Review
Integrative Imaging Self-Assessment Module LIFELONG LEARNING FOR RADIOLOGY
November 23, 2012

MRI of Pediatric Patients: Part 2, Normal Variants and Abnormalities of the Knee

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to discuss MRI of the pediatric knee and familiarize the reader with conditions encountered in the pediatric population. Clinical scenarios are included to convey important concepts and to orient the learner to normal variants and abnormalities of the pediatric knee. The conditions discussed include, but are not limited to, distal femoral metaphysial irregularity, isolated popliteus tendon avulsion, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and discoid meniscus.
CONCLUSION. The knee is the joint that is most commonly imaged by MRI in children. Injury patterns and signs of other pathologic processes seen in skeletally immature patients are different from those seen in adults. Interpreting pediatric knee MRI studies may be a challenge for those unfamiliar with the evolving patterns of normal development and of the signs of conditions that are more prevalent in children. Through case scenarios, this article describes and provides images that depict conditions commonly encountered in the pediatric knee. Most of the described normal findings and abnormalities are more prevalent in the pediatric population than in adults, and a few of the conditions are, in fact, unique to pediatric patients.
Children continue to participate in competitive activities at a high level. The lack of skeletal maturity in this patient population can lead to injuries and injury patterns not commonly encountered in the adult population. Conventional radiography remains the first imaging choice for children presenting with knee pain. However, conventional radiographs do not adequately evaluate many types of injuries, including damage to soft tissues. Children also frequently present with knee pain without a history of trauma and conventional radiography may not elucidate a cause for the pain. Although radiographs remain the first-line imaging modality of knee injuries in children, several clinical tools have been validated in children to reduce unnecessary imaging including the Ottawa knee rules [1]. This clinical tool states that radiographs should be considered after knee injury for patients who meet at least one of the following clinical criteria: age of 55 years or older, tenderness at the head of the fibula, isolated tenderness of the patella, inability to flex to 90??, and inability to bear weight immediately after injury and in the emergency department.
In the pediatric population, using MRI to evaluate the knee is an excellent choice for the following reasons: lack of ionizing radiation, multiplanar capabilities, and excellent detail and contrast of soft tissue, including menisci, ligaments, and cartilage. The principal indications to perform MRI of the knee are clinical suspicion of internal derangement or an occult fracture, persistent pain, refusal to bear weight, or hemarthrosis [2].
MRI protocols vary depending on the clinical question, the strength of the magnet, the manufacturer of the MR machine, and institutional preferences. At our institution, we typically perform most knee MRI examinations on a 3-T magnet.
If evaluating for internal derangement, the following sequences are typically performed: sagittal proton density, sagittal T2 fat-suppressed, axial T1, axial T2 fat-suppressed, and coronal STIR. Imaging is performed at a 3-mm thickness with a 1-mm interslice gap. We also routinely perform a 3D sagittal fluid-sensitive gradient sequence, which provides excellent cartilage detail, and reconstruct in the axial and coronal planes.
If the clinical concern is for arthritis, infection, or tumor, we typically perform the following sequences: STIR in three planes; axial T1; T1 fat-saturated in a single plane before IV gadolinium administration; and T1 fat-saturated in at least two planes after IV gadolinium administration, with one of the planes in the same orientation as the T1 fat-saturated before IV gadolinium administration.
The radiologist can modify the protocol depending on the exact clinical question and the imaging findings. Occasionally, sedation is required for younger patients who are not cooperative during the MRI examination. At our institution, sedation is performed and monitored by a dedicated anesthesia team with direct input from the supervising radiologist. Sedation is achieved most often using a combination of sevoflurane anesthetic gas and IV propofol.

Scenario 1

Clinical History

A 12-year-old boy presents with lateral knee pain after a football injury.

Description of Images

Figure 1A is a frontal radiograph of the left knee that shows an avulsion fracture adjacent to the lateral femoral condyle. The lateral view revealed a suprapatellar joint effusion. Figures 1B and 1C are coronal and axial fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive images, respectively, of the same knee showing the avulsion. Attached to the avulsed fragment is the popliteus tendon. There is a moderate joint effusion with a fluid-fluid level.

Conclusion

This is a case of isolated popliteus tendon avulsion. The popliteus tendon, a component of the posterolateral corner of the knee, originates from a groove at the lateral femoral condyle, just inferior to the lateral collateral ligament attachment site. The tendon courses inferomedially and the muscle inserts into the posteromedial surface of the proximal tibial metaphysis. The muscle also has origins from the fibular head and the lateral meniscus [3]. The popliteus muscle opposes lateral meniscal displacement and limits posterior tibial translation and rotation [4, 5]. Although injury to the popliteus tendon is not rare, isolated avulsion fracture of the popliteus tendon is [3, 6].
In 1990, Gruel [7] first described this lesion in a 15-year-old girl who sustained a twisting injury to her knee. In the skeletally immature population, the increased incidence of such avulsion injuries is likely secondary to the relative weakness of bone at tendon insertion sites [8]. It is, therefore, not surprising that adults are more likely to experience intrasubstance tears of the popliteus tendon [5, 6]. Anterior translation of the femur with respect to the tibia accompanied by rotation during knee flexion is thought to be the mechanism of injury.
The popliteus tendon is a dynamic stabilizer, and reflex muscular contraction is likely to contribute to the injury and helps explain its isolated nature [3, 8, 9]. The ideal management of patients with isolated popliteal tendon avulsion injuries is controversial. Success has been reported with both nonsurgical and surgical treatments [7???11].

Scenario 2

Clinical History

A 16-year-old boy presents with knee pain and swelling after sustaining an injury during soccer practice.

Description of Images

Sagittal T2 fat-suppressed (Fig. 2A) and proton density (Fig. 2B) images of the knee show a nondisplaced avulsion fracture (type I) of the anterior tibial spine. There is edema in the avulsed fragment and the underlying tibial epiphysis. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is normal. Note the moderate joint effusion.

Conclusion

A more common bony avulsion injury of the skeletally immature knee is the tibial spine avulsion fracture. Before physial closure, anterior tibial spine avulsions are relatively common, whereas ACL tears become more prevalent after skeletal maturity [12]. The chondroosseous tibial spine is the weakest component of the ACL complex in the skeletally immature patient. Kocher et al. [13] have shown that the size of the intercondylar notch also influences the type of injury sustained. Anterior tibial spine avulsion injuries are more common in patients with a wide intercondylar notch, whereas those with a narrow intercondylar notch are more likely to suffer intrasubstance ACL tears. Tibial spine avulsions may be radiographically subtle or may be occult on conventional views, so oblique and tunnel projections may be helpful [14].
The multiplanar nature of MRI greatly aids in visualization of the avulsion injury. If acute, there is edema in the avulsed fragment and the underlying tibial epiphysis. There may also be high or intermediate signal within the substance of the ACL, indicating a partial-thickness ligament tear [15]. Based on the Meyers and McKeever [16] classification system, a tibial spine avulsion fracture is categorized as type I, II, or III. Type I is nondisplaced and does not inhibit knee extension. A type II fracture is displaced anteriorly and hinged posteriorly. With a type II fracture, knee extension is limited and the anterior horn of a meniscus may be trapped between fracture fragments. There is complete displacement in a type III fracture, and the patient typically holds the knee in a mildly flexed position.
Type I fractures are treated conservatively, whereas type II and type III injuries require reduction and fixation of the avulsed fragment [2]. This patient was treated nonsurgically.

Scenario 3

Clinical History

A 16-year-old boy who is a long-distance runner presents with a 3-month history of anterior proximal tibial pain.

Description of Images

A coned-down frontal radiograph (Fig. 3A) of the left tibia shows sclerosis in the proximal tibia accompanied by surrounding periosteal reaction. A coronal STIR image (Fig. 3B) clearly shows the low-signal fracture line surrounded by marrow edema. There is also soft-tissue edema. These findings are consistent with a proximal tibial stress fracture.

Conclusion

Repeated stress on normal bone???particularly if the strain is concentrated on a focal area not meant to withstand the load???can lead to a stress fracture [17]. For the skeletally immature population, the approximate distribution of stress fractures is as follows: tibia, 50%; fibula, 20%; pars interarticularis of the lumbar spine, 15%; femur, 3%; metatarsals, 2%; and tarsal navicular, 2% [17]. Although radiography is typically the first imaging study performed when a stress fracture is suspected, the initial radiographs show positive findings for a stress fracture in only 10% of the cases, probably because radiographic findings require 2???10 weeks to manifest. Positive findings include periosteal reaction, endosteal cortical thickening, and fracture lucency [17].
When radiographs are negative, MRI is considered the examination of choice to evaluate for a stress fracture [18]. MRI is usually recommended rather than bone scintigraphy because MRI can more precisely discriminate between a stress fracture and other entities that may appear similar to a stress fracture on bone scintigraphy such as osteoid osteoma, osteomyelitis, a ligamentous injury with secondary osseous reaction, and neoplasm [17].
A clinically validated grading system for stress fractures has been proposed by Fredericson et al. [19]. In grade 1 injuries, high T2 signal is confined to the periosteum. If there is high T2 signal in the marrow without accompanying abnormal T1 marrow signal, then the injury is classified as grade 2. Abnormal low T1 signal within the marrow indicates a grade 3 injury. If a cortical signal abnormality (i.e., linear fracture line or a broader, less linear area) accompanies the marrow signal abnormalities, then the lesion is classified as grade 4 (Table 1). Grades 1, 2, and 3 are referred to as a ???stress response??? or ???stress reaction,??? whereas grade 4 represents a true stress fracture. As one would expect, each increasing grade corresponds to an increasing severity of injury and influences the amount and type of activity the patient can perform [20]. Most tibial stress fractures are focal and occur on the posteromedial side near the proximal metadiaphysis. Shin splints, on the other hand, involve a longer segment of the tibia and represent an enthesopathy. Signal abnormality (i.e., high T2) is confined to the periosteum and does not extend to the marrow [21].

Scenario 4

Clinical History

A 4-year-old boy presents with chronic knee pain. Radiographic findings were negative.

Description of Images

Coronal STIR (Fig. 4A) and sagittal proton density (Fig. 4B) images show an abnormally large and thick lateral meniscus with internal intermediate-to-high signal; these findings indicate mucinous degeneration. The abnormal signal does not reach the articular surface. Note the normal shape and size of the medial meniscus.

Conclusion

This is a case of a lateral discoid meniscus. A discoid meniscus is an abnormally wide and thick meniscus that is prone to degeneration and tears. Most discoid menisci occur on the lateral side. The reported incidence ranges from 0.4% to 16.6% [22]. Several quantitative MR criteria for diagnosing discoid menisci have been described. The simplest and most popular method was described by Silverman et al. [23]: If three or more 5-mm-thick contiguous sagittal images show continuity of the anterior and posterior horns of the meniscus, the diagnosis of a discoid meniscus should be made. Araki et al. [24] claim the narrowest transverse width of the midsegment of the meniscus on a coronal slice should not exceed 14 mm. A discoid meniscus may be symptomatic even in the absence of internal signal abnormalities. However, diffuse increased internal signal intensity indicating mucinous degeneration is usually present and may extend to the articular surface. Other findings include meniscal tears, para- or intrameniscal cysts, and posterior horn extrusion. If a discoid meniscus is torn and displaced, a diagnosis of discoid meniscus may be difficult to make [2].

Scenario 5

Clinical History

A 13-year-old girl who is on a volleyball team presents with chronic knee pain.

Description of Images

Coronal proton density (Fig. 5A) and STIR (Fig. 5B) images of the knee show an irregularity at the lateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle; this finding is an osteochondral defect (OCD). Note that the thin rim of hyperintensity on the STIR image is not as bright as the joint fluid. There is a small cyst associated with the OCD, but the cyst is singular and measured less than 5 mm. The overlying cartilage appears intact. This case would be characterized as stable juvenile OCD.

Conclusion

Most OCDs are caused by repetitive trauma, but other causes include familial dysplasia, avascular necrosis, and fat emboli [25???27]. Approximately 70% of the OCDs in the knee occur at the posterolateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle. The remaining cases occur in the central lateral femoral condyle (15???20%) and patella (5???10%) [28]. The incidence of OCDs of the knee in pediatric athletes is increasing, possibly secondary to increasing participation in competitive sports [28]. OCDs are segregated into one of two groups: juvenile or adult. A juvenile OCD occurs in skeletally immature patients and carries a more favorable prognosis than an adult OCD. A juvenile OCD usually heals completely with conservative management, but an adult OCD is more likely to require surgical intervention, lead to premature degenerative changes, become unstable, and worsen clinically [13, 20, 28???30].
TABLE 1: Classification System for Stress Fractures Proposed by Fredericson et al. [19]
A classic OCD located in the medial femoral condyle is best identified in the notch view of conventional radiographs. The lesion is typically oval with variable amounts of central lucency and surrounding sclerosis. MRI can be very helpful in determining the stability of an OCD. In adult OCD, MRI findings of instability include a rim of high T2 signal around the lesion, cysts underlying the lesion, multiple marginal discontinuities in the subchondral bone at the lesion, a second rim of low T2 signal surrounding the lesion, and displaced intraarticular fragments. Because patients with juvenile OCDs have a greater ability to heal, the criteria to suggest instability are slightly more guarded: The high-signal T2 rim must be as bright as fluid, not just relatively bright as in the adult cases; and the cysts underlying the lesion must be multiple in number or larger than 5 mm [20, 31].
The clinical outcome of OCDs in children is more favorable than that in adults. However, part of the reason for the better outcomes in children is likely from mistakes in diagnosis because some normal variants can mimic an OCD. For example, a normal secondary ossification at the posterior aspect of the lateral femoral condyle may be mistaken for an OCD (Figs. 6A and 6B). Careful evaluation will reveal normal overlying cartilage and no associated bone marrow edema [2, 32, 33].

Scenario 6

Clinical History

A 15-year-old boy presents with knee pain after a skiing injury.

Description of Images

Axial T2 fat-saturated (Fig. 7A) and coronal STIR (Fig. 7B) images of the left knee show the sequelae of transient patellar dislocation. On the axial image, there is edema in the medial patella with a delamination injury to the patellar and trochlear cartilage. Soft-tissue edema and thickening medially indicate injury to the medial retinaculum. The coronal image shows edema in the lateral femoral condyle from patellar impaction before relocation.

Conclusion

Transient patellar dislocation is a frequent injury in adolescents and young adults and commonly occurs in patients who are between 14 and 20 years old [34]. The mechanism of injury involves the quadriceps applying lateral tension on the patella while a flexed knee is twisted [35]. Most dislocations relocate spontaneously.
Radiographic findings include a large joint effusion that is sometimes accompanied by a medial patellar avulsion fracture [36]. MR findings are classic for the mechanism of injury. Typically, there are impaction contusions of the lateral femoral condyle and the inferomedial patella. Edema in the medial soft tissue likely indicates injury to the medial retinaculum, the medial patellofemoral ligament, or both. Cartilage injury at the medial patellar facet or lateral trochlea is common and occurs in up to 72% of transient patellar dislocations [34]. MRI may also reveal predisposing factors for transient patellar dislocation, such as trochlear tilt, femoral trochlear dysplasia (shallow sulcus), or patella alta. However, care must be taken before diagnosing lateral subluxation or patella alta when interpreting images of an extended knee [34].

Scenario 7

Clinical History

A 12-year-old girl who plays basketball presents with chronic anterior knee pain.

Description of Images

A lateral radiograph (Fig. 8A), sagittal proton density image (Fig. 8B), and sagittal T2 fat-suppressed image (Fig. 8C) of the left knee show some bony fragmentation at the inferior pole of the patella with associated bone marrow, mild patellar tendinopathy, and edema in Hoffa fat pad. The patellar cartilage is intact. These findings are consistent with Sinding-Larsen-Johansson disease.

Conclusion

In 1921 Sinding-Larsen described a condition in adolescents consisting of tenderness at the anterior knee with inferior patellar fragmentation on radiographs. A year later, Johansson independently described a similar condition that later became know as Sinding-Larsen-Johansson disease [37]. It is important to differentiate this entity from patellar sleeve avulsion and jumper???s knee because treatment varies depending on the condition. Jumper???s knee is a pain syndrome often occurring in adolescent athletes and is caused by chronic inflammation or irritation at the proximal or distal attachment sites of the patellar tendon. The tendon is often thickened but without frank tears or avulsions [14]. A patellar sleeve avulsion typically occurs from a more acute injury, and there is damage to the inferior patellar cartilage. Lateral radiographs may reveal an osseous fragment below the lower pole of the patella. MRI may be necessary to differentiate this entity from Sinding-Larsen-Johansson disease, which involves only the bony patella and has no cartilaginous involvement [38].
In all three conditions, the mechanism of injury is similar; it is believed to be a forceful contraction of the quadriceps against resistance, particularly in adolescent male athletes. The injury usually happens in isolation, and there is no known association with damage to other structures of the knee [39]. The more chronic conditions of jumper???s knee and Sinding-Larsen-Johansson disease are managed conservatively, whereas patellar sleeve avulsion often requires open reduction with internal fixation and extensor mechanism reconstruction [38].

Scenario 8

Clinical History

A 12-year-old girl presents with a nontraumatic swollen knee.

Description of Image

An axial T1 gadolinium-enhanced image (Fig. 9) of the left knee at the level of the patellofemoral joint shows thick, nodular synovial enhancement with a moderate joint effusion.

Conclusion

This is a case of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a relatively uncommon condition (incidence: 5???18 cases per 100 persons; prevalence: 30???150 cases per 100,000 persons) characterized by persistent joint swelling, often of a single joint and most commonly of the knee [40]. Although radiographs have been used to establish a baseline and monitor disease progression in joints, incomplete ossification of the immature skeleton limits the role of conventional radiographs in children. The soft-tissue swelling and joint effusions seen on radiographs are nonspecific, and bony changes do not occur early enough in the disease to enable early diagnosis [41???43].
MRI is regarded as the most sensitive technique for the investigation of juvenile idiopathic arthritis [44???47]. Johnson et al. [43] concluded that synovial hypertrophy, joint effusions, and popliteal lymph nodes were present on MRI of all patients with early juvenile idiopathic arthritis in their study. In addition, gadolinium administration improved the detection of synovial hyperplasia [43]. Thickened (> 3 mm) enhancing synovium is typically identified in the suprapatellar bursa. Hypointense rice bodies can sometimes be identified within the joint space. They represent detached synovial fragments. Other less common findings that occur later in the disease process include cartilage thinning, bony erosions, meniscal hypoplasia, and popliteal synovial cysts [2].
Although this patient was eventually diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, septic arthritis can look similar. Other conditions that can cause similar synovial thickening and enhancement include pigmented villonodular synovitis and hemophilia. Gradient-echo sequences can be helpful in differentiating these causes from juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pigmented villonodular synovitis shows nodular hemosiderin deposition, resulting in blooming related to the susceptibility artifact of paramagnetic hemosiderin. This nodular hemosiderin deposition is in contradistinction to hemophilic arthropathy where the widespread hemosiderin deposition throughout thickened synovium results in a more diffuse appearance of susceptibility artifact. In addition, the osseous deformities seen in chronic hemophilia are not seen as a classic feature of pigmented villonodular synovitis [48]. Finally, the synovial enhancement and joint effusion seen with septic arthritis can be differentiated from other causes primarily on the basis of clinical features and laboratory data, including the results of joint aspiration in suspicious cases.

Scenario 9

Clinical History

An 8-year-old girl presents with right knee pain after falling.

Description of Images

A frontal radiograph (Fig. 10A) of the right knee shows a well-defined lucency in the medial femoral metadiaphysis. This lucency is confirmed to be within the posteromedial metadiaphysis on a lateral radiograph (Fig. 10B). An axial reconstruction of a 3D fluid-sensitive gradient sequence (dual-echo steady-state) (Fig. 10C) shows the lesion to be mildly hyperintense. There is no associated soft-tissue mass or adjacent bone marrow edema. This finding represents a distal femoral metaphysial irregularity, a benign finding.

Conclusion

When evaluating the pediatric knee, it is important to be aware of common benign entities that may mimic abnormalities. A distal femoral metaphysial irregularity is a benign entity typically located at the posterior cortex of the medial femoral condyle metaphysis and is intimately associated with the adductor magnus insertion site. The irregularity likely results from chronic stress at the insertion site [49]. Other benign entities are distal femoral cortical irregularity and cortical desmoid.
On radiography, the lesion may appear as a rounded or scalloped lucency. Nonossifying fibromas (> 2 cm) and fibrous cortical defects (??? 2 cm) are also common benign lesions typically occurring near the metaphysis of the distal femurs of children. On radiography, they appear as scalloped lesions with geographic margins and narrow zones of transition.
On MRI, the lesion is usually low signal on T1-weighted sequences and bright on T2-weighted sequences. There may be slight contrast enhancement within the lesion, but there should be no adjacent soft-tissue enhancement [50]. The MR appearance of this irregularity parallels the radiographic appearance by showing well-defined margins. The lesions are usually dark on T1-weighted images, and the T2-weighted appearance is dependent on their stage of maturation. Uniform brightness on a T2-weighted sequence implies a relatively new lesion. As the lesion matures, the T2 brightness becomes more heterogeneous and less conspicuous [51]. Mild contrast enhancement is not rare.
Goodin et al. [52] characterized the anatomic appearance and metabolic activity of nonossifying fibromas, fibrous cortical defects, and cortical desmoids on PET/CT images. The fibrous lesions showed variable metabolic activity from mild to moderate to intense 18F-FDG uptake. CT, conventional radiography, MRI, or clinical follow-up was used to confirm the diagnoses of these fibroosseous lesions [52].

Scenario 10

Clinical History

A 13-year-old boy presents with chronic anterior knee pain.

Description of Images

Coronal STIR (Fig. 11A) and dual-echo steady-state (Fig. 11B) images of the right knee show a bipartite patella with hyperintensity within the synchondrosis.

Conclusion

Most commonly located superolaterally, a bipartite patella represents the failure of fusion of a secondary ossification center of the patella. It is usually asymptomatic but may cause anterior knee pain if chronic or direct trauma interrupts the synchondrosis between the ossification centers [53]. In symptomatic cases, MRI may show abnormal signal within the synchondrosis, edema in the bipartite fragment, and cartilage discontinuity [2].
Fig. 1A ???12-year-old boy presents with lateral knee pain after football injury.
A, Frontal radiograph of left knee shows avulsion fracture (arrow) adjacent to lateral femoral condyle. Lateral view (not shown) revealed suprapatellar joint effusion.
Fig. 1B ???12-year-old boy presents with lateral knee pain after football injury.
B, Coronal (B) and axial (C) fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive images of same knee shown in A reveal avulsion (arrow). Attached to avulsed fragment is popliteus tendon (arrowhead, C). There is moderate joint effusion with fluid-fluid level (double arrowheads, C).
Fig. 1C ???12-year-old boy presents with lateral knee pain after football injury.
C, Coronal (B) and axial (C) fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive images of same knee shown in A reveal avulsion (arrow). Attached to avulsed fragment is popliteus tendon (arrowhead, C). There is moderate joint effusion with fluid-fluid level (double arrowheads, C).
Fig. 2A ???16-year-old boy presents with knee pain and swelling after sustaining injury during soccer practice.
A, Sagittal T2 fat-suppressed (A) and proton density (B) images of knee show nondisplaced (type I) avulsion fracture of anterior tibial spine. There is edema in avulsed fragment (arrow) and underlying tibial epiphysis. Anterior cruciate ligament is normal. Note moderate joint effusion (arrowhead, A).
Fig. 2B ???16-year-old boy presents with knee pain and swelling after sustaining injury during soccer practice.
B, Sagittal T2 fat-suppressed (A) and proton density (B) images of knee show nondisplaced (type I) avulsion fracture of anterior tibial spine. There is edema in avulsed fragment (arrow) and underlying tibial epiphysis. Anterior cruciate ligament is normal. Note moderate joint effusion (arrowhead, A).
Fig. 3A ???16-year-old boy who is long-distance runner presents with 3-month history of anterior proximal tibial pain.
A, Coned-down frontal radiograph of left tibia shows sclerosis (arrow) in proximal tibia accompanied by surrounding periosteal reaction (arrowheads).
Fig. 3B ???16-year-old boy who is long-distance runner presents with 3-month history of anterior proximal tibial pain.
B, Coronal STIR image clearly shows low-signal fracture line (arrow) surrounded by marrow edema. Soft-tissue edema (arrowheads) is also present.
Fig. 4A ???4-year-old boy presents with chronic knee pain. Radiographs (not shown) were negative.
A, Coronal STIR (A) and sagittal proton density (B) images show abnormally large and thick lateral meniscus (arrow) with internal intermediate-to-high signal; these findings indicate mucinous degeneration. Abnormal signal does not reach articular surface. Note normal shape and size of medial meniscus (arrowhead, A).
Fig. 4B ???4-year-old boy presents with chronic knee pain. Radiographs (not shown) were negative.
B, Coronal STIR (A) and sagittal proton density (B) images show abnormally large and thick lateral meniscus (arrow) with internal intermediate-to-high signal; these findings indicate mucinous degeneration. Abnormal signal does not reach articular surface. Note normal shape and size of medial meniscus (arrowhead, A).
Fig. 5A ???13-year-old girl who is on volleyball team presents with chronic knee pain.
A, Coronal proton density (A) and STIR (B) images of knee show irregularity at lateral aspect of medial femoral condyle (arrow), indicating osteochondral defect (OCD). Note that thin rim of STIR hyperintensity (single arrowhead, B) is not as bright as joint fluid (asterisk, B). There is single small cyst (double arrowheads, B) associated with irregularity that measures less than 5 mm. Overlying cartilage appears intact. This case would be characterized as stable juvenile OCD.
Fig. 5B ???13-year-old girl who is on volleyball team presents with chronic knee pain.
B, Coronal proton density (A) and STIR (B) images of knee show irregularity at lateral aspect of medial femoral condyle (arrow), indicating osteochondral defect (OCD). Note that thin rim of STIR hyperintensity (single arrowhead, B) is not as bright as joint fluid (asterisk, B). There is single small cyst (double arrowheads, B) associated with irregularity that measures less than 5 mm. Overlying cartilage appears intact. This case would be characterized as stable juvenile OCD.
Fig. 6A ???14-year-old boy presents with nonspecific knee pain.
A, Sagittal CT reconstruction (A) and sagittal dual-echo steady-state (B) images show normal secondary ossification center in lateral femoral condyle (arrow). Note normal overlying cartilage and lack of marrow edema.
Fig. 6B ???14-year-old boy presents with nonspecific knee pain.
B, Sagittal CT reconstruction (A) and sagittal dual-echo steady-state (B) images show normal secondary ossification center in lateral femoral condyle (arrow). Note normal overlying cartilage and lack of marrow edema.
Fig. 7A ???15-year-old boy presents with knee pain after skiing injury.
A, Axial T2 fat-suppressed (A) and coronal STIR (B) images of left knee show sequelae of transient patellar dislocation. On axial image, there is edema in medial patella (single arrowhead, A) with delamination injury to patellar and trochlear cartilage (arrows, A). Soft-tissue edema and thickening medially (double arrowheads, A) indicate injury to medial retinaculum. Coronal image shows edema in lateral femoral condyle (asterisk, B) from patellar impaction before relocation.
Fig. 7B ???15-year-old boy presents with knee pain after skiing injury.
B, Axial T2 fat-suppressed (A) and coronal STIR (B) images of left knee show sequelae of transient patellar dislocation. On axial image, there is edema in medial patella (single arrowhead, A) with delamination injury to patellar and trochlear cartilage (arrows, A). Soft-tissue edema and thickening medially (double arrowheads, A) indicate injury to medial retinaculum. Coronal image shows edema in lateral femoral condyle (asterisk, B) from patellar impaction before relocation.
Fig. 8A ???12-year-old girl who plays basketball presents with chronic anterior knee pain.
A, Lateral radiograph (A), sagittal proton density image (B), and sagittal T2 fat-suppressed image (C) of left knee show some bony fragmentation at inferior pole of patella and associated bone marrow edema (arrow), mild patellar tendinopathy (arrowhead, B and C), and edema in Hoffa fat pad (asterisk, C). Patellar cartilage is intact. These findings are consistent with Sinding-Larsen-Johansson disease.
Fig. 8B ???12-year-old girl who plays basketball presents with chronic anterior knee pain.
B, Lateral radiograph (A), sagittal proton density image (B), and sagittal T2 fat-suppressed image (C) of left knee show some bony fragmentation at inferior pole of patella and associated bone marrow edema (arrow), mild patellar tendinopathy (arrowhead, B and C), and edema in Hoffa fat pad (asterisk, C). Patellar cartilage is intact. These findings are consistent with Sinding-Larsen-Johansson disease.
Fig. 8C ???12-year-old girl who plays basketball presents with chronic anterior knee pain.
C, Lateral radiograph (A), sagittal proton density image (B), and sagittal T2 fat-suppressed image (C) of left knee show some bony fragmentation at inferior pole of patella and associated bone marrow edema (arrow), mild patellar tendinopathy (arrowhead, B and C), and edema in Hoffa fat pad (asterisk, C). Patellar cartilage is intact. These findings are consistent with Sinding-Larsen-Johansson disease.
Fig. 9 ???12-year-old girl presents with nontraumatic swollen knee. Axial T1 gadolinium-enhanced image of left knee at level of patellofemoral joint shows thick, nodular synovial enhancement (arrows) with moderate joint effusion (asterisks). Although patient was eventually diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, septic arthritis can look similar.
Fig. 10A ???8-year-old girl presents with right knee pain after fall.
A, Frontal radiograph of right knee shows well-defined lucency (arrow) in medial femoral metadiaphysis.
Fig. 10B ???8-year-old girl presents with right knee pain after fall.
B, Lucency (arrow) seen in A is confirmed to be within posteromedial metadiaphysis on lateral radiograph.
Fig. 10C ???8-year-old girl presents with right knee pain after fall.
C, Axial reconstruction of 3D fluid-sensitive gradient sequence (dual-echo steady-state) shows lesion (arrow) seen in A and B to be mildly hyperintense. There is no associated soft-tissue mass or adjacent bone marrow edema. This finding represents distal femoral metaphysial irregularity, a benign finding.
Fig. 11A ???13-year-old boy presents with chronic anterior knee pain.
A, Coronal STIR (A) and dual-echo steady-state (B) images of right knee show bipartite patella (arrow) with hyperintensity within synchondrosis.
Fig. 11B ???13-year-old boy presents with chronic anterior knee pain.
B, Coronal STIR (A) and dual-echo steady-state (B) images of right knee show bipartite patella (arrow) with hyperintensity within synchondrosis.

Footnotes

CME SAM MRI of Pediatric Patients
CME/SAM
This article is available for CME/SAM credit.
WEB
This is a Web exclusive article.

References

1.
Bulloch B, Neto G, Plint A, et al. Validation of the Ottawa knee rule in children: a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 42:48???55
2.
Sanchez R, Strouse PJ. The knee: MR imaging of uniquely pediatric disorders. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2009; 17:521???537, vii
3.
Wheeler LD, Lee EY, Lloyd DC. Isolated popliteus tendon avulsion in skeletally immature patients. Clin Radiol 2008; 63:824???828
4.
Staubli HU, Birrer S. The popliteus tendon and its fascicles at the popliteal hiatus: gross anatomy and functional arthroscopic evaluation with and without anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Arthroscopy 1990; 6:209???220
5.
Harner CD, Hoher J, Vogrin TM, Carlin GJ, Woo SL. The effects of a popliteus muscle load on in situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament and on knee kinematics: a human cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26:669???673
6.
Brown TR, Quinn SF, Wensel JP, Kim JH, Demlow T. Diagnosis of popliteus injuries with MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol 1995; 24:511???514
7.
Gruel JB. Isolated avulsion of the popliteus tendon. Arthroscopy 1990; 6:94???95
8.
McConkey JP. Avulsion of the popliteus tendon. J Pediatr Orthop 1991; 11:230???233
9.
Naver L, Aalberg JR. Avulsion of the popliteus tendon: a rare cause of chondral fracture and hemarthrosis. Am J Sports Med 1985; 13:423???424
10.
Conroy J, King D, Gibbon A. Isolated rupture of the popliteus tendon in a professional soccer player. Knee 2004; 11:67???69
11.
Garth WP, Pomphrey MM, Merrill KD. Isolated avulsion of the popliteus tendon: operative repair???a report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74:130???132
12.
Johnston DR, Ganley TJ, Flynn JM, Gregg JR Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients. Orthopedics 2002; 25:864???871; quiz, 872???873
13.
Kocher MS, Mandiga R, Klingele K, Bley L, Micheli LJ. Anterior cruciate ligament injury versus tibial spine fracture in the skeletally immature knee: a comparison of skeletal maturation and notch width index. J Pediatr Orthop 2004; 24:185???188
14.
Stevens MA, El-Khoury GY, Kathol MH, Brandser EA, Chow S. Imaging features of avulsion injuries. RadioGraphics 1999; 19:655???672
15.
Accousti WK, Willis RB. Tibial eminence fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2003; 34:365???375
16.
Meyers MH, McKeever FM. Fracture of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959; 41:209???220; discussion, 220???222
17.
Coady CM, Micheli LJ. Stress fractures in the pediatric athlete. Clin Sports Med 1997; 16:225???238
18.
Heyworth BE, Green DW. Lower extremity stress fractures in pediatric and adolescent athletes. Curr Opin Pediatr 2008; 20:58???61
19.
Fredericson M, Bergman AG, Hoffman KL, Dillingham MS. Tibial stress reaction in runners: correlation of clinical symptoms and scintigraphy with a new magnetic resonance imaging grading system. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23:472???481
20.
Davis KW. Imaging pediatric sports injuries: lower extremity. Radiol Clin North Am 2010; 48:1213???1235
21.
Carty H. Children???s sports injuries. Eur J Radiol 1998; 26:163???176
22.
Samoto N, Kozuma M, Tokuhisa T, Kobayashi K. Diagnosis of discoid lateral meniscus of the knee on MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 20:59???64
23.
Silverman JM, Mink JH, Deutsch AL. Discoid menisci of the knee: MR imaging appearance. Radiology 1989; 173:351???354
24.
Araki Y, Yamamoto H, Nakamura H, Tsukaguchi I. MR diagnosis of discoid lateral menisci of the knee. Eur J Radiol 1994; 18:92???95
25.
Cahill B. Treatment of juvenile osteochondritis dissecans and osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Clin Sports Med 1985; 4:367???384
26.
Hughston JC, Hergenroeder PT, Courtenay BG. Osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66:1340???1348
27.
De Smet AA, Fisher DR, Graf BK, Lange RH. Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: value of MR imaging in determining lesion stability and the presence of articular cartilage defects. AJR 1990; 155:549???553
28.
Kocher MS, Tucker R, Ganley TJ, Flynn JM. Management of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: current concepts review. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34:1181???1191
29.
De Smet AA, Ilahi OA, Graf BK. Untreated osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyles: prediction of patient outcome using radiographic and MR findings. Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26:463???467
30.
Sales de Gauzy J, Mansat C, Darodes PH, Cahuzac JP. Natural course of osteochondritis dissecans in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 1999; 8:26???28
31.
Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Shinki K, Fine JP, Graf BK, De Smet AA. Juvenile versus adult osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: appropriate MR imaging criteria for instability. Radiology 2008; 248:571???578
32.
Nawata K, Teshima R, Morio Y, Hagino H. Anomalies of ossification in the posterolateral femoral condyle: assessment by MRI. Pediatr Radiol 1999; 29:781???784
33.
Gebarski K, Hernandez RJ. Stage-I osteochondritis dissecans versus normal variants of ossification in the knee in children. Pediatr Radiol 2005; 35:880???886
34.
Beasley LS, Vidal AF. Traumatic patellar dislocation in children and adolescents: treatment update and literature review. Curr Opin Pediatr 2004; 16:29???36
35.
Sanders TG, Morrison WB, Singleton BA, Miller MD, Cornum KG. Medial patellofemoral ligament injury following acute transient dislocation of the patella: MR findings with surgical correlation in 14 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25:957???962
36.
Ecklund K. Magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric musculoskeletal trauma. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 13:203???217
37.
Iwamoto J, Takeda T, Sato Y, Matsumoto H. Radiographic abnormalities of the inferior pole of the patella in juvenile athletes. Keio J Med 2009; 58:50???53
38.
Bates DG, Hresko MT, Jaramillo D. Patellar sleeve fracture: demonstration with MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 193:825???827
39.
Gottsegen CJ, Eyer BA, White EA, Learch TJ, Forrester D. Avulsion fractures of the knee: imaging findings and clinical significance. RadioGraphics 2008; 28:1755???1770
40.
Andersson G??re B. Juvenile arthritis: who gets it, where and when? A review of current data on incidence and prevalence. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1999; 17:367???374
41.
Pettersson H, Rydholm U. Radiologic classification of knee joint destruction in juvenile chronic arthritis. Pediatr Radiol 1984; 14:419???421
42.
Pettersson H, Rydholm U. Radiologic classification of joint destruction in juvenile chronic arthritis. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1985; 26:719???722
43.
Johnson K, Wittkop B, Haigh F, Ryder C, Gardner-Medwin JM. The early magnetic resonance imaging features of the knee in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Radiol 2002; 57:466???471
44.
Reed MH, Wilmot DM. The radiology of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the English language literature. J Rheumatol Suppl 1991; 31:2???22
45.
Gylys-Morin VM. MR imaging of pediatric musculoskeletal inflammatory and infectious disorders. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998; 6:537???559
46.
Murray JG, Ridley NT, Mitchell N, Rooney M. Juvenile chronic arthritis of the hip: value of contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Clin Radiol 1996; 51:99???102
47.
Forslind K, Larsson EM, Johansson A, Svensson B. Detection of joint pathology by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36:683???688
48.
Garner HW, Ortiguera CJ, Nakhleh RE. Pigmented villonodular synovitis. RadioGraphics 2008; 28:1519???1523
49.
Resnick D, Greenway G. Distal femoral cortical defects, irregularities, and excavations. Radiology 1982; 143:345???354
50.
Stacy GS. Contour irregularities of the distal femur caused by developmental, traumatic, and benign cortically-based neoplastic conditions: radiographic and MRI correlation. Clin Radiol 2004; 59:793???802
51.
Jee WH, Choe BY, Kang HS, et al. Nonossifying fibroma: characteristics at MR imaging with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1998; 209:197???202
52.
Goodin GS, Shulkin BL, Kaufman RA, McCarville MB. PET/CT characterization of fibroosseous defects in children: 18F-FDG uptake can mimic metastatic disease. AJR 2006; 187:1124???1128
53.
Elias DA, White LM. Imaging of patellofemoral disorders. Clin Radiol 2004; 59:543???557

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

American Journal of Roentgenology
Pages: W456 - W465
PubMed: 22528927

History

Submitted: December 9, 2010
Accepted: October 26, 2011

Keywords

  1. knee
  2. MRI
  3. musculoskeletal imaging
  4. osteochondral defect
  5. pediatric imaging

Authors

Affiliations

Mahesh M. Thapa
All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Washington & Seattle Children???s Hospital, 4800 Sandpoint Way NE, R-5417, Seattle, WA 98105-3901.
Apeksha Chaturvedi
All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Washington & Seattle Children???s Hospital, 4800 Sandpoint Way NE, R-5417, Seattle, WA 98105-3901.
Stephen E. Darling
All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Washington & Seattle Children???s Hospital, 4800 Sandpoint Way NE, R-5417, Seattle, WA 98105-3901.
Paritosh C. Khanna
All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Washington & Seattle Children???s Hospital, 4800 Sandpoint Way NE, R-5417, Seattle, WA 98105-3901.
Gisele Ishak
All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Washington & Seattle Children???s Hospital, 4800 Sandpoint Way NE, R-5417, Seattle, WA 98105-3901.
Felix S. Chew
All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Washington & Seattle Children???s Hospital, 4800 Sandpoint Way NE, R-5417, Seattle, WA 98105-3901.

Notes

Address correspondence to M. M. Thapa ([email protected]).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

To download the citation to this article, select your reference manager software.

Articles citing this article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media