June 1994, VOLUME 162
NUMBER 6

Recommend & Share

June 1994, Volume 162, Number 6

Doppler evaluation of renal artery stenosis: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of waveform morphology.

Citation: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1994;162: 1371-1376. 10.2214/ajr.162.6.8192002

ABSTRACT :

Analysis of Doppler waveform morphology for features of the tardus-parvus phenomenon has been promoted as a useful and accurate means for detecting renal artery stenosis. The purpose of this study was to examine and quantify the interobserver agreement of such an analysis and to determine if interobserver differences limit the value of this approach for predicting renal artery stenosis.

Four observers independently categorized renal artery waveforms of 47 patients (94 kidneys) clinically selected for renovascular hypertension. Waveforms were classified into five categories based on the presence and severity of tardus-parvus changes in the systolic upstroke and early systolic peak. This categorization was then compared with angiographic findings, and the results were analyzed with receiver-operating-characteristic curves. Kappa statistics and agreement tables were computed to evaluate interobserver agreement.

Interobserver agreement in the waveform analysis for the four interpreters was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The receiver-operating-characteristic areas produced by the observers indicated, however, that such waveform classification was not strongly predictive of renal artery stenosis.

We conclude that substantial agreement in the interpretation of waveform morphology can be obtained between independent observers, and that such differences that do exist do not preclude the use of the pattern-recognition approach to waveform analysis. Even so, the specific application of this strategy to the waveform contours of early systole was not successful in predicting the presence or severity of renal artery stenosis.

Recommended Articles

Doppler evaluation of renal artery stenosis: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of waveform morphology.

Full Access, ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2003;180:885-892. 10.2214/ajr.180.4.1800885
Citation | Full Text | PDF (10737 KB) | PDF Plus (10985 KB) 
Full Access, , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 1999;173:761-765. 10.2214/ajr.173.3.10470919
Abstract | PDF (923 KB) | PDF Plus (567 KB) 
Full Access, , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2003;181:1695-1704. 10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811695
Citation | Full Text | PDF (28306 KB) | PDF Plus (1683 KB) 
Full Access
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2014;202:633-642. 10.2214/AJR.13.11465
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (904 KB) | PDF Plus (860 KB) 
Full Access, , , , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2000;174:815-819. 10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740815
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (3594 KB) | PDF Plus (610 KB) 
Full Access, , , , ,
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2014;202:479-492. 10.2214/AJR.13.11463
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (1418 KB) | PDF Plus (1472 KB)