AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dialani, V.
Right arrow Articles by Boiselle, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dialani, V.
Right arrow Articles by Boiselle, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.4031
AJR 2008; 191:1576-1580
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

MDCT Detection of Airway Stent Complications: Comparison with Bronchoscopy

Vandana Dialani1, Armin Ernst2, Maryellen Sun1, Karen S. Lee1, David Feller-Kopman2, Diana Litmanovich1, Alexander Bankier1 and Phillip M. Boiselle1

1 Center for Airway Imaging, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.
2 Department of Interventional Pulmonary Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Received March 26, 2008; accepted after revision May 19, 2008.

 
Address correspondence to V. Dialani (vdialani{at}bidmc.harvard.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the detection rate of central airway stent complications using MDCT as compared with bronchoscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A review was performed of all consecutive patients undergoing MDCT and bronchoscopy for suspected complications of airway stents during an 18-month period. MDCT images were interpreted in a blinded fashion by an experienced thoracic radiologist before bronchoscopy was performed, and the accuracy of MDCT was determined using bronchoscopy as the gold standard. MDCT images were specifically assessed for the presence of the following complications: narrowing of stent lumen due to granulation tissue or secretions (or both), stent fracture, stent invasion by adjacent neoplasm, stent migration, and perforation of adjacent airways.

RESULTS. The study population was composed of 21 patients, with mean age of 48 years (range, 16–79 years), who underwent tracheal (n = 3), tracheobronchial (n = 7), or bronchial (n = 11) stent placement for benign (n = 13) or malignant (n = 8) airway disorders. Eleven of 21 stents were metallic and the remaining 10 were silicone. Thirty complications were detected in 21 patients, including stent luminal narrowing due to granulation tissue or secretions (or both) (n = 13), stent migration (n = 9), stent fracture (n = 4), stent invasion by adjacent neoplasm (n = 3), and tracheal perforation (n = 1). MDCT accurately detected 29 (97%) of the 30 complications diagnosed by bronchoscopy. There was one false-negative case in which MDCT failed to detect a stent fracture. There were no false-positive diagnoses of stent complications.

CONCLUSION. MDCT is highly accurate for detecting airway stent complications.

Keywords: airway stents • bronchoscopy • interventional radiology • MDCT • stent complications


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Airway stents are commonly used to treat patients with airway obstruction from a variety of malignant and benign disorders [17]. Although airway stents are effective in reducing symptoms, complications are relatively common, particularly with long-term use [1, 4, 8].

Bronchoscopy is currently the reference standard for the detection and treatment of stent complications and usually involves a two-step procedure [4]. Initially, diagnostic bronchoscopy is performed with a flexible bronchoscope to detect and characterize a stent complication; if a treatable complication is detected, rigid bronchoscopy is usually required for therapeutic intervention.

MDCT is a noninvasive imaging alternative to diagnostic bronchoscopy for the detection of stent complications. However, to date, only limited data regarding the accuracy of single-detector helical CT for detecting complications of metallic stents are available [9]. Importantly, clinical practice has shifted to the greater use of silicone stents because of their ease of removal and more favorable complication rate compared with metallic stents [4, 8]. To our knowledge, no prior studies have assessed the accuracy of MDCT for the detection of silicone stent complications.

To determine the role of MDCT in the assessment of airway stents, there is a need to assess its accuracy in a larger series of patients with complications from both silicone and metallic stents. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the MDCT detection rate of airway stent complications using bronchoscopy as the reference standard.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Subjects
Our hospital institutional review board approved the review of radiologic and clinical data for this study. Informed consent was not required for this retrospective analysis, but patient confidentiality was protected. At our institution, all patients who are referred to the interventional pulmonary service routinely undergo MDCT evaluation before bronchoscopy. Using our hospital information system, we identified 31 patients with bronchoscopically proven airway stent complications over an 18-month period. Twenty-one of the 31 patients also underwent MDCT of the airways within 1 week of bronchoscopy and are our study population.

The study cohort included 11 males and 10 females, with a mean age of 48 years (range, 16–79 years). Of the 21 airway stents, three were tracheal, seven were tracheobronchial, and 11 were bronchial in location. Stents were placed for benign airway disorders in 13 patients and for malignant airway disorders in eight patients. Eleven of the 21 stents were metallic (placed for malignancy, n = 7; tracheobronchomalacia, n = 3; postintubation stenosis, n = 1), and the remaining 10 were silicone (placed for malignancy, n = 1; tracheobronchomalacia, n = 7; sarcoidosis n = 1; severe kyphoscoliosis causing tracheal stenosis, n = 1).

