June 1983, VOLUME 140
NUMBER 6

Recommend & Share

June 1983, Volume 140, Number 6

Articles

Gastroesophageal reflux--the acid test: scintigraphy or the pH probe?

Citation: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1983;140: 1087-1090. 10.2214/ajr.140.6.1087

ABSTRACT :

The best established technique for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux in children is the 24 hr esophageal pH probe test. No simultaneous comparison of this technique with radionuclide scans has been reported. Therefore, simultaneous 1 hr pH monitoring and gastroesophageal scintigraphy were performed in 49 infants and children with suspected gastroesophageal reflux. Forty-seven of these patients also were later monitored by the 24 hr pH probe test. Upper gastrointestinal series were performed on all patients. All patients with a positive 1 hr pH monitoring also had positive simultaneous scintigraphy. All patients with positive scintigraphy and pH probe monitoring also had a positive upper gastrointestinal series for reflux. The sensitivity of gastroesophageal scintigraphy, when compared to the 24 hr probe as a standard, was 79%; its specificity was 93%. The sensitivity of the upper gastrointestinal series was 86%, when compared to the 24 hr pH probe test. However, it specificity was only 21%.

Recommended Articles

Gastroesophageal reflux--the acid test: scintigraphy or the pH probe?

Full Access, ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2018;211:260-266. 10.2214/AJR.18.19787
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (720 KB) | PDF Plus (764 KB) | Supplemental Material 
Full Access, ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 1980;135:1001-1004. 10.2214/ajr.135.5.1001
Abstract | PDF (685 KB) | PDF Plus (340 KB) 
Full Access, , , , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2006;187:W610-W617. 10.2214/AJR.05.1550
Abstract | Full Text
Full Access, , , , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2014;202:479-492. 10.2214/AJR.13.11463
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (1418 KB) | PDF Plus (1472 KB) 
Full Access, , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2002;178:405-412. 10.2214/ajr.178.2.1780405
Citation | Full Text | PDF (892 KB) | PDF Plus (759 KB) 
Full Access, , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2010;195:310-320. 10.2214/AJR.10.4923
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (1196 KB) | PDF Plus (1092 KB) | Erratum