AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dinter, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Michaely, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dinter, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Michaely, H. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1814
AJR 2009; 193:234-240
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Peripheral Bolus-Chase MR Angiography: Analysis of Risk Factors for Nondiagnostic Image Quality of the Calf Vessels—A Combined Retrospective and Prospective Study

Dietmar J. Dinter1, K. Wolfgang Neff1, Giovanni Visciani1, Ricarda Lachmann2, Christel Weiss3, Stefan O. Schoenberg1 and Henrik J. Michaely1

1 Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
2 Department of Radiology, Catholic Hospital, Koblenz, Germany.
3 Department of Medical Statistics, Biomathematics, and Information Technology, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Received September 11, 2008; accepted after revision October 14, 2008.

 
H. J. Michaely is a consultant to Bayer HealthCare. D. J. Dinter and K. W. Neff contributed equally to this study.

Address correspondence to H. J. Michaely (Henrik.Michaely{at}umm.de).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the influence of endogenous and exogenous risk factors on the rate of nondiagnostic examinations of the calves in peripheral bolus-chase MR angiography (MRA).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Peripheral bolus-chase MRA runoff studies in 177 patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) were retrospectively assessed with regard to the rate of nondiagnostic image quality due to substantial venous overlay in the calf arteries requiring repeated MRA examinations. Logistic regression was used to analyze the rate of nondiagnostic MRA examinations as a function of several endogenous and exogenous risk factors and of the stage of PAOD. To probe the retrospective data, 22 consecutive patients were prospectively included and underwent a standard peripheral MRA examination if the probability of a nondiagnostic examination was less than 50% based on the results of logistic regression; otherwise, a hybrid MRA examination was ordered.

RESULTS. Nondiagnostic image quality of the calf arteries was found in 53 patients (30%). The incidence increased with each stage of PAOD up to 39% for stage IV. For each increase in the stage of PAOD, the probability of nondiagnostic image quality increased by a factor of 1.5561 (p = 0.0024). With an increasing number of risk factors, a significantly (p = 0.0074) higher rate of nondiagnostic images was found.

CONCLUSION. Based on the retrospective statistical analysis of PAOD stages and risk factors, selected patients can be triaged to undergo a specific hybrid MRA technique and thus circumvent the occurrence of nondiagnostic images and the need for repeated MRA examinations.

Keywords: MR angiography • peripheral arterial occlusive disease • peripheral vessels • runoff study • second injection • venous overlay


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
With the introduction of bolus-chase techniques, 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) of the lower extremity has continuously evolved into a standard clinical examination for assessing peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) and has largely replaced invasive diagnostic angiography [1-4]. The main advantages of 3D CE-MRA are the lack of ionizing radiation, well-tolerated contrast agents, and user-independent depiction of the leg vasculature. In comparison with CT angiography (CTA), which has benefited significantly from the introduction of fast MDCT scanners, 3D CE-MRA provides images with superior contrast and no disturbing overlay from bone or calcified plaques. This capability promotes better interobserver agreement for peripheral 3D CE-MRA images than for peripheral CTA images [5]. In addition, the reported overall accuracy of this method is higher than the accuracy of CTA or Doppler ultrasound [6]. In a meta-analysis, the overall sensitivity and specificity of 3D CE-MRA were determined to be 96.2% and 94.5%, respectively [7].

A technically adequate MRA examination is the prerequisite for such excellent results. Most commonly, a bolus-chase technique is used. Here, MRA acquisitions are performed consecutively at several anatomic levels from the body toward the periphery [3]. More recently, with the advent of whole-body MR scanners, runoff studies have been integrated into a whole-body MRA examination [8, 9]. Bolus-chase techniques are technically relatively easy to apply and require only a single injection of contrast agent. However, their main limitation is the high probability of substantial venous overlay in the calf station, particularly in patients with advanced stages of PAOD or in diabetic patients. Therefore, several solutions have been presented to overcome this limitation. Venous return can be reduced by placing a pressure cuff around the patient's thighs [10] or by adjusting the scanning parameters to better match the movement of the table with the flow of the contrast agent down the patient's legs [11]. Another solution is to change the MRA acquisition scheme to a so-called "hybrid approach" in which images are acquired at the calf station first after the initial contrast administration. After a second injection of contrast medium, the remaining parts of the peripheral vessels are imaged using a bolus-chase approach [12].


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Schematic flowchart of study. PAOD = peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

 
The hybrid technique allows high-quality 3D CE-MRA of the calf station without venous overlay, but it is technically more demanding, is more time consuming, and requires more contrast agent than the standard technique. However, no objective criteria have been established to date for assigning patients to a specific MRA technique. Investigators have reported in the literature that infections of the lower limb and ulcers, particularly in diabetic patients, may cause increased and early venous return in the affected limb [13]. In previous studies, the effects of cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension and a history of smoking, on the venous signal in peripheral MRA were investigated [13, 14]. The influence of other typical cardiovascular risk factors, such as hyperlipoproteinemia, and of the degree of PAOD on image quality has not been investigated. Furthermore, in previous studies investigators analyzed the influence of risk factors separately.

Currently, no evidence-based recommendations are available to identify patients who are more likely to require a hybrid technique MRA or those who need standard bolus-chase MRA. Therefore, the aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze the individual risk factors for producing images of nondiagnostic quality due to substantial venous overlay and to prospectively probe the findings of this retrospective analysis.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients and Study Design
Institutional review board approval was obtained for this combined retrospective and prospective study. For the retrospective part of the study, the MRA data of 177 consecutive inpatients (104 men and 73 women; mean age, 68.1 ± 11.0 [SD] years) who underwent a peripheral MRA study between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2005, were included. Because at the time of the study the possible link between nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) and the administration of gadolinium chelates was not known, the exact estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was not determined using the formula established by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study and all patients underwent an MR examination. Before the MR examination, the PAOD stage was assessed by the referring physician on the basis of the ultrasound and clinical findings. Of 177 patients, 14 (8%) had no PAOD. PAOD stage I was present in 11 patients (6%); stage II, in 65 patients (37%); stage III, in 18 patients (10%); and stage IV, in 69 patients (39%).

For the prospective part of the study, 22 consecutive inpatients (14 men and eight women; mean age, 71.7 ± 9.3 years) were included between July 11, 2007, and March 20, 2008, after providing informed consent. Patients with an estimated GFR of less than 30 mL/min (MDRD study formula) were excluded from the prospective study to prevent the development of NSF. A standard bolus-chase MRA with a single injection of contrast agent, as described earlier, was prescribed when the probability of obtaining nondiagnostic image quality as based on the retrospective data analysis was less than 50%; a hybrid MRA was chosen when the probability for venous overlay was calculated to be higher than 50%. A flowchart of the study is presented in Figure 1.

Determination of Risk Factors and Image Evaluation
For all patients, the presence and the maximum degree of PAOD as determined by the referring clinician were registered according to the Fontaine lower limb ischemia classification: stage 0, no PAOD; I, mild claudication and patient can complete treadmill exercise; II, moderate claudication; III, severe claudication and patient cannot complete treadmill exercise; and IV, ischemic rest pain. On the basis of the patients' medical files, the presence of established cardiovascular risk factors was determined and entered into an electronic score sheet in a dichotomous way (0, risk factor not present; 1, risk factor present). Complete medical records were available for 132 of the 177 patients.

The American Heart Association (AHA)-acknowledged causative risk factors for cardiovascular disease—that is, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipoproteinemia, and cigarette smoking—were chosen as endogenous risk factors [15]. Other endogenous risk factors included the following concomitant diseases: acute renal failure, chronic renal failure, osteomyelitis, phlegmon of the feet and calves, the presence of arterial bypasses, and the presence of allogenic material such as stents or bypass grafts. Concomitant medications were considered exogenous risk factors and included insulin, antihypertensive drugs, aspirin, statins, and coumarin. The endogenous risk factors chosen were based on AHA recommendations [15], results from previous studies [13, 14], and results from the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) study [16]. They represent medications commonly administered to patients with PAOD that might alter the hemodynamics. All data were entered into a digital score sheet using Excel (Excel 2003, Microsoft).

For the prospective part of this study, the image quality of the calf station was evaluated by two radiologists (10 and 7 years of experience in vascular MRI) in consensus. The aforementioned Likert scale was used.

MR Protocol and Image Analysis
All MR examinations were performed on an 8-channel 1.5-T MR scanner (Magnetom Sonata Maestro Class, Siemens Healthcare) equipped with a high-performance gradient system with a maximum amplitude of 40 mT/m and a slew rate of 200 mT/m/ms using a dedicated circularly polarized peripheral coil.

According to the protocol, localizing sequences and mask images were acquired before the contrast agent was administered. An automated injector pump (Spectris, Medrad) was used to inject contrast agent at a dose of 0.2 mmol/kg of body weight. Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Bayer Schering Pharma) was injected at a flow rate of 2 mL/s and was followed by a 30-mL saline chaser at the same flow rate through a standard 18-gauge needle placed in an antecubital vein. A fluoroscopic triggering technique in the coronal direction was applied to detect the arrival of the contrast agent bolus at the level of the renal arteries. Immediately after the contrast medium was visible at this level, three-station bolus-chase MRA of the lower extremity was manually started. For all three stations, fast 3D spoiled gradient-echo sequences were used. The exact sequence parameters are given in Table 1. All MRA examinations were supervised by an attending physician with 10 years of experience in vascular imaging.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 : Acquisition Parameters for the Bolus-Chase MR Angiography

 

After the MRA acquisition, the quality of the MRA examination in the calf station was assessed using a 4-point Likert-type scale, with 1 representing nondiagnostic (complete venous overlay precluding diagnostic reading); 2, moderate (moderate venous overlay hampering but not precluding diagnostic reading); 3, good (minimal venous enhancement not interfering with diagnostic reading); and 4, very good (no venous enhancement). When the image quality was nondiagnostic at the calf station—that is, a Likert score of 1—the attending radiologist ordered a repeated focused MRA acquisition of the calf station. A repeated MRA examination was also ordered if images of only one side were nondiagnostic. This MRA examination was repeated during the same session at least 10 minutes after the initial contrast injection using the same sequence.

For the second MRA examination, a bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine was administered at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight. Fluoroscopic triggering was performed at the level of the popliteal artery to ensure that bolus arrival was correctly synchronized with the acquisition of k-space center. The total contrast agent dose for the repeated MRA examination together with the initial MRA examination was 0.3 mmol/kg of body weight of gadopentetate dimeglumine.

For the prospective part of the study, the same sequences with parameters identical to those in the retrospective study were used. After determining the number of endogenous and exogenous risk factors, an attending physician (10 or 7 years of experience in vascular imaging) decided if a standard bolus-chase MRA examination or if a hybrid MRA examination of the lower extremities should be prescribed.

A standard bolus-chase MRA with a single injection of contrast agent, as described earlier, was performed when the probability of obtaining nondiagnostic image quality due to substantial venous overlay based on the retrospective data analysis was less than 50%; otherwise, hybrid MRA was chosen. The hybrid MRA images at the calf station were acquired first after administering the bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg of body weight) with a flow rate of 2 mL/s followed by a 30-mL saline chaser. Fluoroscopic triggering was performed at the level of the popliteal artery to ensure that bolus arrival was correctly synchronized with the acquisition of k-space center. Images of the pelvic and thigh stations were then acquired as described earlier, resulting in a total dose of 0.3 mmol/kg of body weight of gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 13.0, SPSS) and SAS (release 9.01, SAS Institute) software. The incidence of repeated MRA acquisition was determined with regard to the presence of various risk factors and the stage of PAOD. To compare the two groups regarding different risk factors, the chi-square test was used. In addition, odds ratios for a required second contrast agent injection were calculated separately based on the stage of PAOD and the number of risk factors. Furthermore, as a multiple statistical model, logistic regression with stepwise selection was applied to identify risk factors and covariates associated with the need for a second injection. Effects with a p value of less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. The results of the image analysis for the prospective study are presented as medians because of their ordinal nature.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
All MRA acquisitions were acquired without any technical problems. An example of diagnostic image quality is shown in Figure 2. An example of nondiagnostic image quality in the calf arteries that required a repeated MRA acquisition is shown in Figures 3A, and 3B. Nondiagnostic MRA examinations occurred in 53 patients (30%): 28 (53%) were men and 25 (47%), women. There was no significant association between patient sex and the prevalence of nondiagnostic MRA examinations of the calf arteries (p = 0.2950, chi-square test).


Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Composed full-thickness maximum-intensity-projection image of runoff study shows optimal image quality in 62-year-old woman with two risk factors.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 59-year-old man with four risk factors. Composed full-thickness maximum-intensity-projection image of runoff study shows high degree of venous contamination (arrows) that resulted in nondiagnostic image quality in initial MR angiography (MRA) examination.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 59-year-old man with four risk factors. In repeated MRA examination, good image quality at calf station makes it possible to assess peripheral arteries without venous overlay.

 
Influence of PAOD Stage
The incidence of nondiagnostic images due to substantial venous overlay increased with increasing stage of PAOD, as shown in Table 2. A repeated MRA examination was ordered in two (14%) of 14 patients with PAOD. Using the logistic regression model, an odds ratio of 1.561 was found for a repeated MRA examination: With each aggravation in the stage of PAOD, the probability of a nondiagnostic MRA examination of the calf arteries increased by a factor of 1.561 (p = 0.0024).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 : Rate of Repeated MR Angiography Examinations in 177 Patients by Stage of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease (PAOD)

 

Influence of Endogenous Risk Factors
Hypertension was the only single risk factor for which a statistically significant increase was found in the rate of nondiagnostic MRA examinations of the calf arteries. In patients without hypertension, nondiagnostic MRA examination of the calf arteries was present in 11% (3/27 patients), whereas among those with hypertension, image quality was nondiagnostic in 32% (34/105 patients) (p = 0.0282). A detailed overview of all risk factors is shown in Table 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 : Influence of Different Risk Factors in 132 Patients

 

Influence of Exogenous Risk Factors
There were no major differences among the different types of medications being analyzed in this study and the number of nondiagnostic MRA examinations of the calf arteries. With all drugs studied, the rate of nondiagnostic MRA examinations of the calf arteries was between 22% (coumarin) and 30% (insulin). In patients taking statins at the time of the examination, the rate of repeated MRA examinations was 28%; with aspirin, 29%; and with antihypertensive drugs, 30%. There was no significant association between the current medication and the rate of nondiagnostic MRA examinations of the calf arteries.

Additive Effect of Multiple Risk Factors
An increasing rate of nondiagnostic MRA examinations of the calf arteries was observed with a rising total number of risk factors. In four patients without any risk factors, only diagnostic images were obtained. In 37 patients with one risk factor, the image quality of the calf arteries was nondiagnostic for five MRA examinations (14%), whereas in the 58 patients with two risk factors this occurred in 19 patients (33%). In patients with three risk factors (n = 33), the rate of nondiagnostic MRA examinations of the calf arteries reached 39%. The trend toward a higher rate of nondiagnostic MRA examinations of the calf arteries in patients with a higher number of risk factors was statistically significant (p = 0.0074, logistic regression). The odds ratio was assessed as 2.043, indicating that the relative risk for nondiagnostic image quality of the calf arteries due to venous overlay roughly doubles with each additional risk factor.

Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis
Based on the retrospectively analyzed patient data and by means of a logistic regression model, the following formula for the probability of repeated MRA was obtained:

Formula
where e is Euler's number, which can be approximated as 2.718. PAOD is the stage of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (0-IV), and nrisk is the total number of risk factors (0-4). The calculated relationship between the rates of nondiagnostic MRA examinations of the calf arteries as a function of the stage of PAOD and the number of endogenous risk factors is graphically shown in Figure 4. These associations are statistically significant at p = 0.0164 (number of risks) and p = 0.0200 (degree of PAOD).


Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 With increasing number of endogenous risk factors and increasing stage of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), probability of venous overlay in calf station requiring repeated MR angiography examination increases drastically.

 
Prospective Evaluation of the Logistic Regression Model
To determine the clinical value of the logistic regression model, 22 consecutive patients were assigned to undergo hybrid MRA when the probability of substantial venous overlay was higher than 50%, as calculated and illustrated in Figure 4. All patients with stage II or III PAOD and four additional endogenous risk factors and those with stage IV PAOD and at least three additional endogenous risk factors were assigned to hybrid MRA. All MRA images were successfully acquired.

Venous overlay preventing diagnostic image reading was not found. The median image quality of the calf station was 3—that is, good (minimal venous enhancement not interfering with diagnostic reading—in patients who underwent a standard bolus-chase MRA examination. In patients assigned to a hybrid MRA examination, the median image quality of the calf station was 4—that is, very good (no venous enhancement).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Adequate arterial vessel enhancement with minimal venous overlay is essential for good diagnostic image quality. The rate of examinations producing nondiagnostic image quality of the calf arteries is particularly high in patients for whom further therapeutic decision-making strongly depends on the results of the MRA examination: compromised patients with multiple risk factors who are in danger of below-the-knee amputation. Although this fact is well known, no evidence-based data are available about the exact influence of multiple, different risk factors on the rate of nondiagnostic MRA examinations. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to separately analyze the influence of the individual risk factors that are typically found in patients with PAOD on image quality [4, 13].

