<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology Gastrointestinal Imaging</title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Roentgenology RSS feed -- recent Gastrointestinal Imaging articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1546-3141</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Roentgenology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0361-803X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1531?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1540?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1546?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1556?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1561?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1568?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1576?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W490?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1242?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1243?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1252?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1261?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/193/5/1268?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1272?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1282?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/193/5/1289?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1296?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1305?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1311?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1318?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1037?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1044?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1053?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1061?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1070?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1077?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/W301?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/W308?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology</title>
<url>http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1531?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CT Colonography With Decreased Purgation: Balancing Preparation, Performance, and Patient Acceptance]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1531?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Reduction or elimination of catharsis with fecal tagging
enhances the tolerability of CT colonography (CTC) and may increase compliance
with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations. We systematically
reviewed studies that prospectively evaluated performance and patient
satisfaction with decreased-purgation CTC and with optical colonoscopy.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The nine studies reviewed showed moderate-to-good
performance for decreased-purgation CTC; however, data are limited, and study
design and data presentation are inconsistent. Further study of
decreased-purgation CTC and standardization of terminology are needed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahgerefteh, S., Fraifeld, S., Blachar, A., Sosna, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2342</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CT Colonography With Decreased Purgation: Balancing Preparation, Performance, and Patient Acceptance]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1539</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1531</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1540?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Aspiration and Ethanolamine Oleate Sclerotherapy for Sustained Resolution of Symptomatic Polycystic Liver Disease: An Initial Experience]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1540?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Surgical therapy for symptomatic polycystic liver disease
is effective but has substantial mortality and morbidity. Minimally invasive
options such as percutaneous aspiration with or without ethanol sclerosis have
had disappointing results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate
percutaneous aspiration with ethanolamine oleate sclerosis in the management
of symptomatic polycystic liver disease.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> The study included 13 patients (11 with
polycystic liver disease, two with simple cysts) with 17 cysts. All patients
underwent percutaneous aspiration of the liver cyst under ultrasound guidance
followed by insertion of a 7-French pigtail catheter, instillation of
ethanolamine oleate (10% of cyst volume), and aspiration of the ethanolamine
oleate. The catheter was kept in place for 24 hours of open drainage and then
removed.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> All but one of the cysts resolved with one instillation.
The one cyst, in a patient with polycystic liver disease, required two
instillations 3 months apart. The mean initial volume of cysts was 589.8 mL,
and the mean reduction in volume was 88.8%. Both the simple cysts resolved
completely. In the cases of polycystic disease, the volume of cysts larger
than 10 cm in diameter was reduced by 92.8%. Cyst resolution was gradual, and
clinically significant cyst reduction was achieved within 1 year of therapy.
None of the patients needed surgery. The median follow-up period was 54 months
(range, 1 week&ndash;95 months). There were no significant adverse effects,
and all patients had relief of symptoms after therapy.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> This initial experience with a single session of
percutaneous aspiration and ethanolamine oleate sclerosis resulted in
sustained resolution of symptomatic polycystic liver disease with minimal
morbidity, avoidance of surgery, and improvement in quality of life.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nakaoka, R., Das, K., Kudo, M., Chung, H., Innoue, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1681</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Aspiration and Ethanolamine Oleate Sclerotherapy for Sustained Resolution of Symptomatic Polycystic Liver Disease: An Initial Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1545</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1540</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1546?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Radiologist Performance in Differentiating Polypoid Early From Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Specific CT Criteria: Emphasis on Dimpling Sign]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1546?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to retrospectively
determine whether there are specific CT features that can be used to
differentiate polypoid early from advanced gastric cancer and to assess the
performance of radiologists using specific CT findings for
differentiation.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> A review of medical records yielded the cases
of 46 patients, 27 with polypoid early gastric cancer and 19 with polypoid
advanced gastric cancer, whose CT scans were available for review. Two
radiologists retrospectively reviewed the CT images for the presence and depth
of dimpling at the tumor base, the presence of vessel invagination at the
dimpling site, thickening of the low-attenuating outer layer, perigastric
infiltration, and transmural full-thickness enhancement of the lesion.
Individual CT findings relevant as predictors were determined with univariate
and multivariate analyses. Individual review of CT scans subsequently was
performed by two other radiologists, who were blinded to tumor stage but aware
of the results of univariate and multivariate analyses. Individual performance
was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The presence of severe dimpling greater than 3.5 mm at the
base of the tumor (odds ratio, 31.3) had the highest odds ratio for
differentiating early from advanced gastric cancer, followed by vessel
invagination (odds ratio, 12.3), the presence of dimpling (odds ratio, 9.8),
perigastric infiltration (odds ratio, 5.2), and transmural full-thickness
enhancement (odds ratio, 4.8). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence
of dimpling greater than 3.5 mm was the only independent variable that
differentiated polypoid advanced gastric cancer from polypoid early gastric
cancer (<I>p</I> = 0.001). Subsequent differentiation of advanced from early
gastric cancer with the described CT findings was very good, yielding areas
under the receiver operating characteristic analysis curves of 0.827 and 0.811
for the two observers.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Greater than 3.5 mm dimpling and other ancillary CT
findings are helpful in differentiating polypoid advanced gastric cancer from
polypoid early gastric cancer and contribute to good individual accuracy for
differentiation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, E. S., Kim, S. H., Lee, J. Y., Kim, S. J., Kim, M. A, Lee, J. M., Han, J. K., Choi, B. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.2308</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Radiologist Performance in Differentiating Polypoid Early From Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Specific CT Criteria: Emphasis on Dimpling Sign]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1555</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1546</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1556?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Value of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Assessing Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1556?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to determine the
usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of liver parenchyma for
determining the severity of liver fibrosis.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> This study investigated 78 patients who
underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with 1.5-T MRI and pathologic
staging of liver fibrosis based on biopsy. DWI was performed with b values of
50 and 400 s/mm<sup>2</sup>. ADCs of liver were measured using 2.0- to
3.0-cm<sup>2</sup> regions of interest in the right and left lobes of the
liver; the mean ADC value was used for analysis. Pathologic METAVIR scores for
liver fibrosis stage were used as a reference standard.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The mean ADC values for fibrosis pathologically staged
using the METAVIR classification system as F0 (<I>n</I> = 11), F1
(<I>n</I> = 16), F2 (<I>n</I> = 10), F3 (<I>n</I> = 14), and F4
(<I>n</I> = 27) were 125.9, 105.0, 104.5, 103.2, and 99.1 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>
10<sup>-5</sup> s/mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The correlation between the
ADC values and the degree of liver fibrosis was moderate (Spearman's test,
 = &ndash;0.36). There was a significant difference in ADC values between
patients with nonfibrotic liver (F0) and those with cirrhotic liver (F4)
(<I>p</I> = 0.008). The best cutoff ADC value to distinguish between these
groups was 118 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 10<sup>-5</sup> s/mm<sup>2</sup>. However, ADC values
were not useful for differentiating viral hepatitis patients with F2 fibrosis
or higher from those with a lower degree of fibrosis (area under the receiver
operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.66) or for differentiating low-stage
fibrosis in all patients from high-stage fibrosis in all patients (AUC =
0.54).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The ADCs in cirrhotic livers are significantly lower
than those in nonfibrotic livers. However, ADC values measured using the
current generation of scanners are not reliable enough to replace liver biopsy
for staging hepatic fibrosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandrasegaran, K., Akisik, F. M., Lin, C., Tahir, B., Rajan, J., Saxena, R., Aisen, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2436</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Value of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Assessing Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1560</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1556</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1561?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Polyp Size and Volume at CT Colonography: Implications for Follow-Up CT Colonography]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1561?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability
of polyp measurements at CT colonography and the factors that affect the
measurements.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Fifty colonoscopically proven cases of polyps
6 mm in diameter or larger were analyzed by two observers who measured each
polyp in supine and prone views. Manual measurements of 2D volume by summation
of areas, 2D maximum diameter, and 3D maximum diameter and automated
measurements of 3D maximum diameter and volume were recorded for each observer
and were repeated for one of the observers. Intraobserver and interobserver
agreement was calculated. Analysis was performed to determine the measurement
parameter that correlated most with summation-of-areas volume. Supine and
prone measurements as a surrogate for tracking change in polyp size over time
were analyzed to determine the measurement parameter with the least
variation.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Maximum diameter measured manually on 3D images had the
highest correlation with summation-of-areas volume. Manual summation-of-areas
volume was found to have the least variation between supine and prone
measurements.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Linear polyp measurement in the 3D endoluminal view
appears to be the most reliable parameter for use in the decision to excise a
polyp according to current guidelines. In our study, manual calculation of
volume with summation of areas was found to be the most reliable measurement
parameter for observing polyp growth over serial examinations. High
reliability of polyp measurements is essential for adequate assessment of
change in polyp size over serial examinations because many patients with
intermediate-size polyps are expected to choose surveillance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethea, E., Nwawka, O. K., Dachman, A. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2618</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of Polyp Size and Volume at CT Colonography: Implications for Follow-Up CT Colonography]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1567</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1561</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1568?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contrast Material Administration Protocols for 64-MDCT Angiography: Altering Volume and Rate and Use of a Saline Chaser to Better Match the Imaging Window--Physiologic Phantom Study]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1568?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of
varying volumes and rates of contrast material, use of a saline chaser, and
cardiac output on aortic enhancement characteristics in MDCT angiography
(MDCTA) using a physiologic phantom.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Volumes of 75, 100, and 125 mL of iopamidol,
370 mg I/mL, were administered at rates of 4, 6, and 8 mL/s. The effect of a
saline chaser (50 mL of normal saline, 8 mL/s) was evaluated for each volume
and rate combination. Normal, reduced (33% and 50%), and increased (25%)
cardiac outputs were simulated. Peak aortic enhancement and duration of peak
aortic enhancement were recorded. Analysis of variance models were run with
these effects, and the estimated mean levels for the sets of factor
combinations were determined.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Lowering the volume of contrast material resulted in
reduced peak enhancement (example, -56.2 HU [<I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001] with 75
vs 125 mL) and reduced duration of 75% peak enhancement (example, -9.0 seconds
[<I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001] with 75 vs 125 mL). Increasing the rate resulted in
increased peak enhancement (example, 104.5 HU [<I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001] with a
rate of 8 vs 4 mL/s) and decreased duration of 75% peak enhancement (example,
-13.0 seconds [<I>p</I> &lt; 0.001]). Use of a saline chaser resulted in
increased peak enhancement, and this increase was inversely proportional to
contrast material volume. Peak enhancement increased when reduced cardiac
output was simulated. Peak enhancement decreased when increased cardiac output
was simulated.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Reducing contrast material volume from 125 to 75 mL,
increasing the rate to 6 or 8 mL/s, and use of a saline chaser result in an
aortic enhancement profile that better matches the approximately 5-second
imaging window possible with 64-MDCTA of the abdomen and pelvis. Even smaller
volumes of contrast material may be adequate in patients with reduced cardiac
output.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coursey, C. A., Nelson, R. C., Weber, P. W., Howle, L. E., Nichols, E. B., Marin, D., DeLong, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2670</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contrast Material Administration Protocols for 64-MDCT Angiography: Altering Volume and Rate and Use of a Saline Chaser to Better Match the Imaging Window--Physiologic Phantom Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1575</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1568</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1576?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Duodenal Switch Gastric Bypass Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Imaging of Postsurgical Anatomy and Postoperative Gastrointestinal Complications]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1576?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to evaluate the normal
postsurgical findings and appearance of gastrointestinal tract complications
in patients who have undergone biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch
bariatric surgery. We performed a 4-year retrospective review of 218 patients
who underwent duodenal switch surgery.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The most common complications of duodenal switch surgery
were bowel obstruction, followed by ventral hernias and anastomotic leaks.
Only 2% of cases required repeat surgery for management.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell, M. T., Carabetta, J. M., Shah, R. N., O'Riordan, M. A., Gasparaitis, A. E., Alverdy, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1941</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Duodenal Switch Gastric Bypass Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Imaging of Postsurgical Anatomy and Postoperative Gastrointestinal Complications]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1580</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1576</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W482?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multiphasic MDCT Enhancement Pattern of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Smaller Than 3 cm in Diameter: Tumor Size and Cellular Differentiation]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W482?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate according to
size and degree of cellular differentiation the multiphasic MDCT enhancement
pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) smaller than 3 cm in diameter in
patients with cirrhosis.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> In 155 consecutively registered patients (126
men, 29 women; mean age, 58.4 years), 204 pathologically proven HCCs smaller
than 3 cm were detected at multiphasic MDCT. Three radiologists in consensus
classified the relative attenuation of the tumors compared with the
surrounding liver parenchyma as hyperattenuation, isoattenuation, or
hypoattenuation on biphasic (<I>n</I> = 86) and triphasic (<I>n</I> = 69)
CT scans.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The prevalent enhancement patterns of HCC differed
depending on tumor size. The prevalent pattern of HCC measuring 20&ndash;29 mm
was arterial hyperattenuation with venous washout (47%, 47/101). The prevalent
enhancement patterns of HCC smaller than 10 mm and HCC measuring 10&ndash;19
mm were isoattenuation during the arterial and portal venous phases (29%,
6/21) and hyperattenuation and isoattenuation during the arterial and portal
venous phases (33%, 27/82). The typical HCC enhancement pattern (arterial
hyperattenuation with venous washout) was identified in 48% (67/141) of the
moderately and poorly differentiated HCCs and in 13% (8/63) of
well-differentiated HCCs.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The prevalent enhancement patterns of HCC smaller than 3
cm on multiphasic MDCT scans differed depending on tumor size and cellular
differentiation. HCCs smaller than 2 cm and well-differentiated HCCs
frequently had atypical enhancement patterns.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoon, S. H., Lee, J. M., So, Y. H., Hong, S. H., Kim, S. J., Han, J. K., Choi, B. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1818</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multiphasic MDCT Enhancement Pattern of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Smaller Than 3 cm in Diameter: Tumor Size and Cellular Differentiation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W489</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W482</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W490?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA["Pseudo Washout" Sign in High-Flow Hepatic Hemangioma on Gadoxetic Acid Contrast-Enhanced MRI Mimicking Hypervascular Tumor]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W490?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this article is to describe the
"pseudo washout" sign of high-flow hepatic hemangioma that mimics
hypervascular tumor on gadoxetic acid&ndash;enhanced MRI.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> High-flow hemangiomas might show relatively low signal
intensity because of gadoxetic acid contrast uptake in the surrounding normal
liver parenchyma during the equilibrium (3-minute delay) phase. Such findings
are called pseudo washout and can mimic hypervascular hepatic tumors. However,
high-flow hemangioma can be diagnosed by observing bright signal intensity on
T2-weighted imaging, arterial phase&ndash;dominant enhancement, pseudo washout
sign during the equilibrium phase, and isointense or slightly increased signal
intensity on subtraction images.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doo, K. W., Lee, C. H., Choi, J. W., Lee, J., Kim, K. A., Park, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1732</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA["Pseudo Washout" Sign in High-Flow Hepatic Hemangioma on Gadoxetic Acid Contrast-Enhanced MRI Mimicking Hypervascular Tumor]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W496</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W490</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1239?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CT Colonography: Coming of Age]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1239?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this article is to highlight key issues in
CT colonography (CTC) for radiologists so they can represent the technology
accurately to referring physicians and provide a perspective that will
hopefully augment best care for their patients.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> With publication of the National CT Colonography Trial
and the endorsement of CTC for screening by a multisociety task force that
included the American Cancer Society, American College of Radiology, and U.S.
Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, the clinical validation of CTC
has been completed, and CTC is now ready for widespread clinical application.
Radiologists must be skilled in CTC and knowledgeable about colorectal cancer
screening issues.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnson, C. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1859</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CT Colonography: Coming of Age]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1242</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1242?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ACR Colon Cancer Committee White Paper: Status of CT Colonography 2009]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1242?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> To review the current status and rationale of the updated
ACR practice guidelines for CT colonography (CTC).</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Clinical validation trials in both the U.S. and Europe are
reviewed. Key technical aspects of the CTC examination are emphasized,
including low-dose protocols, proper insufflation, and bowel preparation.
Important issues of implementation are discussed, including training and
certification, definition of target lesion, reporting of colonic and
extracolonic findings, quality metrics, reimbursement, and
cost-effectiveness.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Successful validation trials in screening cohorts both in
the U.S. with ACRIN&reg; and in Germany demonstrated sensitivity of 90% or
greater for patients with polyps 10 mm or greater. Proper technique is
critical, including low-dose techniques in screening cohorts with upper limits
in CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> of 12.5 mGy per exam. Training of new readers includes
the requirement of interactive workstation training with 2-D and 3-D image
display techniques. The target lesion is defined as a polyp 6 mm or greater,
consistent with the American Cancer Society joint guidelines. Five quality
metrics have been defined for CTC, with pilot data entered. Although the CMS
national noncoverage decision in May 2009 was a disappointment, multiple
third-party payers are reimbursing for screening CTC. Cost-effective modeling
has shown CTC to be a dominant strategy, including in a Medicare cohort.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Supported by third party payer reimbursement for
screening, CTC will continue to further transition into community practice and
can provide an important adjunctive examination for colorectal screening.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McFarland, E. G., Fletcher, J. G., Pickhardt, P. P., Dachman, A., Yee, J., McCollough, C. H., Macari, M., Knechtges, P., Zalis, M., Barish, M., Kim, D. H., Keysor, K., Johnson, C. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ACR Colon Cancer Committee White Paper: Status of CT Colonography 2009]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1242</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1243?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epiploic Appendagitis: An Entity Frequently Unknown to Clinicians--Diagnostic Imaging, Pitfalls, and Look-Alikes]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1243?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Epiploic appendagitis is an ischemic infarction of an
epiploic appendage caused by torsion or spontaneous thrombosis of the epiploic
appendage central draining vein. When it occurs on the right side of the
abdomen, it can mimic appendicitis and right-sided diverticulitis; whereas
when it occurs on the left side of the abdomen, it is often mistaken for
sigmoid diverticulitis. The purpose of this article is to review the
diagnostic imaging of this entity.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Epiploic appendagitis is self-limited and spontaneously
resolves without surgery within 5&ndash;7 days. Therefore, it is imperative
for radiologists to be familiar with this entity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Almeida, A. T., Melao, L., Viamonte, B., Cunha, R., Pereira, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.2071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epiploic Appendagitis: An Entity Frequently Unknown to Clinicians--Diagnostic Imaging, Pitfalls, and Look-Alikes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1251</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1252?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preliminary Estimate of Triphasic CT Enterography Performance in Hemodynamically Stable Patients With Suspected Gastrointestinal Bleeding]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1252?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to retrospectively
evaluate the performance of triphasic CT enterography and identify causes of
false-negative CT results in hemodynamically stable patients with suspected
gastrointestinal bleeding.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> A retrospective review of 48 patients
(male&ndash;female ratio, 22:26) with suspected gastrointestinal bleeding
(first-episode gastrointestinal bleed, <I>n</I> = 19; obscure
gastrointestinal bleed, <I>n</I> = 29) who underwent triphasic CT
enterography was performed. All patients had endoscopic, pathologic, or other
imaging confirmation within 3 months of triphasic CT enterography. The
sensitivity and specificity of triphasic CT enterography were calculated using
pathology, endoscopy, or other imaging confirmation as the reference standard.
Results were retrospectively reviewed to determine the cause of missed
findings at triphasic CT enterography.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The overall sensitivity and specificity of triphasic CT
enterography for detecting gastrointestinal bleeding was 33% (7/21) and 89%
(24/27), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were higher in
first-episode gastrointestinal bleed cases (42% and 100%, respectively) than
in obscure gastrointestinal bleed cases (22% and 85%). In the subset of
patients undergoing capsule endoscopy (<I>n</I> = 17), only triphasic CT
enterography identified two of three bleeding sources. Triphasic CT
enterography did not identify six ulcers, four vascular malformations, two
hemorrhoids, a duodenal mass, and a bleeding colonic diverticulum. The missed
findings at triphasic CT enterography were attributed to being CT occult
(<I>n</I> = 9), perception errors (<I>n</I> = 4), and technical errors
(<I>n</I> = 1). If perception errors are excluded, the sensitivity of
triphasic CT enterography increases to 52% (11/21).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Triphasic CT enterography can be a useful and
complementary test in the evaluation of clinically stable patients with
suspected gastrointestinal bleeding by identifying the bleeding source in one
third to one half of patients. Because of the potential for perception errors,
radiologists should familiarize themselves with the appearance of bleeding
sources at CT enterography.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hara, A. K., Walker, F. B., Silva, A. C., Leighton, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1494</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preliminary Estimate of Triphasic CT Enterography Performance in Hemodynamically Stable Patients With Suspected Gastrointestinal Bleeding]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1260</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1252</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1261?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hepatic Iron Deposition in Patients With Liver Disease: Preliminary Experience With Breath-Hold Multiecho T2*-Weighted Sequence]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1261?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to conduct, using
histopathologic examination as the reference standard, a preliminary
evaluation of the use of a breath-hold multiecho T2<sup>*</sup>-weighted MRI
sequence in the detection and quantification of hepatic iron deposition in
patients with liver disease.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> The images of 43 patients with liver disease
who underwent 1.5-T MRI of the liver that included a multiecho
T2<sup>*</sup>-weighted sequence who also underwent concomitant liver biopsy
or liver transplantation were assessed. Two independent observers measured
hepatic T2<sup>*</sup> by placing regions of interest in the hepatic
parenchyma. Hepatic T2<sup>*</sup> values were compared between patients
stratified by hepatic iron grade and were correlated with histopathologic iron
grade. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to assess the
accuracy of images obtained with the hepatic T2<sup>*</sup>-weighted sequence
in the diagnosis of iron deposition.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Patients with iron deposition had shorter hepatic
T2<sup>*</sup> values than did patients without iron deposition (mean
T2<sup>*</sup>, 17.7 vs 32.3 milliseconds with pooled data from both
observers; <I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001). Patients with iron grade 3 or greater had
shorter T2<sup>*</sup> values than those with iron grade 2 or less (10.1 vs
20.8 milliseconds; <I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001). There was a strong negative
correlation between hepatic T2<sup>*</sup> and histopathologic iron grade
(<I>r</I> = &ndash;0.849; <I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001). For the prediction of
iron grades 1 or greater and 3 or greater, area under the curve, sensitivity,
and specificity were 0.968&ndash;0.982, 90.5&ndash;100%, and 100&ndash;97.3%
at T2<sup>*</sup> cutoffs of less than 24 and less than 14 milliseconds,
respectively.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Hepatic iron overload in patients with liver disease can
be assessed rapidly and accurately with MRI performed with a breath-hold
T2<sup>*</sup>-weighted sequence.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chandarana, H., Lim, R. P., Jensen, J. H., Hajdu, C. H., Losada, M., Babb, J. S., Huffman, S., Taouli, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1996</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hepatic Iron Deposition in Patients With Liver Disease: Preliminary Experience With Breath-Hold Multiecho T2*-Weighted Sequence]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1267</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/193/5/1268?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CT Protocols for Acute Appendicitis: Time for Change]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/193/5/1268?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paulson, E. K., Coursey, C. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.3313</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CT Protocols for Acute Appendicitis: Time for Change]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1271</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1272?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MDCT for Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Impact of Oral and IV Contrast Media at Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Techniques]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1272?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of this study was to prospectively
investigate the influence of oral, IV, and oral and IV contrast media on the
information provided by MDCT at standard and simulated low radiation doses in
adults suspected of having acute appendicitis.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> One hundred thirty-one consecutive patients
(80 women, 51 men; age range, 18&ndash;87 years; mean age, 37 years) suspected
of having appendicitis were randomly assigned to either ingest or not ingest
iodinated contrast material. Thereafter, all patients underwent IV unenhanced
and enhanced abdominopelvic MDCT with a 4 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 2.5 mm collimation at 120
kVp and 100 mAs<SUB>eff</SUB>. Dose reduction corresponding to 30
mAs<SUB>eff</SUB> was simulated. Two radiologists independently read scans
during separate sessions, assessed appendix visualization, and proposed a
diagnosis (i.e., appendicitis or an alternative diagnosis). The final
diagnosis was based on either surgical findings or clinical follow-up. Data
were analyzed by factorial analysis of multiple correspondences followed by an
ascending hierarchic classification method.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Factorial analysis and ascending hierarchic classification
revealed that, in terms of diagnostic correctness, reader influence
predominated over the influence of IV and oral contrast media use and
radiation dose but that correctness was also influenced by the patient's sex
(<I>p</I> = 0.048) and was lower in cases of alternative diseases
(<I>p</I> &lt; 0.001). Visualization of the appendix depended predominantly
on the reader rather than on the use of IV, oral, or oral and IV contrast
agents or on radiation dose.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Diagnostic correctness is much more influenced by the
reader than by the use of contrast medium (oral, IV, or both) or of simulated
low-radiation-dose technique.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keyzer, C., Cullus, P., Tack, D., De Maertelaer, V., Bohy, P., Gevenois, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1959</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MDCT for Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Impact of Oral and IV Contrast Media at Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Techniques]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1281</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1272</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1282?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abdominal 64-MDCT for Suspected Appendicitis: The Use of Oral and IV Contrast Material Versus IV Contrast Material Only]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1282?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to compare the diagnostic
accuracy of IV contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT with and without the use of oral
contrast material in diagnosing appendicitis in patients with abdominal
pain.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> We conducted a randomized trial of a
convenience sample of adult patients presenting to an urban academic emergency
department with acute nontraumatic abdominal pain and clinical suspicion of
appendicitis, diverticulitis, or small-bowel obstruction. Patients were
enrolled between 8 am and 11 pm when research assistants were present.
Consenting subjects were randomized into one of two groups: Group 1 subjects
underwent 64-MDCT performed with oral and IV contrast media and group 2
subjects underwent 64-MDCT performed solely with IV contrast material. Three
expert radiologists independently reviewed the CT examinations, evaluating for
the presence of appendicitis. Each radiologist interpreted 202 examinations,
ensuring that each examination was interpreted by two radiologists. Individual
reader performance and a combined interpretation performance of the two
readers assigned to each case were calculated. In cases of disagreement, the
third reader was asked to deliver a tiebreaker interpretation to be used to
calculate the combined reader performance. Final outcome was based on
operative, clinical, and follow-up data. We compared radiologic diagnoses with
clinical outcomes to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of CT in both
groups.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Of the 303 patients enrolled, 151 patients (50%) were
randomized to group 1 and the remaining 152 (50%) were randomized to group 2.
The combined reader performance for the diagnosis of appendicitis in group 1
was a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 76.8&ndash;100%) and specificity of 97.1%
(95% CI, 92.7&ndash;99.2%). The performance in group 2 was a sensitivity of
100% (73.5&ndash;100%) and specificity of 97.1% (92.9&ndash;99.2%).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Patients presenting with nontraumatic abdominal pain
imaged using 64-MDCT with isotropic reformations had similar characteristics
for the diagnosis of appendicitis when IV contrast material alone was used and
when oral and IV contrast media were used.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anderson, S. W., Soto, J. A., Lucey, B. C., Ozonoff, A., Jordan, J. D., Ratevosian, J., Ulrich, A. S., Rathlev, N. K., Mitchell, P. M., Rebholz, C., Feldman, J. A., Rhea, J. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2336</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abdominal 64-MDCT for Suspected Appendicitis: The Use of Oral and IV Contrast Material Versus IV Contrast Material Only]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1288</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1282</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/193/5/1289?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Optical Colonoscopy and CT Colonography for Polyp Detection]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/193/5/1289?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dachman, A. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.3311</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of Optical Colonoscopy and CT Colonography for Polyp Detection]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1290</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1289</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1291?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CT Colonography Predictably Overestimates Colonic Length and Distance to Polyps Compared With Optical Colonoscopy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1291?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to determine the
discrepancy between CT colonography (CTC) and optical colonoscopy (OC)
measurements for both anus-to-cecum length and anus-to-polyps distance and
then determine whether a conversion factor could be generated to equate these
CTC and OC distances.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> We retrospectively reviewed CTC and OC
reports from patients who had undergone both procedures as part of an
established protocol. The anus-to-cecum measurement recorded on a single
proprietary CTC workstation was compared with the OC cecal length for each
patient. Likewise, anus-to-polyp distances were compared as measured by the
radiologist and endoscopist.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Three hundred thirty-eight patients and 437 polyps were
identified with complete data from both CTC and same-day OC. The average
anus-to-cecum distance measured at CTC was 189 cm (range, 75&ndash;257 cm) and
at OC, 108 cm (range, 65&ndash;150 cm). For polyps proximal to the splenic
flexure (<I>n</I> = 145), the CTC anus-to-polyp measurement was on average
1.7 times that measured at OC. For left-sided polyps (<I>n</I> = 292), the
CTC measurement was, on average, within 12 cm or 1.3 times that of the OC
anus-to-polyp measurement. All the differences between CTC and OC measurements
of cecal length and polyp distances were found to be statistically significant
using a paired Student's <I>t</I> test of means (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.001).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Anus-to-cecum and anus-to-polyp distances are disparate
but comparable using a conversion factor of 0.57 for the CTC anus-to-cecum
measurement and 0.59 for right-sided CTC anus-to-polyp or 0.78 for left-sided
CTC anus-to-polyp measurements. These anus-to-polyp conversion factors could
potentially augment current CTC guidelines for accurate and precise polyp
localization and removal at endoscopy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duncan, J. E., McNally, M. P., Sweeney, W. B., Gentry, A. B., Barlow, D. S., Jensen, D. W., Cash, B. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2365</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CT Colonography Predictably Overestimates Colonic Length and Distance to Polyps Compared With Optical Colonoscopy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1295</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1296?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Normalized Distance Along the Colon Centerline: A Method for Correlating Polyp Location on CT Colonography and Optical Colonoscopy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1296?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The ability to accurately locate a polyp found on CT
colonography (CTC) at subsequent optical colonoscopy (OC) is an important part
of the successful implementation of CTC for colorectal cancer screening. The
purpose of this study was to determine whether a polyp's normalized distance
along the colon centerline derived from CTC data can accurately predict its
location on OC.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> The polyp population consisted of 152 polyps
in 121 patients. CTC polyp findings were verified by same-day
segmentally-unblinded OC. Each polyp's normalized distance along the colon
centerline was computed by dividing its distance from the anorectal junction
measured along the colon centerline by the length of the colon at CTC. The
predicted polyp location at OC was computed by multiplying the normalized
distance along the colon centerline by the colon length at OC (i.e., the
distance to the cecum as determined at full colonoscope insertion). The
differences between the true and predicted polyp locations at OC were compared
using paired Student's <I>t</I> tests, linear regression, prediction
interval assessment, and Bland-Altman analyses.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The differences between the true and predicted polyp
locations at OC using the supine and prone CTC-normalized distances along the
colon centerline were 2.2 &plusmn; 10.5 cm (mean &plusmn; SD; <I>n</I> =
136) and 1.5 &plusmn; 10.5 cm (<I>n</I> = 135), respectively. The predicted
location was within 10 cm of its true location for 71.3% (97/136) to 74.8%
(101/135) of polyps and within 20 cm of its true location for 93.3% (126/135)
to 93.4% (127/136) of polyps.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> By computing the normalized distance along the colon
centerline of a polyp found at CTC, the location of a polyp at OC can be
predicted to within 10 cm (i.e., 1 colonoscope mark) for the majority of
polyps.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Summers, R. M., Swift, J. A., Dwyer, A. J., Choi, J. R., Pickhardt, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2611</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Normalized Distance Along the Colon Centerline: A Method for Correlating Polyp Location on CT Colonography and Optical Colonoscopy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1304</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1296</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1305?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Automated Measurement of Colorectal Polyp Height at CT Colonography: Hyperplastic Polyps Are Flatter Than Adenomatous Polyps]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1305?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Hyperplastic polyps are more difficult to detect than
adenomatous polyps at CT colonography (CTC), and it has been theorized that
this difference in detectability is because hyperplastic polyps are flatter.
Using automated software that computes polyp height, we determined whether
hyperplastic colonic polyps on CTC are indeed flatter than adenomatous polyps
of comparable width.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> At three medical centers, 1,186 patients
underwent oral contrast-enhanced CTC and same-day optical colonoscopy (OC)
with segment unblinding for colorectal cancer screening. One hundred
eighty-five of the patients had at least one hyperplastic or adenomatous polyp
6&ndash;10 mm visible at both OC and CTC, where size was determined by a
calibrated guidewire at OC. To assess flatness, the heights of the polyps at
CTC were measured using a validated automated software program. The heights
and height-to-width ratios of the hyperplastic polyps were compared with those
of the adenomatous polyps using a Student's <I>t</I> test (two-tailed,
unpaired, unequal variance).</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> There were 176 adenomatous and 83 hyperplastic polyps
visible at segment-unblinded OC. The fraction of these polyps that were
measurable at CTC using the automated software was not significantly different
for adenomatous versus hyperplastic polyps (158/176 [89.8%] vs 73/87 [83.9%],
respectively; <I>p</I> = 0.2). The average height-to-width ratios using
automated width measurements were 15% less for hyperplastic polyps: 0.39
&plusmn; 0.20 (<I>n</I> = 158) and 0.33 &plusmn; 0.19 (<I>n</I> = 73) for
adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps, respectively (<I>p</I> = 0.03). When
polyps of comparable OC size or CTC width were considered, the heights of
hyperplastic polyps were up to 27% less than those of adenomatous polyps.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> For 6&ndash;10 mm polyps of a given size as determined
by OC or a given width at CTC, hyperplastic polyps tend to be flatter (i.e.,
have lower height) compared with adenomatous polyps.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Summers, R. M., Liu, J., Yao, J., Brown, L., Choi, J. R., Pickhardt, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2442</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Automated Measurement of Colorectal Polyp Height at CT Colonography: Hyperplastic Polyps Are Flatter Than Adenomatous Polyps]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1310</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1305</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1311?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intraabdominal Complications Secondary to Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts: CT Findings and Review of the Literature]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1311?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to evaluate the
abdominopelvic CT findings of various intraabdominal complications secondary
to ventriculoperitoneal shunts for hydrocephalus and to review the
literature.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> The CT images of 70 patients (33 men and 37
women; mean age, 48.5 years) who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt
placement and abdominopelvic CT because of shunt-related abdominal symptoms
were reviewed retrospectively. CT images were analyzed with regard to the
location of the shunting catheter tip; site, size, wall, and septa of
localized fluid collection; peritoneal thickening; omentomesentery
infiltration; abscess; bowel perforation; abdominal wall infiltration; and
thickening of the catheter track wall.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The mean period between the last ventriculoperitoneal
shunting operation and CT was 11 months (range, 1 week to 115 months), and the
mean number of ventriculoperitoneal shunting operations undergone was 1.4
(range, 1&ndash;6). A total of 76 ventriculoperitoneal shunting catheters were
introduced in 70 patients: 64 patients had a unilateral catheter inserted and
six patients had bilateral catheters inserted. Sixteen patients (22.9%) were
pathologically diagnosed with ventriculoperitoneal shunt&ndash;related
complications: 11 cases (15.7%) of shunt infection, six cases (8.6%) of CSF
pseudocyst, four cases (5.7%) of abdominal abscess, three cases (4.3%) of
infected fluid collection, and one case (1.4%) of bowel perforation.
Microorganisms were cultured from the tip of the shunting catheter or
peritoneal fluid in 11 patients (15.7%).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> On abdominopelvic CT, various intraabdominal
complications secondary to ventriculoperitoneal shunt were shown, of which,
shunt infection was the most common, followed by CSF pseudocyst, abscess, and
infected fluid collection.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chung, J.-J., Yu, J.-S., Kim, J. H., Nam, S. J., Kim, M.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2463</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intraabdominal Complications Secondary to Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts: CT Findings and Review of the Literature]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1317</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1311</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1318?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Normal Dynamic MRI Enhancement Patterns of the Upper Abdominal Organs: Gadoxetic Acid Compared With Gadobutrol]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/1318?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to investigate whether, at
dynamic MRI of the upper abdominal organs, contrast enhancement with gadoxetic
acid, a hepatobiliary contrast agent, is comparable with that achieved with an
extracellular contrast agent.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Dynamic gadoxetic acid&ndash;enhanced MRI of
the pancreas, spleen, kidney, liver, and abdominal aorta was performed on 50
patients; dynamic gadobutrol&ndash;enhanced MRI was performed on a control
group of 50 patients; and the images were compared. Dynamic imaging with a
T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination gradient-echo
sequence (TR/TE, 3.35/1.35; flip angle, 12&deg;) was performed before and 20
(arterial phase), 55 (portal venous phase), and 90 (hepatic venous phase)
seconds after bolus injection of gadoxetic acid (0.25 mmol/mL) or gadobutrol
(1.0 mmol/mL). Signal-to-noise ratios and enhancement indexes were calculated
for each organ and time.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> All MR images in both groups were of diagnostic quality.
During the early dynamic phases, significantly lower mean enhancement indexes
were found in the gadoxetic acid group than in the gadobutrol group in the
pancreas (portal venous phase, 0.66, 1.39, <I>p</I> &le; 0.001; hepatic
venous phase, 0.51, 1.36, <I>p</I> &le; 0.001), spleen (portal venous phase,
1.54, 2.41, <I>p</I> &le; 0.001; hepatic venous phase, 1.19, 2.23,
<I>p</I> &le; 0.001), renal cortex (portal venous phase, 1.76, 2.63,
<I>p</I> &le; 0.001; hepatic venous phase, 1.60, 2.63, <I>p</I> &le;
0.001), and liver (portal venous phase, 0.76, 0.94, <I>p</I> = 0.016;
hepatic venous phase, 0.76, 1.04, <I>p</I> &le; 0.001). In the abdominal
aorta, the mean enhancement index was greater after bolus injection of
gadoxetic acid (arterial phase, 3.33, 2.24, <I>p</I> &le; 0.005).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Early dynamic MRI of the upper abdominal organs,
especially the spleen, pancreas, and kidney, benefits from the higher
gadolinium concentration of gadobutrol than in the organ-specific contrast
agent gadoxetic acid. Higher protein binding resulting in increased relaxivity
of gadoxetic acid compensates for the low gadolinium concentration in the
abdominal aorta.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuhn, J.-P., Hegenscheid, K., Siegmund, W., Froehlich, C.-P., Hosten, N., Puls, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:34 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2412</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Normal Dynamic MRI Enhancement Patterns of the Upper Abdominal Organs: Gadoxetic Acid Compared With Gadobutrol]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1323</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1318</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1037?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[B-Mode Ultrasound With Algorithm Based on Statistical Analysis of Signals: Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1037?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of
liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C by use of a method in
which the homogeneity of the tissue texture of the liver on B-mode ultrasound
images is analyzed on the basis of results of a statistical chi-square test of
the echo amplitudes. The method includes an algorithm for removing small
structures, such as cross sections of the thin vessels, in the background
texture to minimize differences in analysis results between users.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Analysis was performed on images of 148
patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C without cirrhosis. The
peak value of the <f>C<SUB>m</SUB><sup>2</sup></f> (modified chi-square
distribution) histogram was calculated from B-mode ultrasound images, and the
resulting value was compared with the histologic fibrosis grade.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The peak <f>C<SUB>m</SUB><sup>2</sup></f> histogram value
for grade F3 fibrosis was higher than that for grades F0 and F1 (<I>p</I>
&lt; 0.0001) and F2 (<I>p</I> = 0.0003). The value for grade F2 was higher
than that for grades F0 and F1 (<I>p</I> = 0.0027). The values gradually
increased with an increase in liver fibrosis grade, although no difference was
found between grades F0 and F1.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The grades of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic
hepatitis C are well discriminated with the B-mode ultrasound&ndash;based
analysis algorithm without discrimination between grades F0 and F1. Findings
on conventional ultrasound images may reflect progression of liver fibrosis
even in the absence of cirrhosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toyoda, H., Kumada, T., Kamiyama, N., Shiraki, K., Takase, K., Yamaguchi, T., Hachiya, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.4047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[B-Mode Ultrasound With Algorithm Based on Statistical Analysis of Signals: Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1043</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1037</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1044?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of Tumor Necrosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Chemoembolization: Diffusion-Weighted and Contrast-Enhanced MRI With Histopathologic Correlation of the Explanted Liver]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1044?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to compare, with
histopathologic examination of the liver explant as the reference standard,
diffusion-weighted MRI with contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI in the
assessment of necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after trans arterial
chemoembolization (TACE).</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> The cases of 21 patients with HCC who
underwent MRI after TACE were evaluated. Two independent observers calculated
the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of HCC and measured percentage tumor
necrosis on subtraction images. The ADCs of necrotic and viable tumor tissues
were compared. ADC and percentage necrosis on subtraction images were
correlated with percentage necrosis found at pathologic examination. Receiver
operating characteristics analysis was performed on the diagnosis of complete
tumor necrosis.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Twenty-eight HCCs (mean diameter, 2.3 cm) were evaluated.
There were significant differences between the ADC of viable tissue and that
of necrotic tumor tissue (1.33 &plusmn; 0.41 vs 2.04 &plusmn; 0.38 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>
10<sup>&ndash;3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001). There was
significant moderate correlation between ADC and the pathologic finding of
percentage necrosis (<I>r</I> = 0.64, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.001) and significant
strong correlation between subtraction image and pathologic percentage
necrosis (<I>r</I> = 0.89&ndash;0.91, depending on the phase; <I>p</I>
&lt; 0.001). In the diagnosis of complete tumor necrosis, ADC had an area
under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.85, 75%, and 87.5% compared
with 0.82&ndash;0.89, 100%, and 58.3&ndash;79.1% for subtraction imaging
(<I>p</I> &gt; 0.5 between ADC and subtraction imaging).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Compared with diffusion-weighted imaging,
contrast-enhanced MRI with subtraction technique had more significant
correlation with the histopathologic findings in the evaluation of necrosis of
HCC after TACE. There was no difference, however, between the two methods in
diagnosis of complete tumor necrosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mannelli, L., Kim, S., Hajdu, C. H., Babb, J. S., Clark, T. W. I., Taouli, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1461</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of Tumor Necrosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Chemoembolization: Diffusion-Weighted and Contrast-Enhanced MRI With Histopathologic Correlation of the Explanted Liver]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1052</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1044</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1053?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cirrhotic Liver Enhancement Using Gd-EOB-DTPA]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1053?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to prospectively evaluate
quantitatively and qualitatively the enhancement patterns of cirrhotic liver
tissue and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after administration of the
hepatocyte-specific contrast agent gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine
pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) on dynamic MRI and to determine the time point
of maximum liver-to-lesion contrast.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Twenty-five patients with HCC in liver
cirrhosis underwent 1.5-T MRI. T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and T1-weighted 3D
gradient-echo sequences before and between 15 seconds and 20 minutes after the
injection of 10 mL of Gd-EOB-DTPA were performed. Signal-to-noise ratios
(SNRs) of liver parenchyma and liver-to-lesion contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs)
were calculated and plotted over time. Enhancement patterns of HCC were
characterized qualitatively by two radiologists.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The SNR of liver parenchyma increased significantly at 15
seconds and 60 seconds after contrast injection and remained stable
thereafter. HCC showed positive CNR during the arterial phase and increasingly
negative CNR during the further time course (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.05). The
maximum absolute CNR was found at 20 minutes after contrast injection. There
was no correlation between the degree of enhancement at any time point and
tumor grade. On qualitative evaluation, 16 HCCs showed arterial enhancement
with early washout, and five showed arterial enhancement with late washout. In
the remaining four HCCs, enhancement persisted until 20 minutes. Lesion
conspicuity at 20 minutes after contrast injection was at least equal to or
higher than it was on the remaining sequences in 19 of the 25 patients.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> After Gd-EOB-DTPA injection, most HCCs showed typical
arterial enhancement with early washout. Liver-to-lesion contrast was best at
20 minutes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frericks, B. B., Loddenkemper, C., Huppertz, A., Valdeig, S., Stroux, A., Seja, M., Wolf, K.-J., Albrecht, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1946</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cirrhotic Liver Enhancement Using Gd-EOB-DTPA]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1060</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1053</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1061?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Differential CT Features of Intraductal Biliary Metastasis and Double Primary Intraductal Polypoid Cholangiocarcinoma in Patients With a History of Extrabiliary Malignancy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1061?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to discern clinical and
imaging features for differentiating intraductal metastasis from double
primary intraductal cholangiocarcinoma in patients with a history of
extrabiliary malignant disease.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Over a 10-year period, the cases of 14
patients with histopathologically proven intraductal metastasis (<I>n</I> =
8) or double primary intraductal cholangiocarcinoma (<I>n</I> = 6) who had a
history of extrabiliary malignancy were identified. Two radiologists
retrospectively reviewed CT (<I>n</I> = 14) and MR (<I>n</I> = 6) images
for the size and appearance of the intraductal lesion, presence of a
parenchymal mass, multiplicity, attenuation on arterial and portal phase
images, and presence of calcification. Clinical findings such as the location
of extrabiliary malignancy and presence of <I>Clonorchis sinensis</I>
infestation also were recorded. Univariate tests were used to differentiate
the two disease entities.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Histopathologic confirmation was obtained by surgical
resection (<I>n</I> = 12) or ultrasound-guided biopsy (<I>n</I> = 2). All
intraductal metastatic lesions were of colorectal cancer, and all intraductal
cholangiocarcinomas were associated with extracolonic malignant disease,
including three cases of gastric cancer (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001). All
cholangiocarcinomas manifested themselves as purely intraductal masses, but
five of the eight intraductal metastatic lesions were contiguous with
parenchymal masses (<I>p</I> = 0.031). The appearance of the intraductal
lesion was predominantly expansile in cases of metastasis (seven of eight
cases) but not in cases of cholangiocarcinoma (one of six cases) (<I>p</I> =
0.026). Other findings were not statistically significant in differentiating
the two disease entities.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> When an intraductal lesion is found in a patient with
extrabiliary malignancy, the presence of a contiguous parenchymal mass, an
expansile nature of the intraductal lesion, and a history of colorectal cancer
may suggest the presence of intraductal metastasis rather than double primary
intraductal cholangiocarcinoma.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, Y. J., Kim, S. H., Lee, J. Y., Kim, M. A, Lee, J. M., Han, J. K., Choi, B. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.2089</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Differential CT Features of Intraductal Biliary Metastasis and Double Primary Intraductal Polypoid Cholangiocarcinoma in Patients With a History of Extrabiliary Malignancy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1069</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1061</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1070?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pitfalls in Abdominal Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: How Predictive is Restricted Water Diffusion for Malignancy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1070?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> As diffusion-weighted imaging is increasingly implemented
into routine protocols of abdominal MRI, abnormal findings in expected and
unexpected locations become more common. The aim of our retrospective study
was to investigate the specificity of restricted diffusion in differentiation
of benign from malignant abdominal disease.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Two hundred thirty consecutively registered
patients underwent abdominal MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging
(single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence) with b values of 0, 150, 500, and
1,000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>. Lesions were detected by two blinded readers using
only the images with a b value of 1,000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, and representative
apparent diffusion coefficients were measured. Lymph nodes were not
documented.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Fifty-two of the 230 patients had a total of 55 lesions
with restricted diffusion (23.9%). The mean apparent diffusion coefficient was
809 mm<sup>2</sup>/s. Forty-three lesions (78.2%) were malignant. The 12
benign lesions were liver hemangioma, liver adenoma, autoimmune pancreatitis,
pancreatic teratoma, two abscesses, three cases of inflammatory bowel wall
thickening due to Crohn's disease, Bartholin cyst, hemorrhagic ovarian cyst,
and renal Rosai-Dorfman disease.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Restricted diffusion is generally considered to be
associated with malignant tumors because of the high cellularity of these
tumors. However, in interpretation of diffusion-weighted images, it should be
kept in mind that a number of benign lesions, as many as 22% in our cohort,
can exhibit restricted diffusion on images with high b values, thus mimicking
malignant lesions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feuerlein, S., Pauls, S., Juchems, M. S., Stuber, T., Hoffmann, M. H. K., Brambs, H.-J., Ernst, A. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.2093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pitfalls in Abdominal Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: How Predictive is Restricted Water Diffusion for Malignancy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1076</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1070</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1077?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spontaneous Abdominal Hemorrhage: Causes, CT Findings, and Clinical Implications]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1077?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this article is to present the most common
causes of spontaneous abdominal hemorrhage and to review the CT findings that
are important in establishing the correct diagnosis and in guiding appropriate
therapy.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Knowledge of the common CT manifestations of various
causes of spontaneous abdominal hemorrhage allows their accurate diagnosis and
has a direct impact on clinical decision making.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Furlan, A., Fakhran, S., Federle, M. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.2231</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spontaneous Abdominal Hemorrhage: Causes, CT Findings, and Clinical Implications]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1087</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1077</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/W301?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diffusion-Weighted MRI of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma During Sorafenib Treatment: Initial Results]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/W301?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to evaluate signal changes
of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in diffusion-weighted MRI in the
early-response monitoring of oral therapy with the multikinase inhibitor
sorafenib.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Hepatocellular carcinoma lesions exhibit characteristic
but unusual apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes during sorafenib
therapy, consisting of early decrease in ADC after therapy onset followed by a
reincrease. The ADC changes seem to reflect the underlying pathophysiologic
mechanisms in tumor necrosis (most probably hemorrhagic) induced by this novel
targeted agent early after therapy onset and may indicate tumor reactivation
in the later follow-up period.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schraml, C., Schwenzer, N. F., Martirosian, P., Bitzer, M., Lauer, U., Claussen, C. D., Horger, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.2289</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diffusion-Weighted MRI of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma During Sorafenib Treatment: Initial Results]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W307</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W301</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/W308?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MRI Features of Pancreatic Colloid Carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/W308?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to retrospectively
investigate the MRI findings (diameter, location, contour and margin, signal
intensity characteristics, and enhancement patterns) in a series of eight
patients with pathologically proven colloid carcinoma of the pancreas.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Colloid carcinomas of the pancreas appear as masses with
lobulating contours, indiscrete margins, and hyperintensity on T2-weighted
images (<I>n</I> = 8). In addition, all patients who underwent dynamic
studies (<I>n</I> = 4) showed peripheral and internal spongelike or meshlike
progressive delayed contrast enhancement.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoon, M. A., Lee, J. M., Kim, S. H., Lee, J. Y., Han, J. K., Choi, B. I., Choi, J.-Y., Park, S. H., Lee, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2347</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MRI Features of Pancreatic Colloid Carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W313</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W308</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>