<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology Musculoskeletal Imaging</title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Roentgenology RSS feed -- recent Musculoskeletal Imaging articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1546-3141</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Roentgenology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0361-803X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1247?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1255?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1260?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1263?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/W283?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1097?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1112?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1124?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology</title>
<url>http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1247?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Prevalence, Pattern, and Spectrum of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: CT Analysis of 218 Patients]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1247?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence,
pattern, and spectrum of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder dislocation,
to relate this to the frequency of dislocation, and to test the
appropriateness of the measurement method.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Two hundred eighteen patients with single or
recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation underwent shoulder CT examination.
Fifteen patients had bilateral dislocation. Prevalence and severity of glenoid
bone loss and glenoid fracture were assessed. CT examinations of 56 control
subjects without shoulder dislocation were evaluated for glenoid contour and
side-to-side variation in glenoid width.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Glenoid bone loss was present in 27 (41%) of 66 patients
with first-time unilateral dislocation and 118 (86%) of 137 patients with
recurrent unilateral dislocation. Glenoid bone loss ranged from &ndash;0.3% to
&ndash;33% (mean, &ndash;10.8% &plusmn; 7.9%). Seventy-four (51%) of 145
patients had &le; 10% glenoid bone loss, 54 (37%) had between 10% and 20%,
eight (6%) had between 20% and 25% glenoid bone loss, and nine (6%) had &ge;
25% glenoid bone loss. Glenoid rim fractures were present in 49 (21%) of 233
dislocated shoulders. The number of dislocations correlated moderately with
the severity of glenoid bone loss (<I>r</I> = 0.56). The normal side-to-side
glenoid width variation was small (0.46 &plusmn; 0.81 mm).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Glenoid bone loss is common in anterior shoulder
dislocation. It is probably multifactorial in origin, is usually mild in
degree, and has a maximum observed severity of &ndash;33%. Dislocation
frequency cannot accurately predict the degree of bone loss.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griffith, J. F., Antonio, G. E., Yung, P. S. H., Wong, E. M. C., Yu, A. B., Ahuja, A. T., Chan, K. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Prevalence, Pattern, and Spectrum of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: CT Analysis of 218 Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Musculoskeletal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1255?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Detection of Bone Graft Failure in Lumbar Spondylodesis: Spatial Resolution with High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative CT]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1255?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> In spinal surgery, anterior spondylodesis is often
combined with bone grafting, and graft integration is assessed with CT.
High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT offers a resolution of 82 &micro;m.
The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior spondylodesis as
assessed with three radiologic procedures.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Monosegmental lumbar spondylodesis with
autologous iliac crest graft or solvent-preserved bovine cancellous bone was
performed on seven sheep. The fused spinal segments were explanted after 24
weeks and examined with clinical 64-MDCT, high-resolution peripheral
quantitative CT, and contact radiography. In 2D views, the area of the disk
space bridged by bone was assessed, and the grafts were examined for
fractures.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> In three of seven sheep, clinical CT erroneously showed
stable consolidation, whereas contact radiography revealed a clearly visible
graft fracture, as did high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT. There was a
statistically significant difference (<I>p</I> = 0.038) between bone volume
assessed with clinical CT and that assessed with contact radiography. There
was an almost significant difference (<I>p</I> = 0.053) between volumes
assessed with high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT and clinical
MDCT.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT, a technique
approved for clinical use, has higher resolution in imaging of bone structure
than does 64-MDCT. Our results show that high-resolution peripheral
quantitative CT is superior to 64-MDCT in assessing osseous implant
integration after anterior spondylodesis. The specimen size limit, however,
prohibits in vivo use of this method in evaluation of the human spine. Our
results suggest that in clinical practice, persisting symptoms despite
radiologic findings of consolidated spondylodesis may be related to graft
failure, which cannot be detected with clinically available methods.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strohm, P. C., Kubosch, D., Bley, T. A., Sprecher, C. M., Sudkamp, N. P., Milz, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2701</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Detection of Bone Graft Failure in Lumbar Spondylodesis: Spatial Resolution with High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative CT]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1259</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Musculoskeletal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1260?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Femoroacetabular Impingement: Can the Alpha Angle Be Estimated?]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1260?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Femoroacetabular impingement is an important entity with
well-described radiographic findings. One of the criteria of the cam type of
femoroacetabular impingement is femoral head&ndash;neck dysplasia, denoted
mathematically as the "alpha angle." Several observers have
reported that direct measurement of the angle may not be necessary because
subjective appraisal may yield similar results. We sought to scientifically
determine the accuracy of a subjective assessment, using the calculated angle
as the gold standard.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> At 1.5 T, 50 consecutive patients' hips were
evaluated on sets of oblique axial images. Two musculoskeletal radiologists
recorded their subjective opinion as to the alpha angle using a confidence
scale of 1&ndash;5. Direct mathematic measurement of the alpha angle was done
by a third independent observer and correlated with the subjective results.
Correlations between the subjective and measured angles and interobserver
variation were calculated.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Statistically, significant variability was seen in the
subjective assessment of the alpha angle. When the alpha angle was &gt;
55&deg;, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was
0.606, indicating that visual assessment is a poor predictor of a wide alpha
angle. Even in patients with a measured normal alpha angle (&lt; 55&deg;),
slightly fewer than half were subjectively thought to possibly, likely, or
definitely have abnormal angles. Similarly, more than half of the abnormal
cases (alpha angles &gt; 55&deg;) were subjectively thought to possibly or
probably be normal.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Subjective assessment of alpha angles is suboptimal
unless one is quite confident of a bone abnormality.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nouh, M. R., Schweitzer, M. E., Rybak, L., Cohen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3258</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Femoroacetabular Impingement: Can the Alpha Angle Be Estimated?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1260</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Musculoskeletal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1263?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Practical Experience with Sonographically Guided Phenol Instillation of Stump Neuroma: Predictors of Effects, Success, and Outcome]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1263?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Phantom limb pain and stump pain frequently occur after
limb amputation, and stump neuromas play an important role in generation of
the pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a
previously described optimized procedure for sclerosis of painful stump
neuromas under real-time high-resolution sonographic guidance.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> In this prospective study, neurosclerosis was
performed on 82 patients by means of high-resolution sonographically guided
injection of up to 0.8 mL of 80% phenol solution according to a standardized
protocol.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> During treatment all patients had marked improvement in
terms of reduction of pain measured with a visual analog scale. Twelve (15%)
of the subjects were pain free after one to three treatments, nine of the 12
achieving relief with the initial instillation. At 6-month follow-up
evaluation, 52 patients assessed their present pain quantity with a simplified
three-step score. Twenty (38%) of the 52 patients reported almost unnoticeable
pain, and 33 (64%) reported pain equal to the minimum reached during therapy.
In 18 (35%) of the 52 patients, the incidence of painful periods had markedly
decreased. The neurosclerosis procedure had a low complication rate (5% rate
of minor complications, 1.3% rate of major complications).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The high-resolution sonographically guided
neurosclerosis procedure had a significantly better outcome than other
documented treatments. Sonographically guided neurosclerosis should be
included in the management of chronic phantom limb and stump pain.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gruber, H., Glodny, B., Bodner, G., Kopf, H., Bendix, N., Galiano, K., Strasak, A., Peer, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2050</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Practical Experience with Sonographically Guided Phenol Instillation of Stump Neuroma: Predictors of Effects, Success, and Outcome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1269</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Musculoskeletal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/W283?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] CT-Guided Biopsy of Bone: A Radiologist's Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/W283?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> We present an overview of approaches for bone biopsy used
to minimize potential tumor seeding of adjacent soft-tissue structures and
compartments. We discuss a variety of approaches related to specific anatomic
parts and review pertinent anatomy.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> We provide important guidelines and key examples that
will help readers perform percutaneous needle bone biopsy safely.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Espinosa, L. A., Jamadar, D. A., Jacobson, J. A., DeMaeseneer, M. O., Ebrahim, F. S., Sabb, B. J., Kretschmer, M. T., Biermann, J. S., Kim, S.-M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3138</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] CT-Guided Biopsy of Bone: A Radiologist's Perspective]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W289</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W283</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Musculoskeletal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1097?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Whole-Body MRI Versus Whole-Body MDCT for Staging of Multiple Myeloma]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1097?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to compare the detection
rate of bone manifestations of multiple myeloma in whole-body MRI compared
with MDCT and to assess accuracy in staging.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Forty-one patients with histologically
confirmed myeloma were prospectively examined with a whole-body MDCT protocol
and whole-body MRI on a 1.5-T system. The MRI protocol consisted of
T1-weighted spin-echo and STIR sequences. For data analysis, the entire
skeleton was divided into 61 regions per patient. Image evaluation was
performed in a consensus reading by two radiologists blinded to the patients'
history, with separate evaluation of each technique. The patients were staged
by MRI and MDCT data separately according to the Durie and Salmon PLUS staging
system.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> On MRI, 15 patients showed no involvement. In 26 patients,
975 regions were affected: 21 patients were stage I, two were stage II, and 18
were stage III. On MDCT, 19 patients showed no involvement. In 22 patients,
462 regions were affected. For the detection rate, MRI was statistically
superior to MDCT (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.001, Wilcoxon's signed rank test).
According to MDCT, 25 patients were stage I, seven were stage II, and nine
were stage III. In 21 patients with involvement detected on both methods, MRI
showed more extensive disease than MDCT. Eleven patients were understaged with
MDCT compared with MRI, which was statistically significant (<I>p</I> &lt;
0.001, chi-square test).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Whole-body MDCT leads to a significantly lower detection
rate and staging in patients with multiple myeloma.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baur-Melnyk, A., Buhmann, S., Becker, C., Schoenberg, S. O., Lang, N., Bartl, R., Reiser, M. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2635</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Whole-Body MRI Versus Whole-Body MDCT for Staging of Multiple Myeloma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1104</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1097</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Musculoskeletal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Atrophy and Fatty Infiltration of the Supraspinatus Muscle: Sonography Versus MRI]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to compare sonography with
MRI for the evaluation of supraspinatus muscle atrophy and fatty
infiltration.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Forty-five shoulders in 39 patients who had
undergone shoulder MRI for the assessment of rotator cuff disease were
evaluated blindly with sonography. Supraspinatus muscle atrophy was
quantitatively assessed by calculating the occupation ratio (cross-sectional
surface area of the supraspinatus muscle belly divided by that of its fossa).
This was done by reproducing on sonography the equivalent of the
"Y" view on MRI. Fatty infiltration was assessed by evaluating
supraspinatus muscle echogenicity compared with that of the trapezius muscle
and pennate pattern. The occupation ratio and fatty infiltration of the
supraspinatus muscle on sonography were compared with these findings on
MRI.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Occupation ratios calculated on sonography images ranged
from 0.07 (severe atrophy) to 0.81 (normal) and correlated with the ratios
calculated on MRI (<I>R</I> = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83&ndash;0.95). All 20
shoulders with no fatty infiltration on MRI had normal echogenicity and a
pennate pattern on sonography. Eight of the 10 shoulders with mild fatty
infiltration on MRI had an effaced pennate pattern and mild hyperechogenicity
on sonography. In 13 of the 15 shoulders with moderate to severe fatty
infiltration on MRI, the pennate pattern was absent and marked
hyperechogenicity was present on sonography.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Our study suggests that there is a good correlation
between sonography and MRI for the assessment of supraspinatus muscle atrophy
and fatty infiltration.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khoury, V., Cardinal, E., Brassard, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2835</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Atrophy and Fatty Infiltration of the Supraspinatus Muscle: Sonography Versus MRI]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1111</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Musculoskeletal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1112?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Postoperative Evaluation of the Total Ankle Arthroplasty]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1112?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this article is to review the basic design
features of second-generation total ankle arthroplasty components and to
illustrate the normal and abnormal postoperative imaging features associated
with such devices. The usefulness of CT in postoperative evaluation will be
highlighted.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Postoperative evaluation of the total ankle arthroplasty
necessitates a familiarity with the various designs currently in use.
Radiography serves as an integral component in the postoperative evaluation of
such devices, with CT offering further characterization of radiographic
abnormalities.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bestic, J. M., Peterson, J. J., DeOrio, J. K., Bancroft, L. W., Berquist, T. H., Kransdorf, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2729</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Postoperative Evaluation of the Total Ankle Arthroplasty]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1123</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1112</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Musculoskeletal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1124?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Direct MR Arthrography of the Hip with Leg Traction: Feasibility for Assessing Articular Cartilage]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/1124?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Hip arthrography is an accurate diagnostic method for
evaluation of the peripheral compartment, but its depiction of cartilage
lesions is moderate. The purpose of this study was to add leg traction to MR
arthrography of the hip to test its effect on visualization of cartilage
surfaces.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Hip MR arthrography with leg traction is a technically
feasible and safe procedure that improves visualization of the femoral and
acetabular cartilage surfaces.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Llopis, E., Cerezal, L., Kassarjian, A., Higueras, V., Fernandez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2559</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Direct MR Arthrography of the Hip with Leg Traction: Feasibility for Assessing Articular Cartilage]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1128</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Musculoskeletal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>