AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taouli, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taouli, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.4027
AJR 2009; 192:450-454
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Characterization of Adrenal Pheochromocytoma Using Respiratory-Triggered Proton MR Spectroscopy: Initial Experience

Sooah Kim1, Nouha Salibi2, Andrew D. Hardie1,3, Jian Xu2, Ruth P. Lim1, Vivian S. Lee1 and Bachir Taouli1

1 Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, 530 First Ave., MRI, New York, NY 10016.
2 Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, PA.
3 Present address: Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Received March 25, 2008; accepted after revision August 19, 2008.

 
N. Salibi and J. Xu are employees of Siemens Medical Solutions.

Address correspondence to B. Taouli (bachir.taouli{at}nyumc.org).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of respiratory-triggered proton single-voxel MR spectroscopy for the diagnosis of adrenal pheochromocytoma and to determine whether certain spectral resonances detected on single-voxel MR spectroscopy are specific for adrenal pheochromocytomas compared with adrenal adenomas.

CONCLUSION. Adrenal pheochromocytomas have a unique MR spectral signature, showing 6.8 ppm resonance that is not seen in adenomas. This unique spectral signature may be attributed to the presence of catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites that are abundant in pheochromocytomas.

Keywords: adenoma • adrenal gland neoplasms • catecholamine • MR spectroscopy • pheochromocytoma


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Adrenal pheochromocytomas are rare catecholamine-secreting tumors derived from chromaffin cells. These tumors carry a high risk of cardiac arrhythmia and malignant hypertension. Therefore, a correct, noninvasive preoperative diagnosis is important. Pheochromocytomas have a variable imaging appearance, which is often nonspecific, and thus no one imaging method has been universally advocated for diagnosis. Proton MR spectroscopy has been used extensively to investigate tumor metabolism in other organ systems, such as the brain and prostate. Published studies regarding the use of MR spectroscopy for the characterization of adrenal gland masses are limited [1, 2] and, to our knowledge, no study has yet used a respiratory-triggered spectroscopy technique to reduce motion-related artifacts.

The purpose of our study was to show the feasibility of respiratory-triggered proton single-voxel MR spectroscopy for characterizing adrenal pheochromocytomas on the basis of their metabolic content.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patient Population
This HIPAA-compliant prospective study was performed with the approval of our institutional review board. Written informed con sent was obtained from each patient before the study. Six consecutive patients (two men and four women; mean age, 48.8 years; age range, 31–68 years) with adrenal masses > 2.0 cm in maximum diameter underwent MRI and respiratory-triggered single-voxel MR spectroscopy at our institution. The final diagnosis was based on the presence of fat on in-phase and out-of-phase imaging for adenoma and histopathology for pheochromocytoma.

MRI
MRI of the adrenal glands was performed us ing two different 1.5-T clinical scanners (Magnetom Sonata and Magnetom Symphony, Siemens Medical Solutions) and body phased-array coils (6-element matrix coil). The routine adrenal MRI protocol included the following breath-hold sequences: axial gradient-echo T1-weighted in-phase and out-of-phase imaging, coronal T2 HASTE, axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging, and 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted interpolated spoiled gradient-echo imaging. At our institution, patients with adrenal masses receive IV contrast material only in cases of non-fat-containing lesions.

An MR spectroscopy sequence (1H MR spectroscopy) was added to the routine MRI protocol and was performed before any contrast administration to avoid possible spectral changes caused by contrast material [3, 4]. Proton single-voxel MR spectroscopy was performed using a respiratory-triggered double spin-echo sequence combined with a navigator-echo 2D prospective acquisition correction (PACE, Siemens Medical Solutions). The 2D PACE technique uses respiratory triggering to the end-expiration phase of the respiratory cycle by tracking the motion of the diaphragm. Spectral data were acquired with and without water suppression. As determined by the respiratory cycle, the average TR was approximately 4,500 milliseconds. The remaining measurement parameters were TE, 30 milliseconds; 32 averages; 1,024 data points; bandwidth, 1,000 Hz; acquisition time, 3–4 minutes. Automated 3D shimming was performed followed by manual shimming as needed. The spectroscopic voxel (ranging from 8 to 27 cm3) was positioned by one of the authors within the adrenal mass on the basis of a combination of the 3-plane unenhanced images (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C).


Figure 1
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 64-year-old woman with right adrenal pheochromocytoma. Single-voxel MR spectroscopy sequence using 3-plane reference images shows placement of 8 cm3 voxel (lines) in center of adrenal mass, avoiding contamination from retroperitoneal fat.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 64-year-old woman with right adrenal pheochromocytoma. Single-voxel MR spectroscopy sequence using 3-plane reference images shows placement of 8 cm3 voxel (lines) in center of adrenal mass, avoiding contamination from retroperitoneal fat.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 64-year-old woman with right adrenal pheochromocytoma. Single-voxel MR spectroscopy sequence using 3-plane reference images shows placement of 8 cm3 voxel (lines) in center of adrenal mass, avoiding contamination from retroperitoneal fat.

 

Although data were collected with the patient breathing freely, the spectra of 2D PACE single-voxel MR spectroscopy allowed detection of small metabolic resonances by minimizing the effects of respiratory motion and by allowing the collection of data with more averages than allowed within a breath-holding measurement. As a result, small metabolite signals were better seen against the reduced background noise. Breath-hold single-voxel MR spectroscopy of the abdomen is usually adequate only for measuring large signals such as water and fat.

Spectroscopic Data Analysis
Spectroscopic data were processed using commercially available software (Syngo, Siemens Medical Solutions) by one of the authors. Processing included zero filling, multiplication by a gaussian filter with < 1-Hz line broadening, Fourier transformation, and phase and baseline corrections. Automated curve fitting yielded peak height, line width, and integral value. All spectral analysis was performed in the range of 0–9.0 ppm. This includes the range downfield from water (> 4.7 ppm), which is not routinely evaluated on in vivo MR spectroscopy. Assignment of spectral resonances from 2D PACE single-voxel 1H MR spectroscopy was based on the knowledge that catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites are elevated in the blood serum and urine of patients with pheochromocytoma because of a significant contribution from catecholamine metabolism within the tumor itself [5]. This led to the investigation of a possible correlation between the spectral resonances expected from the chemical structure of catecholamines (dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine), catecholamine metabolites (metanephrine and normetanephrine) (Fig. 2), and the resonances in the measured pheochromocytoma spectra. Further correlation was made with catecholamine and metabolite spectra published in the Human Metabolome Database [6]. In addition, known lipid resonances were determined in the analysis window in the range of 1.0–2.0 ppm [7].


Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Diagrams show chemical structure of catecholamines (dopamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine) and their metabolites (metanephrine, normetanephrine) [6].

 


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Three pheochromocytomas and three fat-containing adenomas (mean lesion diameter, 3.6 cm; range, 2.9–5.5 cm) were present in six patients. The pheochromocytomas were all histopathologically proven after surgical resection. The fat-containing adenomas were diagnosed on the basis of typical MRI findings on T1 in-phase and out-of-phase gradient-echo imaging [8, 9].

Clinical and Laboratory Findings
The details on the three patients with pheochromocytomas are as follows: Patient number 1 was a 42-year-old man with a 5.5-cm left adrenal pheochromocytoma. He had elevated serum dopamine (25 pg/mL; normal range, 0–20 pg/mL), epinephrine (1,188 pg/mL; normal range, 10–200 pg/mL), norepinephrine (1,497 pg/mL; normal range, 50–520 pg/mL), and 24-hour urine metanephrine (1,832 µg/24 hr; normal range, 35–460 µg/24 hr).

Patient number 2 was a 31-year-old woman with a 3.6-cm left adrenal pheochromocytoma. She had elevated 24-hour urine metanephrine (486 µg/24 hr), normetanephrine (5,433 µg/24 hr; normal range, 50–650 µg/24 hr), and vanillyl-mandelic acid (31.8 mg/24 hr; normal range 0.0–7.0 mg/24 hr). This patient underwent 131I metaiodobenzylguanidine scanning 1 week after MRI, which was positive for a left adrenal pheochromocytoma.