MDCT Protocol
All patients underwent the same MDCT protocol on an 8-MDCT scanner (LightSpeed, GE Healthcare) with a gantry rotation time of 0.5 second. The MDCT protocol parameters were as follows: 170 mAs, 120 kVp, 2.5-mm collimation, high-speed mode, and pitch equivalent of 1.5. The CT acquisition focused on the central airways and included the entirety of the trachea and main bronchi. Coronal and sagittal multiplanar volume reformation images, as well as 3D internal and external renderings of the airways, were routinely obtained in all cases.

Analysis of CT and Bronchoscopic Studies
All MDCT images were prospectively reviewed and the results were reported by an experienced thoracic radiologist before bronchoscopy. MDCT images were reviewed on a PACS workstation (Centricity version 2.0, GE Healthcare). The interpreting radiologist was aware of the indication for stent placement and the intended location of the stent but was unaware of the presence of or concern for a specific stent complication.

For each patient's CT scan, the radiologist assessed for stent complications using MDCT criteria previously described in the literature [8]. Stent fracture was defined as discontinuity of the stent wall with or without identification of stent fragments protruding into the airways. Stent migration was defined as a stent position that differed from its intended location. Narrowing of the stent lumen was defined as the presence of a circumferential or polypoid intraluminal soft-tissue density within the stent lumen resulting in > 25% reduction in cross-sectional area. Neoplastic stent invasion was defined as contiguous spread of neoplasm into the affected airway through the stent wall. Airway perforation was defined as disruption of airway wall adjacent to the stent with an associated extraluminal air collection. Stent erosion into adjacent structures was defined as extension of the stent into extratracheobronchial structures.

All patients underwent flexible bronchoscopy performed by an experienced interventional pulmonologist using standard technique [3]. After completion of both MDCT and bronchoscopy, MDCT and bronchoscopic findings were reviewed jointly by the radiologist and bronchoscopist and evaluated for any discrepancies. In this review process, bronchoscopy was considered the reference standard for the diagnosis of airway complications.

Statistical Analysis
The CT detection rate of stent complications was calculated using bronchoscopy as the reference standard. Detection rates were calculated for each individual type of complication rather than on a per-patient basis because some patients had more than one type of airway complication present.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
As shown in Table 1, 30 complications were detected at bronchoscopy in 21 patients. These complications included narrowing of the stent lumen in 13 cases (43%), stent migration in nine (30%) cases, stent fracture in four (13%), stent invasion by adjacent neoplasm in three (10%), and tracheal perforation in one case (3%). MDCT correctly identified 29 (97%) of 30 complications, including all cases of intraluminal narrowing (Fig. 1), stent migration (Fig. 2), invasion by neoplasm (Fig. 3A, 3B), and tracheal perforation (Fig. 4). MDCT also identified three of four cases of stent fracture (Fig. 5A, 5B, 5C).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Stent Complications Detected on MDCT

 

Figure 1
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Intraluminal narrowing due to granulation tissue in metallic stent placed after lung transplantation for anastomotic stenosis in 16-year-old girl. Oblique reformation CT image (bone window) along axis of left main bronchus shows that polypoid soft-tissue density (arrows), which was proven to be granulation tissue response at bronchoscopy, is narrowing airway lumen.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Migrated metallic stent in 61-year-old woman with non–small cell lung carcinoma. Coronal oblique CT image (bone window) shows that proximal aspect of stent (arrow) above carina is extending into adjacent paratracheal soft tissues. Stent has migrated from initial location in proximal right bronchus and is responsible for causing partial collapse of right upper lobe.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A Silicone stent migration and tumor invasion in 41-year-old woman with metastatic non–small cell lung carcinoma. Coronal reformation CT image shows that proximal aspect of stent (arrow) is at carina due to stent migration.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B Silicone stent migration and tumor invasion in 41-year-old woman with metastatic non–small cell lung carcinoma. Axial CT image shows intraluminal soft-tissue density (arrow) at site of disrupted stent that was proven to represent tumor invasion at bronchoscopy. Note collapse of left lung.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Airway perforation due to stent erosion in 76-year-old man with history of non–small cell lung cancer and radiation therapy. Axial CT image (lung window) shows extraluminal gas collection (arrow) contiguous with proximal right main bronchus that was due to contained perforation secondary to metallic stent erosion of lateral bronchial wall.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A Metallic stent fracture in 78-year-old man with non–small cell lung cancer who presented for follow-up after radiation therapy. Coronal reformation CT image (bone window) shows focal disruption (arrow) of proximal aspect of stent with lateral protrusion of fragment. Also note intraluminal granulation tissue. Stent was focally fractured at bronchoscopy.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B Metallic stent fracture in 78-year-old man with non–small cell lung cancer who presented for follow-up after radiation therapy. After removal of metallic stent, coronal CT image was used to provide measurements for custom-designed silicone stent for lower trachea and proximal bronchi.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5C Metallic stent fracture in 78-year-old man with non–small cell lung cancer who presented for follow-up after radiation therapy. Photograph shows custom-designed stent. (Reprinted with permission from Lee KS, Lunn W, Feller-Kopman D, Ernst A, Hatabu H, Boiselle PM. Multislice CT evaluation of airway stents. J Thorac Imaging 2005; 20:81–88 [8])