Our results show that the rate of repeated examinations increased steadily with the advance in PAOD stage. Based on our retrospective data, the relative risk for a nondiagnostic MRA examination of the calf arteries in a patient with PAOD stage IV is increased by a factor of 5.94 compared with the risk for nondiagnostic MRA in a patient without PAOD. Apart from hypertension, which was associated with a significantly higher rate of repeated injections, the other single risk factors—among them, nicotine abuse, osteomyelitis, and diabetes mellitus—did not increase the risk for repeated MR examinations. This result was surprising particularly with regard to diabetic patients and patients with osteomyelitis given that time-resolved imaging approaches have been proposed because venous contamination occurs more frequently in those populations [17]. Another possibility that may explain this finding could be the relatively small number of patients in this study, which also represents a limitation. Therefore, the lacking statistical significance could be attributed to a statistical error of the second kind (i.e., an insufficient number of patients). In practice, most patients will have more than one risk factor.

The analysis of our data proves that the number of nondiagnostic MRA examinations due to venous contamination increased significantly with the number of simultaneous endogenous risk factors in a given patient, whereas the presence of exogenous risk factors did not seem to influence the outcome of the MRA examination. In addition, the results of this study show that multiple risk factors have an additive character in terms of image degradation. Previous studies on this topic addressed the potential risk factors separately [13, 14]. The exponential slope of the logistic regression model shows this additive character of multiple risk factors.

For daily MR examination routine, it would be desirable to be able to anticipate the risk of nondiagnostic MRA examination of the calf arteries before starting the MRA procedure. For this purpose, a predictive model for the probability of venous overlay based on the retrospective data according to the stage of PAOD and the number of simultaneously occurring endogenous risk factors was established. This model can serve as a means of triaging patients to choose the appropriate MRA technique. In patients with no to little risk for venous contamination, a standard bolus-chase technique can be chosen. However, patients with a high risk of venous contamination should undergo a hybrid MRA or a time-resolved MRA study of the lower legs [12, 17-20].

In the prospective part of our study, a probability of 50% was chosen as the cutoff for a high risk of venous contamination, which was the case in 32% of the prospectively included patients. The fact that none of the examinations of these patients revealed venous enhancement can be seen as a proof of concept for the prediction model. In addition, the median image quality score was 4 with the hybrid approach versus 3 with the conventional bolus-chase MRA, which again supports application of the prediction model. Most patients who underwent standard bolus-chase MRA showed slight venous enhancement that did not interfere with diagnostic reading. Some slight venous enhancement might, however, be seen as an inherent characteristic of the bolus-chase technique that, in most cases, does not impair the diagnostic reading. In the intermediate-risk group, the venous return can be decreased by using a blood pressure cuff with subsystolic pressure [10, 21]. This technique has the advantage of being cheap and easily applied. It might, however, decrease patient comfort.

Our approach of selecting patients with a high likelihood for having examinations with venous contamination before MRA examination has the additional advantage of being efficient with regard to contrast agent administration. Both the repeated MRA examination, performed because of nondiagnostic images of the calf arteries, and the hybrid approach require the injection of 0.3 mmol/kg of standard gadolinium chelates. With the a priori knowledge about which patients would benefit from the hybrid MRA, the number of patients allocated to this procedure can be minimized.

MRA is considered a standard technique for the detection and grading of PAOD and is recommended by current international guidelines as the technique of choice because of its noninvasiveness and high accuracy [4]. Only little information is provided about the suggested MRA parameters. A spatial resolution of 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.0 mm should be achieved in the lower leg [4]. No specifications are given for the upper leg or pelvis. In the current study, we used parallel imaging only for the calf station with a spatial resolution of 1.2 x 0.8 x 1.0 m, whereas the spatial resolutions of the thigh and pelvis stations were slightly lower.

By applying parallel imaging with smaller voxel sizes, new coil concepts such as the total imaging matrix and particularly high field strengths will foster the use of MRA as an accurate means of diagnosis [11, 22]. If a lower spatial resolution is acceptable, the MRA acquisition can be sped up at the cost of diagnostic accuracy. For the thigh station, for example, thicker partitions can be chosen, as suggested by Maki et al. [11]. Therefore, the problem of early, disturbing venous return will prevail unless completely different imaging strategies, such as time-resolved MRA, intravascular contrast agents, or both, are chosen. The commercially available intravascular contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium—previously known as MS-325—offers the possibility of acquiring time-resolved MRA data during the first pass and ultra-high-spatial-resolution MRA data during the steady state. In a recent study, investigators reported that an acquired spatial resolution with a 0.5-mm isotropic voxel size [23] provided excellent visualization and differentiation of the arteries and veins of the lower leg.

Our study has some well-recognized limitations. Because of the retrospective design of the study, we were not able to retrieve all of the patients' records, so a complete history of risk factors could be obtained in only 132 of the 177 patients. The model that we suggested for calculating the probability of nondiagnostic MRA examination of the calf arteries is also based on these retrospective data, but it was successfully probed in the prospective part of this study. These findings reflect primarily the patient population at our institution but should be largely applicable for any other hospital of this size. However, these results may not be valid for other institutions with a larger number of outpatients who are less critically ill.

In conclusion, the current study is the first to quantitatively and comprehensively assess the number of nondiagnostic MRA examinations of the calf arteries with regard to the stage of PAOD and to a set of common cardiovascular risk factors. According to our results, patients for whom the probability of a nondiagnostic MRA examination of the calf arteries is high can be preselected and hence patients can be triaged to the appropriate MRA technique.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Leiner T. Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal and lower extremity vasculature. Top Magn Reson Imaging2005; 16:21 -66[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Meaney JF, Sheehy N. MR angiography of the peripheral arteries. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005;13 : 91-111, vi[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology1999; 211:59 -67[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al.; TASC II Working Group. Inter-Society Consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg 2007;45 [suppl S]:S5 -S67[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Ouwendijk R, Kock MC, Visser K, Pattynama PM, de Haan MW, Hunink MG. Interobserver agreement for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography and MDCT angiography in peripheral arterial disease. AJR 2005; 185:1261 -1267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Collins R, Cranny G, Burch J, et al. A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease. Health Technol Assess2007; 11: iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-184[Medline]
  7. Visser K, Hunink MG. Peripheral arterial disease: gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US—a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000;216 : 67-77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Barkhausen J, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis. Lancet2001; 357:1086 -1091[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Nael K, Ruehm SG, Michaely HJ, et al. Multistation whole-body high-spatial-resolution MR angiography using a 32-channel MR system. AJR 2007; 188:529 -539[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Zhang HL, Ho BY, Chao M, et al. Decreased venous contamination on 3D gadolinium-enhanced bolus-chase peripheral MR angiography using thigh compression. AJR 2004;183 : 1041-1047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, Hoogeveen RM. Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower station sub-millimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15:484 -491[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Meissner OA, Rieger J, Weber C, et al. Critical limb ischemia: hybrid MR angiography compared with DSA. Radiology2005; 235:308 -318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wang Y, Chen CZ, Chabra SG, et al. Bolus arterial-venous transit in the lower extremity and venous contamination in bolus chase three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol2002; 37:458 -463[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Prince MR, Chabra SG, Watts R, et al. Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. Radiology 2002;224 : 55-61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Grundy SM, Bazzarre T, Cleeman J, et al. Prevention Conference V. Beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention—medical office assessment, Writing Group I. Circulation 2000;101 : E3-E11[Medline]
  16. Assmann G, Schulte H, Cullen P. New and classical risk factors: the Münster heart study (PROCAM). Eur J Med Res1997; 2:237 -242[Medline]
  17. Andreisek G, Pfammatter T, Goepfert K, et al. Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography. Radiology 2007;242 : 610-620[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology 2002;225 : 43-52[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Mell M, Tefera G, Thornton F, Siepman D, Turnipseed W. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 2007;45 : 543-548; discussion, 548[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Pereles FS, Collins JD, Carr JC, et al. Accuracy of stepping-table lower extremity MR angiography with dual-level bolus timing and separate calf acquisition: hybrid peripheral MR angiography. Radiology 2006;240 : 283-290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Vogt FM, Ajaj W, Hunold P, et al. Venous compression at high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional MR angiography of peripheral arteries. Radiology 2004;233 : 913-920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kramer H, Michaely HJ, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. Peripheral magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 T. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 18:135 -138[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Nikolaou K, Kramer H, Grosse C, et al. High-spatial-resolution multistation MR angiography with parallel imaging and blood pool contrast agent: initial experience. Radiology2006; 241:861 -872[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dinter, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Michaely, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dinter, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Michaely, H. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS