<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology Women's Imaging</title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Roentgenology RSS feed -- recent Women's Imaging articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1546-3141</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Roentgenology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0361-803X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1708?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1716?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1723?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1731?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1738?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W558?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W563?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/W452?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/W458?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/986?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/994?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1001?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1010?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1019?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1025?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1030?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/W295?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology</title>
<url>http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1708?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MRI of the Urethra in Women With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Spectrum of Findings at Static and Dynamic Imaging]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1708?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to determine the findings at
both static and dynamic MRI in women with a clinically suspected urethral
abnormality.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> MRI of the urethra was performed in 84 women
with lower urinary tract symptoms using multiplanar T2-weighted turbo
spin-echo and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced gradient-echo sequences. A
dynamic true fast imaging with steady-state free precession sequence was
performed during straining in the sagittal plane. Images were evaluated by two
radiologists for urethral pathology and pelvic organ prolapse. MRI findings
were correlated with clinical symptoms using the Fisher's exact and
Mann-Whitney tests.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Urethral abnormalities were found in 10 of 84 patients
(11.9%), including two urethral diverticula, five Skene's gland cysts or
abscesses, and three periurethral cysts. Thirty-three patients (39.3%) were
diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse, of whom 29 (87.9%) were diagnosed
exclusively on dynamic imaging. In 29 of 33 patients with prolapse (87.9%),
the urethra was structurally normal. MRI showed 13 cystoceles and 17 cases of
urethral hypermobility not detected on physical examination. Patients with a
greater number of vaginal deliveries, stress urinary incontinence, frequency
of voiding, and voiding difficulty were statistically more likely to have
anterior compartment prolapse (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.05).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Including a dynamic sequence permits both structural and
functional evaluation of the urethra, which may be of added value in women
with lower urinary tract symptoms. Dynamic MRI allows detection of pelvic
organ prolapse that may not be evident on conventional static sequences.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bennett, G. L., Hecht, E. M., Tanpitukpongse, T. P., Babb, J. S., Taouli, B., Wong, S., Rosenblum, N., Kanofsky, J. A., Lee, V. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1547</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MRI of the Urethra in Women With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Spectrum of Findings at Static and Dynamic Imaging]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1715</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1708</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1716?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging as an Adjunct to Conventional Breast MRI for Improved Positive Predictive Value]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1716?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to investigate whether
adding diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
(DCE-MRI) could improve the positive predictive value (PPV) of breast MRI.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> The retrospective study included 70 women
with 83 suspicious breast lesions on DCE-MRI (BI-RADS 4 or 5) who underwent
subsequent biopsy. DWI was acquired during clinical breast MRI using b = 0 and
600 s/mm<sup>2</sup>. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were
compared for benign and malignant lesions. PPV was calculated for DCE-MRI
alone (based on biopsy recommendations) and DCE-MRI plus DWI (adding an ADC
threshold) for the same set of lesions. Results were further compared by
lesion type (mass, nonmasslike enhancement) and size.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Of the 83 suspicious lesions, 52 were benign and 31 were
malignant (11 ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS], 20 invasive carcinoma). Both
DCIS (mean ADC, 1.31 &plusmn; 0.24 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 10<sup>&ndash;3</sup>
mm<sup>2</sup>/s) and invasive carcinoma (mean ADC, 1.29 &plusmn; 0.29 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>
10<sup>&ndash;3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s) exhibited lower mean ADC than benign
lesions (1.70 &plusmn; 0.44 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 10<sup>&ndash;3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s,
<I>p</I> &lt; 0.001). Applying an ADC threshold of 1.81 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>
10<sup>&ndash;3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s for 100% sensitivity produced a PPV of
47% versus 37% for DCE-MRI alone, which would have avoided biopsy for 33%
(17/52) of benign lesions without missing any cancers. DWI increased PPV
similarly for masses and nonmasslike enhancement and preferentially improved
PPV for smaller (&le; 1 cm) versus larger lesions.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> DWI shows potential for improving the PPV of breast MRI
for lesions of varied types and sizes. However, considerable overlap in ADC of
benign and malignant lesions necessitates validation of these findings in
larger studies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Partridge, S. C., DeMartini, W. B., Kurland, B. F., Eby, P. R., White, S. W., Lehman, C. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.2139</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging as an Adjunct to Conventional Breast MRI for Improved Positive Predictive Value]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1722</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1716</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1723?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Short-Term Follow-Up of Palpable Breast Lesions With Benign Imaging Features: Evaluation of 375 Lesions in 320 Women]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1723?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility
of short-term follow-up of palpable masses that have benign imaging
features.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> The cases of all women with round, oval, or
lobular palpable masses with circumscribed margins and homogeneous ultrasound
echotexture for which short-term follow-up was recommended from July 1997
through December 2003 were retrospectively identified. Evaluation was by
ultrasound and/or mammography and focused clinical examination. Outcome was
assessed with imaging or clinical follow-up lasting at least 12 months. The
cancer incidence for palpable lesions was compared with that for nonpalpable
lesions recommended for short-term follow-up.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> In 379 women, 443 palpable masses with benign features for
which short-term follow-up was recommended were identified. Outcome data were
available on 375 masses in 320 women. Lesions were evaluated with mammography
and ultrasound (<I>n</I> = 186) or ultrasound alone (<I>n</I> = 189).
Masses were typically identified only with ultrasound (<I>n</I> = 258,
68.8%); were oval (<I>n</I> = 275, 73.3%), of equal density to normal breast
tissue on mammograms (<I>n</I> = 95 on 117 mammograms, 81.2%), and
hypoechoic (<I>n</I> = 336 in 372 ultrasound examinations, 90.3%); and were
prospectively believed to be fibroadenoma (<I>n</I> = 304, 81.1%).
Eighty-five lesions (22.7%) were biopsied soon after evaluation, and one
1.5-mm ductal carcinoma in situ was diagnosed. At follow-up (mean, 2.7 years),
26 lesions (6.9%) had grown. Twenty-four of the 26 lesions were biopsied, and
no cancer was diagnosed. The overall cancer prevalence was similar for
palpable (0.3%) and nonpalpable (1.6%) masses. The cost of short-term
follow-up was less than that of biopsy.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Short-term follow-up is a reasonable alternative to
biopsy of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features, particularly
for young women with probable fibroadenoma.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harvey, J. A., Nicholson, B. T., LoRusso, A. P., Cohen, M. A., Bovbjerg, V. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2811</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Short-Term Follow-Up of Palpable Breast Lesions With Benign Imaging Features: Evaluation of 375 Lesions in 320 Women]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1730</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1723</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1731?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preoperative Sonographic Classification of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer: Node-to-Node Correlation With Surgical Histology and Sentinel Node Biopsy Results]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1731?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate
the role of axillary lymph node classification by sonography in breast cancer
patients by node-to-node correlation with surgical histology and sentinel node
biopsy results.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Between June 2006 and December 2006,
preoperative axillary sonography was performed in 191 consecutive breast
cancer patients (median age, 46 years; age range, 24&ndash;79 years) who had
been scheduled to undergo breast cancer surgery with sentinel node biopsy. The
axillary lymph node that had the thickest cortex or that was closest to the
primary tumor was prospectively classified and then removed through
sonographically guided needle localization. Correspondence about and
histologic results for the needle-localized nodes and the radioactive sentinel
nodes were analyzed. The rate of malignancy, according to the sonographic
classification, and the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve
were analyzed.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Of the 191 needle-localized nodes, 41 (21%) had metastases
and 150 (79%) did not have metastases. When a cutoff point of a cortical
thickness of 2.5 mm was used, sonographic classification showed 85% (35/41)
sensitivity, 78% (117/150) specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.861
(95% CI, 0.796&ndash;0.926). Of the 54 patients with metastases at sentinel
node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection, 13 (24%) had false-negative
results of sonographically guided needle localization. Unsuccessful lymphatic
mapping because of absent radiotracer uptake during sentinel node biopsy was
found in 4% (7/191), whereas all needle-localized nodes with a cortical
thickness of more than 2.5 mm were confirmed as metastases.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Sonographic classification of axillary lymph nodes is
effective for predicting the presence of metastases to avoid sentinel node
biopsy or to reduce unsuccessful lymphatic mapping during sentinel node
biopsy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cho, N., Moon, W. K., Han, W., Park, I. A., Cho, J., Noh, D.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.3122</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preoperative Sonographic Classification of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer: Node-to-Node Correlation With Surgical Histology and Sentinel Node Biopsy Results]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1737</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1731</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1738?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimal Timing of Breast MRI Examinations for Premenopausal Women Who Do Not Have a Normal Menstrual Cycle]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1738?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of this article is to describe a method for
timing breast MRI examinations corresponding to the follicular phase of the
menstrual cycle in premenopausal women without cyclical menses, thereby
reducing the number of false-positive findings and nondiagnostic
examinations.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Serum progesterone concentrations corresponding to the
follicular phase of a normal menstrual cycle can aid in optimal scheduling of
breast MRI examinations for premenopausal women who lack cyclical menses.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellis, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2657</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimal Timing of Breast MRI Examinations for Premenopausal Women Who Do Not Have a Normal Menstrual Cycle]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1740</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1738</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W558?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of Uterine Anomalies: 3D FRFSE Cube Versus Standard 2D FRFSE]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W558?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to compare a novel MRI
sequence&mdash;3D fast-recovery fast spin-echo (FRFSE) cube&mdash;with a
standard 2D FRFSE sequence for the investigation of uterine anomalies.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Compared with 2D FRFSE, 3D FRFSE cube provides superior
image quality and improved 3D reconstructions in a shorter acquisition time
and enables excellent visualization of uterine anatomy in any orientation,
regardless of the original scanning plane.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agrawal, G., Riherd, J. M., Busse, R. F., Hinshaw, J. L., Sadowski, E. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2716</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of Uterine Anomalies: 3D FRFSE Cube Versus Standard 2D FRFSE]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W562</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W558</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W563?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Halfpipe Coaxial Cannula for Self-Contained Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Systems: Feasibility in a Pig Breast Model]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/W563?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this article is to discuss the development
of a dedicated halfpipe coaxial cannula for stereotactic vacuum-assisted
biopsy. We evaluated the system by retrieving 18 copper targets from a pig
breast model in the upright position via vertical and lateral approaches.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Sampling was successful in 15 of 18 cases. Errors
occurred only in superficial lesions biopsied via the vertical approach. The
halfpipe coaxial cannula shows promise for improving positioning accuracy,
avoiding target dislocation, and obviating repeated needle repositioning.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teubner, T., Hafner, M. F., Schimmele, M., Teubner, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2876</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Halfpipe Coaxial Cannula for Self-Contained Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Systems: Feasibility in a Pig Breast Model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W566</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W563</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/W452?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biopsy Method: A Major Predictor of Adherence After Benign Breast Biopsy?]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/W452?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Adopting a longitudinal approach to assess women after
breast biopsy with a benign result, this study aimed to comparatively evaluate
the effect of the biopsy method on compliance with clinical recommendations
for follow-up.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> For this study, 410 patients who underwent
biopsy of a breast lesion were included: fine-needle aspiration biopsy,
<I>n</I> = 95 patients; core biopsy, <I>n</I> = 84; local excision under
local anesthesia, <I>n</I> = 72; vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, <I>n</I> =
100; and hookwire localization, <I>n</I> = 59. Information about patient
age, place of residence, whether complications occurred, and type of lesion
was collected.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Compliance was higher among women who had undergone
vacuum-assisted breast biopsy than those who had undergone one of the other
biopsy methods. The superiority (carryover effect) of vacuum-assisted breast
biopsy persisted for 18 months after the biopsy procedure. Patient compliance
for all of the other biopsy methods followed an M pattern, with the peaks
corresponding to the follow-up mammography sessions. In patients who had
undergone vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, a gradual decrease in compliance over
time was observed. Older women were more compliant than younger women with
follow-up recommendations regardless of biopsy method. A subanalysis of the
vacuum-assisted breast biopsy group indicated that complications are
associated with better compliance.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Women more often adhere to clinical recommendations for
follow-up sessions comprising mammography. Patient age and whether biopsy
complications occurred also seem to modify compliance. Further studies should
assess whether superior compliance after vacuum-assisted breast biopsy
persists in other settings, such as with stereotactic or ultrasound guidance,
different numbers of cores, and procedures of various durations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sergentanis, T. N., Zagouri, F., Domeyer, P., Giannakopoulou, G., Tsigris, C., Bramis, J., Zografos, G. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biopsy Method: A Major Predictor of Adherence After Benign Breast Biopsy?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W457</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W452</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/W458?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Time-Resolved MR Angiography as a Useful Sequence for Assessment of Ovarian Vein Reflux]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/5/W458?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the
imaging characteristics of ovarian vein reflux using time-resolved MR
angiography (TR-MRA). One hundred consecutive female patients underwent TR-MRA
of the pelvis to evaluate suspected or known pelvic pathology. Findings of
ovarian vein reflux, ovarian vein dilation, and periuterine varices were
analyzed and correlated with symptoms of pelvic pain.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Overall, TR-MRA is a useful sequence for the assessment
of ovarian vein reflux, which may aid the evaluation of pelvic congestion
syndrome.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, C. Y., Miller, M. J., Merkle, E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:02:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2557</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Time-Resolved MR Angiography as a Useful Sequence for Assessment of Ovarian Vein Reflux]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W463</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W458</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/986?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is Breast MRI Helpful in the Evaluation of Inconclusive Mammographic Findings?]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/986?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness
of MRI of the breast in cases in which mammographic or sonographic findings
are inconclusive.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> We retrospectively reviewed images from 115
MRI examinations of the breast performed from 1999 to 2005 for the indication
of problem-solving for inconclusive findings on a mammogram. Forty-eight of
the 115 women (41.8%) were at high risk. We discerned whether sonography or
MRI was used as an adjunctive tool and correlated the findings with those in
the pathology database.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The equivocal findings most frequently leading to MRI were
asymmetry and architectural distortion. No suspicious MRI correlate was found
in 100 of 115 cases (87%). These cases were found stable at follow-up
mammography or MRI after a mean of 34 months. Fifteen enhancing masses (13%)
that corresponded to the mammographic abnormality were seen on MR images. All
masses identified at MRI were accurately localized for biopsy, and six
malignant lesions were identified. Four of six malignant tumors were seen in
one mammographic view only; two were seen on second-look ultrasound images.
MRI had a sensitivity of 100% and compared with mammography had significantly
higher specificity (91.7% vs 80.7%, <I>p</I> = 0.029), positive predictive
value (40% vs 8.7%, <I>p</I> = 0.032), and overall accuracy (92.2% vs 78.3%,
<I>p</I> = 0.0052). Eighteen incidental lesions (15.7%) were detected at
MRI, and all were subsequently found benign.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> We found breast MRI to be a useful adjunctive tool when
findings at conventional imaging were equivocal. Strict patient selection
criteria should be used because of the high frequency of incidental lesions
seen on MR images.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moy, L., Elias, K., Patel, V., Lee, J., Babb, J. S., Toth, H. K., Mercado, C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1229</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is Breast MRI Helpful in the Evaluation of Inconclusive Mammographic Findings?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>993</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>986</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/994?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[BI-RADS Lesion Characteristics Predict Likelihood of Malignancy in Breast MRI for Masses But Not for Nonmasslike Enhancement]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/994?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to evaluate the predictive
features of BI-RADS lesion characteristics and the risk of malignancy for
mammographically and clinically occult lesions detected initially on breast
MRI.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> We reviewed 1,523 consecutive breast MRI
examinations performed from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2005, to identify all
lesions initially detected on MRI and assessed as BI-RADS 4 or 5 for which the
patient underwent subsequent imaging-guided needle or excisional biopsy.
BI-RADS lesion features were recorded for each case, and the risk of
malignancy was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Separate
multivariate models were constructed for lesions classified as masses.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Included in the analysis were 258 suspicious lesions in 196
women. Among all lesions, those of 1 cm or greater were significantly more
often malignant (50/147, 34%) than lesions of less than 1 cm (22/111, 20%;
odds ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.13&ndash;3.83). For masses, size, BI-RADS margin,
and enhancement pattern predicted malignancy. In multivariate analysis of
combinations of features, masses of 1 cm or greater with heterogeneous
enhancement and irregular margins had a 68% probability of malignancy. Masses
of 1 cm or greater with smooth margins and homogeneous enhancement had the
lowest predicted probability of malignancy of 3%. BI-RADS descriptors and size
were not significant predictors of malignancy for nonmasslike enhancement
(NMLE).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Combinations of BI-RADS lesion descriptors can predict
the probability of malignancy for breast MRI masses but not for NMLE. If our
model is validated, masses with a low probability of malignancy may be
eligible for short-interval follow-up rather than biopsy. Further research
focused on predictive features of NMLE is needed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gutierrez, R. L., DeMartini, W. B., Eby, P. R., Kurland, B. F., Peacock, S., Lehman, C. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1983</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[BI-RADS Lesion Characteristics Predict Likelihood of Malignancy in Breast MRI for Masses But Not for Nonmasslike Enhancement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1000</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>994</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1001?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Radioguided Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer Lesions: Randomized Comparison With Wire Localization in Patients Undergoing Conservative Surgery and Sentinel Node Biopsy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1001?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The aim of this investigation was to determine whether
radioguided occult lesion localization and routine wire localization differ in
respect to the effectiveness of complete excision of nonpalpable breast cancer
lesions.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> This prospective randomized study included
patients with breast cancer scheduled for conservative tumor excision and
sentinel node biopsy. Patients were randomized to either radioguided
localization or wire localization. Comparative radiologic, surgical, and
pathologic data were collected and analyzed to establish the duration, ease of
use, and accuracy of the two techniques for occult lesion localization. The
effectiveness of sentinel node biopsy also was assessed. One radiologist and
two surgeons participated in the study.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Among 134 patients, 68 were treated with wire localization
and 66 with radioguided localization. The mean duration of radiologic
localization was significantly shorter for radioguided localization
(<I>p</I> &lt; 0.001). No statistical differences were found for the other
parameters studied. Radiography of the surgical specimen showed 100% lesion
excision with both techniques. Complete tumor excision with tumor-free margins
was achieved in 89.4% of patients who underwent radioguided localization group
and 82.4% of patients who underwent wire localization. Pathologic examination
showed the excised tissue volume was slightly larger (<I>p</I> = 0.371) and
lesion concentricity slightly less (<I>p</I> = 0.730) with radioguided
localization. The sentinel node detection rate was 91% with radioguided
localization and 84% with wire localization.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The radioguided technique is as effective as the
standard wire technique for localization and excision of nonpalpable breast
cancer lesions and is somewhat faster and simpler to perform than wire
localization.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mariscal Martinez, A., Sola, M., de Tudela, A. P., Julian, J. F., Fraile, M., Vizcaya, S., Fernandez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.2005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Radioguided Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer Lesions: Randomized Comparison With Wire Localization in Patients Undergoing Conservative Surgery and Sentinel Node Biopsy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1009</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1001</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1010?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Review in the Irish Breast Screening Program]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1010?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Clinical trials to date into the use of full-field
digital mammography (FFDM) for breast cancer screening have shown variable
results. The aim of this study was to review the use of FFDM in a
population-based breast cancer screening program and to compare the results
with screen-film mammography.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> The study included 188,823 screening
examinations of women between 50 and 64 years old; 35,204 (18.6%) mammograms
were obtained using FFDM. All films were double read using a 5-point rating
scale to indicate the probability of cancer. Patients with positive scores
were recalled for further workup. The recall rate, cancer detection rate, and
positive predictive value (PPV) of FFDM were compared with screen-film
mammography.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The cancer detection rate was significantly higher for FFDM
than screen-film mammography (6.3 vs 5.2 per 1,000, respectively; <I>p</I> =
0.01). The cancer detection rate for FFDM was higher than screen-film
mammography for initial screening and subsequent screening, for invasive
cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ, and across all age groups. The cancer
detection rate for cancers presenting as microcalcifications was significantly
higher for FFDM than for screen-film mammography (1.9 vs 1.3 per 1,000,
<I>p</I> = 0.01). The recall rate was significantly higher for FFDM than
screen-film mammography (4.0% vs 3.1%, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.001). There was no
significant difference in the PPVs of recall to assessment for FFDM and
screen-film mammography (15.7% and 16.7%, <I>p</I> = 0.383).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> FFDM resulted in significantly higher cancer detection
and recall rates than screen-film mammography in women 50&ndash;64 years old.
The PPVs of FFDM and screen-film mammography were comparable. The results of
this study suggest that FFDM can be safely implemented in breast cancer
screening programs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hambly, N. M., McNicholas, M. M., Phelan, N., Hargaden, G. C., O'Doherty, A., Flanagan, F. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.2157</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Review in the Irish Breast Screening Program]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1018</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1010</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1019?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early First Trimester Fetal Dose Estimation Method in a Multivendor Study of 16- and 64-MDCT Scanners and Low-Dose Imaging Protocols]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1019?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to corroborate the relation
between the estimated absorbed fetal dose derived from directly measured
uterine doses early in the first trimester and the volume CT dose index
(CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB>) for 16- and 64-MDCT of the maternal chest, abdomen, and
pelvis.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Estimated absorbed fetal dose was measured
with a metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeter
placed in the expected uterine location in an anthropomorphic phantom of a
woman and scanned with 16- and 64-MDCT units of one vendor and a 64-MDCT unit
of another vendor. A trauma chest, abdomen, and pelvis protocol and an abdomen
and pelvis protocol were used. Absorbed uterine dose was measured directly
from the MOSFET detector. The CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> for each protocol was
recorded from the scanner console. Correlation between mean uterine dose and
CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> was tested with a goodness of fit model.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The absorbed uterine dose ranged from 9.25 to 37.7 mGy.
Absorbed fetal dose in the early first trimester correlated with
CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> in a linear regression equation. For the 16-MDCT scanner,
at 130 kVp, the fetal dose was 2.091 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> &ndash; 9.489.
For the 64-MDCT scanner from the same vendor, at 120 kVp, the fetal dose was
1.113 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> + 1.773. For the 64-MDCT scanner from the
other vendor, at 120 kVp, the fetal dose was 1.378 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB>
&ndash; 1.014. The goodness of fit results (<I>R</I><sup>2</sup>) for the
equations were 0.97, 0.98, and 0.99.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Estimated absorbed fetal dose during the first trimester
of pregnancy is linearly associated with CTDI<SUB>vol</SUB> regardless of beam
energy, detector configuration, and scanner manufacturer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaffe, T. A., Neville, A. M., Anderson-Evans, C., Long, S., Lowry, C., Yoshizumi, T. T., Toncheva, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.2274</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early First Trimester Fetal Dose Estimation Method in a Multivendor Study of 16- and 64-MDCT Scanners and Low-Dose Imaging Protocols]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1024</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1019</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1025?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Targeted Ultrasound of the Breast in Women With Abnormal MRI Findings for Whom Biopsy Has Been Recommended]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1025?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> This study was performed to identify characteristics of
suspicious lesions seen on breast MRI that are most likely to have an
ultrasound correlate and to determine how often the presumed ultrasound
correlate actually corresponds to the MRI finding.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> From September 2005 through December 2007,
targeted ultrasound was performed for 519 suspicious MRI-detected lesions in
361 women. Retrospective review was performed to determine lesion type (mass
vs nonmass), lesion descriptors, lesion size, BI-RADS category, indication for
MR examination, patient age, and biopsy outcome. The results of 80 follow-up
MRI examinations among 154 cases with concordant benign results on
ultrasound-guided biopsy were noted.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> A presumed ultrasound correlate was found in 290 (56%) of
the 519 lesions with masses more likely than nonmass lesions to be seen with
ultrasound (62% of masses and 31% of nonmass lesions). Increasing lesion size,
assessment of BI-RADS category 5 versus BI-RADS category 4, rim enhancement in
masses, and clumped enhancement in nonmass lesions were also significantly
more likely to have an ultrasound correlate. On follow-up imaging in 80
benign, concordant ultrasound-guided biopsies, the sonographic lesion did not
correspond to the MRI finding in 10. Nine of these 10 lesions underwent
subsequent MRI-guided biopsy and five cancers were diagnosed.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The MR characteristics of lesions most likely to be seen
with an ultrasound correlate were mass versus nonmass, increasing size, and
increased level of suspicion of the lesion. Clip placement and follow-up
imaging after ultrasound-guided biopsy that yields benign concordant results
should be performed to detect cases in which the presumed ultrasound correlate
is inaccurate to detect unsuspected false-negative biopsies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meissnitzer, M., Dershaw, D. D., Lee, C. H., Morris, E. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2480</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Targeted Ultrasound of the Breast in Women With Abnormal MRI Findings for Whom Biopsy Has Been Recommended]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1029</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1025</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1030?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of Breast Lesions With Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Comparing the Use of Different b Values]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/1030?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Our purpose was to study the utility of
diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions
by assessing the best b values.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Forty-five women (mean age, 46.1 years) with
52 focal mass breast lesions underwent diffusion-weighted imaging with
different b values. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of each
lesion was calculated from the ADC maps done using five b values (0, 250, 500,
750, and 1,000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>) and using b values of 0 s/mm<sup>2</sup> with
each other b value separately (0 and 250 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, 0 and 500
s/mm<sup>2</sup>, 0 and 750 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, 0 and 1,000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>).
The mean ADC values were correlated with imaging findings and histopathologic
diagnoses. The cutoff ADC value, sensitivity, and specificity of
diffusion-weighted imaging to differentiate benign and malignant lesions were
calculated in all b value combinations. A <I>p</I> value of &lt; 0.05 was
considered statistically significant.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The mean ADC value was significantly lower for malignant
lesions compared to benign lesions (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001) in all b value
combinations. No statistical difference was seen between the ADC obtained from
different b value combinations (<I>p</I> = 0.2581) in the differentiation
between benign and malignant lesions. The ADC calculated from b 0 and 750
s/mm<sup>2</sup> was slightly better than the other b value combinations,
showing a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 96.2%.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Diffusion-weighted imaging is a potential resource as a
coadjutant of MRI in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.
Such imaging can be performed without a significant increase in examination
time, especially because it can be done with lower b values.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pereira, F. P. A., Martins, G., Figueiredo, E., Domingues, M. N. A., Domingues, R. C., da Fonseca, L. M. B., Gasparetto, E. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:00 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2522</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of Breast Lesions With Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Comparing the Use of Different b Values]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1035</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1030</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/W295?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: Quantitative Method for Kinetic Curve Type Assessment]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/4/W295?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The type of contrast enhancement kinetic curve (i.e.,
persistently enhancing, plateau, or washout) seen on dynamic contrast-enhanced
MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast is predictive of malignancy. Qualitative estimates
of the type of curve are most commonly used for interpretation of DCE-MRI. The
purpose of this study was to compare qualitative and quantitative methods for
determining the type of contrast enhancement kinetic curve on DCE-MRI.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Ninety-six patients underwent breast DCE-MRI.
The type of DCE-MRI kinetic curve was assessed qualitatively by three
radiologists on two occasions. For quantitative assessment, the slope of the
washout curve was calculated. Kappa statistics were used to determine inter-
and intraobserver agreement for the qualitative method. Matched sample tables,
the McNemar test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve statistics
were used to compare quantitative versus qualitative methods for establishing
or excluding malignancy.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Seventy-eight lesions (77.2%) were malignant and 23 (22.8%)
were benign. For the qualitative assessment, the intra- and interobserver
agreement was good ( = 0.76&ndash;0.88), with an area under the ROC
curve (AUC) of 0.73&ndash;0.77. For the quantitative method, the highest AUC
was 0.87, reflecting significantly higher diagnostic accuracies compared with
qualitative assessment (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.01 for the difference between the
two methods).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Quantitative assessment of the type of contrast
enhancement kinetic curve on breast DCE-MRI resulted in significantly higher
diagnostic performance for establishing or excluding malignancy compared with
assessment based on the standard qualitative method.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Khouli, R. H., Macura, K. J., Jacobs, M. A., Khalil, T. H., Kamel, I. R., Dwyer, A., Bluemke, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.2483</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: Quantitative Method for Kinetic Curve Type Assessment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>193</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W300</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W295</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Women's Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>