<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology Gastrointestinal Imaging</title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Roentgenology RSS feed -- recent Gastrointestinal Imaging articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1546-3141</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Roentgenology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0361-803X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1286?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1044?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1050?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology</title>
<url>http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] 3-T MRI of Rectal Carcinoma: Preoperative Diagnosis, Staging, and Planning of Sphincter-Sparing Surgery]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of
3-T MRI in the preoperative diagnosis, staging, and planning of surgical
management of rectal carcinoma.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Thirty-eight patients (23 men, 15 women) with
clinically suspected rectal carcinoma underwent 3-T MRI. Coronal, axial, and
sagittal T2-weighted sequences with and without fat suppression; axial
T1-weighted spin-echo sequences; axial T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences
with and without fat suppression; oblique 2D MR hydrography; and 3D
fat-suppressed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were performed. Image quality
with these sequences was evaluated by three radiologists experienced in body
MRI. The significance of difference in results with the sequences was tested.
The manner in which MRI staging and feasibility of sphincter-sparing surgery
agreed with operative and pathologic findings was evaluated with kappa
statistics.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Rectal carcinoma was identified on MRI and confirmed
histologically in all 38 patients. MRI findings were correctly predictive of T
category in 35 cases (accuracy, 92.1%). In 31 (96.9%) of 32 resectable
cases,sphincter-sparing surgical approaches were accurately chosen on the
basis of MRI findings. Among the 11 sequences, 3D fat-suppressed dynamic
contrast-enhanced MRI best delineated tumor margins. Coronal and axial
T2-weighted images also well depicted tumor margins with minimal artifact.
T2-weighted images were superior to unenhanced T1-weighted images.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> MRI of rectal cancer at 3 T is accurate for prediction
of T category and the feasibility of sphincter-sparing surgery. The best
images were obtained with coronal, sagittal, and axial T2-weighted sequences
and 3D fat-suppressed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, X. M., Zhang, H. L., Yu, D., Dai, Y., Bi, D., Prince, M. R., Li, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2505</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] 3-T MRI of Rectal Carcinoma: Preoperative Diagnosis, Staging, and Planning of Sphincter-Sparing Surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1278</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Protrusion Method for Automated Estimation of Polyp Size on CT Colonography]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and
measurement variability of automated lesion measurement on CT colonography in
comparison with manual 2D and 3D techniques under varying scanning
conditions.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> The study included phantoms (23 phantom
objects) and patients (16 polyps). Measurement with sliding calipers served as
the reference for the phantom data. The mean of two independent colonoscopic
measurements was the reference for the polyps. The automated measurement was
developed for a computer-aided detection scheme, and the size of any detected
object was obtained from measurement of its largest diameter. The automated
measurement was compared with manual 2D and 3D measurements by two experienced
observers.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> For phantom data, the measurement variability of the
automated method was significantly less than that of the two observers
(<I>p</I> &lt; 0.05), except for the 3D measurement by observer 1, as
follows: automated, 0.86 mm; observer 1, 1.76 mm (2D), 0.96 (3D); observer 2,
1.34 mm (2D), 1.45 mm (3D). The variability of the automated method did not
differ significantly from that of manual methods in measurement with patient
data. The automated method had a systematic error for phantom data (1.9
mm).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> For phantoms, the automated method has less measurement
variability than manual 2D and 3D techniques. For true polyps, the measurement
variability of the automated method is comparable with that of manual methods.
The automated method does not suffer from intraobserver variability. Because
systematic error can be calibrated, automated size measurement may contribute
to a practical evaluation strategy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Wijk, C., Florie, J., Nio, C. Y., Dekker, E., de Vries, A. H., Venema, H. W., van Vliet, L. J., Stoker, J., Vos, F. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2865</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Protrusion Method for Automated Estimation of Polyp Size on CT Colonography]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1285</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1286?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Jejunal Diverticulosis: Findings on CT in 28 Patients]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1286?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to better characterize the
CT findings of jejunal diverticulosis by retrospectively reviewing abdominal
CT scans of 28 patients with this condition on barium examinations.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Jejunal diverticula have characteristic findings on CT,
appearing as discrete round or ovoid, contrast-, fluid-, or air-containing
structures outside the expected lumen of the small bowel, with a smooth,
barely discernible wall and no recognizable small-bowel folds. Not
infrequently, these structures are seen to communicate directly with an
adjoining small-bowel loop, a feature best recognized by scrolling the images.
Our experience suggests that jejunal diverticulosis can often be recognized on
the basis of the characteristic CT features of this condition.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fintelmann, F., Levine, M. S., Rubesin, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Jejunal Diverticulosis: Findings on CT in 28 Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1290</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1286</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1044?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Is There Sufficient MDCT Capacity to Provide Colorectal Cancer Screening with CT Colonography for the U.S. Population?]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1044?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The impact of introducing widespread colorectal cancer
(CRC) screening with CT colonography (CTC) on current resource capacity is
unknown. Although a relatively large number of MDCT scanners are currently in
operation throughout the United States, these existing units already perform
studies for a wide array of indications. Our aim was to assess the ability of
the available MDCT capacity in the United States to provide population
screening with CTC.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Mathematic and Markov models were used to
assess the mean number of CTC procedures per MDCT scanner per day (expressed
as CTC/MDCT/day) necessary for both the startup and steady-state phases of a
nationwide screening effort. Plausible ranges were applied to a number of
variables in the sensitivity analysis. The number of existing CT scanners in
the United States was based on 2006 estimates.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> At baseline analysis, assuming gradual increases in
compliance, CTC penetrance (percentage of screening-compliant population who
would opt for CTC), and MDCT capacity, a total of 37,227,541 adults would need
to undergo CTC screening over a 10-year startup period, corresponding to
1.2&ndash;1.6 CTC/MDCT/day. Assuming a 5-year routine screening interval
between the ages of 50 and 80 years, the number of CTC studies needed to be
performed in the steady-state period is 1.2 CTC/MDCT/day. These estimates were
sensitive to variations in compliance, MDCT capacity, population size,
interval for the startup phase, and the routine CTC screening interval.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> CT capacity in the United States appears to be adequate
for handling the potential demand related to mass population screening with
CTC, even without assuming a specific CTC-driven increase in MDCT supply.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pickhardt, P. J., Hassan, C., Laghi, A., Kim, D. H., Zullo, A., Iafrate, F., Morini, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Is There Sufficient MDCT Capacity to Provide Colorectal Cancer Screening with CT Colonography for the U.S. Population?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1049</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1044</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1050?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Barium Enema Evaluation of Colonic Involvement in Endometriosis]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1050?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to define the role of
double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) compared with laparoscopy in the diagnosis
and local staging of intestinal endometriosis.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> A search of our radiology database revealed
the cases of 234 women who underwent surgical resection for pelvic
endometriosis with associated intestinal surgery for intestinal endometriosis.
We retrospectively evaluated all preoperative DCBE images for the presence of
bowel endometriosis and the number, site (rectum, sigmoid, cecum), and size of
the lesions. The radiographic findings at DCBE were retrospectively correlated
with those at surgical pathologic examination.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> DCBE revealed 211 intestinal lesions of bowel endometriosis
in 168 (71.8%) of 234 patients with pelvic endometriosis clinically enrolled.
Forty (23.8%) of the 168 women had more than one endometriotic bowel nodule
(two nodules in 37 cases, three in three cases). Laparoscopy revealed 233
intestinal lesions in 174 (74.3%) of the patients. Fifty-four (31.0%) of 174
women had more than one endometriotic bowel nodule (two nodules in 49 cases,
three in five cases). There was 100% correlation between the DCBE and
histologic findings as far as site and size of the lesions were concerned.
DCBE had a sensitivity of 88.4%, specificity of 93.0%, positive predictive
value of 97.5%, negative predictive of 71.0%, and accuracy of 89.5% in the
identification of bowel endometriosis.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> DCBE is helpful in discerning bowel wall involvement in
endometriosis, enabling proper surgical planning. DCBE also appears to have a
role in the management of endometriosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faccioli, N., Manfredi, R., Mainardi, P., Chiara, E. D., Spoto, E., Minelli, L., Mucelli, R. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Barium Enema Evaluation of Colonic Involvement in Endometriosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1054</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1050</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>