Figure 5
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A Water-suppressed spectra acquired with respiratory-triggered proton single-voxel MR spectroscopy sequence (TR/TE, 4,500/30; 32 averages). Images from three patients with pheochromocytoma (42-year-old man [A], 31-year-old woman [B], and 64-year-old woman [C]) and three patients with adrenal adenoma (42-year-old man [D], 68-year-old woman [E], and 46-year-old woman [F]) show lipid resonances between 0 and 2.0 ppm. Pheochromocytoma spectra include characteristic resonances at 2.7, 3.16, 3.8, and particularly at 6.8 ppm (arrows, AC) that may be explained by contributions from various chemical groups of catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites. Residual water peak at 4.7 ppm in spectra of AC was used as reference. In spectrum of F, patient motion has affected shim and water suppression.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B Water-suppressed spectra acquired with respiratory-triggered proton single-voxel MR spectroscopy sequence (TR/TE, 4,500/30; 32 averages). Images from three patients with pheochromocytoma (42-year-old man [A], 31-year-old woman [B], and 64-year-old woman [C]) and three patients with adrenal adenoma (42-year-old man [D], 68-year-old woman [E], and 46-year-old woman [F]) show lipid resonances between 0 and 2.0 ppm. Pheochromocytoma spectra include characteristic resonances at 2.7, 3.16, 3.8, and particularly at 6.8 ppm (arrows, AC) that may be explained by contributions from various chemical groups of catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites. Residual water peak at 4.7 ppm in spectra of AC was used as reference. In spectrum of F, patient motion has affected shim and water suppression.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C Water-suppressed spectra acquired with respiratory-triggered proton single-voxel MR spectroscopy sequence (TR/TE, 4,500/30; 32 averages). Images from three patients with pheochromocytoma (42-year-old man [A], 31-year-old woman [B], and 64-year-old woman [C]) and three patients with adrenal adenoma (42-year-old man [D], 68-year-old woman [E], and 46-year-old woman [F]) show lipid resonances between 0 and 2.0 ppm. Pheochromocytoma spectra include characteristic resonances at 2.7, 3.16, 3.8, and particularly at 6.8 ppm (arrows, AC) that may be explained by contributions from various chemical groups of catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites. Residual water peak at 4.7 ppm in spectra of AC was used as reference. In spectrum of F, patient motion has affected shim and water suppression.

 


Figure 8
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D Water-suppressed spectra acquired with respiratory-triggered proton single-voxel MR spectroscopy sequence (TR/TE, 4,500/30; 32 averages). Images from three patients with pheochromocytoma (42-year-old man [A], 31-year-old woman [B], and 64-year-old woman [C]) and three patients with adrenal adenoma (42-year-old man [D], 68-year-old woman [E], and 46-year-old woman [F]) show lipid resonances between 0 and 2.0 ppm. Pheochromocytoma spectra include characteristic resonances at 2.7, 3.16, 3.8, and particularly at 6.8 ppm (arrows, AC) that may be explained by contributions from various chemical groups of catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites. Residual water peak at 4.7 ppm in spectra of AC was used as reference. In spectrum of F, patient motion has affected shim and water suppression.

 


Figure 9
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3E Water-suppressed spectra acquired with respiratory-triggered proton single-voxel MR spectroscopy sequence (TR/TE, 4,500/30; 32 averages). Images from three patients with pheochromocytoma (42-year-old man [A], 31-year-old woman [B], and 64-year-old woman [C]) and three patients with adrenal adenoma (42-year-old man [D], 68-year-old woman [E], and 46-year-old woman [F]) show lipid resonances between 0 and 2.0 ppm. Pheochromocytoma spectra include characteristic resonances at 2.7, 3.16, 3.8, and particularly at 6.8 ppm (arrows, AC) that may be explained by contributions from various chemical groups of catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites. Residual water peak at 4.7 ppm in spectra of AC was used as reference. In spectrum of F, patient motion has affected shim and water suppression.

 


Figure 10
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3F Water-suppressed spectra acquired with respiratory-triggered proton single-voxel MR spectroscopy sequence (TR/TE, 4,500/30; 32 averages). Images from three patients with pheochromocytoma (42-year-old man [A], 31-year-old woman [B], and 64-year-old woman [C]) and three patients with adrenal adenoma (42-year-old man [D], 68-year-old woman [E], and 46-year-old woman [F]) show lipid resonances between 0 and 2.0 ppm. Pheochromocytoma spectra include characteristic resonances at 2.7, 3.16, 3.8, and particularly at 6.8 ppm (arrows, AC) that may be explained by contributions from various chemical groups of catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites. Residual water peak at 4.7 ppm in spectra of AC was used as reference. In spectrum of F, patient motion has affected shim and water suppression.

 
Patient number 3 was a 64-year-old-woman with a 4.7-cm right adrenal pheochromocytoma. Her laboratory workup was performed at an outside institution and was not available for review.

Single-Voxel MR Spectroscopy Findings
All three pheochromocytomas showed a unique spectral signature, with the most distinct and prominent resonance identified at 6.8 ppm (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F). Other common resonances were identified at 2.7, 3.16, and 3.8 ppm.

A residual water resonance was displayed as a reference at 4.7 ppm and lipid resonances in the 0–2.0 ppm range. The resonances at 2.7, 3.16, 3.8, and 6.8 ppm may be explained by the presence of elevated levels of catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites within the tumor (see Discussion); however, it was not possible to attribute any individual resonance to one particular substance or to quantify individual concentrations.

Spectra from the three adenomas with suppressed water had only lipid resonances in the range of 0–2.0 ppm (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F). A large residual water peak was present in patient number 3. The adenomas did not have any of the additional resonances detected in the pheochromocytoma spectra.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In this small series, we report a unique spectral signature of pheochromocytoma using a 2D PACE single-voxel MR spectroscopy sequence, which, to our knowledge, has never before been reported in vivo. We hypothesize that these resonances could be attributed to signals from aromatic (6.8 ppm) and methyl and methylene protons (2.7, 3.16, and 3.8 ppm) as configured in the chemical structure of catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites. These signals are increased in the plasma and urine of patients with pheochromocytomas and are present in the tumors. Previous studies have reported that elevated catecholamine metabolites in urine and plasma result mostly from catecholamine metabolism within the tumor, where these levels would be expected to be orders of magnitude higher than the elevated plasma levels [5].

All catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites have a structure that consists of an aromatic ring with attached hydroxyl or O-methylated (-O-CH3) groups and a side chain of ethylamine (as in dopamine) or hydroxyethylamine (as in epinephrine, norepinephrine, metanephrine, and normetanephrine). Various substitutions on the amine group (Fig. 2) and on the aromatic ring account for differences in their spectra and in the relative intensities of the various resonances. For example, as a result of the methylated amine group (-HN-CH3) in epinephrine and metanephrine, a methyl proton resonance at 2.7 ppm is seen in the epinephrine and metanephrine spectra. This resonance is missing from the spectra of norepinephrine and normetanephrine, which have a primary amine group instead of a methylated amine group at the same position.

Similarly, metanephrine and normetanephrine have an -O-CH3 group attached directly to the aromatic ring at the same position as the hydroxyl group in the catecholamine structures. This explains the resonance at 3.8 ppm seen in the metabolite spectra but not in the catecholamine spectra. Resonances at 6.8 ppm from the aromatic ring protons and at 3.16 ppm from the CH2 protons in the side chain are common to all catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites. Smaller resonances from the remaining hydroxyl and amine protons may not always be detected in vivo but may be seen in ex vivo high-field spectra [6]. In addition, resonances that are multiplets in ex vivo high-field spectra are not resolved in vivo with the 1.5-T clinical scanners and present as single peaks.

Although further studies are needed, the presence of catecholamine in amounts detectable by single-voxel MR spectroscopy within an adrenal mass is likely to be a unique property of pheochromocytoma.

Adrenal masses are often detected incidentally using cross-sectional imaging. The incidence of pheochromocytoma presenting as an adrenal incidentaloma is low, estimated to be 3.2% in a prior study (36 of 1,111) [10]. However, although MRI has been shown to be accurate in differentiating adrenal adenomas from metastases, MRI is less accurate in differentiating pheochromocytoma from other adrenal lesions, with reported sensitivity of 64.7% and specificity of 88.0% in a prior study [11]. Currently, screening tests for pheochromocytoma in the presence of an adrenal incidentaloma include assessment of the plasma-free metanephrine and urinary fractionated metanephrine, although other tests are often used [12]. In patients with an adrenal mass, sometimes this method is unable to exclude a nonfunctioning pheochromocytoma. Therefore, a highly specific, noninvasive imaging diagnosis would be of great utility. It is particularly important to be able to diagnose pheochromocytoma before intervention (biopsy or surgery) because the patients are at significant cardiovascular risk during interventions due to the release of catecholamine metabolites into the blood. Because MRI already is often used as part of the diagnostic workup of adrenal incidentalomas, the addition of single-voxel MR spectroscopy to conventional MRI sequences is quick and may provide improved diagnostic accuracy. Although our study was performed only for adrenal lesions, this technique may potentially be applicable for the diagnosis of extraadrenal catecholamine-secreting paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. A definitive characterization of catecholamine-producing tumors, whether hypersecreting or subclinical, could prove valuable in preoperative evaluation.

