<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology Abdominal Imaging</title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Roentgenology RSS feed -- recent Abdominal Imaging articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1546-3141</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Roentgenology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0361-803X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/5/1458?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/5/1465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/5/1469?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/191/5/1477?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/4/1102?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/4/1107?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/4/1115?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology</title>
<url>http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/5/1458?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Role of CT in Predicting Pathologic Subtypes]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/5/1458?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to evaluate whether CT can
be used to predict the pathologic subtypes of pancreatic intraductal papillary
mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs).</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Three radiologists, blinded to the pathologic
IPMN subtype, retrospectively and independently reviewed the preoperative CT
scans of 38 patients with surgically resected pancreatic IPMN: 11 intraductal
papillary mucinous adenomas, 11 intraductal papillary mucinous carcinomas, and
16 intraductal papillary mucinous carcinomas with invasion. The patients, 16
women and 22 men, ranged in age from 38 to 80 years (mean age, 64.3 years). CT
findings were correlated with each pathologic subtype using the chi-square
(two-sided) test and analysis of variance. Interobserver agreement of the CT
diagnosis of pathologic subtype and agreement between the CT diagnosis and
pathologic subtype were also studied (kappa statistic).</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Predominant main pancreatic duct (MPD) involvement
(<I>p</I> = 0.04) and a wide (&gt; 1 cm) connection of a side-branch lesion
with the MPD (<I>p</I> = 0.03) correlated with intraductal papillary
mucinous carcinoma with invasion. Tumor size, MPD diameter, number of tumors
per patient, number of pseudoseptations per tumor, common bile duct
dilatation, enlarged lymph nodes, intraductal calcifications, papillary
bulging, and presence and size of a solid mass yielded no statistically
significant relationship with pathologic subtype. Both interobserver agreement
of CT diagnosis (range, 0.004&ndash;0.359) and agreement between CT diagnosis
and pathologic subtype (range, 0.046&ndash;0.317) ranged from slight to
fair.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Prediction of the pathologic subtypes of pancreatic
IPMNs by CT is limited. Predominant MPD involvement and a wide connection of a
side-branch lesion with the MPD are the only CT findings that can be used to
predict the pathologic subtype of pancreatic IPMN.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gupta, R., Mortele, K. J., Tatli, S., Girshman, J., Glickman, J. N., Levy, A. D., Erturk, S. M., Heffess, C. S., Banks, P. A., Silverman, S. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3302</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Role of CT in Predicting Pathologic Subtypes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1464</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1458</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abdominal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/5/1465?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Small-Bowel Bezoar Versus Small-Bowel Feces: CT Evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/5/1465?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to evaluate the accuracy
of CT for differentiating small-bowel bezoar from small-bowel feces in cases
of small-bowel obstruction (SBO).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> In cases of SBO, although some CT features of bezoars
and small-bowel feces overlap, a well-defined mass mottled with gas bubbles
associated with an encapsulating wall, the newly described "floating
fat-density debris" sign, and a lesion in the stomach that appears
similar to the obstructing mass is typical of a small-bowel bezoar; an
isolated amorphous mass mottled with gas bubbles is typical of small-bowel
feces.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delabrousse, E., Lubrano, J., Sailley, N., Aubry, S., Mantion, G. A., Kastler, B. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.4004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Small-Bowel Bezoar Versus Small-Bowel Feces: CT Evaluation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1468</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1465</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abdominal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/5/1469?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Postoperative Pelvic MRI of Anorectal Malformations]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/5/1469?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Patients operated on for anorectal malformations can
experience technical complications related to the initial corrective surgery.
Many of these complications may necessitate reoperation. Pelvic MRI is part of
the evaluation to assess the position of the pulled-through bowel, the
sphincter muscles, and the critical area of the posterior urethra. This
article reviews the various pelvic MRI findings in these patients.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Pelvic MRI is a valuable tool in the assessment of
postoperative anorectal malformations that may necessitate additional
surgery.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eltomey, M. A., Donnelly, L. F., Emery, K. H., Levitt, M. A., Pena, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3773</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Postoperative Pelvic MRI of Anorectal Malformations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1476</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1469</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abdominal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/191/5/1477?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Radiologic-Pathologic Conferences of the University of Rochester School of Medicine: Inflammatory Pseudotumor of the Spleen]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/191/5/1477?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhatt, S., Simon, R., Dogra, V. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Radiologic-Pathologic Conferences of the University of Rochester School of Medicine: Inflammatory Pseudotumor of the Spleen]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1479</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1477</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abdominal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/4/1102?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Therapeutic Impact of CT of the Appendix in a Community Hospital Emergency Department]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/4/1102?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate
the therapeutic impact of CT of the appendix in a community hospital.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> For each of 100 consecutive adult patients who
presented to a community hospital emergency department from August 2006 to
November 2006 and underwent CT of the appendix, the proposed treatment plan
and the likelihood of appendicitis were recorded before CT and were compared
with the actual treatment after CT. The primary outcome assessed was change in
patient management after CT. The percentage likelihood of appendicitis,
whether patient disposition changed after CT, and the presence or absence of
appendicitis were examined. The accuracy of CT was also calculated.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The treatment plans of the emergency clinicians changed in
29 patients (29%). Appendicitis was ruled out on the basis of CT findings in
50% (9/18) of patients when appendicitis was considered probable and in 60%
(3/5) when appendicitis was considered very likely. When appendicitis was
considered unlikely, appendicitis was ruled out by CT in 100% (20/20) of
patients. CT of the appendix was shown to have high sensitivity (94%),
specificity (100%), positive predictive value (100%), negative predictive
value (99%), and accuracy (99%).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> CT of the appendix had an important therapeutic impact
on patients presenting to a community hospital emergency department. The data
suggest that CT can be withheld in patients in whom emergency clinicians rate
the likelihood of appendicitis as unlikely but that CT findings are often of
benefit even when appendicitis is judged to be very likely.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan, R. O., Blackmore, C. C., Jarvik, J. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3466</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Therapeutic Impact of CT of the Appendix in a Community Hospital Emergency Department]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1106</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abdominal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/4/1107?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Noninvasive Evaluation of Active Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison Between Contrast-Enhanced MDCT and 99mTc-Labeled RBC Scintigraphy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/4/1107?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to compare contrast-enhanced
MDCT and <sup>99m</sup>Tc-labeled RBC scanning for the evaluation of active
lower gastrointestinal bleeding.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Over 17 months, 55 patients (32 men, 23 women;
age range, 21&ndash;92 years) were evaluated prospectively with
contrast-enhanced MDCT using 100 mL of iopromide 300 mg I/mL.
Technetium-99m-labeled RBC scans were obtained on 41 of 55 patients and select
patients underwent angiography for attempted embolization. Each imaging
technique was reviewed in a blinded fashion for sensitivity for detection of
active bleeding as well as the active lower gastrointestinal bleeding
location.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Findings were positive on both examinations in eight
patients and negative on both examinations in 20 patients. Findings were
positive on contrast-enhanced MDCT and negative on <sup>99m</sup>Tc-labeled
RBC in two patients; findings were negative on contrast-enhanced MDCT and
positive on <sup>99m</sup>Tc-labeled RBC in 11 patients. Statistics showed
significant disagreement, with simple agreement = 68.3%,  = 0.341, and
<I>p</I> = 0.014. Sixteen of 60 (26.7%) contrast-enhanced MDCT scans were
positive prospectively, with all accurately localizing the site of bleeding
and identification of the underlying lesion in eight of 16 (50%). Nineteen of
41 (46.3%) <sup>99m</sup>Tc-labeled RBC scans were positive. Eighteen of 41
matched patients went on to angiography. In four of these 18 (22.2%) patients,
the site of bleeding was confirmed by angiography, but in 14 of 18 (77.8%),
the findings were negative.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Contrast-enhanced MDCT and <sup>99m</sup>Tc-labeled RBC
scanning show significant disagreement for evaluation of active lower
gastrointestinal bleeding. Contrast-enhanced MDCT appears effective for
detection and localization in cases of active lower gastrointestinal bleeding
in which hemorrhage is active at the time of CT.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zink, S. I., Ohki, S. K., Stein, B., Zambuto, D. A., Rosenberg, R. J., Choi, J. J., Tubbs, D. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3642</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Noninvasive Evaluation of Active Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison Between Contrast-Enhanced MDCT and 99mTc-Labeled RBC Scintigraphy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1114</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abdominal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/4/1115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/4/1115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to evaluate the value of
diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic
cysts.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Forty-two cysts (16 simple cysts, seven
pseudocysts, five abscesses, three hydatid cysts, two serous cystadenomas,
three mucinous cystadenomas, two mucinous cystadenocarcinomas, four cystic
degenerated adenocarcinomas) were included in this prospective study.
Single-shot spin-echo echo-planar DWI was performed with three b factors (0,
500, and 1,000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>), and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs)
were calculated. On DWI, the signal intensity of the cysts was visually
compared with the signal intensity of the pancreas parenchyma. For the
quantitative evaluation, cyst-to-pancreas signal intensity ratios, ADC of the
lesions, and cyst-to-pancreas ADC ratios were compared.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> On visual evaluation, all cystic lesions were hyperintense
on DWI with b factors of 0 and 500 s/mm<sup>2</sup>. On DWI with a b factor of
1,000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, all abscesses and hydatid and neoplastic cysts were
hyperintense, whereas most of the simple and pseudocysts were isointense.
Quantitatively, with b factors of 0 and 500 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, no statistical
significance was achieved. With a b factor of 1,000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, the
cyst-to-pancreas signal intensity ratios of the abscesses and hydatid and
neoplastic cysts were significantly higher than those of the simple cysts and
pseudocysts. Setting the cutoff value of signal intensity ratio at 1.9, the
cyst-to-pancreas signal intensity ratio had a sensitivity of 70% and a
specificity of 90% for differentiating abscesses, hydatid cysts, and
neoplastic cysts from simple cysts and pseudocysts. The ADC and the ADC ratios
of the abscesses, hydatid cysts, and neoplastic cysts were significantly lower
than those of the simple cysts and pseudocysts.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> DWI may help in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic
cysts.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inan, N., Arslan, A., Akansel, G., Anik, Y., Demirci, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3754</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Abdominal Imaging] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1121</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abdominal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>