October 1990, VOLUME 155
NUMBER 4

Recommend & Share

October 1990, Volume 155, Number 4

Canadian National Breast Screening Study: assessment of technical quality by external review.

Citation: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1990;155: 743-747. 10.2214/ajr.155.4.2119103

ABSTRACT :

Mammograms from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) were reviewed by three external experts to provide an objective evaluation of their technical quality, to establish a model for auditing mammograms in a screening program, and to assess whether NBSS mammograms improved over time. The sample reviewed included 10 randomly chosen mammograms from each of 15 screening centers for each calendar year of their operation between 1980 and 1987. All 830 mammograms were reviewed on two consecutive days in randomized sequence by each reader, and rated 0-3 for each of four criteria including positioning and image quality, with a total possible score of 0-12. Although the mammograms were not in temporal sequence when reviewed, the scores assigned by each reader were significantly higher for mammograms dating from later years. Subjects' ages at entry (40-49 vs 50-59 years) did not affect the score. The largest increase in scores was associated with a 1985 protocol change in which mediolateral oblique positioning replaced straight mediolateral positioning. This study reinforces the importance of monitoring technical quality in screening programs and establishes that the NBSS benefited from technical improvements during its operation. A retrospective review of NBSS mammography by three external reviewers confirmed that technical quality improved from 1980 to 1987. This improvement was associated with improved technology (film, processing, and units) and with the quality assurance programs operating during the NBSS, which identified problems and offered remedies.

Recommended Articles

Canadian National Breast Screening Study: assessment of technical quality by external review.

Free Access,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 1993;161:755-760. 10.2214/ajr.161.4.8372752
Abstract | PDF (1349 KB) | PDF Plus (451 KB) 
Free Access,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011;196:W112-W116. 10.2214/AJR.10.5609
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (613 KB) | PDF Plus (752 KB) 
Free Access, , , , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2002;178:797-803. 10.2214/ajr.178.4.1780797
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (62 KB) | PDF Plus (165 KB) 
Free Access
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2005;185:176-182. 10.2214/ajr.185.1.01850176
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (128 KB) | PDF Plus (225 KB) 
Free Access
American Journal of Roentgenology. 1990;155:748-749. 10.2214/ajr.155.4.ajronline_155_4_001
Citation | Full Text | PDF (284 KB) | PDF Plus (183 KB) 
Free Access, , , , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2018;210:807-815. 10.2214/AJR.17.18212
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (836 KB) | PDF Plus (750 KB)