Evaluation of Tumor Angiogenesis of Breast Carcinoma Using Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography : American Journal of Roentgenology : Vol. 187, No. 5 (AJR)

November 2006, Volume 187, Number 5

Women's Imaging

Original Research

Evaluation of Tumor Angiogenesis of Breast Carcinoma Using Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography

Clarisse Dromain¹, Corrine Balleyguier¹, Serge Muller², Marie-Christine Mathieu³, France Rochard⁴, Paule Opolon³ and Robert Sigal¹

+ Affiliations:

¹Department of Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulin, Villejuif Cedex, France 94805.

²GE Healthcare, Buc, France.

³Department of Pathology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France.

⁴Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France.

Citation: American Journal of Roentgenology. 2006;187: W528-W537. 10.2214/AJR.05.1944

ABSTRACT :

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in the detection of breast carcinoma and to correlate the findings on the images with those of histologic analysis using microvessel quantification.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty patients with a suspicious breast abnormality underwent contrast-enhanced digital mammography using a full-field digital mammography unit that was modified to detect iodinated enhancement. For each patient, a total of six contrast-enhanced craniocaudal views were acquired from 30 seconds to 7 minutes after the injection of a bolus of 100 mL of an iodinated contrast agent. Image processing included a logarithmic subtraction and the analysis of enhancement kinetic curves. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography findings were compared with histologic analysis of surgical specimens, including intratumoral microvessel density quantification evaluated on CD34-immunostained histologic sections obtained from all patients.

RESULTS. An area of enhancement was depicted on contrast-enhanced digital mammograms in 16 of the 20 histologically proven breast carcinomas. Excellent correlation was seen between the size of enhancement and the histologic size of tumors, which ranged from 9 to 22 mm. Early enhancement with washout was observed in four cases, early enhancement followed by a plateau in four cases, gradual enhancement in seven cases, and unexpected decrease of enhancement in one case. Intratumoral microvessel density ranged from 11.7 to 216.6 microvessels per square millimeter. A poor correlation was found between data measured on contrast-enhanced digital mammography and intratumoral microvessel density measured on CD34-immunostained histologic sections.

CONCLUSION. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography is able to depict angiogenesis in breast carcinoma. Breast compression and projective images acquisition alter the quantitative assessment of enhancement parameters.

Keywords: angiogenesis, breast, breast cancer, contrast media, digital images, mammography, microvessel

This work was supported by a grant from the Ministère Français de la Jeunesse, de l'Education et de la Recherche.

Address correspondence to C. Dromain ([email protected]).

WEB

This is a Web exclusive article.

We thank Fanny Jeunehomme for her technical assistance and statistical analysis.

References

1. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, et al. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:1-8 [Google Scholar]

2. Chu JS, Lee WJ, Chang TC, Chang KJ, Hsu HC. Correlation between tumor angiogenesis and metastasis in breast cancer. J Formos Med Assoc 1995; 94:373-378 [Google Scholar]

3. Ackerman LV, Watt AC, Shetty P, et al. Breast lesions examined by digital angiography: work in progress. Radiology 1985; 155:65-68 [Google Scholar]

4. Watt AC, Ackerman LV, Windham JP, et al. Breast lesions: differential diagnosis using digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1986; 159:39-42 [Google Scholar]

5. Hagay C, Cherel PJ, de Maulmont CE, et al. Contrast-enhanced CT: value for diagnosing local breast cancer recurrence after conservative treatment. Radiology 1996; 200:631-638 [Google Scholar]

6. Chang CH, Nesbit DE, Fisher DR, et al. Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner. AJR 1982; 138:553-558 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

7. Harms SE, Flamig DP. MR imaging of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3:277-283 [Google Scholar]

8. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989; 171:95-103 [Google Scholar]

9. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001; 220:13-30 [Google Scholar]

10. American College of Radiology (ACR). BI-RADS: mammography, 4th ed. Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS atlas. Reston, VA: ACR, 2003 [Google Scholar]

11. Skarpathiotakis M, Yaffe MJ, Bloomquist AK, et al. Development of contrast digital mammography. Med Phys 2002; 29:2419-2426 [Google Scholar]

12. Kim NT, Elie N, Plancoulaine B, et al. An original approach for quantification of blood vessels on the whole tumour section. Anal Cell Pathol 2003; 25:63-75 [Google Scholar]

13. Elie N, Plancoulaine B, Signolle JP, Herlin P. A simple way of quantifying immunostained cell nuclei on the whole histologic section. Cytometry A 2003; 56:37-45 [Google Scholar]

14. Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M, et al. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2003; 228:842-850 [Google Scholar]

15. Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Taupitz M, et al. Use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography: initial experience. Rofo 2003; 175:342-345 [Google Scholar]

16. Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 2003; 229:261-268 [Google Scholar]

17. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996; 200:639-649 [Google Scholar]

18. Frouge C, Guinebretiere JM, Contesso G, et al. Correlation between contrast enhancement in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast and tumor angiogenesis. Invest Radiol 1994; 29:1043-1049 [Google Scholar]

19. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 196:415-419 [Google Scholar]

20. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Haustein J, Pohl C, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of two different doses of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 1994; 191:639-646 [Google Scholar]

21. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA—preliminary observations. Radiology 1989; 170:681-686 [Google Scholar]

22. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110 [Google Scholar]

23. Smith AP, Hall PA, Marcello DM. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection. Radiol Manage 2004; 26:16-27 [Google Scholar]