
CT Enteroclysis Features of Uncomplicated Celiac Disease: Retrospective Analysis of 44 Patients
Radiology, November 1, 2009; 253(2): 416 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soyer, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rymer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soyer, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rymer, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS