Pattern Recognition of Benign Nodules at Ultrasound of the Thyroid: Which Nodules Can Be Left Alone?
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate morphologic features predictive of benign thyroid nodules.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. From a registry of the records of 1,232 fine-needle aspiration biopsies performed jointly by the cytology and radiology departments at a single institution between 2005 and 2007, the cases of 650 patients were identified for whom both a pathology report and ultrasound images were available. From the alphabetized list generated, the first 500 nodules were reviewed. We analyzed the accuracy of individual sonographic features and of 10 discrete recognizable morphologic patterns in the prediction of benign histologic findings.
RESULTS. We found that grouping of thyroid nodules into reproducible patterns of morphology, or pattern recognition, rather than analysis of individual sonographic features, was extremely accurate in the identification of benign nodules. Four specific patterns were identified: spongiform configuration, cyst with colloid clot, giraffe pattern, and diffuse hyperechogenicity, which had a 100% specificity for benignity. In our series, identification of nodules with one of these four patterns could have obviated more than 60% of thyroid biopsies.
CONCLUSION. Recognition of specific morphologic patterns is an accurate method of identifying benign thyroid nodules that do not require cytologic evaluation. Use of this approach may substantially decrease the number of unnecessary biopsy procedures.
Introduction
One of the consequences of increased use of imaging has been the discovery of incidentalomas, or pseudodiseases, that are common in the general population but have no or minor clinical significance. Once such incidentaloma, the thyroid nodule, is extremely common, found in some autopsy series in as much as 50% of the general population [1, 2]. Most of these nodules are benign; the incidence of malignancy is quite low, 3-7% [3-5]. In the late 1990s, articles began to appear questioning the reliability of radiotracer uptake as a predictor of benignity, occasioning a rapid transition from nuclear medicine to ultrasound for evaluation of the thyroid [6-8]. The superior resolution of ultrasound images has resulted in discovery of a large number of thyroid nodules that heretofore had been obscured [9].
Since the late 1990s, several studies have been conducted to analyze the relation between specific sonographic features of thyroid nodules and malignancy [2, 10-16]. Although guidelines have been established, such as those of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound, the American Thyroid Association, and the European Thyroid Association [2, 17-22], they are commonly confusing and at times ignored in everyday practice, largely because of lack of familiarity with and trust in their validity. Common in the studies is a persistent limitation of specificity and sensitivity of specific ultrasound features in the prediction of malignancy. Some authors [23, 24] advocate a changed approach of recognition of specific patterns rather than individual ultrasound features in separation of nodules that require biopsy from those that do not. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of such a morphologic feature-oriented approach to the identification of benign thyroid nodules.
Materials and Methods
Patients
Among the records of 1,232 fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies performed jointly by the cytology and radiology departments at a single institution from January 2005 to December 2007, the cases of 650 patients (436 women, 64 men; average age, 54.7 years; range, 17-88 years) were identified in which both pathology reports and ultrasound images were available. From the alphabetized list generated, the first 500 nodules were reviewed. This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by our institutional review board with a waiver of informed consent. We analyzed the accuracy of individual sonographic features and of 10 discrete recognizable morphologic patterns in the prediction of benign histologic findings.





Ultrasound Technique
All diagnostic ultrasound examinations and FNA biopsies were performed with an Acuson ×300 or Antares unit (both Siemens Healthcare). All FNA biopsies were performed by a group of four cytologists (average experience, 5 years) under ultrasound guidance by one of five radiologists (average experience, 20.5 years). The biopsies were performed with 25-gauge spinal needles in most instances; a 27-gauge needle was used for hypervascular lesions. At least two passes were made for each nodule (average, 3.2 passes per nodule; range, 2-6 passes). All specimens were evaluated immediately by the cytologists to confirm sample adequacy.
Ultrasound Interpretation
In this retrospective study the ultrasound images of all nodules were reviewed in consensus by two blinded radiologists: one an attending radiologist with 31 years of ultrasound experience, the other a second-year radiology resident. Each nodule was evaluated for the presence or absence of individual sonographic features and was assigned one of 10 distinct recognizable morphologic patterns.
Histologic Analysis
The final diagnosis was based on the cytologic result; final pathologic confirmation was limited to the 20 malignant tumors resected. In the 20 patients with these tumors, there was no discrepancy between the initial cytologic and the final pathologic result. The cytologic results were divided into three categories: 1, benign nodules, including colloid nodules, hyperplastic nodules, and localized thyroiditis; 2, intermediate nodules, including follicular and Hürthle cell neoplasms; and 3, carcinoma. Type 1 nodules were determined to be nodules that did not require biopsy; types 2 and 3 were nodules requiring biopsy.
Data Analysis
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were defined for each individual sonographic feature in the detection of nonbenign masses. The Blyth-Still-Casella procedure for construction of exact CI for a binomial proportion was used to derive a 95% CI for the negative predictive value associated with each classification factor when used to identify benign masses. All reported p values were two-sided significance levels and were declared statistically significant at less than 0.05. SAS software (version 9.0, SAS Institute) was used for all statistical computations. Each p value was derived from a Fisher's exact test performed to determine whether the classification factor was associated with benignity.
Results
The individual ultrasound features of each nodule analyzed were size, number, texture (Fig. 1A), margination (Fig. 1B), presence of internal densities or calcifications (Figs. 1C, and 1D), edge refraction, and vascularity relative to the rest of the gland [13, 25, 26] (Fig. 1E). Analysis of the presence or absence of individual sonographic features revealed no feature with consistently high sensitivity or specificity for malignancy (Table 1). In our study, sensitivity for the presence or absence of specific features was 35-100% and specificity, 8.9-97.8%. There was no correlation between diagnosis and nodule size, which was categorized as less than 1 cm (n = 7), 1-2 cm (n = 288), and larger than 2 cm (n = 206) (Table 2). However, several features were found to have a statistically significant negative predictive value. These individual features, the absence of which was common in benign disease, included calcification, halo, hypoechogenicity, isoechogenicity, and ring or peripheral hypervascularity.
Classification | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Positive Predictive Value (%) | Negative Predictive Value (%) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Presence of sharp border | 62.5 (25/40) | 61.7 (284/460) | 12.4 (25/201) | 95.0 (284/299) | 0.0017 |
Absence of calcification | 25.0 (10/40) | 93.3 (429/460) | 24.4 (10/41) | 93.5 (429/459) | 0.0005 |
Absence of halo | 32.5 (13/40) | 75.9 (349/460) | 10.5 (13/124) | 92.8 (349/376) | 0.0731 |
Presence of hyperechogenicity | 100.0 (40/40) | 8.9 (41/460) | 8.7 (40/459) | 100.0 (41/41) | 0.0282 |
Absence of hypoechogenicity | 52.5 (21/40) | 92.2 (424/460) | 36.8 (21/57) | 95.7 (424/443) | < 0.0001 |
Absence of isoechogenicity | 35.0 (14/40) | 78.7 (362/460) | 12.5 (14/112) | 93.3 (362/388) | 0.023 |
Absence of hypervascularity | 35.0 (14/40) | 90.4 (416/460) | 24.1 (14/58) | 94.1 (416/442) | < 0.0001 |
Presence of spongiform configuration | 90.0 (36/40) | 57.8 (266/460) | 15.7 (36/230) | 98.5 (266/270) | < 0.0001 |
Absence of edge refraction | 7.5 (3/40) | 97.8 (450/460) | 23.1 (3/13) | 92.4 (450/487) | 0.0625 |
Absence of ring vascularity | 22.5 (9/40) | 92.2 (424/460) | 20.0 (9/45) | 93.2 (424/455) | 0.0042 |
Presence of classification 1-4 | 100.0 (40/40) | 65.9 (303/460) | 20.3 (40/197) | 100.0 (303/303) | < 0.0001 |
Note—Values in parentheses are numbers of nodules.
Nodule Diameter (cm) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Diagnosis | < 1 | 1-2 | > 2 |
Benign | 6 | 265 | 190 |
Follicular | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Malignant | 1 | 13 | 6 |
Total | 7 | 288 | 206 |
Note—There was no correlation between diagnosis and nodule size.
