<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology Women's Imaging</title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Roentgenology RSS feed -- recent Women's Imaging articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1546-3141</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Roentgenology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0361-803X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1200?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1216?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1220?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1227?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/W278?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/854?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/860?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/865?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/870?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/W227?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/W234?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/190/4/W237?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology</title>
<url>http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1200?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Accuracy of Short-Interval Follow-Up Mammograms by Patient and Radiologist Characteristics]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1200?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to examine the accuracy of
short-interval follow-up mammograms and evaluate patient and radiologist
characteristics associated with accuracy.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> We evaluated 45,007 initial short-interval
follow-up mammograms from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium
interpreted 3&ndash;9 months after a probably benign assessment on a screening
or diagnostic examination between 1994 and 2004. We linked these mammograms
with patient characteristics and breast cancer diagnoses within 12 months. A
subset of short-interval follow-up examinations (<I>n</I> = 13,907) was
merged with radiologist characteristics collected from survey data from 130
interpreting radiologists. Using logistic regression, we fit generalized
estimating equations to model sensitivity and specificity of short-interval
follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> For every 1,000 women, 8.0 women (0.8%) were diagnosed with
breast cancer within 6 months and 11.3 (1.1%) within 12 months. Sensitivity
was 83.3% (95% CI, 79.4&ndash;87.3%) for cancers diagnosed within 6 months and
60.5% (56.2&ndash;64.7%) for those diagnosed within 12 months. Specificity was
97.2% (96.9&ndash;97.6%) at 6 months and 97.3% (96.9&ndash;97.6%) at 12
months. Sensitivity at 12 months increased among women with unilateral
short-interval follow-up mammograms (odds ratio, 1.56 [95% CI,
1.06&ndash;2.29]) and when the interpreting radiologist spent more than 10
hours a week in breast imaging (odds ratio, 3.25 [1.00&ndash;10.52]).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Initial short-interval follow-up mammography
examinations had a lower sensitivity for detecting breast cancer within 12
months than other diagnostic mammograms (61% for short-interval follow-up vs
80% for diagnostic mammograms reported in the literature). However,
sensitivity within the 6-month interval that is usually recommended for
subsequent follow-up was 83%. Accuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms
was influenced by few patient and radiologist characteristics.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bowles, E. J. A., Miglioretti, D. L., Sickles, E. A., Abraham, L., Carney, P. A., Yankaskas, B. C., Elmore, J. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Accuracy of Short-Interval Follow-Up Mammograms by Patient and Radiologist Characteristics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1208</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1200</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Clinical Application of the BI-RADS Final Assessment to Breast Sonography in Conjunction with Mammography]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to report the results of
classification of sonographic findings according to BI-RADS and to calculate
the positive predictive value (PPV) for each BI-RADS assessment category.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> We prospectively classified 4,668 breast
sonograms according to BI-RADS final assessment category. Suspicious
sonographic findings were divided into major and minor suspicious findings.
Category 1 was normal and category 2 was a benign finding such as cyst or
nodule with uniform and intense hyperechogenicity. A nodule neither category 2
nor category 4 or 5 was defined as category 3. A nodule with one or more
suspicious findings, not category 5, was defined as category 4. A nodule with
two or more major suspicious findings was defined as category 5.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Of the 4,668 cases, 321 cases failed to undergo follow-up
of at least 1 year. The PPV was 0.1% in category 1 (3/2,191), 0% in category 2
(0/773), 0.8% in category 3 (6/737), 31.1% in category 4 (161/519), and 96.9%
in category 5 (123/127). In palpable lesions (<I>n</I> = 751), the PPV was
2.2% in category 1 (2/93), 0.9% in category 3 (2/217), 54% in category 4
(107/198), and 98% in category 5 (98/100). In nonpalpable lesions (<I>n</I>
= 3,596), the PPV was 0.05% in category 1 (1/2,098), 0.8% in category 3
(4/520), 16.8% in category 4 (54/321), and 92.6% in category 5 (25/27).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> As with mammography, placing sonographic lesions into
BI-RADS categories is useful for predicting the presence of malignancy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, E.-K., Ko, K. H., Oh, K. K., Kwak, J. Y., You, J. K., Kim, M. J., Park, B.-W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3259</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Clinical Application of the BI-RADS Final Assessment to Breast Sonography in Conjunction with Mammography]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1215</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1216?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Predicting Neonatal Deaths and Pulmonary Hypoplasia in Isolated Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Using the Sonographic Fetal Lung Volume-Body Weight Ratio]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1216?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>. The objective of our study was to evaluate the potential
of the sonographic fetal lung volume&ndash;body weight ratio to predict
neonatal deaths and pulmonary hypoplasia in fetuses with isolated congenital
diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS</b>. Between January 2002 and December 2004, 40
fetuses with isolated CDH and 450 control subjects were prospectively
evaluated in two centers. Fetal lung volumes were estimated on 3D sonography
using the rotational technique and fetal weight on 2D sonography using the
Hadlock equation. The ratio of sonographic fetal lung volume to body weight
was calculated in each case and was correlated with neonatal deaths using the
Mann-Whitney <I>U</I> test. Accuracies of the ratio in predicting neonatal
deaths and pathologic diagnosis of pulmonary hypoplasia were also
evaluated.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS</b>. The ratio of sonographic fetal lung volume to body weight
is constant throughout gestation, with a mean value of 0.025. The ratio was
significantly lower in neonates that died (median, 0.009; range,
0.004&ndash;0.021) than in those that survived (median, 0.011; range,
0.008&ndash;0.020) (<I>p</I> = 0.018). Pulmonary hypoplasia was suspected
prenatally in 34 of 40 (85.0%) fetuses with CDH, in all cases of death (100%),
and in seven of nine (77.8%) neonates that survived. At autopsy, pulmonary
hypoplasia was diagnosed in 19 cases (86.4%). Accuracies of the ratio in
predicting neonatal deaths and pulmonary hypoplasia were 64.5% (20/31) and
86.4% (19/22), respectively.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION</b>. The sonographic fetal lung volume&ndash;body weight
ratio can be used more accurately to diagnose pulmonary hypoplasia than to
predict neonatal deaths in fetuses with isolated CDH. Further studies are
necessary to show the prevalence of pulmonary hypoplasia in fetuses with
isolated CDH and its importance for predicting neonatal deaths.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruano, R., Aubry, M.-C., Dumez, Y., Zugaib, M., Benachi, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3078</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Predicting Neonatal Deaths and Pulmonary Hypoplasia in Isolated Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Using the Sonographic Fetal Lung Volume-Body Weight Ratio]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1219</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1220?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Submucosal Fibroids Becoming Endocavitary Following Uterine Artery Embolization: Risk Assessment by MRI]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1220?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to assess the relationship
between the endometrium and submucosal fibroids before and after uterine
artery embolization (UAE).</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Contrast-enhanced pelvic 1.5-T MRI was
performed in 49 women before and after UAE over a 2-year period. Dominant
(largest diameter) fibroids in intramural, submucosal, subserosal,
pedunculated subserosal, and endocavitary locations were assessed on pre-
(baseline) and postembolization MRI. Size, locations of dominant fibroids
relative to endometrium and serosa before and after embolization were
compared. The ratio between the largest endometrial interface and the maximum
dimension of the dominant submucosal fibroid (interface&ndash;dimension ratio)
was determined on baseline MRI. The infarction rate for dominant fibroids was
estimated after UAE.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> One hundred forty dominant fibroids were identified on
baseline MRI. Forty-nine (35%) were intramural, 39 (28%) were submucosal, 34
(24%) were subserosal, eight (6%) were pedunculated subserosal, and 10 (6%)
were endocavitary in location on preembolization MRI. After UAE, of 39
dominant submucosal fibroids, 13 (33%) became endocavitary: complete
(<I>n</I> = 4), partial (<I>n</I> = 9) on the basis of European Society of
Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) classification. The preembolization mean
interface&ndash;dimension ratio and mean diameters for dominant fibroids that
became endocavitary were significantly greater than for those that did not
become endocavitary after embolization (0.65 vs 0.32, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.005; 8
vs 5.4 cm, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.05, respectively). All dominant submucosal
fibroids showed 100% infarction after UAE.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Submucosal fibroids with an interface&ndash;dimension
ratio of greater than 0.55 are more likely to migrate into the endometrial
cavity after UAE. The majority of these are expelled spontaneously without
significant symptoms. Rarely, submucosal fibroids greater than 6 cm in size
that become endocavitary may cause postprocedural complications requiring
further intervention and medical treatment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verma, S. K., Bergin, D., Gonsalves, C. F., Mitchell, D. G., Lev-Toaff, A. S., Parker, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3312</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Submucosal Fibroids Becoming Endocavitary Following Uterine Artery Embolization: Risk Assessment by MRI]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1226</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1227?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Are Fibroids That Become Endocavitary After Uterine Artery Embolization Necessarily a Complication?]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/1227?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> This commentary deals with the study by Verma et al.
discussing submucosal and endocavitary fibroids after uterine artery
embolization (UAE).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> UAE can infarct fibroids. Fibroids spontaneously infarct
after childbirth. Because the postpartum cervix is patulous, infarcted
fibroids that fall into the uterine cavity easily exit the uterus. Each
patient contemplating UAE should anticipate that infarcted fibroids bordering
on or inside the uterine cavity may require cervical dilatation or
hysteroscopic resection for removal. The addition of either of these two
gynecology procedures should not necessarily be regarded as a UAE complication
or treatment failure.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burbank, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3545</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Are Fibroids That Become Endocavitary After Uterine Artery Embolization Necessarily a Complication?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1230</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/W278?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Bilateral Hydrosalpinx in Adolescent Girls with Hirschsprung's Disease: Association of Two Rare Conditions]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/5/W278?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to illustrate three cases of
bilateral hydrosalpinx in postpubertal girls operated on for Hirschsprung's
disease and to discuss the possible cause: iatrogenic or congenital. We
identified bilateral hydrosalpinx in three postpubertal sexually inactive
girls with Hirschsprung's disease treated, respectively by Duhamel, Soave
pull-through, and Martin procedures. No history of surgical complications or
pelvic inflammation had been reported.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Hirschsprung's disease is rare in girls and bilateral
hydrosalpinx is also extremely uncommon in sexually inactive adolescents. We
think there may be a possible common cause: either a postsurgical complication
or a congenital defect of the autonomous innervation in the context of a
neurocristopathy. Because of the rarity of both conditions, the association is
unlikely to be coincidental. The cause of this association is unclear and
further studies are required to find its prevalence and to estimate the
possible impact on fertility.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merlini, L., Anooshiravani, M., Peiry, B., La Scala, G., Hanquinet, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3183</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Bilateral Hydrosalpinx in Adolescent Girls with Hirschsprung's Disease: Association of Two Rare Conditions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W282</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W278</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/854?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Comparison of Computer-Aided Detection to Double Reading of Screening Mammograms: Review of 231,221 Mammograms]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/854?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> This study compares the efficacy of single reading with
computer-aided detection (CAD) to double reading and also to the first reader
(without CAD) in a double-reading program.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> A review was performed of 231,221 screening
mammograms interpreted by experienced mammographers from 2001 through 2005 in
a community-based mammography program. In 112,413 (48.6%), mammographers
performed the first of two readings. In 118,808 (51.4%), they performed a
single reading aided by CAD.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> For double reading, the first reader's recall rate was
10.2%; sensitivity, 81.4%; positive predictive value, as a percentage of
positive screening mammograms resulting in a tissue diagnosis of cancer within
1 year (PPV<SUB>1</SUB>), 4.1%; and cancer detection rate, 4.12 per 1,000.
After the double-reading process, the final recall rate was 11.9%;
sensitivity, 88.0%; PPV<SUB>1</SUB>, 3.7%; and cancer detection rate, 4.46 per
1,000. For single-reading with CAD, the recall rate was 10.6%; sensitivity,
90.4%; PPV<SUB>1</SUB>, 3.9%; and cancer detection rate, 4.20 per 1,000.
Statistically significant results included a lower recall rate with CAD
compared with double reading (10.6% vs 11.9%, respectively; <I>p</I> &lt;
0.0001); increased sensitivity with CAD compared with the first reader (90.4%
vs 81.4%, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001); and increased recall rate with CAD compared
with the first reader (10.6% vs 10.2%, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Double reading increased sensitivity with a modest
increase in the recall rate compared with single reading. Single reading with
CAD, compared with double reading, resulted in a small, but not statistically
significant, increase in sensitivity with a lower recall rate. Our results
indicate that CAD enhances performance of a single reader, yielding increased
sensitivity with only a small increase in recall rate.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gromet, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2812</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Comparison of Computer-Aided Detection to Double Reading of Screening Mammograms: Review of 231,221 Mammograms]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>859</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>854</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/860?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Early First-Trimester Fetal Radiation Dose Estimation in 16-MDCT Without and With Automated Tube Current Modulation]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/860?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to correlate the estimated
fetal absorbed radiation dose derived by directly measured uterine doses in
the early first trimester and the volume CT dose index (CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB>)
for 16-MDCT of the maternal chest, abdomen, and pelvis.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Estimated absorbed fetal dose was measured
using a metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeter
that was placed in the uterus of an adult female anthropomorphic phantom. The
phantom was scanned on a 16-MDCT scanner using three protocols. The scanning
parameters for protocol A (trauma) were detector configuration, 16 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>
0.625 mm; pitch, 1.75:1; rotation time, 0.5 second; 140 kVp; and 340 mA. The
scanning parameters for protocol B (CT angiography) were detector
configuration, 16 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 1.25 mm; pitch, 1.38:1; rotation time, 0.6 second;
140 kVp; and 300 mA. The scanning parameters for protocol C, which is the
automated tube current modulation (ATCM) protocol previously used in the
literature, were detector configuration, 16 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 1.25 mm; pitch, 0.938:1;
rotation time, 0.5 second; 140 kVp; and 380 mA. The protocols were also
modified for the ATCM mode; the CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> was documented from the
scanner's console. Correlation between these data was tested with a
goodness-of-fit model.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Absorbed fetal radiation dose in the early first trimester
correlated with the CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> via a linear regression equation. For a
constant tube current and peak voltage of 140 kVp, fetal dose (mGy) = 1.665
<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> (mGy) &ndash; 7.059. For the ATCM mode and a
constant kVp of 140, fetal dose (mGy) = 2.151 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> (mGy)
&ndash; 2.200. The goodness of fit (<I>R</I><sup>2</sup>) for the equations
is 0.99 and 0.91, respectively.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> In both the manual and ATCM modes, absorbed fetal
radiation dose can be estimated from the CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> obtained at the
time of scanning independent of pitch and tube current&ndash;time product
(mAs).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaffe, T. A., Yoshizumi, T. T., Toncheva, G. I., Nguyen, G., Hurwitz, L. M., Nelson, R. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2925</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Early First-Trimester Fetal Radiation Dose Estimation in 16-MDCT Without and With Automated Tube Current Modulation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>864</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>860</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/865?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Pilot Observer Study]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/865?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to assess ergonomic and
diagnostic performance&ndash;related issues associated with the interpretation
of digital breast tomosynthesis&ndash;generated examinations.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Thirty selected cases were read under three
different display conditions by nine experienced radiologists in a fully
crossed, mode-balanced observer performance study. The reading modes included
full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone, the 11 low-dose projections
acquired for the reconstruction of tomosynthesis images, and the reconstructed
digital breast tomosynthesis examination. Observers rated cases under the
free-response receiver operating characteristic, as well as a screening
paradigm, and provided subjective assessments of the relative diagnostic value
of the two digital breast tomosynthesis&ndash;based image sets as compared
with FFDM. The time to review and diagnose each case was also evaluated.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Observer performance measures were not statistically
significant (<I>p</I> &gt; 0.05) primarily because of the small sample size
in this pilot study, suggesting that showing significant improvements in
diagnosis, if any, will require a larger study. Several radiologists did
perceive the digital breast tomosynthesis image set and the projection series
to be better than FFDM (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.05) for diagnosing this specific
case set. The time to review, interpret, and rate the examinations was
significantly different for the techniques in question (<I>p</I> &lt;
0.05).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Tomosynthesis-based breast imaging may have great
potential, but much work is needed before its optimal role in the clinical
environment is known.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Good, W. F., Abrams, G. S., Catullo, V. J., Chough, D. M., Ganott, M. A., Hakim, C. M., Gur, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2841</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Pilot Observer Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>869</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>865</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/870?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Cesarean Section Scar Diverticulum: Appearance on Hysterosalpingography]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/870?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to characterize the
frequency and appearance of hysterotomy defects on hysterosalpingography in
patients with a history of cesarean section.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> We reviewed the hysterosalpingograms of 150
women with a history of cesarean section. The incidence, location, and
appearance of defects at the expected location of a hysterotomy scar were
evaluated.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Of the 148 patients with history of cesarean section and
technically adequate hysterosalpingograms, 89 (60%) had defects that were in
the expected location of a hysterotomy incision. Fifty-eight (65%) of the
diverticula were focal outpouchings, and 31 (35%) were thin linear defects.
Forty-eight (54%) of the diverticula were located at the lower uterine cavity,
32 (36%) at the uterine isthmus, and nine (10%) at the upper endocervical
canal.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> A diverticulum at the lower uterine cavity, uterine
isthmus, or upper endocervical canal is a common finding on
hysterosalpingography in patients with a history of cesarean section.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Surapaneni, K., Silberzweig, J. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2916</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Cesarean Section Scar Diverticulum: Appearance on Hysterosalpingography]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>874</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>870</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/W227?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Sonohysterography: Do 3D Reconstructed Images Provide Additional Value?]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/W227?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to retrospectively
determine the value of adding 3D multiplanar sonography to 2D
sonohysterography.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Between September 2003 and April 2005, 80
women (mean age, 43.5 years; range, 26&ndash;78 years) underwent
sonohysterography with both conventional 2D sonohysterography and 3D
multiplanar imaging (volume of data acquired and reconstructed in the
transverse, sagittal, and coronal planes). Three blinded readers interpreted
the 2D scans alone and then the 2D and 3D images together. Visualization of
endometrial abnormality (polyps, fibroids, or septations) and definition of
fundal contour were scored by each reader on a three-point scale (1,
visualized; 2, unsure; 3, not visualized). Wilcoxon's signed rank test was
used to assess mean differences between findings. Reader agreement was
determined with the kappa statistic. Pathologic correlation was performed when
the findings were available.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Average (mean &plusmn; SD) reader scores for identification
of endometrial abnormality were not significantly different: 1.70 &plusmn;
0.91 for 2D alone versus 1.69 &plusmn; 0.92 for 2D and 3D combined (<I>p</I>
= 0.38). There also was no significant difference when polyps (2.14 &plusmn;
0.90 vs 2.12 &plusmn; 0.93), fibroids (2.57 &plusmn; 0.79 vs 2.53 &plusmn;
0.82), and septations (2.88 &plusmn; 0.39 vs 2.87 &plusmn; 0.42) were
evaluated separately. Average scores for definition of fundal contour were
significantly (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001) different (2.93 &plusmn; 0.34 for 2D
alone versus 1.45 &plusmn; 0.80 for 2D and 3D combined). Agreement between
readers was found with average kappa values of 0.72 for 2D alone and 0.78 for
2D and 3D. For the 42 subjects for whom pathologic findings were available,
readers identified 92% of the abnormalities.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Three-dimensional reformations improve visualization of
the uterine fundus and aid in identification or exclusion of a fundal contour
abnormality but do not add value in the detection of endometrial
abnormalities.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghate, S. V., Crockett, M. M., Boyd, B. K., Paulson, E. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2561</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Sonohysterography: Do 3D Reconstructed Images Provide Additional Value?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W233</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/W234?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Microcalcifications of Breast Tissue: Appearance on Synchrotron Radiation Imaging with 6-{micro}m Resolution]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/4/W234?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to use synchrotron
radiation imaging with 6-&micro;m resolution to evaluate amorphous and
pleomorphic breast tissue microcalcifications.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Synchrotron radiation imaging depicted
microcalcifications as small as 24 &micro;m. Imaging with this technique revealed
that most amorphous and pleomorphic calcifications on conventional mammograms
are clusters of fine specks and that in addition to the shape or density of a
speck, the distribution density of clustered specks is a factor determining
the apparent shape.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Imamura, K., Ehara, N., Inada, Y., Kanemaki, Y., Okamoto, J., Maeda, I., Miyamoto, K., Ogata, H., Kawamoto, H., Nakajima, Y., Fukuda, M., Umetani, K., Uesugi, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2610</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Microcalcifications of Breast Tissue: Appearance on Synchrotron Radiation Imaging with 6-{micro}m Resolution]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W236</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/190/4/W237?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Radiologic-Pathologic Conferences of the Nagoya University Hospital: Centrally Necrotizing Carcinoma of the Breast]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/190/4/W237?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oda, K., Satake, H., Nishio, A., Ichihara, S., Shimoyama, Y., Imai, T., Nagino, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Women's Imaging] Radiologic-Pathologic Conferences of the Nagoya University Hospital: Centrally Necrotizing Carcinoma of the Breast]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W239</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>