December 1986, VOLUME 147
NUMBER 6

Recommend & Share

December 1986, Volume 147, Number 6

Articles

Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast

Citation: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1986;147: 1149-1153. 10.2214/ajr.147.6.1149

ABSTRACT :

To compare the advantages of one-view vs two-view mammography screening, films were reviewed for 2500 consecutive asymptomatic women undergoing baseline mammography. To provide screening at low cost, examinations were limited to two radiographs per breast, one each in the craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections, with the understanding that those few patients with detected abnormalities would require additional mammograms, taken with an individually directed, problem-solving approach, at considerably higher cost. Two separate interpretations were made of each case, one using only the oblique projection images, the other using both oblique and craniocaudal views. Two-view interpretations not only identified more cancers than one-view readings (27 vs 25), they also required fewer additional mammograms to evaluate potential abnormalities (179 vs 642, 7% vs 26%). These advantages outweigh the additional radiation risk and added cost. Baseline screening mammography should be done with two views per breast.

Recommended Articles

Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast

Full Access, , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 1978;130:349-351. 10.2214/ajr.130.2.349
Abstract | PDF (416 KB) | PDF Plus (210 KB) 
Full Access, , , , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2002;178:797-803. 10.2214/ajr.178.4.1780797
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (62 KB) | PDF Plus (165 KB) 
Full Access, , , , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2017;209:1419-1425. 10.2214/AJR.16.17522
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (758 KB) | PDF Plus (744 KB) 
Full Access, , , , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2015;205:1143-1148. 10.2214/AJR.15.14406
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (501 KB) | PDF Plus (555 KB) 
Full Access, , , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2018;211:445-451. 10.2214/AJR.17.19023
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (788 KB) | PDF Plus (818 KB) 
Full Access,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2007;188:667-675. 10.2214/AJR.06.0413
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (1822 KB) | PDF Plus (1922 KB)