 

Table 2 lists the frequency of specific complications for the subgroups of patients with metallic and silicone stents. As shown in Table 2, certain complications, such as stent fracture, were seen more frequently with metallic stents, whereas other complications, such as stent migration, were seen more commonly with silicone stents.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Comparison of Complications Between Silicone and Metallic Stents

 

There was a single false-negative diagnosis of metallic stent fracture. Although no abnormality was detected on MDCT in this case, a focal disruption of the stent was observed on bronchoscopic inspection, and the stent was subsequently noted to be fragmented at the time of bronchoscopic removal. After completion of the study, the MDCT images from this case were rereviewed by two radiologists with knowledge of the bronchoscopy findings to determine whether this false-negative case was an error in detection or was a technical limitation of MDCT. The stent disruption was not visible on retrospective review of the axial and multiplanar reformation images. Thus, the false-negative case was defined as a technical limitation of MDCT rather than an observer error. There were no false-positive diagnoses of stent complications.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In this study, MDCT accurately detected 29 (97%) of 30 stent complications, including 28 of 29 common complications and one rare complication of airway perforation. Although airway stenting has become an increasingly popular and effective treatment for central airway obstruction, a rate-limiting factor for the use of stents has been the historically high rate of complications, particularly with long-term use [4, 10, 11]. Because most stent complications are potentially treatable if detected early and because an invasive procedure can potentially be avoided, a noninvasive method, such as MDCT, is needed for stent surveillance.

The most common complications of airway stents reported in the literature are stent migration, luminal narrowing (secondary to granulation tissue formation or adherent secretions around the stent), malignant disease recurrence within the stent, and stent fracture [8, 1214]. Rare complications include airway perforation and stent erosion into adjacent structures [8]. Our results show that CT can accurately detect a broad spectrum of stent complications.

To our knowledge, this study is the first to assess the detection rate of CT for both major types of stents, silicone and metallic (Figs. 6A, 6B and 7A, 7B). The main advantages of silicone stents are that they are easily adjusted and removed, whereas metallic stents are quite difficult to adjust and remove once placed [15]. Metallic stents also have a higher rate of several complications, including fracture, erosion, tumor ingrowth, and granulation tissue response, than silicone stents [15]. Silicone stents are more predisposed to migration than metallic stents [15]. The complication rates for silicone and metallic stents in our study (Table 2) are consistent with these profiles [15].


Figure 9
View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A Normal metallic stent in 45-year-old woman with history of tracheomalacia. Coronal oblique CT image (bone window) shows intact metallic stent (arrow).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B Normal metallic stent in 45-year-old woman with history of tracheomalacia. Photograph shows metallic stent before deployment. (Reprinted with permission from Lee KS, Lunn W, Feller-Kopman D, Ernst A, Hatabu H, Boiselle PM. Multislice CT evaluation of airway stents. J Thorac Imaging 2005; 20:81–88 [8])

 

Figure 11
View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A Normal appearance of silicone stent. Virtual bronchoscopic image shows intraluminal perspective of stent. Note external stud (arrow) that is stabilization device to help prevent dislodgement.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B Normal appearance of silicone stent. Photograph of silicone stent shows numerous external studs.

 
Because of their less favorable complication rate and difficulty of removal, metallic stents are being used less frequently. Indeed, there has been an important shift toward using silicone stents, especially for the treatment of benign disorders and for temporary interventions [15]. This trend will likely continue because the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently issued a warning that the use of metallic stents should be avoided in patients with benign diseases [16]. The FDA warning is specifically targeted at patients with benign disorders for two reasons: First, this population has a greater risk of serious complications compared with patients with malignant disorders because stents are in place for a longer duration in patients with benign disorders due to their longer life expectancy; and, second, the use of metallic stents may preclude them from receiving future alternative therapies such as tracheal surgery.

Ferretti et al. [9] previously compared single-detector helical CT and bronchoscopy in the assessment of 16 metallic stent complications among a series of 28 stents that underwent surveillance by CT. In that series, CT detected all clinically significant abnormalities, but two cases of moderate luminal narrowing due to granulation tissue at the stent origin were missed. These authors concluded that CT should serve as a primary surveillance technique for patients with stents and as a first-line test for suspected stent complications. They emphasized that bronchoscopy is not necessary when CT shows no evidence of stent complication. Importantly, our results confirm the accuracy of MDCT in a larger series (n = 30) of stent complications and also show that MDCT can be used to detect complications of silicone stents, which were not included in their series.

A major impact of our study is that patients with positive MDCT findings of a stent complication can avoid diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy and may go directly to therapeutic rigid bronchoscopy. There are two additional potential benefits to performing MDCT in patients with stent complications: First, MDCT findings can be used to plan the bronchoscopic intervention, thus potentially decreasing the time of the procedure; and, second, if the stent needs to be replaced due to fracture, a custom stent can be designed using measurements obtained from MDCT [8] (Fig. 5A, 5B, 5C). A future study is necessary to quantify these potential benefits.

Although our study was not designed to compare the roles of axial and multiplanar reformation CT images in the assessment of stent complications, we found that reformation images are particularly helpful for aiding in the detection and characterization of certain complications such as stent fracture and migration. We emphasize that axial and reformation CT images should be considered complementary tools in the assessment of airway stents.

Because MDCT is often performed in patients with airway stents for follow-up of an underlying disease process [9], it is important for radiologists to be aware of the accuracy of CT findings for detecting various stent complications. Thus, our results also have a practical application for radiologists interpreting routine MDCT scans of patients with airway stents.

Although to our knowledge our study is the largest series of stent complications imaged by MDCT, we acknowledge that there are relatively few rare complications. In addition, our study was limited to patients with proven stent complications. Because our study was limited to patients with bronchoscopically proven complications, we acknowledge that there may be a bias toward more severe complications. A future surveillance study comparing MDCT and bronchoscopy in a larger cohort of patients with and without stent complications would be helpful to determine the negative predictive value of MDCT and to ensure that the entire range of stent complications is assessed.

In summary, the results of this study show that MDCT is highly accurate for detecting metallic and silicone airway stent complications in comparison with the reference standard of bronchoscopy. MDCT has the potential to replace bronchoscopy for the routine surveillance of patients with airway stents.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Mitsuoka M, Sakuragi T, Itoh T. Clinical benefits and complications of Dumon stent insertion for the treatment of severe central airway stenosis or airway fistula. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2007; 55:275 –280[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Saito Y, Imamura H. Airway stenting. Surg Today 2005; 35:265 –270[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Prakash UB. Advances in bronchoscopic procedures. Chest 1999; 116:1403 –1408[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Wahidi MM, Herth FJ, Ernst A. State of the art: interventional pulmonology. Chest 2007;131 : 261–274[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Walser EM. Stent placement for tracheobronchial disease. Eur J Radiol 2005;55 : 321–330[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Colt HG, Dumon JF. Airway stents: present and future. Clin Chest Med 1995;16 : 465–478[Medline]
  7. Madden BP, Loke TK, Sheth AC. Do expandable metallic airway stents have a role in the management of patients with benign tracheobronchial disease? Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82 : 274–278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lee KS, Lunn W, Feller-Kopman D, Ernst A, Hatabu H, Boiselle PM. Multislice CT evaluation of airway stents. J Thorac Imaging 2005; 20:81 –88[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Ferretti GR, Kocier M, Calaque O, et al. Follow-up after stent insertion in the tracheobronchial tree: role of helical computed tomography in comparison with fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Eur Radiol2003; 13:1172 –1178[Medline]
  10. Wood DE, Liu YH, Vallieres E, Karmy-Jones R, Mulligan MS. Airway stenting for malignant and benign tracheobronchial stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76:167 –174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gaissert HA, Grillo HC, Wright CD, Donahue DM, Wain JC, Mathisen DJ. Complication of benign tracheobronchial strictures by self-expanding metal stents. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126 : 744–747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Saad CP, Murthy S, Krizmanich G, Mehta AC. Self-expandable metallic airway stents and flexible bronchoscopy: long-term outcomes analysis. Chest 2003; 124:1993 –1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Wood D. Airway stenting. Chest Surg Clin North Am 2003; 13:211 –229[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Zakaluzny SA, Lane JD, Mair EA. Complications of tracheobronchial airway stents. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2003; 128:478 –488[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Ernst A, Feller-Kopman D, Becker HD, Mehta A. Central airway obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2004; 169:1278 –1297[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. FDA Website. FDA public health notification: complications from metallic tracheal stents in patients with benign airway disorders. www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/072905-tracheal.html. Published July 29, 2005. Accessed March 11, 2008

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Kim, J. H. Shin, H.-Y. Song, J.-Y. Ohm, J. M. Lee, D. H. Lee, and S.-W. Kim
Palliative Treatment of Inoperable Malignant Tracheobronchial Obstruction: Temporary Stenting Combined With Radiation Therapy and/or Chemotherapy
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2009; 193(1): W38 - W42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dialani, V.
Right arrow Articles by Boiselle, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dialani, V.
Right arrow Articles by Boiselle, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS