AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodhams, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hatabu, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodhams, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hatabu, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1670
AJR 2009; 193:260-266
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Mucinous Carcinoma of the Breast: Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Signal Intensity in Correlation With Histologic Findings

Reiko Woodhams1,2,3,4, Satoko Kakita1, Hirofumi Hata1, Keiichi Iwabuchi1, Shigeaki Umeoka2, Carolyn E. Mountford3 and Hiroto Hatabu2

1 Departments of Radiology, Pathology, and Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine and Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
3 Centre for Clinical Spectroscopy, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
4 Present address: Department of Radiology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1, Kitasato, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 228-8555 Japan.

Received August 15, 2008; accepted after revision January 9, 2009.

 
FOR YOUR INFORMATION

Got a few minutes for a visit? Stop by the American Roentgen Ray Society's online women's imaging community, which features exclusive content and resources by and for women's imaging specialists, including articles, electronic exhibits, webcasts, current news, and job and meeting listings. ARRS provides these valuable resources as a free service just for you. Visit us at http://womensimagingonline.arrs.org/.

Address correspondence to R. Woodhams (reikow{at}hotmail.co.jp).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of mucinous carcinoma of the breast with that of other breast tumors and to analyze correlations between signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images and the histologic features of mucinous carcinoma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Two hundred seventy-six patients with 277 lesions, including 15 mucinous carcinomas (13 pure type, two mixed type), 204 other malignant tumors, and 58 benign lesions, were examined with 1.5-T MRI at b values of 0 and 1,500 s/mm2. The correlations between cellularity and ADC, homogeneity of signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images, and histopathologic findings were analyzed. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

RESULTS. The mean ADC of mucinous carcinoma (1.8 ± 0.4 x 10-3 mm2/s) was statistically higher than that of benign lesions (1.3± 0.3 x 10-3 mm2/s) and other malignant tumors (0.9 ± 0.2 x 10-3 mm2/s) (p < 0.001). The ADC of pure type mucinous carcinoma (1.8 ± 0.3 x 10-3 mm2/s) was higher than that of mixed type mucinous carcinoma (1.2 ± 0.2 x 10-3 mm2/s) (p < 0.001) and other histologic types (p > 0.05). The correlation between mean cellularity and the ADC of mucinous carcinoma was significant ({rho}s = -0.754; p = 0.001). The homogeneity of signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images correlated with the homogeneity of histologic structures of mucinous carcinoma (p < 0.001; {kappa} = 0.826).

CONCLUSION. Mucinous carcinoma can be clearly differentiated from other breast tumors on the basis of ADC. The low signal intensity of mucinous carcinoma on diffusion-weighted images appears to reflect the presence of mucin and low cellularity. High signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images may reflect the presence of fibrovascular bundles, increased cell density, or a combination of these features.

Keywords: ADC valve • breast • diffusion-weighted imaging • MRI • mucinous carcinoma of the breast


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The high sensitivity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for malignant breast tumors is well recognized. According to previous reports [1, 2], the diffusivity of water molecules is restricted in environments of high cellularity, intracellular and extracellular edema, high viscosity, and a high degree of fibrosis because these conditions become barriers to the movement of water molecules. Malignant tumors, including breast cancer, are usually characterized by high cellularity. DWI depicts the restriction of water molecule diffusivity in malignant tissue as high signal intensity and yields a low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which is a quantitative index of the diffusivity of water molecules [2-4]. Several studies have shown that benign and malignant tumors can be differentiated on the basis of ADC because a higher ADC may indicate benign lesions and a lower ADC, malignant lesions [1, 3, 4]. Studies [3, 4] of breast DWI, however, have shown that the ADC of mucinous carcinoma of the breast is considerably higher than that of other malignant tumors of the breast and may overlap the ADCs of benign tumors and normal breast tissue.

Mucinous carcinoma of the breast is a relatively rare tumor that accounts for 1-7% of all cases of breast cancer. It is defined by a histologically distinctive pattern characterized by proliferation of clusters of generally uniform round cells floating in large amounts of extracellular mucus, as described in the World Health Organization international histologic classification of tumors [5]. There are two types of mucinous carcinoma. In the pure type, all of the tumor cells are completely surrounded by mucin, and the tumor does not have any invasive ductal components. In the mixed type, invasive ductal carcinoma is present but not embedded in extracellular mucin. Pathologic specimens of mucinous carcinoma of the breast vary in the amount of mucin and cells and are described as having the hypercellular and hypocellular properties of mucinous carcinoma of the breast [5].

We hypothesized that the ADC and DWI signal intensity of mucinous carcinoma of the breast vary depending on amount of mucin, cellularity, and fibrous stroma. This hypothesis was based on results of previous studies of tumors of various organs, including the brain, pancreas, and other soft tissues, that pointed to the influence of cellularity, fibrosis, and mucous matrix on ADC [6-9]. The aim of this study was to compare the ADC of mucinous carcinoma of the breast with the ADCs of other breast tumors. We also examined the correlation between signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images and the histopathologic features of mucinous carcinoma of the breast.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Subjects
This study was approved by the local institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. At our institution, all patients who are scheduled for breast MRI undergo the same protocol except those unable to assume the prone position. Two hundred seventy-six patients (277 lesions) who underwent consecutive routine breast MRI examinations with the same protocol that included DWI from May 2005 to September 2007 participated in this study. All patients with mucinous carcinoma underwent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy after breast MRI and then underwent surgery. Pathologic diagnoses of other malignant and benign lesions were made at core needle biopsy or surgery. Patients with pacemakers, an allergy to the MRI contrast agent, or severe renal or hepatic dysfunction had been excluded from the study. The group of 276 participants had 277 lesions. Fifteen patients (mean age, 59 years; range, 41-78 years) had mucinous carcinoma (13 pure type, two mixed type). The other lesions were 204 malignant tumors and 58 benign tumors.

MRI
Routine breast MRI was performed with a 1.5-T MRI system (HDx, GE Healthcare) and a dedicated eight-channel breast-array coil on patients in the prone position. After the positioning acquisition, DWI of both breasts was performed in the axial plane with the single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence to reduce motion artifacts (TR/TE, 9,500/89; section thickness, 4.0 mm; interslice gap, 0 mm; number of signals averaged, 8; field of view, 320 mm2; matrix size, 160 x 224; no parallel imaging because of the possibility of unfold failure and lower signal-to-noise ratio). Data were collected at b values of 0 and 1,500 s/mm2. The b value of 1,500 s/mm2 was used to minimize the T2-weighted shine-through effect and to suppress the signal from normal breast parenchyma [10]. In addition, a frequency-selective radiofrequency pulse was used before the pulse sequence to suppress the strong signal from lipids, reducing chemical shift artifacts. The acquisition time for DWI was 5 minutes.

After DWI, unilateral examination of the index breast consisted of a sagittal fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequence with fat suppression (4,000/90; section thickness, 5 mm; interslice gap, 2 mm; number of signals averaged, 2; field of view, 200 mm; matrix size, 288 x 219) and a sagittal 3D T1-weighted fast gradient-echo sequence (16.3/2.1; flip angle, 15°; section thickness, 2 mm; number of signals averaged, 1.5; field of view, 200 mm; matrix size, 288 x 192) with chemical shift selective suppression technique for active suppression of the fat signal. For the dynamic contrast-enhanced portion of the study, a bolus injection of 0.10 mmol/kg of body weight of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Bayer HealthCare) was administered through the right antecubital vein with an automatic injector (Sonic Shot 50, Nemoto Kyorindo). The injection rate was 2 mL/s, and the contrast agent was followed by a 20-mL saline flush. Acquisitions were performed before and 90 seconds (early phase) and 300 seconds (delayed phase) after contrast injection. An ADC map was generated on a workstation (Advantage Windows 4.1, GE Healthcare) from diffusion-weighted images with b values of 0 and 1,500 s/mm2.

Assessment of ADC, Diffusion-Weighted Images, and Corresponding Histopathologic Structures
Measurement of ADC of all tumors—Calculation of the ADC of all tumors was by one radiologist with 6 years of experience in breast imaging, including MRI. This investigator was not aware of the histopathologic diagnosis in any case. The location of tumors on the diffusion-weighted images and ADC maps was determined on fat-suppressed T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. The region of interest covering the whole tumor was placed on the ADC map, and the ADC was recorded. If the presence of hemorrhage or necrosis was suspected on the basis of the findings on the unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images, the region of interest did not include that area [11]. Regions of interest were placed inside the tumor on all slices that displayed the tumor and were averaged. Calculation of the ADC of each tumor was repeated, and the values were averaged. We disregarded satellite lesions coexisting with main tumors. The mean ADCs of mucinous carcinomas, other malignant breast tumors, and benign breast tumors were compared.

Pathologic analysis of mucinous carcinoma— Each resected specimen of mucinous carcinoma was obtained with four sutures of various lengths with the axilla, nipple side, cranial margin, and caudal margin for orientation. Surgical specimens were cut into 5-mm slices, fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, and processed for histologic examination. The specimens were stained with H and E and evaluated by a pathologist expert in breast pathology. Mucinous carcinomas of the two subtypes, pure and mixed, were examined.

The cellularity of mucinous carcinoma was analyzed according to the methods of previous studies [1] with National Institutes of Health Image J 1.40g software with a Windows operating system. The original magnification of the specimens was x200. A pathologist analyzed five sample views randomly chosen from the specimens for cellularity values. The mean cellularity of each tumor was calculated by averaging of these five values. The correlation between the mean cellularity value and ADC was statistically analyzed.

Comparison between DWI and histopathologic findings of mucinous carcinoma—We matched the tumor on the diffusion-weighted images and the specimens by referring to the pathologic diagram that displayed each orientation of each specimen in the resected breast tissue. On the basis of previous reports [1, 6, 9, 12] of the correlation between ADC and the presence of mucus, degree of cellularity, and the degree of fibrosis in other organs, we hypothesized that the pattern of signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images would reflect the histopathologic structure of mucinous carcinoma. In this study, signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images was considered inversely proportional to ADC because the effect of T2-weighted shine-through was considered to be at a minimum owing to the b value of 1,500 s/mm2 [13]. Therefore, we hypothesized that the specimens with high DWI signal intensity would correlate with high-cellularity lesions or fibrovascular tissue and the specimens with low DWI signal intensity would correlate with low-cellularity, mucin-rich lesions.

The homogeneity of the signal intensity pattern of mucinous carcinoma on diffusion-weighted images was categorized as homogeneously high signal intensity, which was higher than the signal intensity of the rib or sternum; homogeneously low signal intensity, which was lower than or equal to the signal intensity of the rib or sternum; and heterogeneous signal intensity, a composite of high and low signal intensity. Each lesion was categorized by two radiologists with more than 6 years of experience in MRI, including breast MRI. If there was a discrepancy between the two readers, they discussed the findings and made a final decision.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Scatter diagram shows apparent diffusion coefficients of benign tumors (left), mucinous carcinoma (center), and other malignant tumors (right).

 
The homogeneity of histologic structures was categorized as homogeneously high cellularity, which consisted of uniform high-cellularity lesions with or without fibrovascular tissue; homogeneously low cellularity, which consisted of low cellularity, mucin-rich lesions not including fibrovascular tissue; and heterogeneous structures, which consisted of a mixture of low cellularity, mucin-rich lesions and high-cellularity lesions or fibrovascular tissue. Histologic assessment was per formed by a pathologist.

The correlation between homogeneity of signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images and homogeneity of histologic structure was assessed. The lesions categorized as having heterogeneous signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images were analyzed in detail with regard to histopathologic characteristics.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with JMP software (version 7.0, SAS Institute). The mean ADCs of mucinous carcinomas, other breast malignant tumors, and benign breast tumors were com pared by the Student's t test. The mean ADCs of pure mucinous carcinoma and mixed mucinous carcinoma were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Spearman's correlation was used to evaluate the relation between the mean cellularity and the ADC of mucinous carcinoma. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Correlation between signal intensity pattern on diffusion-weighted images and histologic homogeneity was validated with kappa statistics.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The mean ADC of mucinous carcinoma was 1.8 ± 0.4 [SD] x 10-3 mm2/s, of other malignant tumors was 0.9 ± 0.2 x 10-3 mm2/s, and of benign tumors was 1.3 ± 0.3 x 10-3 mm2/s. The mean ADC of mucinous carcinoma was statistically greater than that of other malignant tumors and that of benign tumors (p < 0.001) (Table 1) (Fig. 1). Clinical data, histologic subcategory, ADCs, and cellularity are summarized in Table 2. Thirteen of the 15 mucinous carcinomas were of the pure type, and two were of the mixed type. The mean ADC of pure mucinous carcinoma was 1.8 ± 0.3 x 10-3 mm2/s, and that of mixed mucinous carcinoma was 1.2 ± 0.2 x 10-3 mm2/s. The mean ADC of pure mucinous carcinoma was significantly greater than that of mixed mucinous carcinoma (p < 0.001) and of the other individual histologic types of breast tumors (p < 0.05). The ADC of mixed mucinous carcinoma was not significantly different from that of any other histologic type of breast tumor. Correlation between the mean cellularity and ADC of mucinous carcinoma was inverse and significant ({rho}s = -0.754; p = 0.001) (Fig. 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 : Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of Mucinous Carcinoma, Other Malignant Tumors, and Benign Tumors

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 : Clinical and Histologic Details and Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of 15 Mucinous Carcinomas of the Breast

 

Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Scatter diagram shows inverse correlation between tumor cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient. Spearman's {rho} = -0.754, p = 0.001.

 

On diffusion-weighted images, mucinous carcinoma of the breast had homogeneously high signal intensity in one case, homogeneously low signal intensity in three patients, and heterogeneity in 11 patients (Table 3). In the comparison of the signal intensity pattern of mucinous carcinoma on diffusion-weighted images and the histologic homogeneity of the specimens, the only tumor with homogeneously high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images exhibited homogeneously high cellularity in the specimens (Figs. 3A, 3B, and 3C). Two of the three lesions with homogeneously low signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images were found to have homogeneously low cellularity and mucin-rich content (Figs. 4A, 4B, and 4C). In the third patient, homogeneous mucin-rich content with thin fibrovascular tissue demarcating the border of the tumor was found. Specimens of all 11 tumors with heterogeneous signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images had a combination of low cellularity, mucin-rich content, and high-cellularity content or a combination of low cellularity, mucin-rich content, and fibrovascular tissue (Figs. 5A, 5B, and 5C). The correlation between the homogeneity of the signal-intensity patterns on diffusion-weighted images and the histologic homogeneity of the specimens was significant (p < 0.001; {kappa} = 0.826).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 : Correlation Between Homogeneity of Signal Intensity on Diffusion-Weighted Images and Histologic Homogeneity of Mucinous Carcinoma Specimens (n = 15)

 

Figure 3
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 75-year-old woman with mixed mucinous carcinoma of breast. Isotropic diffusion-weighted image with b value of 1,500 s/mm2 shows tumor as high-signal-intensity nodule with homogeneous structure.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 75-year-old woman with mixed mucinous carcinoma of breast. Apparent diffusion coefficient map shows area with low coefficient of 1.1 x 10-3 mm2/s (arrows).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (207K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C 75-year-old woman with mixed mucinous carcinoma of breast. Photomicrograph of specimen shows dense tumor cell package with few surrounding mucous lakes. Intersecting thick fibrovascular bundles are evident. Mean cellularity is 67.0%. (H and E, x200)

 

Figure 6
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A 51-year-old woman with pure mucinous carcinoma of breast. Isotropic diffusion-weighted image with b value of 1,500 s/mm2 shows tumor with homogeneously low signal intensity (arrows) approximate to that of rib (arrowhead). Margin of tumor is indistinct.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B 51-year-old woman with pure mucinous carcinoma of breast. Apparent diffusion coefficient map shows tumor as distinctive red area (arrows) with high coefficient of 2.0 x 10-3 mm2/s.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C 51-year-old woman with pure mucinous carcinoma of breast. Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen shows sparse tumor cell distribution surrounded by abundant mucus (arrows). No fibrous stroma surrounds tumor. Mean cellularity of tumor is 4.0%. (H and E, x200)

 

Figure 9
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A 66-year-old woman with pure mucinous carcinoma of breast. Isotropic diffusion-weighted image with b value of 1,500 s/mm2 shows tumor has heterogeneous signal intensity consisting of lobulated outline demarcated by high-signal-intensity margin and low signal intensity inside tumor.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B 66-year-old woman with pure mucinous carcinoma of breast. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map shows high ADC component inside tumor surrounded by low ADC component at periphery (arrows) corresponding to high signal intensity in A. ADC is 1.9 x 10-3 mm2/s.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5C 66-year-old woman with pure mucinous carcinoma of breast. Photomicrograph of representative portion of histopathologic specimen shows thick fibrotic lobulated border at periphery corresponding to high-signal-intensity outline of tumor in A. Inside of tumor shows mucin lake containing tumor clusters. Cellularity inside tumor is 27.5%. (H and E, x200)

 

Regarding the 11 tumors with heterogeneous signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images, we classified the pattern of the high-signal-intensity compartment into linear and nodular patterns to correlate these features with the histologic structure of the lesion. These 11 cases with heterogeneous signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images and the corresponding histologic structures are summarized in Table 4.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4 : Correlation Between Pattern of High Signal Intensity on Diffusion-Weighted Images and Histologic Structure in Tumors With Heterogeneous Signal Intensity (n = 11)

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
To our knowledge, this study is the first evaluation of the correlation between the DWI and the histologic findings of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Mucinous carcinoma of the breast had a much higher ADC than other malignant breast tumors. Abundant mucin and low cellularity may be responsible for this effect. This finding has been corroborated in studies [6, 7] of tumors in various organs, including the brain, pancreas, and other soft tissue, all findings pointing to the influence of the mucous matrix on ADC. Findings of studies [14, 15] showing an inverse correlation between cellularity and ADC in lesions of various organs, including breast tumors, suggest that the characteristically low cellularity of mucinous carcinoma of the breast contributes to the high ADC.

The ADC of mucinous carcinoma also was higher than that of benign breast tumors. However, some benign breast tumors, particularly fibroadenoma and benign phyllodes tumor (Table 1), have high ADCs overlapping those of mucinous carcinoma. Myxomatous or edematous stroma, which is sometimes found in fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumor on histopathologic images, may be the cause of high ADCs [16-18]. Articles [18, 19] have described the characteristics of mucinous carcinoma on conventional MRI. They mention the similarity between fibroadenoma and pure mucinous carcinoma on T2-weighted images and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. The comprehensive approach of DWI, ADC calculation, and conventional MRI to increase specificity is a subject for further study.

Cysts were not included in our benign lesions. The ADCs of simple cysts can overlap those of pure mucinous carcinoma [20]. On diffusion-weighted images, the appearance of pure mucinous carcinoma, which has homogeneously low signal intensity, may be similar to the that of cysts. Complicated cysts, such as highly condensed cysts and bloody cysts, can mimic the DWI findings and ADCs of mixed mucinous carcinoma and those of other malignant tumors because they have low ADCs [21, 22]. These issues need further study.

The number of mixed mucinous carcinomas in our study was too small for reliable conclusions about ADCs, but the two mixed mucinous carcinomas had significantly lower ADCs than pure mucinous carcinoma. According to general pathologic findings [16, 17], the cellularity of mixed mucinous carcinoma tends to be greater than that of pure mucinous carcinoma. A previous study [23] showed that the proportion of extracellular mucin in mixed mucinous carcinoma was less than that of pure mucinous carcinoma. Our study also showed an inverse correlation between the cellularity of mucinous carcinoma of the breast and ADC (Fig. 2). Therefore, it seems likely that the high cellularity and lower mucin matrix of mixed mucinous carcinoma contribute to its low ADC. If the tumor is already suspected of being mucinous carcinoma at MRI that includes DWI, a lower ADC of mucinous carcinoma may indicate the tumor is mixed mucinous carcinoma.

It may not be possible to differentiate mixed and pure mucinous carcinoma with conventional MRI of the breast [24]. Mixed mucinous carcinoma has a worse prognosis and a higher incidence of axillary lymph node metastasis than does pure mucinous carcinoma [23]. Thus the DWI features and ADC of mucinous carcinoma may supply additional information for prognosis. The diagnosis of mixed mucinous carcinoma can be difficult, however, if there is no information suggesting the possibility of the presence of mucinous carcinoma. There was no significant difference between the ADC of mixed mucinous carcinoma and that of other histologic types of breast tumors except pure mucinous carcinoma. This issue needs further evaluation.

Our study showed a significant correlation between signal intensity pattern on diffusion-weighted images and histologic features. The finding of a low-signal-intensity compartment is evidence of the presence of a mucin-rich, low cellularity compartment. The study also showed that not only high cellularity but also fibrous stroma is a cause of high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images. This correlation is consistent with the findings in several previous reports [9, 12, 25] on the inverse correlation between ADC and degree of fibrosis. The high cellularity may narrow the free space for water diffusion, and fibrous tissue works as a boundary and obstacle to the diffusibility of water molecules.

To our knowledge, this study is the first to show the possible correlation between high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images and the presence of fibrous stroma in breast tumors. Because there appears to be a correlation between the presence of a high-signal-intensity lesion on diffusion-weighted images and its corresponding histologic structure, the morphologic features of a high-signal-intensity lesion may also represent the histologic structure. Linear high signal intensity is highly likely to be a sign of the presence of fibrous tissue, and nodular high signal intensity may be a sign of a the presence of either fibrous tissue or a high-cellularity lesion. It is not yet known whether the nature of the fibrovascular tissue on its own is a cause of high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images. The neighboring structure, which is the mucin matrix in mucinous carcinoma, and infiltrating inflammatory cells and other factors may interact in concert with the fibrous tissue to cause high signal intensity. This issue needs further investigation.

One of the limitations of this study was the premise of the minimum T2-weighted shine-through effect at DWI with a b value of 1,500 s/mm2. T2-weighted shine-through cannot be eliminated even with a higher b value. The contrast of the signal intensity between solid lesions, mucin lesions, and water lesions is larger with a higher b value than with a lower b value, as shown in a previous study of evaluation of pancreatic cystic tumors at a b value of 1,000s/mm2 [21]. Another limitation was that the number of mixed mucinous carcinomas was too small for definitive comparison with pure mucinous carcinoma and other histologic types of breast tumors. The number of subjects with each benign tumor also was small. We need a larger number of subjects with each histologic type to reach a more reliable conclusion about comparison of ADCs between histologic types.

We did not analyze the ADC of each signal component inside the mucinous carcinomas at DWI. Some of the tumors were small, and the ADCs of the components might have been inaccurate because of the partial volume effect. Pathologic specimens were not sliced according to the slice direction of DWI. Therefore, one-to-one correspondence between components on the tumor on diffusion-weighted images and in the histologic specimens was not strictly achieved. The location and outline of each signal-intensity component and those of the expected corresponding histologic structure were matched. We used bilateral DWI and unilateral conventional T1- and T2-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced imaging because at the time we were not satisfied with the quality of transverse bilateral breast dynamic images with volume imaging for breast assessment (Vibrant, GE Healthcare) compared with unilateral sagittal images. Therefore, we did not use bilateral imaging for dynamic studies. The quality of bilateral imaging has improved, and we are performing bilateral imaging for all sequences.

DWI may be a helpful and supportive tool for conventional MRI, especially if integrated with standard metrics for lesions detected with breast MRI, such as signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images, morphologic features of lesions, and contrast enhancement kinetics. We suspect that better sensitivity and specificity can be achieved, but larger studies integrating ADC and DWI data with conventional MRI are required.

We conclude that most mucinous carcinomas of the breast have a markedly higher ADC than other malignant breast tumors. The ADC and signal intensity pattern reflect the histologic characteristics of cellularity, fibrovascular tissue, and mucin-rich content. Thus, DWI is useful for evaluation of mucinous carcinoma of the breast.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Peter Stanwell, physicist in the department of radiology, for technical advice and Alba Cid and Dale Woodhams for editorial assistance.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16:172 -178[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR2007; 188:1622 -1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29:644 -649[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S. ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005;4 : 35-42[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, eds. Pathology and genetics: tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2003
  6. Irie H, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, et al. Measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in intraductal mucin-producing tumor of the pancreas by diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:82 -87[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Maeda M, Matsumine A, Kato H, et al. Soft-tissue tumors evaluated by line-scan diffusion-weighted imaging: influence of myxoid matrix on the apparent diffusion coefficient. J Magn Reson Imaging2007; 25:1199 -1204[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Hayashida Y, Hirai T, Morishita S, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of metastatic brain tumors: comparison with histologic type and tumor cellularity. Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27 : 1419-1425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Annet L, Peeters F, Abarca-Quinones J, Leclercq I, Moulin P, Van Beers BE. Assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in liver fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25 : 122-128[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Kuroki Y, Nasu K. Advances in breast MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast. Breast Cancer2008; 15:212 -217[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Atlas SW, DuBois P, Singer MB, Lu D. Diffusion measurements in intracranial hematomas: implications for MR imaging of acute stroke. Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21 : 1190-1194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Boulanger Y, Amara M, Lepanto L, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver of hepatitis C patients. NMR Biomed 2003; 16:132 -136[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Geijer B, Sundgren PC, Lindgren A, Brockstedt S, Stahlberg F, Holtas S. The value of b required to avoid T2 shine-through from old lacunar infarcts in diffusion-weighted imaging. Neuroradiology2001; 43:511 -517[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Guo AC, Cummings TJ, Dash RC, Provenzale JM. Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. Radiology 2002;224 : 177-183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008; 7:23 -29[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Tavassoli FA. Mucinous carcinoma: colloid type. In: Pathology of the breast. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1999: 441-450
  17. Rosen PP. Fibroepithelial neoplasms. In: Rosen's breast pathology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2001 : 163-200
  18. Yuen S, Uematsu T, Kasami M, et al. Breast carcinomas with strong high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: pathological characteristics and differential diagnosis. J Magn Reson Imaging2007; 25:502 -510[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Okafuji T, Yabuuchi H, Sakai S, et al. MR imaging features of pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Eur J Radiol2006; 60:405 -413[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C. Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 2007;17 : 2646-2655[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Inan N, Arslan A, Akansel G, Anik Y, Demirci A. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas. AJR 2008; 191:1115 -1121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Fischbein NJ, Roberts TP, Dillon WP. Bleed or stroke? Diffusion measurements in intracranial hematomas. Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21:1179 -1180[Free Full Text]
  23. Komaki K, Sakamoto G, Sugano H, Morimoto T, Monden Y. Mucinous carcinoma of the breast in Japan: a prognostic analysis based on morphologic features. Cancer 1988;61 : 989-996[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Kawashima M, Tamaki Y, Nonaka T, et al. MR imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. AJR 2002;179 : 179-183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Muraoka N, Uematsu H, Kimura H, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient in pancreatic cancer: characterization and histopathological correlations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27 : 1302-1308[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodhams, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hatabu, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodhams, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hatabu, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS