<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology Hepatobiliary Imaging</title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Roentgenology RSS feed -- recent Hepatobiliary Imaging articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1546-3141</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Roentgenology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0361-803X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1314?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1318?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1324?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/W290?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/984?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/993?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1003?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1010?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1018?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/190/4/W261?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology</title>
<url>http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1314?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] CT Laparoscopy for Detecting Small Superficial Metastatic Lesions of the Liver Surface: Initial Experience]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1314?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy
of CT laparoscopy in the detection of superficial metastasis of the liver
surface.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> From April 1, 2007, to July 1, 2007, a total
of 34 consecutively registered patients (19 men, 15 women; median age, 55
years) with various intraabdominal malignant tumors underwent preoperative CT
and composed the study population. All patients underwent superparamagnetic
iron oxide&ndash;enhanced MRI and portal phase contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT,
including CT laparoscopy. CT laparoscopy is a form of volume-rendering 3D
imaging of the liver that depicts the liver surface in detail.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Among 23 patients who underwent surgery for management of a
primary tumor, four patients had seven superficial metastatic lesions of the
liver surface. None of these lesions had been detected with preoperative axial
CT or superparamagnetic iron oxide&ndash;enhanced MRI. In contrast, CT
laparoscopy revealed four of seven lesions in four patients. On a
lesion-by-lesion basis, the sensitivity was 57%, the positive predictive value
was 100%, and the accuracy was 57%.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Our initial experience proves that CT laparoscopy is a
promising method for detecting small superficial metastatic lesions of the
liver surface. The findings can influence decisions regarding tumor
resectability.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maetani, Y. S., Isoda, H., Nomura, A., Arizono, S., Hirokawa, Y., Shibata, T., Kaori, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2887</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] CT Laparoscopy for Detecting Small Superficial Metastatic Lesions of the Liver Surface: Initial Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1317</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1314</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1318?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Effect of T1 Shortening on T2-Weighted MRI Sequences: Comparison of Hepatic Mass Conspicuity on Images Acquired Before and After Gadolinium Enhancement]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1318?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to compare the conspicuity
of hepatic lesions on T2-weighted fast-recovery fast spin-echo MR images
obtained before and after administration of gadolinium.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> We reviewed T2-weighted fast-recovery fast
spin-echo images before and after gadolinium enhancement for 84 patients with
118 focal liver lesions. Solid lesions (22 hepatomas, seven ablated hepatomas,
12 metastatic lesions, six cases of focal nodular hyperplasia, five dysplastic
nodules, one adenoma) were proved pathologically or with multiple follow-up
studies. Nonsolid lesions were diagnosed as hemangiomas (<I>n</I> = 33) or
cysts (<I>n</I> = 32) on the basis of imaging features. Two blinded
radiologists interpreted the images independently, reading unenhanced images
first and gadolinium-enhanced images at least 2 weeks later. Lesion
conspicuity was ranked as follows: 1, poor; 2, moderate; 3, good; 4,
excellent. The sign test was used for qualitative scoring of imaging pairs
(unenhanced and gadolinium enhanced). The Fisher's exact test was used for
subgroup analysis of solid and nonsolid lesions.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> On gadolinium-enhanced T2-weighted images, 21 (17.8%) of
118 of the lesions had improved conspicuity, 86 (72.9%) had no difference in
conspicuity, and 11 (9.3%) appeared worse. No statistically significant
difference was found between unenhanced and enhanced images (<I>p</I> =
0.11), but a trend toward improved conspicuity with gadolinium enhancement was
observed. Subgroup analysis showed that on gadolinium-enhanced T2weighted
images, visualization of solid hepatic lesions (28.3%) was significantly
better than that of nonsolid lesions (9.2%) (<I>p</I> = 0.01).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Compared with unenhanced T2-weighted images,
gadolinium-enhanced T2-weighted images had a trend toward improved conspicuity
of focal liver lesions. Subgroup analysis showed that visualization of solid
lesions benefited significantly more from use of gadolinium-enhanced
T2-weighted sequences than did visualization of nonsolid lesions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chang, S. D., Thoeni, R. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2696</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Effect of T1 Shortening on T2-Weighted MRI Sequences: Comparison of Hepatic Mass Conspicuity on Images Acquired Before and After Gadolinium Enhancement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1323</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1318</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1324?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Planning Sonography to Assess the Feasibility of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinomas]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1324?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to evaluate the
feasibility rate and the reasons for infeasibility of percutaneous
radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) at planning
sonography.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> We retrospectively evaluated 248 patients who
had been referred for planning sonography at our department between October
2005 and February 2006. We reviewed the radiologic reports of 256 planning
sonography examinations in terms of the rate of feasible cases and the reasons
for infeasibility. The reasons for infeasibility were classified in six
categories: an inconspicuous tumor, an inadequate electrode path, an organ
vulnerable to collateral thermal damage, a tumor that was too large or too
many tumors, and a high risk of the heat sink effect. In addition, we assessed
the treatment modality for the patients who were determined to have HCCs for
which percutaneous radiofrequency ablation was not feasible.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> In 141 (55%) of the 256 planning sonography examinations,
percutaneous radiofrequency ablation was feasible. The remaining 115 (45%)
planning sonography examinations revealed that radiofrequency ablation was not
a feasible procedure. The reasons for infeasibility included an inconspicuous
tumor in 77 patients (55.8%), an inadequate electrode path in 33 patients
(23.9%), an organ vulnerable to collateral thermal damage in 14 patients
(10.1%), a tumor that was too large or too many tumors in eight patients
(5.8%), a high risk of the heat sink effect in five patients (3.6%), and a
portal vein thrombosis in one patient (0.7%). One reason for infeasibility was
found in 96 patients, two reasons in 19 patients, and four reasons in one
patient. Seventy (61.9%) of 113 patients for whom radiofrequency ablation was
not feasible underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization as an
alternative treatment.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> In approximately half of the patients for whom
percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of HCC is requested, the procedure is not
feasible, mainly due to inconspicuous tumors, at planning sonography.
Additional objective criteria for assessing the feasibility of radiofrequency
ablation and therapeutic strategies according to the reasons for infeasibility
should be investigated further.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rhim, H., Lee, M. H., Kim, Y.-s., Choi, D., Lee, W. J., Lim, H. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2970</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Planning Sonography to Assess the Feasibility of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinomas]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1330</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1324</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1331?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Evaluation of the Severity of Chronic Hepatitis C with 3-T1H-MR Spectroscopy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1331?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to compare the spectral
characteristics of lipids, choline-containing compounds, and
glutamine&ndash;glutamate complex assessed with <sup>1</sup>H-MR spectroscopy
with the histologic findings in patients with chronic hepatitis C.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Nine healthy controls and 30 patients with
biopsy-proven hepatitis C virus&ndash;related liver disease participated in
this prospective study. Degree of fibrosis and histologic activity were scored
according to the METAVIR classification. The percentage of involved
hepatocytes was used to grade steatosis. Hepatic spectra were obtained with a
3-T spectroscopic system. Tenfold cross-validated stepwise discriminant
analysis was performed to classify disease severity on the basis of the
spectroscopic findings.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> There was a strong correlation between <sup>1</sup>H-MR
spectroscopically measured lipid concentration and the degree of steatosis at
histologic examination (<I>r</I> = 0.9236, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001). This
finding enabled clear separation of groups according to degree of
histologically determined steatosis. Variation in lipid concentration was
consistent with the degree of steatosis (<I>r</I> = 0.7265, <I>p</I> &lt;
0.0001) and stage of fibrosis (<I>r</I> = 0.8156, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001).
In univariate analysis, concentrations of both choline-containing compounds
and glutamine&ndash;glutamate complex had a direct correlation with histologic
grade (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001) and degree of steatosis (<I>p</I> &lt;
0.0001) but not with stage of fibrosis (<I>p</I> &gt; 0.05). In multivariate
analysis, the only factor independently associated with concentrations of
choline-containing compounds and glutamine&ndash;glutamate complex was
histologic grade. In cross-validated discriminant analysis based on
choline-containing compound, glutamine&ndash;glutamate complex, and lipid
resonance, 70% (21 of 30) of the histologic grade groups and 73% (22 of 30) of
the steatosis groups were correctly classified.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy can be an alternative to
liver biopsy in the evaluation of steatosis and necroinflammatory activity in
liver disease but is not useful for complete evaluation of hepatic
fibrosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orlacchio, A., Bolacchi, F., Cadioli, M., Bergamini, A., Cozzolino, V., Angelico, M., Simonetti, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2262</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Evaluation of the Severity of Chronic Hepatitis C with 3-T1H-MR Spectroscopy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1339</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1331</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/W290?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] MRI of Hepatic Adenomatosis: Initial Observations with Gadoxetic Acid Contrast Agent in Three Patients]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/W290?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to describe the MR signal
characteristics of histologically proven liver adenomatosis in three patients
using gadoxetic acid, a newly developed liver-specific MR contrast agent.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> In all three patients, more than 100 liver adenomas
revealed no metabolism of the new liver-specific contrast agent in the delayed
phase. Because of absent or strongly reduced intracellular uptake of gadoxetic
acid in all adenomas during delayed contrast-enhanced series, differentiation
of adenomas from dysplastic or malignant lesions was not possible.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giovanoli, O., Heim, M., Terracciano, L., Bongartz, G., Ledermann, H. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] MRI of Hepatic Adenomatosis: Initial Observations with Gadoxetic Acid Contrast Agent in Three Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W293</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W290</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/984?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Imaging of Biliary Tract Inflammation: An Update]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/984?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The concepts of biliary tract inflammation are changing.
Some previously common entities are now rare. New autoimmune conditions are
being recognized, and imaging has continued to advance, resulting in better
and in many areas less-invasive techniques for examination of the biliary
tract.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Radiologists should be aware of the etiologic factors of
biliary tract inflammation being proposed. They should also understand new
approaches to imaging of the biliary tract.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knowlton, J. Q., Taylor, A. J., Reichelderfer, M., Stang, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Imaging of Biliary Tract Inflammation: An Update]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>992</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>984</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/993?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/993?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The inflammatory subtype of nonalcoholic fatty liver
disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, is becoming one of the most important
causes of chronic liver disease. In this article, we discuss the epidemiology,
pathogenesis, and clinical and radiologic diagnosis of the subtypes of
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> We discuss the current and evolving imaging tests in the
evaluation of hepatic fatty content, inflammation, and fibrosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lall, C. G., Aisen, A. M., Bansal, N., Sandrasegaran, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2052</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1002</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>993</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1003?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Optimal Contrast Dose for Depiction of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Dynamic CT Using 64-MDCT]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1003?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to investigate
prospectively the optimal contrast dose for the depiction of hypervascular
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during the hepatic arterial phase (HAP) at
dynamic CT using a 64-MDCT scanner.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> The study included 135 patients with known or
suspected HCC who underwent dynamic CT on a 64-detector scanner and 47 were
found to have 71 hypervascular HCCs. The patients were randomly assigned to
one of three protocols: A contrast dose of 450, 525, or 600 mg I/kg of body
weight was delivered over 30 seconds in protocols A, B, and C, respectively.
We measured the tumor&ndash;liver contrast (TLC) during HAP in the three
groups and compared the results. Two radiologists qualitatively evaluated
tumor conspicuity during HAP using a 3-point scale; their results were
compared.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The TLC in protocols A, B, and C was 26.5, 38.4, and 52.3
H, respectively; the difference was significant between protocols A and B
(<I>p</I> = 0.05), A and C (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.01), and B and C (<I>p</I> =
0.02). In our qualitative analysis of tumor conspicuity, the mean score for
protocols A, B, and C was 1.6, 2.3, and 2.7, respectively; there was a
significant difference between protocols A and B and A and C, but not between
protocols B and C.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The administration of a total iodine dose of 525 mg or
more per kilogram of body weight is desirable for the good or excellent
depiction of hypervascular HCC, although the administration of 450 mg I/kg of
body weight can depict hypervascular HCC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yanaga, Y., Awai, K., Nakaura, T., Namimoto, T., Oda, S., Funama, Y., Yamashita, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3129</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Optimal Contrast Dose for Depiction of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Dynamic CT Using 64-MDCT]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1009</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1003</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1010?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Doppler Sonography to Diagnose Venous Congestion in a Modified Right Lobe Graft After Living Donor Liver Transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1010?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to assess the value of
Doppler sonography for the diagnosis of hepatic venous congestion in a
modified right lobe graft during the early postoperative period after living
donor liver transplantation.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Doppler sonography examinations were
prospectively performed in 54 patients within 24 hours after living donor
liver transplantation with a modified right lobe graft in which large (&gt; 5
mm) middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries were reconstructed. The number, flow
direction, and waveform of the MHV tributaries; the echogenicity of the
surrounding parenchyma; and the flow direction of the corresponding portal
branch were evaluated. Hepatic venous congestion was diagnosed when there was
no color flow or a monophasic waveform of an MHV tributary. The sensitivity of
Doppler sonography for the detection of MHV tributaries was assessed using
donors' preoperative CT scans and surgical records as references. The
diagnostic values of Doppler sonography for hepatic venous congestion were
assessed using recipients' postoperative CT scans as references. Differences
in prevalence of Doppler sonography findings between the group with hepatic
venous congestion and the non&ndash;hepatic venous congestion group were
assessed.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Doppler sonography enabled us to identify 90% (155/173) of
all and 98% (129/131) of the large MHV tributaries. The sensitivity and
specificity of Doppler sonography for hepatic venous congestion were 90%
(28/31) and 77% (96/124), respectively, for all and 88% (15/17) and 85%
(95/112), respectively, for large MHV tributaries. Parenchymal
hyperechogenicity was more commonly seen in the hepatic venous congestion
group (65%, 20/31) than in non&ndash;hepatic venous congestion group (6%,
7/124) (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.01). All five MHV tributaries with reversed flow
were seen in the non&ndash;hepatic venous congestion group. All five portal
branches with hepatofugal flow were seen in the hepatic venous congestion
group.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Doppler sonography provides a reliable noninvasive
surveillance tool for hepatic venous congestion in a modified right lobe graft
during the early postoperative period after living donor liver
transplantation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, S. Y., Kim, K. W., Lee, S. S., Song, G.-W., Hwang, S., Kim, P. N., Lee, S. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2825</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Doppler Sonography to Diagnose Venous Congestion in a Modified Right Lobe Graft After Living Donor Liver Transplantation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1017</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1010</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1018?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Sparing of Fatty Infiltration Around Focal Hepatic Lesions in Patients with Hepatic Steatosis: Sonographic Appearance with CT and MRI Correlation]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1018?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purposes of this study were to illustrate the
sonographic features of focal hepatic lesions with peritumoral sparing of
fatty infiltration in patients with hepatic steatosis, to correlate the
sonographic findings with CT and MRI findings, and to discuss the possible
mechanisms.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Various focal hepatic lesions can accompany peritumoral
sparing of fatty infiltration in patients with hepatic steatosis, and they can
manifest with an atypical sonographic appearance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, K. W., Kim, M. J., Lee, S. S., Kim, H. J., Shin, Y. M., Kim, P.-N., Lee, M.-G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2863</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Sparing of Fatty Infiltration Around Focal Hepatic Lesions in Patients with Hepatic Steatosis: Sonographic Appearance with CT and MRI Correlation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1027</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1018</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/190/4/W261?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Undifferentiated Embryonal Sarcoma of the Liver]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/190/4/W261?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, M., Tireno, B., Slanetz, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Undifferentiated Embryonal Sarcoma of the Liver]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>