Each nodule was assigned to one of 10 discrete morphologic groupings. These patterns, which were based on a previous report [23] and expanded according to our experience, were as follows: 1, spongiform without hypervascularity (Fig. 2A); 2, cyst with avascular colloid plug (Fig. 2B); 3, giraffe pattern (Fig. 2C) with blocks of hyperechogenicity, or white, separated by bands of hypoechogenicity, or black; 4, uniform hyperechogenicity (“white knight”) (Fig. 2D); 5, intense hypervascularity (“red light”) (Fig. 2E); 6, hypoechogenicity (Fig. 2F); 7, isoechogenicity without halo (Fig. 2G); 8, isoechogenicity with halo (Fig. 2H); 9, “ring of fire,” or nodules with intense peripheral vascularity (Fig. 2I); and 10, other (Fig. 2J), or a mixed pattern or pattern that did not fit the other categories (Table 3). A distinct pattern emerged in which it became evident that there were specific morphologic groupings or patterns that were accurate predictors of benign disease. Specifically, there were no malignant nodules in the 303 patients (61%) with patterns 1-4 (Table 4). Spongiform nonhypervascular masses were the most common type of nodule seen, 210 of 210 being found benign at FNA biopsy. All 53 of the cysts with internal colloid clot, all 23 giraffe pattern nodules, and all 17 hyperechoic nodules were benign. The results in patterns 5-10 were unpredictable, ranging from 35 of 37 isoechoic nodules without halo biopsied being benign to only 31 of 45 hypoechoic nodules being benign.
Pattern | Texture | Vascularity | Margins | Densities |
---|---|---|---|---|
1, Spongiform or “puff pastry” | Spongiform internal cysts | None or isovascular | Well-defined | Present or absent comet tail |
2, Cyst with colloid clot | Cystic with mural clot | None or isovascular | Well-defined | Present or absent comet tail |
3, Giraffe | Hyperechoic block, black bands | None or isovascular | Any | Absent |
4, Hyperechoic, or “white knight” | Hyperechoic | None or isovascular | Well-defined | Absent |
5, Intensely hypervascular, or “red light” | Any | Central hypervascularity | Any | Present or absent |
6, Hypoechoic | Hypoechoic | None or isovascular | Any | Present or absent |
7, Isoechoic without halo | Isoechoic | None or isovascular | Any | Present or absent |
8, Isoechoic with halo | Isoechoic | None or isovascular | Well-defined | Present or absent |
9, “Ring of fire” | Any | Peripheral hypervascularity | Well-defined | Present or absent |
10, Other | Any | Any | Any | Present or absent |
Benign, Watch (n = 460) | Malignant, Biopsy (n = 40) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pattern | Total | Colloid | Hashimoto's Thyroiditis | Hyperplasia | Total | Follicular | Malignant |
1, Spongiform | 210 | 196 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2, Cyst with colloid clot | 53 | 52 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3, Giraffe | 23 | 12 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4, “White knight” | 17 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5, “Red light” | 37 | 29 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 11 | 4 |
6, Hypoechoic | 31 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 14 | 1 | 13 |
7, Isoechoic without halo | 35 | 26 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
8, Isoechoic with halo | 37 | 33 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
9, “Ring of fire” | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
10, Other | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Note—Patterns 1-4 are invariably associated with benign conditions. Patterns 5-10 are variable.
Discussion
A thyroid nodule is a discrete lesion, sonographically distinct from the surrounding thyroid parenchyma [27]. Rather than a single disease, nodules are manifestations of a gamut of thyroid diseases [28]. Although some thyroid nodules may be discovered at physical examination, many are incidental findings of other imaging studies, such as CT and MRI of the neck or chest and carotid ultrasound imaging. FNA of thyroid nodules has replaced blind surgical excision as the procedure of choice in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Use of FNA has led to a considerable decrease in the number of surgical excisions and to a twofold increase in the diagnosis of carcinoma [4, 5, 29]. The relative ease of FNA compared with surgery and the increased frequency and refinement of imaging studies has resulted in what some authors have referred to as an epidemic of thyroid nodules [3, 30].
In view of their ubiquity, it is not feasible to biopsy every thyroid nodule discovered with ultrasound. Reasons for limiting thyroid biopsy, which is relatively painless and safe, include the small percentage of malignant lesions, the small number of cases of thyroid cancer in which early diagnosis may actually have an influence, the economic and societal costs, the strain on radiology resources, and the patient uncertainty and anxiety incumbent on a potentially malignant diagnosis. Hence, reliable guidelines for nodules that may not require biopsy have become essential.
Not surprisingly in view of the experience of other authors [31], we concluded that no individual sonographic feature had both high sensitivity and high specificity in the detection of malignancy. Nonetheless, many of these previously described high-risk features, such as calcification, hypoechogenicity, poor definition, and hypervascularity, were found to be absent over and over again in nodules that did not require biopsy.










The persistent combination of some of these common individual ultrasound characteristics, or, more properly, their absence, led us to consider a more pattern-oriented approach, such as that advocated by Reading et al. [23] as an alternative to the analysis of individual features. Those authors described eight typical appearances of commonly encountered benign and malignant nodules, allowing them to separate more than one half of thyroid nodules into those that could be observed versus those requiring biopsy. According to their results, the following four classic patterns necessitate biopsy: 1, a hypoechoic nodule with microcalcifications; 2, coarse calcifications in a hypoechoic nodule; 3, well-marginated, ovoid, solid nodules with a thin hypoechoic halo; and 4, a solid mass with refractive shadowing from the edges, which is believed to occur as a result of fibrosis. The four classic patterns of nodules that did not require biopsy in that series were the following: 1, small (< 1 cm) colloid-filled cystic nodules; 2, a nodule with a honeycomb appearance consisting of internal cystic spaces with thin echogenic walls; 3, a large predominantly cystic nodule; and 4, diffuse multiple small hypoechoic nodules with intervening echogenic bands, which are indicative of Hashimoto's thyroiditis.
Like Reading et al. [23], we found that use of a pattern approach to thyroid nodules is highly sensitive and specific for the presence of benignity. Our patterns differed somewhat from those proposed previously, yet there are definite similarities. Analysis of our data revealed four patterns that were invariably benign at FNA biopsy (Table 5). The most common overall pattern is a nodule with diffuse internal linear cysts, described as spongiform or honeycomb, our type 1 pattern. In our cases, this finding was commonly described as a “puff pastry” pattern similar to the ultrathin layers of flaky pastry in desserts such as napoleons. This pattern was characteristic of colloid nodules or goiter. The only spongiform nodule not classically benign was a single nodule that also was intensely hypervascular. Our type 1 or spongiform nodule consequently is defined as avascular or, occasionally, isovascular in relation to the rest of the gland.
Current Study | Classification of Reading et al. |
---|---|
1, Spongiform, or “puff pastry” | 2, Honeycomb of internal cystic spaces with thin echogenic walls |
2, Cyst with colloid clot | 1, Small (< 1 cm) colloid-filled cystic nodules; 3, large predominantly cystic nodule |
3, Giraffe | 4, Diffuse, multiple small hypoechoic nodules with intervening echogenic bands indicative of Hashimoto's thyroiditis |
4, Hyperechoic, or “white knight” |
The second pattern (type 2) was a cystic nodule containing a central plug of avascular colloid, similar to the previously described small or large cyst patterns [23]. In our initial analysis of individual features, size of cyst was deemed insignificant. Important, however, was the characterization of the plug as avascular and puff pastry. All of these nodules were also colloid nodules. If the cystic portion of the lesion is subtracted visually, a type 1 spongiform nodule remains. The third pattern (type 3), or giraffe pattern, was characterized by globular areas of hyperechogenicity surrounded by linear thin areas of hypoechogenicity, similar to the two-tone blocklike coloring of a giraffe. This pattern was quite characteristic of Hashimoto's thyroiditis. A variation of this pattern is our type 4 “white knight,” or hyperechoic, nodule, which was found commonly to be a regenerative nodule of Hashimoto's thyroiditis.
Analysis of our other patterns revealed more variability in final cytologic findings (Table 6). Such nodules included both insignificant and significant lesions with such variability that prediction before biopsy was not reliable. These nodules had the four biopsy-recommendation patterns described earlier, such as isoechoic nodule with a surrounding halo or refractive edges, which came to be simplified in our series as isoechoic nodules with or without a halo (types 7 and 8). A hypoechoic nodule with or without central microcalcification or with central macrocalcification in other series [25, 26, 32], for which biopsy was recommended, was the most worrisome pattern (type 6) in our study.
Current Study: Indeterminate Finding, Biopsy Necessary | Reading et al.: High Risk of Malignancy, Biopsy Necessary |
---|---|
5, “Red light,” central hypervascularity | |
6, Hypoechoic | 1, Hypoechoic nodule with microcalcifications; 2, coarse calcifications in a hypoechoic nodule |
7, Isoechoic without halo | 4, Solid mass with refractive shadowing from the edges, believed to be due to fibrosis |
8, Isoechoic with halo | 3, Well-marginated, ovoid, solid nodule with a thin hypoechoic halo |
9, “Ring of fire,” peripheral vascularity | |
10, Other |
We identified other common patterns, including the type 5 “red light” pattern, or an intensely hypervascular lesion that on Doppler images glowed like a red stoplight. This pattern was commonly seen in lesions with abundant cellularity, including, commonly, follicular neoplasms and, less commonly, hyperplastic nodules and carcinoma. Other nodule types included type 9 ring-of-fire nodules with intense peripheral vascularity and nodules described as other (type 10), which did not fit any of the classic patterns. Calcification, although commonly seen in nodules requiring biopsy, was never seen as an isolated finding. The likelihood of benignity of these nodules (type 5-10) ranged from 60% (type 9, ring of fire) to 91% (type 10, other). Because of this lack of predictability, we believed that these nodules should be considered for FNA biopsy.
The limitations of our study are related to the fact that most of the diagnoses were based on cytologic rather than histologic findings, the retrospective nature of the study, and the fact that nodule characterization was dependent on only two observers. The readers were blinded to the cytologic results at the time of nodule characterization. The period 2005-2007 was chosen to minimize the potential for recall bias. To answer our concerns with respect to these limitations, we are preparing a study in which we train radiologists with varying degrees of experience in this pattern approach. A series of consecutive thyroid biopsies will be chosen prospectively in the weeks before their performance, and the images will be shown to these readers, who will decide whether biopsy should be performed. Analysis of interobserver variability for assigning nodules to a specific pattern will be analyzed, as will the characterizations with final cytologic result.
We conclude that biopsy of a large number of thyroid nodules (in our study, 61%) can be avoided when a pattern approach to nodule characterization is used. Specific morphologic patterns are highly predictive of benignity. Specifically, a nodule that has a uniform nonhypervascular spongiform appearance, is a cystic lesion with a colloid clot, has a giraffelike pattern, or is diffusely hyperechoic can be observed rather than biopsied. If, conversely, a nodule does not correspond to one of these four patterns, according to our data biopsy should be performed regardless of the individual features or pattern of the nodule.
Footnote
Address correspondence to J. Bonavita ([email protected]).
References
1.
Ezzat S, Sarti DA, Cain DR, et al. Thyroid incidentalomas: prevalence by palpation and ultrasonography. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:1838-1840
2.
Frates MC, Benson CB, Charboneau JW, et al. Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. Radiology 2005; 237:794-800
3.
Brander AE, Viikinkoski VP, Nickels JI, Kivisaari LM. Importance of thyroid abnormalities detected at US screening: a 5-year follow-up. Radiology 2000; 215:801-806
4.
Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:10-30 [Erratum in CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:259]
5.
Harnsberger H. Diagnostic imaging: head and neck. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys, 2004:24-40
6.
Kountakis SE, Skoulas IG, Maillard AA. The radiologic work-up in thyroid surgery: fine-needle biopsy versus scintigraphy and ultrasound. Ear Nose Throat J 2002; 81:151-154
7.
Rago T, Vitti P, Chiovato L, et al. Role of conventional ultrasonography and color flow-Doppler sonography in predicting malignancy in “cold” thyroid nodules. Eur J Endocrinol 1998; 138:41-46
8.
Giuffrida D, Gharib H. Controversies in the management of cold, hot, and occult thyroid nodules. Am J Med 1995; 99:642-650
9.
Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bianchini A, et al. Risk of malignancy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules: predictive value of ultrasound and color-Doppler features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87:1941-1946
10.
Jun P, Chow LC, Jeffrey RB. The sonographic features of papillary thyroid carcinomas: pictorial essay. Ultrasound Q 2005; 21:39-45
11.
Kim EK, Park CS, Chung WY, et al. New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid. AJR 2002; 178:687-691
12.
Koike E, Noguchi S, Yamashita H, et al. Ultrasonographic characteristics of thyroid nodules: prediction of malignancy. Arch Surg 2001; 136:334-337
13.
Chan BK, Desser TS, McDougall IR, et al. Common and uncommon sonographic features of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22:1083-1090
14.
Ahuja A, Chick W, King W, Metreweli C. Clinical significance of the comet-tail artifact in thyroid ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1996; 24:129-133
15.
Kovacevic DO, Skurla MS. Sonographic diagnosis of thyroid nodules: correlation with the results of sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound 2007; 35:63-67
16.
Frates MC, Benson CB, Doubilet PM, et al. Prevalence and distribution of carcinoma in patients with solitary and multiple thyroid nodules on sonography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91:3411-3417
17.
Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al. Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2006; 16:109-142
18.
Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Dralle H, Elisei R, Smit JW, Wiersinga W; European Thyroid Cancer Taskforce. European consensus for the management of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma of the follicular epithelium. Eur J Endocrinol 2006; 154:787-803
19.
British Thyroid Association and Royal College of Physicians. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer in adults. London, UK: Publication Unit of the Royal College of Physicians, 2002
20.
Rodrigues FJ, Limbert ES, Marques AP, et al.; Grupo de Estudo da Tiróide. Treatment and follow up protocol in differentiated thyroid carcinomas of follicular origin [in Portuguese]. Acta Med Port 2005; 18:2-16
21.
Società Italiana di Endocrinologia, Associazione Italiana di Medicina Nucleare ed Imaging Molecolare, Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Linee Guida SIE-AIMN-AIFM per il trattamento e follow-up del carcinoma tiroideo differenziato della tiroide. Rome, Milan, and Gazzada, Italy: SIE, AIMN, and AIFM, 2004:1-75
22.
Van De Velde CJ, Hamming JF, Goslings BM, et al. Report of the consensus development conference on the management of differentiated thyroid cancer in The Netherlands. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1988; 24:287-292
23.
Reading CC, Charboneau JW, Hay ID, Sebo TJ. Sonography of thyroid nodules: a “classic pattern” diagnostic approach. Ultrasound Q 2005; 21:157-165
24.
Hegedus L. Thyroid ultrasound. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2001; 30:339-360
25.
Hoang JK, Lee WK, Lee M, Johnson D, Farrell S. US features of thyroid malignancy: pearls and pitfalls. RadioGraphics 2007; 27:847-860
26.
Takashima S, Fukuda H, Nomura N, Kishimoto H, Kim T, Kobayashi T. Thyroid nodules: reevaluation with ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1995; 23:179-184
27.
Vandermeer FQ, Wong-You-Cheong J. Thyroid nodules: when to biopsy. Appl Radiol 2007; 36:8-19
28.
Pacini F, Burroni L, Ciuoli C, Di Cairano G, Guarino E. Management of thyroid nodules: a clinicopathological, evidence-based approach. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004; 31:1443-1449
29.
Castro MR, Gharib H. Thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: progress, practice, and pitfalls. Endocr Pract 2003; 9:128-136
30.
Ross DS. Nonpalpable thyroid nodules: managing an epidemic. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87:1938-1940
31.
Sahin M, Sengul A, Berki Z, Tutuncu NB, Guvener ND. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and ultrasonographic features of infracentimetric nodules in patients with nodular goiter: correlation with pathological findings. Endocr Pathol 2006; 17:67-74
32.
Iannuccilli JD, Cronan JJ, Monchik JM. Risk for malignancy of thyroid nodules as assessed by sonographic criteria: the need for biopsy. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23:1455-1464
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© American Roentgen Ray Society.
History
Submitted: September 12, 2008
Accepted: October 24, 2008
First published: November 23, 2012
Keywords
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
To download the citation to this article, select your reference manager software.