To date, MR spectroscopy studies on adrenal masses are extremely limited. Leroy-Willig et al. [1] applied single-voxel MR spectroscopy using a modified Dixon method [13] for the differentiation of adrenal masses (n = 22) by measuring lipid content to distinguish adrenal adenoma from adrenocortical carcinoma. The authors reported a mean percentage of lipids in adenomas of 13.4%, significantly higher compared with carcinomas (3.5%). A recent study [2] assessed the spectra and metabolic ratios of a large number of adrenal masses (n = 60, including 10 pheochromocytomas) using point-resolved multi-voxel proton MR spectroscopy performed during free breathing. The authors described cutoff values of choline/creatine and choline/lipid ratios to distinguish adenomas and pheochromocytomas from carcinomas and metastases. Although their study showed that 4.0–4.3 ppm/creatine ratios greater than 1.50 proved to be useful for differentiating pheochromocytomas from adenomas (with 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity), the authors were not able to distinguish pheochromocytomas from carcinomas using this criterion. In contrast to these results, we did not identify resonances either at 4.0–4.3 ppm or creatine resonance at 3.08 ppm in our pheochromocytoma and adenoma patients. Three adenomas in our study showed only lipid resonances in the 0–2.0 ppm range. Hence, we were not able to apply the resonance ratios suggested by this prior study to our population. In addition, this prior study did not specifically correlate the metabolic resonances obtained with spectroscopy with nuclear MR data of each catecholamine and its metabolites in pheochromocytomas and, most important, did not evaluate the spectra beyond 5.0 ppm.

Our study has several limitations. First, we report only a small number of cases. Second, other adrenal masses, such as metastases and carcinomas, were not assessed. Third, in this preliminary clinical study, no correlation was made between the levels of catecholamines in tumors based on single-voxel MR spectroscopy and catecholamine levels in blood and urine.

In conclusion, our study shows the potential usefulness of 2D respiratory-triggered single-voxel MR spectroscopy in characterizing pheochromocytomas that show several resonances, with a highly distinct prominent resonance at 6.8 ppm that may be attributed to catecholamines and catecholamine metabolites. On the basis of our results, it is important to analyze spectral data beyond the water resonance. Further evaluation could be performed in a larger series to determine the sensitivity and specificity of single-voxel MR spectroscopy for characterizing pheochromocytomas.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Leroy-Willig A, Bittoun J, Luton JP, et al. In vivo MR spectroscopic imaging of the adrenal glands: distinction between adenomas and carcinomas larger than 15 mm based on lipid content. AJR 1989; 153:771 –773[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Faria JF, Goldman SM, Szejnfeld J, et al. Adrenal masses: characterization with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy—initial experience. Radiology 2007;245 : 788–797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sijens PE, van den Bent MJ, Nowak PJ, van Dijk P, Oudkerk M. 1H chemical shift imaging reveals loss of brain tumor choline signal after administration of Gd-contrast. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37:222 –225[Medline]
  4. Joe BN, Chen VY, Salibi N, Fuangtharntip P, Hildebolt CF, Bae KT. Evaluation of 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer pre- and postgadolinium administration. Invest Radiol2005; 40:405 –411[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Eisenhofer G, Kopin IJ, Goldstein DS. Catecholamine metabolism: a contemporary view with implications for physiology and medicine. Pharmacol Rev 2004;56 : 331–349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Wishart D. Human metabolome database. Metabolomics Toolbox Website. www.hmdb.ca. Accessed December 9, 2008
  7. Longo R, Pollesello P, Ricci C, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy in quantitative in vivo determination of fat content in human liversteatosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5 : 281–285[Medline]
  8. Mitchell DG, Crovello M, Matteucci T, Petersen RO, Miettinen MM. Benign adrenocortical masses: diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185 : 345–351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bilbey JH, McLoughlin RF, Kurkjian PS, et al. MR imaging of adrenal masses: value of chemical-shift imaging for distinguishing adenomas from other tumors. AJR 1995;164 : 637–642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kasperlik-Zaluska AA, Roslonowska E, Slowinska-Srzednicka J, et al. 1,111 patients with adrenal incidentalomas observed at a single endocrinological center: incidence of chromaffin tumors. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006; 1073:38 –46[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Varghese JC, Hahn PF, Papanicolaou N, Mayo-Smith WW, Gaa JA, Lee MJ. MR differentiation of phaeochromocytoma from other adrenal lesions based on qualitative analysis of T2 relaxation times. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:603 –606[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Lenders JW, Pacak K, Walther MM, et al. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best? JAMA2002; 287:1427 –1434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dixon WT. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1984;153 : 189–194[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taouli, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taouli, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS